The Fujifilm 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 Has a LOT to Live Up To!
Рет қаралды 81,431
Күн бұрынThe Fujifilm 18-55mm f/2.8-4 was one of the most legendary kit lenses of all time, but now we have a replacement in the 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 LM WR. Can this new kit lens resolve the 40 megapixel detail required on the latest cameras? And more importantly, can it live up to the legacy of its precursor? Chris Niccolls roamed the streets of Calgary to find out.
Order the Fujifilm 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 here: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...
Read the full review: petapixel.com/2024/05/21/fuji...
Rental equipment provided by The Camera Store:
www.thecamerastore.com
PetaPixel exclusively uses Audio.com music in our KZfaq show: audiio.com/petapixel
0:00 - Intro
1:52 - Sample images
2:19 - Design and controls
3:03 - Autofocus
3:20 - Flare and sunstars
4:01 - Bokeh
4:58 - Close-up performance
5:26 - Sharpness
6:43 - Video performance
7:41 - vs. 18-55mm
@themframes 2 ай бұрын
For those of us on the XT3 or older models, the 18-55mm is still the lens to go for thanks for the OIS switch. Clearly Fujifilm is targeting its new kit to XT4/XT5/XT50 users.
@Indrakusuma_a 2 ай бұрын
Agree. This is clearly just for those 40 MP sensor with IBIS. Those who are still rocking the good oldie like me(X-E1), 18-55 is still the holy grail.
@opalyankaBG 2 ай бұрын
Why would you buy a kit lens separately?
@themframes 2 ай бұрын
@@opalyankaBG For one, if you buy a used body, it's unlikely coming with a lens. So you need to buy one separately. The 18-55 is such a good lens that many add it to their arsenal anyway.
@j2thebee 2 ай бұрын
@@opalyankaBG in addition the above points, the kit lens is usually very cheap (especially used) as so many are made.
@johansphoto 2 ай бұрын
And for everyone else the Sigma 18-50 is the way to go. F2.8 vs 4.8 at the long end makes a big difference.
@BrownieX001 2 ай бұрын
Just waiting on next version of 16-55mm f2.8. Hopefully we will see more updates from Fuji after this.
@Dvlx1 2 ай бұрын
I'm still rocking the XC 15-45mm lens and despite the annoying zoom mechanism I just love the thing. Excellent image quality, compact and very light. A bargain if you pick one up used, which shouldn't be difficult to find.
@Tempus__Fugitive 2 ай бұрын
So underrated, as sharp as my 23f2 around similar focal lengths where I use it most. Zoom is annoying but a price I'm willing to pay to keep it so compact and light. Ideal lens to take into the mountains, especially knowing it's so cheap to replace if smashed off a rock!
@drs-Rigo-Reus 2 ай бұрын
You discovered Fujis biggest secret…😎
@thepolardesert 2 ай бұрын
@@Tempus__FugitiveI almost find it to be sharper than my 23f2 in cases, only downside to me is the micro exposure/distortion shifts when zooming during video
@stopdrpnro 2 ай бұрын
Love mine also. Almost bought another one just in case
@tookamooka Ай бұрын
@@stopdrpnro plastic mount breaks too easily
@seantomlinson3320 2 ай бұрын
I love you guys. Been watching you forever, and now enjoying the podcast and ALL THE VIDEOS the last couple weeks. I don't even shoot Fuji (anymore) but I'm still curious.
@bugsygoo 2 ай бұрын
Canadian possum at 7:39!!!
@totallynotmyeggalt6216 2 ай бұрын
I'm assuming this is a Canadian joke because that's a squirrel, but you guys do also have opossums there
@bugsygoo 2 ай бұрын
@@totallynotmyeggalt6216 Yeah, nah mate.
@BritainMcCubbin 2 ай бұрын
Do we know how this new 16-50 compares to the heavy 16-55 2.8? I love it but is it inline for an update?
@jorgecarrasco868 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video Chris. Always very informative and useful. If you were choosing between the Fujiflm 16-50 F2.8-4.8 and Sigma's 18-50 F/2.8, which would you favor?
@martinphilipps8678 2 ай бұрын
i have the sigma 18-50 and love it, but the internal zoom and WR of the fuji lens are really tempting
@mipmipmipmipmip 23 күн бұрын
The 2mm at the wide end can do a lot as well
@256guitarplayer 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the timely review. I'm buying an X-T50 and wondered if I should get the new 16-50 kit lens with it since I already have the 18-55. Excellent review as always 👍
@pokpokishification 22 күн бұрын
I have the same question. My local fuji store just told me the xt50 is now available and i still haven't decided if i need the new kit lens. What did you decide?
@janwilson9485 2 ай бұрын
Great collection of shots in this one and very pro modelling from Jordan - nice
@gabewebyt 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the review! I brought my 18-55 to the X-T5 and could see that it wasn't resolving the 40MP like the 70-300 does. I hoped that the 16-50 would be sharper and resolve the larger sensor, so it's great to see that confirmed!
@RotemEren 2 ай бұрын
Some great compositions in this episode. You guys were inspired.
@zacredacted2137 2 ай бұрын
Clean water only shot was really funny. nice!
@CartyCantDance 2 ай бұрын
The sigma 18-50mm f2.8 has served me well for 2 years. Great “kit lens”
@ragavsathis 2 ай бұрын
I am geting XT5 and was wondering if sigma 16-50 is doing ?
@CartyCantDance 2 ай бұрын
@@ragavsathis it’s like having 3 primes with you at all times. 28mm (and maybe 35mm) 50mm and 75mm full frame equivalent at f2.8.
@tankivulture148 2 ай бұрын
Looking forward to the GF 500mm f/5.6 review :)
@MRpapageorgeo1 2 ай бұрын
Can you compare the x-mount sigma 18-50 vs the new 16-50?
@9Mtikcus 2 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same thing... in the UK at least the X-T50 Body only + Sigma 18-50 = £1778.00 X-T50 Kit with 16-50 = £1649 That is only £129.00 difference
@Kit2Canada 2 ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZrGGZa1nx5nQnKs.htmlsi=Q4ZmOQrOsF0CC6mO Hugh Brownstone positively reviewed the Sigma 18-50 vs the Fujifilm f/2.8 in this link from a year ago.
@travis5481 2 ай бұрын
I love the Sigma - the size is incredible and the fixed 2.8 is definitely worth the money to me.
@jpl980 15 күн бұрын
Chris, thanks so much for your helpful video. How do you feel the AF (tracking) performance and IQ of this 16-50 f/2.8-4.8 lens compare to the larger Fujifilm XF16-55 2.8 lens?
@VirtousStoic 2 ай бұрын
Another banger keep it up boss❤
@SpencerLupul 2 ай бұрын
does it refocus while zooming in video?
@zerodicjcorez9173 Ай бұрын
ive had fujis since 2012, xt1, x100, xt2 etc - was looking to jump to the xt4 because i still have lenses from the old 1st ones, 18,35,60,55-200,10-24... xt4 because i like the look of the bigger body to be honest.......But now ive seen the Panasonic S5II .. I dont need more megapixels 24 is fine , to go xt4 or s5II ????? any help yhanks
@paulreading8980 2 ай бұрын
My older camera does not have IBIS so I will stick with the 18-55, but the 16mm focal length is something I would much prefer. I used to own a Leica Digilux 2 and it had in-body zooming and I love that too. Fingers crossed for an X-Pro 4 and a 16-50mm
@brownbear100 2 ай бұрын
Grab a 16 2.8, it's really cheap used, has incredibly close focussing, weather sealing, great IQ and is super sharp. Best aperture ring on a Fuji lens I've used and I've only not used the 8mm 3.5 and 200mm f2.
@NotAnotherChannel_Channel 2 ай бұрын
I wish they would’ve squeezed in a little more aperture on the telephoto end, but looks pretty decent especially with the internal zoom.
@SJMPhotography 2 ай бұрын
How does it compare to the Sigma 18-50 F2.8?
@cless85 2 ай бұрын
can you test with x-s20 if it's a better combination than 18-55mm?
@TroupeGoal 2 ай бұрын
Glad the floating aperture thing is mentioned, it's really distracting and I find it with any video shot on this lens
@ChristopherBonis 2 ай бұрын
My M. Zuiko 12-40mm is considered a ‘kit’ lens (as it came with my OM-1)-but it’s also the only ‘pro’ MFT lens I own. So what does ‘kit’ even mean anymore?
@samson40a 2 ай бұрын
And to be honest the 12-40 is a much better lens. I have it and also a Fuji 16-55
@JJARCHIE Ай бұрын
I mean the 24-105 F4L is also part of a kit
@TheFriendlyBroski 2 ай бұрын
I've got the X-T5 on the way, and I'm currently looking for a "1X-5/6Xmm" kind of lens, either with OIS, WR or a constant aperture. So far, I was considering this specific lens, but would the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f2.8 R LM WR Lens be an overall better lens for all around photography and travel?
@dorkapedia 2 ай бұрын
That 16-55 2.8 lens is in a completely different class, and will never disappoint at any of its focal lengths. If you can spare the change, it's well worth it
@andreabeccarisi1126 2 ай бұрын
Definitely consider Sigma 18-50, previously I had the fuji 18-55, the Sigma is definitely sharper and it maintains f 2.8 across all focal lengths
@malfunkt 2 ай бұрын
For an all round lens also consider the Tamron 17-70 2.8. Yes it is a bit larger, but it will be worth it for its versatility. It has an F.28 aperture throughout the range, and at the 70mm telephoto, that 2.8 will allow you to get soft out-of-focus backgrounds if you need but can sharpen up at smaller apertures to amke for a great portrait or landscape lens. The lower aperture will also allow you to get better low-light shots throughout the range, and maintain a higher shutter speed for moving subjects.
@daphnedh9086 2 ай бұрын
I use my 18-55 on smaller bodies on hikes and city trips. With the 10-24 and a prime (usually the 56mm) Honestly i do not want that beast in my bag.
@justcallmesando 2 ай бұрын
This one video I was looking forward to
@short_bar 2 ай бұрын
I have heard that the 18-55 is being sold until their stock is out but they should keep it around to match the x-t30s. They offer OIS to go with the 30’s lack of ibis and help provide a more affordable lens option.
@short_bar 2 ай бұрын
That said, I do like the 16mm view for this since I do like to do landscape and the macro capabilities is cool to see too
@victoriankambe3070 2 ай бұрын
Could this replace my much-used Xf16 f1.4?
@Bayonet1809 2 ай бұрын
Why didn't you test the sunstars at different apertures? Richard Wong found that at f/5.6 they were quite good.
@EricGibaud 2 ай бұрын
I got to the same conclusion. Great video as always
@luisarturohernandezramirez5910 Ай бұрын
How does this compare to the 16-55? I'm waiting on an x100vi because I don't want a big camera, I'm renting the 16-55 since it's what they recommended me this weekend but I got to hold that 18-55 and was shocked at how much I liked the form factor... So an XT-5 with the new 16-50 is quite tempting atm...
@Alex_564 2 ай бұрын
I'd like to see a comparison between this & the Fuji 16-80mm f4 lens.
@mattias5952 2 ай бұрын
7:39 animal detection in the background!
@jeremytheoneofdestiny8691 2 ай бұрын
6:04 can you guys zoom in a little closer for sharpness tests? Fairly hard to tell any difference on an iPad. Why not go a bit further in to really accentuate the differences?
@skrisanto 2 ай бұрын
07:38 SQUIRREL!
@doptimist 2 ай бұрын
I owned the 18-55, sold it to buy a 16-80 (by far the worst Fuji lens ive never used) and sold that to buy another 18-55. The only real downsides are quite a lot of distortion and some very frantic out of focus areas on occasion. Apart from that its crazy value!
@RoamingDoctors 2 ай бұрын
That means U love shopping...😅
@hafidmohadi8811 Ай бұрын
My 16-80 is good
@JJARCHIE Ай бұрын
@@hafidmohadi8811gotta disagree , all of the 16-80 i used are pretty bad
@rogerdavis1746 3 күн бұрын
Do you have a camera with the 40mp sensor? If so that may be the reason for the poorer performance. I have just ordered the 16-50 for my XT5 but will hang onto my 18-55 just in case. I agree it is a fantastic lens. Thanks for the comment.
@backslashio 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review! But your sharpness and video performance chapters are at the wrong parts
@kenilev_photographer 2 ай бұрын
how about putting electronic variable NDs in the new to come XH bodies
@Sleepyboiwonder Ай бұрын
Loving this. The images come out sharp without appearing like overly digital
@Kayzox 2 ай бұрын
For the price you can find a 16-55 f2.8 used in good shape. Again depends on the needs and usage. Nice alternatives out of fuji also now. In a starter kit it makes sense for someone you prefer some 2.8 over 16-80 or a little lighter setup.
@Wannes_ 2 ай бұрын
Not at the kit price It’s half the MSRP when bought in a kit
@robertllawrencejr5503 12 күн бұрын
I have the X-T1 with the 16-80 and love both. I have not been able to find any comparison of the 16-50 and the 16-80 on the X-T5 or any of the 40 megapixel cameras.
@kalvino67 Ай бұрын
It would be good to see future reviews on how this compares to the 16-55mn. This could be a good option for landscapes when you’re shooting at f8-f11. The 16-55nm is just too heavy when hiking.
@chuckl7713 2 ай бұрын
Watching this video I can say I'm glad I'm not the only one that takes shots of weird things.
@jordansmith5248 2 ай бұрын
I dont see any sharpness issues with my 18-55 on my xt5. The only thing i wish it had was WR. But other than that i see no reason upgrade
@ruff1draft 2 ай бұрын
Is the Fuji 18-55 F2.8-F4 going be put down in price.
@Holzi4000 6 күн бұрын
What about the night performance? And how does it compare to the 16-55 2.8?
@larrywhite8590 2 ай бұрын
So would you replace your OM-1+12-100 with a FujiX-T5 and the 16-50 2.8-4.8?
@johntupper1369 2 ай бұрын
He'll na
@balboa0621 2 ай бұрын
No way. The 12-100 is a much, much better and more useful lens.
@petouser 2 ай бұрын
You can get the Fuji 18-120 F4 for fairly good prices. Even cheaper is the 18-135 F3.5-5.6. Or even the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 that is an astonishing value for price.
@jessejayphotography 2 ай бұрын
@@petouser I bought the 18-120 F/4 new on sale for $699 from B&H. Lots of people poo poo this lens but it is generally pretty decent for its size, weight, and features. Update the camera and lens firmware to help with exposure stepping in video. Use something like DxO PureRAW for lens corrections and it is useable as a landscape lens in the F7.1 to F9 range. It was clearly designed for video but it can be used for photos with good to very good results.
@TimvanderLeeuw 2 ай бұрын
So you say that the sunstars are not very good with this lens. Let me ask you, how would you rank all Fuji X-mount lenses for sunstars, worst to best?
@AllenKrughoff 2 ай бұрын
0:35 best opening, subscribed
@jaapkamstra9343 2 ай бұрын
I have mixed feeling about this lens. I really like that they went to 16mm and included weather sealing. F4.8 is a bit too dark for me for general use though. The internal zoom is a nice to have. I wonder if the colours have improved. As that was the biggest reason for me to go for the 16-55. Those colours were very similar to the colours of my primes. Which helps with editing.
@mateuszmrowiec4265 2 ай бұрын
I think fuji decided to make xt50 with new wider kit Lens more appealing to Gen z. They made it more fun to experiment with new jpegs. This also means pricenbump for somebody like me wanting to play with more advanced functions. Thank you for the review!
@mipmipmipmipmip 23 күн бұрын
Xc 16-50 ois has been a kit lens starting ~ 2014
@martinweber3859 2 ай бұрын
How does it compare to the Sigma 18-50?
@Kit2Canada 2 ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ZrGGZa1nx5nQnKs.htmlsi=Q4ZmOQrOsF0CC6mO Hugh Brownstone positively reviewed the Sigma 18-50 vs the Fujifilm f/2.8 in this link from a year ago.
@seanb480 Ай бұрын
I’m still a fan of the 15-45! Use it all the time on my X-E2.
@Xo1ot1 2 ай бұрын
5:21 shouldn't the text say 50mm?
@leemoody9247 2 ай бұрын
Hey Chris. I’d love to see a video about the cameras that you and Jordan own and use personally
@ShelbilunarmoxieHayes 18 күн бұрын
Any thoughts on the 16-50mm vs. the 16-80mm F/4-F/22?
@minimac93 2 ай бұрын
4:40 I think the two images are swapped, the bokeh looks wrong
@jeremytheoneofdestiny8691 2 ай бұрын
2:12 pure art
@robojimtv 2 ай бұрын
I think i may sell the 16-80 with my X-h1 myself and get this instead. I like the internal zoom design and the weather sealing
@robojimtv 2 ай бұрын
Hoping this means a re-designed 55-200 then
@CadenMcCullough2424 2 ай бұрын
@@robojimtvthe redesigned 55-200 is the 70-300
@johnjon1823 2 ай бұрын
Sound seemed a tad muffled here and there to me. Like on that bridge.
@leonthesleepy 13 күн бұрын
is there any advantage to this over the sigma f2.8?
@Zakmani 2 ай бұрын
HOW DO U UPLOUD AT SUCH HIGH QUALITY ??
@petergabriel8448 2 ай бұрын
I never understood the obsession in reviews about sun stars.
@POVwithRC 2 ай бұрын
Your understanding is not required
@shang-hsienyang1284 2 ай бұрын
People love sunstars. Here in Taiwan we literally put a sunstar on our national flag.
@yawningmarmot 2 ай бұрын
Sun stars are just another way of testing/showcasing the lens performance. I do agree, however, that it's arbitrary (personally I find that sun stars look fine on most lenses)
@L3ON360Z 2 ай бұрын
They're popular in cinematography afaik
@Paul_Rohde 2 ай бұрын
Personally, I like the more naturally diffuse rays over the sharp artificial looking ones that Chris aims for.
@Razor2048 2 ай бұрын
I wish they could do a kit lens that would be an f/3.5 constant aperture through a 16-50mm range.
@SquirrelHybrid 2 ай бұрын
No chromatic aberration test?
@mixeddrinks8100 2 ай бұрын
but how does it compare to the 16-80 f4?
@JJARCHIE Ай бұрын
Imma be honest, everything beats the 16-80
@rakoksy Күн бұрын
I sold my 18-55, decent lens with excessive hype because it's a a kit lens and cheap on used market. This seems an upgrade to me. Surely better than 16-80.
@NatPage 2 ай бұрын
i wanna see this lenes vs the sigma 18-50
@ruff1draft 2 ай бұрын
I actually use the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-F4 on my Nikon D5500 it replaced my 18-55 Kit lens that came with it.
@Invincibleagent 2 ай бұрын
The video sections are mislabelled
@PetaPixel 2 ай бұрын
Thanks, fixed!
@MaxwellStarr 2 ай бұрын
Chris and Jordan should do a best lenses for Sun Stars for each camera system video..
@MrBenjy2006 2 ай бұрын
I’d love to see a proper shootout with the old lens. I bit more rendering and feel talk. Whether the resolving power is actually worth it for most people
@Real_Photo 2 ай бұрын
2:13 perfect!
@AllenRReid Ай бұрын
This lens will be on the new XS20 I just ordered, so good to hear it's decent enough. My first venture with a Fuji camera, so I'll likely add a lens or two down the road.
@mysticjais 28 күн бұрын
Did you get your XS20? I'm confused b/w this and Sony a6700. Everyone keeps saying that the autofocus on Fuji is shit but is it really that bad?
@AllenRReid 27 күн бұрын
@mysticjais I got it, but really haven't put the auto focus through any tough tests just yet. I still have a lot to learn with this camera as it's my first Fuji.
@franciskikomanliclic 26 күн бұрын
@@AllenRReidplease post a review or your comment on it. I have the same setup, xs20 and this lens and it’s really not sharp at all! Auto focus breathing all over when video. I’m thinking it’s more compatible with the new 40mp camera only. Hopefully they thix this lens on new firmware
@RM.TokyoPhotographer Ай бұрын
was randomly thinking...if the kit lense becomes inner zoom (zoom not stretching out/inward) does this mean that the 16-55mm F2.8 Mark 2 will also be inner zoom? that would be AWESOME thats probably what alot of people would want
@carlosmcse Ай бұрын
I liked fuji when i had it. I dont miss it though. From the files i see nothing has really changed.
@TheUnleashedRT 2 ай бұрын
Too bad that - at least here in Europe - it does not seem like there are any kit offers for an X-T5 body and the new 16-50, only with an X-T50. Oh well, then I guess we'll just wait and hope that prices drop quickly after its release...
@SCEmissary 2 ай бұрын
I tested the 18-55 on my X-T5 and was, to my own surpirse, pretty underwhelmed by its performance. Maybe I got a bad exemplar or I'm spoiled by my prime lenses but especially on the wide end it never managed to be sufficiently sharp. Pity, as I like the size and could sometimes use an allround zoom again. So maybe I have to wait for some second hand 16-50s.
@Wannes_ 2 ай бұрын
Fuji doesn’t recommend that combo as the 18-55 can’t fully resolve the 40MP
@SCEmissary 2 ай бұрын
@@Wannes_ Yeah, I knew about it, but it still surprised me HOW much worse it is, especially at 18mm. The 16-80 f4 for example is also not recommended, but waaaay sharper in the center. Again, maybe I've got a bad one, but the difference is huge.
@hfranke07 2 ай бұрын
My workhorse is the 18-55 and it will stay on my X-E3 for years to come.
@trulsdirio 2 ай бұрын
I mean my Olympus 12-40mm 2.8 is also a kit lens and it is the best standard zoom I have ever used and that you can get for the system.
@jessejayphotography 2 ай бұрын
That lens is sold in a kit but it part of Oly's Pro line so not really a traditional kit lens. Oly's Pro branded lenses are very good.
@muttishelfer9122 2 ай бұрын
f2,8 on mft is nothing impressiv.
@johansphoto 2 ай бұрын
@@muttishelfer9122 true, f2.8 is hardly impressing on APS-C to be honest, for low light you need faster glass on both systems. But after having owned both I can say with conviction that the Olympus is definitely the better lens - but not a "real" kit lens. Also f4.8 (f7.2 equivalent) on the new lens is very unimpressive, and noticably slower than the mft which is constant f2.8 (f5.6 equivalent).
@Bayonet1809 2 ай бұрын
@@muttishelfer9122 More impressive than f/4.8 on APS-C.
@michaelcroff7097 2 ай бұрын
When you accidentally start the video at 50% speed and Chris is far more intoxicated than normal
@paulwhite1109 2 ай бұрын
The sharpness comparison with the 18-55 looked pretty much the same to me. Could you do a comparison to the Tamron 17-70 f2.8?
@funtaril 2 ай бұрын
+ sharpness and 2mm on wide end. - OIS, 5mm on tele end and not insignificant amount of light. Also it's f/3.2 on 17mm already! And it's expensive, $400 in kit (with pretty costly cameras) and $700 standalone are not your usual kit lens prices.
@juleshorse9056 2 ай бұрын
It feels, I hope, like a good upgrade from my 18-55. I have one on order due to the 16mm, WR and improved IQ. Price is fair considering inflation over ten years and the war and health shocks to the world economy over the last four years. Nice review. Looking forward to receiving mine in June.
@uumuu Ай бұрын
The loss of zoom and aperture at the telephoto end is kind of a big L. I wonder if they could have gotten that back with a changing-length zoom and a bit more weight budget.
@albyzonta 2 ай бұрын
Complimenti
@antonhei2443 2 ай бұрын
With OIS it would be fantastic
@Muldoonite 2 ай бұрын
the sharpness, internal zoom, 16mm focal length, and WR seal the deal for me. squirrel cameo at 7:38!
@zeissiez 2 ай бұрын
The best kit lens for Fuji is the 16-50, XC version. Dirt cheap, good optics, good range, OIS (cancelled in the new XF 16-50), the paint never gets scratched like other XF lenses, dust and moisture proof in REAL use (without having to pay the price for this feature).
@Paul_Rohde 2 ай бұрын
By the time I realised that this lens might be really good to try, it was unavailable.
@MrKikoboy 2 ай бұрын
Agree - I've had it for years with my X-T20 and it's a great combo ....and when I wanted a prime rather than spend $$$ on new Fuji's or Sigma's I bought a mint Konica Hexanon 50mm and adapter for under $100 and it's fantastic on that sensor
@Propaganda_Films 2 ай бұрын
Entry level X-Pro3 🤣
@dopebeats6087 2 ай бұрын
I hope that was a joke!
@loganwebb5449 2 ай бұрын
Seems weird not to mention the sigma 18-50 as a comparison here
@user-db4lq1fg1y Ай бұрын
Shame about the stabilization. It was my impression that the lens stabilization worked in tandem with camera stabilization to get even better results. I guess Fuji know what they're doing though...
@Fusionprogamer 2 ай бұрын
"Much like his film making aspirations" Lol poor Jordan Roasted
@Johnlancaster 2 ай бұрын
Am I the only person who can’t see the difference in this, and other “18-55 can’t resolve the new sensor” videos. Works really well on my XT-5. I will wait til all the used 16-50’s turn up at MPB by Xmas and get one for £300
@TheBigNegative-PhotoChannel 2 ай бұрын
Poor guys who got ther new 40MP Fuji with the old version. :D
@spamllama Ай бұрын
Next compare apples to oranges: XF 16-50/2.8-4.8 vs XF 16-55/2.8!
@opalyankaBG 2 ай бұрын
f/4 on 55mm wasn't fast either. F/4.8 is just half a stop slower, so I doubt one would see a huge difference in shallow DOF.
@daphnedh9086 2 ай бұрын
Well it’s also 5 mm longer. Which adds to the seperation and more pleasing portraits due to being more or less an 85mm equiv.
@bassandtrebleclef 2 ай бұрын
Brutal Jordan takedown at 1:45
@quite1enough 2 ай бұрын
can't believe you didn't test exposure jumping in video
Luca Petralia Photography
Рет қаралды 10 М.