I use the Tamron 28-75 2.8 for weddings and love it. It´s only 100g heavier and about 400 € cheaper and for me it has the more versatile range. Still I think it´s great that Sony tries to offer affordable 2.8 zooms, not like Canon who make you spend 2500 € for the cheapest 2.8 zoom.
@sandeepraiphotography21116 ай бұрын
Agreed. Same here.
@mattiascastillo94586 ай бұрын
Personally, I love my RF 24-70 f2.8. It’s got more quality from it than I even need. But it was expensive, and it’s large and heavy compared to third party competitors on E-mount. And, of course, this 24-50.
@Yupthereitism6 ай бұрын
This lens is still overpriced
@chlks58916 ай бұрын
What the hell are you talking about, dude? As far as I can see, this is the very first and only affordable first party Sony zoom. Their G/GM lens prices are on par with other manufacturers.
@USGrant21st6 ай бұрын
I like Tamron, but starting at 28mm is a dealbreaker for me. Sony should have made it 24-50/2. Yes it would have been as heavy as 24-70/2.8, but it would have eliminated in many cases the need to have primes with you. I can't live with f/2.8 shooting at a restaurant at night, I have to carry at least one prime.
@ChrisandJordan4ever6 ай бұрын
Can we just take a minute to appreciate how Chris and Jordan manage to consistently produce gorgeous photos even in the dead of winter?
@sulev1116 ай бұрын
Locatio, location, location
@paulgood22186 ай бұрын
It's easy to get great images in the winter and snow. There great light all day
@owengee74156 ай бұрын
do they?
@jw483356 ай бұрын
Right out of the gate it was like "something is off" - and boom - 60fps, lol.
@TerryMcKennaFineArt6 ай бұрын
really? do you even use sony lenses or is this just the usual banter about cameras that resembles how folks argue about their favorite sports team.
@CollectionOfJunk6 ай бұрын
@@TerryMcKennaFineArtyour response makes literally no sense to this comment
@Soundwave8576 ай бұрын
It's always insane to me how much better and less jarring 60fps or even 30 fps looks. Videos also have so much more details and less compression
@seantomlinson33206 ай бұрын
yes, it's so weird.
@collective-addiction6 ай бұрын
@@CollectionOfJunk lmao
@jasonwrites91866 ай бұрын
WHAT?!!?!!? THIS IS A THING?!!? I don't know if anyone else needs this, but I need this!
@POVwithRC6 ай бұрын
I think so. Some people prefer first party above other attributes and do not want to spend GM money. No crime in catering to that.
@hardywoodaway99126 ай бұрын
if you don’t wanna spend gm money and don’t need 30fps on your a9, than a tamron does just as fine
@TerryMcKennaFineArt6 ай бұрын
@@hardywoodaway9912 I am speaking as a Sony shooter. I did purchase 2 sigma lenses a while back and both had less that satisfactory auto focus, so a pain in the ass with video (i do both stills and video). so I am no longer tempted to use a 3rd party lens when a first party lens exists. In fact I find that when I do look at Sigma or Tamron, I have to reacquaint myself with what their abbreviations mean. I am not in the market for this lens, but my son who has an a6000 is moving up to full frame and this will likely be his first lens (he does mostly landscape). I am not arguing with you, just pointing out that now the Sony has lots of lenses. sony shooters may not want to waste time on the 3rd party market.
@Jabber-ig3iw6 ай бұрын
@@hardywoodaway9912not everyone wants a Tamron and as said above why wouldn’t Sony want a piece of that pie🤷♂️
@NicholasStein6 ай бұрын
I would prefer to have a Sony lens and would also prefer GM. I would consider buying this lens for my use case and the price point, while not what I could call a bargain, might make it acceptable for me.
@POVwithRC6 ай бұрын
@@hardywoodaway9912"Some people prefer first party above other attributes".... "No crime in catering to that" Read before replying. I promise it will make your day better
@AdamAllen6 ай бұрын
I LOVE this concept and form factor. If I had a Sony, I'd have to have this!
@TaylorPassofaro6 ай бұрын
For everyone saying "if this was a 20-50mm it would be perfect" I want to remind everyone that the Tamron 20-40mm f2.8 exists, and is a pretty great lens.
@martin94106 ай бұрын
so true
@NoSuRReNDeR0016 ай бұрын
"It just makes sticky gonads look great!" - CN - Best quote ever
@funkywholaa6 ай бұрын
For me the most attractive feature is the compact size and still covering 24, 35, and 50mm focal length, which could replace the prime f2.5 lenses if the image quality was good enough. This could be a good alternative for street photographers that strives for compact and large enough aperture.
@KeAiFu6 ай бұрын
No need for this lens. I am using the Tamron 20-40/2.8 on the A7RIV instead - and cropping brings me to about 60mm/4.
@yankiefrankie6 ай бұрын
I like the Tamron 20-40 2.8 better. It's a bit smaller and I like the shift towards the wider end. However, the Tamron is missing the apature ring if that is something you need.
@enohav6 ай бұрын
I actually love the landscapes in this video, and the snow is also nice.
@Calderonvideo6 ай бұрын
this could be my new favorite travel and street lens and keep the GM at home.
@ck.standard6 ай бұрын
The focal range isn't the problem. However, that price ($1,099) is absurd.
@0x1h0b6 ай бұрын
tamron 20-40 mm f2/8 is better option in my opinion
@cinematools96216 ай бұрын
Sony tax
@allend61376 ай бұрын
@@cinematools9621😂
@ck.standard6 ай бұрын
@@0x1h0b 💯
@BrianGrimmett6 ай бұрын
This looks like the videos that play on TVs for sale in big box store. So crisp. So clear.
@kcphotogeek62076 ай бұрын
For Street Photography and Travel I think the Tamron 20-40mm makes more sense. I have an old Pentax-F 24-50mm F4 which I love for street/urban shooting on Pentax, but would love a modern version for my Sony as I would value a more compact zoom over the F2.8 aperture. I may go with the Tamron though
@prl1055 ай бұрын
Back in the DSLR days we had a really useful zoom, the 16-35mm f/2.8. Now your talking.
@fromia16 ай бұрын
Tamron 20-40 if I needed a compact zoom.
@Yupthereitism6 ай бұрын
This
@USGrant21st6 ай бұрын
Tamron is the closest competitor, I wonder there is no comparison.
@selishots6 ай бұрын
I love my 20-40! I've got a whole review of it on my channel but overall I think it's an underrated lens
@houserhythm6 ай бұрын
Whenever you touch a Tamron, you can feel how cheap it was. Maybe if you’re a professional, you just care about results, you want to min-max cost/profit, but I, as a hobbyist, want to also feel good about using my gear. Just like with cars performance isn’t everything; you don’t want hard, scratchy plastics or cheap cloth on the seats, you want soft-touch materials, nicely damped switches, soft leather… Oh and besides feeling cheap, you don’t get a function button, aperture ring, breathing comp.
@selishots6 ай бұрын
@@houserhythm I'm a professional and not once have I used the function button on any of my lenses that she's them. Would a AF/MF switch be nice, yes. Does it take less then 2 seconds to switch MF/AF using buttons on my camera also yes. Sure some Sony glass feels nice in the hand but honestly as long as it gets the job done, produces a great image, and doesn't feel uncomfortable to hold I don't really care if it feels like plastic.
@ying200008186 ай бұрын
More options is always good but I do think it's going to struggle a tad given it has three direct competitors (size and weight wise). Most similar - Tamron 20-40 2.8 More versatile - 20-70 f4 or Sigma 28-70 2.8 (excluding tamron's 28-75 as its considerably bigger) Not for me but more options won't hurt.
@fallryan6 ай бұрын
I think if I was in the Sony system I'd go with the 20-70 F4 G over this one. But it's still super cool the amount of different options Sony shooters get. I hope Jordan doesn't forget his ND's next time. Didn't care for the 60fps presentation.
@E4xtream6 ай бұрын
This is the perfect travel lens for me, if I were to do one lens travel. I love the 24mm focal length and having just a little more close up capability is great.
@zimbabwe06 ай бұрын
exactly, I use 3 primes 28-35-50, always wanted to see a fast compact zoom with 50 on the long end and about 20ish on the wider end. This is such a good offering
@markymarkreviews6 ай бұрын
24mm just not wide enough for a travel lens. 20mm or a little wider then would be a great lens. Way too limiting. I think you will get bored of this lens quickly.
@E4xtream6 ай бұрын
@@markymarkreviews so I tell you that I love 24mm. And you try to impose your point of view, to the point of telling me I'd get bored of a focal length I know I love?
@markymarkreviews6 ай бұрын
@@E4xtream I was speaking more generally not your particular case. The sub title of the video is “ Do we need this (lens) ?” No. Not in my opinion.
@E4xtream6 ай бұрын
@@markymarkreviews you wrote it in reply to my comment though.
@FromDuskTillSean6 ай бұрын
There are way too many frames in my eyeballs in every second of this video. High Refresh Rate Chris will haunt my dreams.
@mickmick806 ай бұрын
Bazaars of istanbul are waiting for u here… ❤❤ come anytime u want; trust me you guys have lots of fans and friends here ❤❤
@craesh6 ай бұрын
24 fps looks much more relaxed than 60 fps. Please make sure Jordan won't forget his ND filters again!
@rajasjaywant5 ай бұрын
In my opinion, an amazing lens to go with the Tamron 35-150mm f2.0 - f2.8. Gets you those ultra wide shots, with a little zoom for versatility, with a low aperture
@MarcelH406 ай бұрын
Way... wayyyyy too expensive. Here in Germany this lens goes for 1299 Euro (= $1405). Who would buy a lens like that when the 20-70mm is available for 100-200 Euro less, the 24-105mm f4 for 300-400 less or the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 & Sigma 28-70mm f2.8 for 400-500 less?
@logtothebase26 ай бұрын
Most of us are looking to minimize the number of lenses we need to buy, so I think its a "dont bother with a kit zoom and a bunch of budget primes lens" , fast enough to soften backgrounds and better in low light than kit zooms, this AND a 150- 600 telle , OR a super wide or a macro and as a hobbyist depending on your interests thats going to cover a lot of situations.
@QawiemJamil6 ай бұрын
Wow. 60 fps is so different. I don't like it. It feels... cheaper somehow. Anyway - I wish there was a 25-50 f/2 like that m43 lens but for sony emount
@classic.cameras6 ай бұрын
24-50? Hmm.... Truly at $1100 USD? Why? Anyone who will buy this should just buy the most excellent Sigma 24-70 DG DN f2.8 ART. See Christopher Frosts review and you will see how much this lens actually needs in camera corrections. Its insane. Love the review though Chris and Jordan. Good job!
@ZOB46 ай бұрын
I think this is aimed to displace those three little G primes they came out with a few years back. I believe the fastest of those was f/2.5. This lens covers the range of all three at a similar aperture and not much more price or size. I think you’re right on with its use as a street/travel lens.
@USGrant21st6 ай бұрын
It has nothing in common with small G primes, other than focal range. People buy those primes for the reason they want small and light and this zoom is not. Moreover, people would choose one, not three of those primes, the one that fit their needs most.
@Getoffmycloud536 ай бұрын
I’d love a good fast 20-50 as a standard walk around, any ff system.
@weekendintokyo5 ай бұрын
got the tamron 20-40mm f2.8 recently and i love it ngl
@LuigiVN6 ай бұрын
I mean if you look at this as a bunch of compact 2.8 primes like 24,28,35,50mm and it can perform like it it's a good deal.
@MoonbearDiedHere6 ай бұрын
I didn’t think about it like that, it’s a great way to look at it :)
@MauriceSchurink6 ай бұрын
I rather get the 20-70 F4 and a prime if I need low light
@kubotwostringz70406 ай бұрын
Hello. I'm not interested in buying this lens since I'm an amateur photographer shooting Pentax 🙂 I did however enjoy and like the different "feel" of this video... Higher frame rate, energetic music/song combined with that fast moving water really made it a treat to watch. Your review was as usually (as usual?) professional with a healthy dose of humour, covering a lot of important aspects and usage scenarios. Really enjoyable to watch. Thank you for your work, sirs 🙂🙏
@victorlim50776 ай бұрын
Wow. The soap bubble Bokeh so pronounced in the macro shot at 6.03min.
@mishkathlay5 ай бұрын
the bokeh was talked about in other reviews as looking like stop signs and lots of onion rings.
@HappyHubris6 ай бұрын
Better to have more choice than less. E mount is all about finding the perfect lens for your creative vision, often at a massive discount over other systems.
@MasterChiefTheChef6 ай бұрын
Wow. The Fujifilm 16-55 2.8 is 655g. This is exactly what I was looking for since switching from Xt3 to A7c!
@withoutpassid6 ай бұрын
The Fuji is 3x zoom, f4 ff equivalent. This lens is 2x zoom with f2.8. You have to trade zoom range for aperture.
@miggyloz8066 ай бұрын
@@withoutpassid I would still take that sony route.
@withoutpassid6 ай бұрын
@@miggyloz806 As a Sony user, I would take the 20-70 f4 route :)
@dannyly6 ай бұрын
If it were a 20-50mm I would have purchased it. In my mft days I loved the PL1025mm. Only downside is that It was huge
@TaylorPassofaro6 ай бұрын
The Tamron 20-40mm f2.8 exists and is pretty great
@colorblindphotographer6 ай бұрын
Definitely a walk-around, street photography lens. I like the idea.
@97nelsn6 ай бұрын
New Fuji X100VI and sigma lenses yesterday and now a new Sony lens today. We’re getting fed this week!
@JesusChrist-xp8sp6 ай бұрын
i go for tanrom 20-40 f/2.8
@robertconrad68026 ай бұрын
The only real reason to get this lens over the Tamron is that it's native sony glass works a lot better with active steady shot
@TaylorPassofaro6 ай бұрын
@@robertconrad6802 That's a good point, I forgot that sony lenses play a bit nicer with the bodies. However, if you're a video person and want to use Gyroflow, you disable all the stabilization anyway.
@emmanuelkontokalos74496 ай бұрын
great video guys. random feedback that audio that played at 3:22 really threw me off. i started checking if i had another tab playing a video lol
@frankfeng27016 ай бұрын
Just picked up the Tamron 20-40 for half the price and more useful coverage.
@echowarp6 ай бұрын
Love how smooth and true-to-life this video feels with the proper recording specs. Good job Jordan 👍
@USGrant21st6 ай бұрын
Actually you can see how the focus is shifting to background instead of being on the face and it's distracting.
@Ildskalli6 ай бұрын
I think the 60p looks like ass, it’s terrible 🤣
@OdiumTV6 ай бұрын
half the price of the GM, considerably smaller and still viable with aps-c crop ...and an aperture ring. love at first sight
@sh87366 ай бұрын
Sounds like a good lens to offer as a kit lens on a new body. I’m hoping to get a 2.8 which crosses the 70mm barrier as photographing events 70mm can be too distant for performers at the back of the stage, so use the 70-200mm but that is not wide enough when their at the front of the stage. Am considering the tamron 35-150 but hoping Sony might come out with some thing lighter… Wouldnt have noticed the frame rate if you’d not said any thing
@HappyHubris6 ай бұрын
60FPS looks so much smoother and more pleasing!
@nhtalbot6 ай бұрын
Not bad. I'm all in for compact, light lenses that don't break the bank. But in this case, I would prefer the wider focal range of the 20-70 f4. It's about the same weight, size and price, and if you can step back, it would give you almost the same shallowness of depth of field at 70mm at f4 as you would get with this lens at 50mm at f2.8. That all being said, I know there would be situations where the need of an extra stop would trump everything else.
@user-be3nj6fh2p29 күн бұрын
Thanks for another great review. Its good to see Sony providing so many options, and I welcome this with open arms. I think its a perfect size light weight and compact, this will go really well in combination with an 85mm FF equivalent for my wedding season. pretty much job done.
@JohnDrummondPhoto6 ай бұрын
Jordan definitely forgot his ND filters because there's no good reason to shoot any standard KZfaq filter at 4K/60. Looking at you, Tony and Chelsea.
@RG-rm9jt6 ай бұрын
The music in this one was straight out of Ixion. I approve.
@AfF3lix6 ай бұрын
Nearly Everybody would be happier with a 50mm 1.8 g
@paulyeung66086 ай бұрын
Thanks for keeping up with all of these releases!!
@rymdskrotet6 ай бұрын
Built in stabilisation, and is it better than the 24-105? (if comparable at same focal lenght).
@TwoOneSe7en6 ай бұрын
The 24mm being fully extended is a hard pass from me. I was really hoping this was staying zoom all internal. THAT would have made this lens VERY interesting.
@LeoSavantt6 ай бұрын
Compact and affordable? Makes one (almost) want to go back to MFT.
@KikujiroChan6 ай бұрын
Yeah because they are so small and cheap Like the 10-25mm.
@martin94106 ай бұрын
It's going to cost between 1100 and 1300 dollars so I don't know how affordable that is. I much prefer my more affordable and wider Tamron 20-40 lens.
@martin94106 ай бұрын
For that coverage, I prefer the Tamron 20-40mm for the wider shot. Plus, it's cheaper too.
@SamandSteve6 ай бұрын
Us too.
@ericaceous16526 ай бұрын
So many releases this week! You guys must have been so busy :)
@bitspacemusic6 ай бұрын
When will they understand that the extending zoom is a deal breaker?
@noenken6 ай бұрын
6:30 Holy coffee jitters, batman!
@youuuuuuuuuuutube6 ай бұрын
My main issue with it is that bokeh, the background rendering is not the best.
@metrostills6 ай бұрын
I was in a Rush cover band called the Sappy Gonads
@danieldougan2696 ай бұрын
I don't quite understand the point of this lens either, especially in a world where the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 and Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 lenses exist on E mount for less money. It doesn't seem to be optically exceptional. If Sony wanted to make a 24-50mm zoom lens, they could have made an f2 version that is like carrying three primes. But this one is neither fish nor fowl.
@MoonbearDiedHere6 ай бұрын
The Sigma is really heavy this one and the 20-70mm f/4 g are much lighter and smaller Coming from the GH5 before the a7siii , my lenses were much smaller. I was happy when Sony 2 years ago started making smaller lenses that I wanted
@bigrobotnewstoday14366 ай бұрын
24p for life.
@danielmoscovitz25205 ай бұрын
no mention of the 20-40 f2.8 tamron? Seems a direct competitor. It's wider, but that might be an advantage to many.
@edcAdventures.3 ай бұрын
What i really like about this lens is the design it just looks nice to look at especially with the lens hood attached
@AnotherOtherMan-alive6 ай бұрын
man, must've been cold if the camera start's shivering at 6:34 lol (the downside of ibis thinking it's moving when it isn't.)
@PetaPixel6 ай бұрын
Gimbal was getting blown around by the wind.
@AnotherOtherMan-alive6 ай бұрын
@@PetaPixel That was the other option, it happens. Put up a good fight though.
@johnsoncityaerialphotograp72016 ай бұрын
Still praying for a Sony 24-105 2.8 .. I know they can make it smaller than the Canon version.. it won’t be lightweight regardless but could definitely be the one lens event use
@scottnelle6 ай бұрын
I don't have any interest in switching to the Sony system, but you two make the most entertaining videos so I'm watching anyway! Great video as always. The 60 FPS looks real weird. Remember those ND filters, Jordan! 😎
@TerryMcKennaFineArt6 ай бұрын
Who is this for??? Let me suggest a new sony user who is a landscape shooter, especially is hiker. So you buy the sony a7c and this as your starting point. I shoot events all time and a lens like this would be great. Expecially for a person who wants to take one camera on a trip to a national park .
@thechampofwhatever6 ай бұрын
I’d argue the 20-70 f4 is a much better choice for that. It’s practically the same weight and f/2.8 is mostly pointless if you’re hiking anyway. Events, f2.8 is probably better but at that point you’d probably be better off with the Tamron…
@dccoletrain6 ай бұрын
Tony would be so proud of the 60 fps
@AseemPatni6 ай бұрын
Great review! Found the music track a little distracting though.
@thebitterfig99035 ай бұрын
I feel like one use for this lens is for someone who would be bringing the 24-70/2.8, but also some sort of a telephoto. This is cheaper and lighter than the 24-70, and if you also have a 70-200, you probably don’t need to fully cover the focal length gap. If you don’t need the 2.8, sure, the 20-70/4 makes sense, but if you do, I could easily see this having benefits over a 24-70 or 28-75. That said, the lens would probably be more special as a 22-45.
@patrickjclarke6 ай бұрын
"The hood is touching the wood." - Chris
@chengong3886 ай бұрын
Rather get the 35GM, you get the same 24-50mm range through the breathing, but you also get a lighter lens at f/1.4😂
@bobdrawbaugh42076 ай бұрын
I say yes we need it. It you like the A7C type camera with the 28-60. Well this gives you a better lens for the compact cameras.
@mihaidavid3596 ай бұрын
6:11 Damn that Panasonic G9 Mk.2 is stable....6:33 Jordan shivering (not the G9) 🤣
@sunflowerdeath6 ай бұрын
I demand this lens! Give it to me now! 😅😅
@j.f.19796 ай бұрын
Nah, I don't like the 60fps, looks too clinical! 24fps please!!
@HorusEagletus6 ай бұрын
Already have a 24-70 F2.8 GM II with a A7C ii, but suddenly feels like to have a lighter lens like this... But I'm worried about the focal length to be lost. Don't really like an F4 lens as I'm planning to go to Istanbul, maybe will visit a bazaar.
@niccollsvideo6 ай бұрын
It would be perfect for that! 😂
@albertlim56756 ай бұрын
I recently bought a used Sony 24-105mm F4 like new. I personally feel it is more practical for All-In-One lens for travel. I am more in photography than videograohy. Aperture F4 is good enough for me. Ultimately, it really depends on your core preference.
@ProbablyAnAmateur6 ай бұрын
3:00 SAPCICLES!
@madaanshivang6 ай бұрын
Wow! 3 videos in 2 days 🎉🎉
@Tnaryt6 ай бұрын
Jordan, what’s happening to Chris’s knees during the sitting shot during the video performance section? It only happens there but was curiosity it was a focusing thing of that lens for the Panasonic or just a rendering thing?
@MeAMuse6 ай бұрын
A lot to compromise on here. I think I would prefer a 20-70 F4 and deal with a stop less of light.
@jackpatmoreinc6 ай бұрын
Would you recommend this lens (Sony 24-50mm) or the Sigma 28-70mm/Tamron28-75mm lens for an all-in-one, compact lens? I know the Sony is a tiny bit smaller and shorter than the others and you get the extra Sony in-body features (focus breathing compensation, etc.), but you also lose 20ish extra mm of reach and it is a few hundred dollars more. Just wanting an extra opinion!
@brentandeck6 ай бұрын
Sigma/Tamron for event work. Sony for street photography
@loldart5 ай бұрын
It is a good option to pull people into full frame. It’s cheaper than Sony 16-55mm F2.8. You cut off the wide a bit. Yet you can then move to full frame in the near future and still have glass.
@GetOutsideYourself4 ай бұрын
Seems like the audio isn't synched right, but that could be a KZfaq issue.
@MikeCTRVLR5 ай бұрын
I would love to see the following comparison. Two photographers shooting a wedding. One with standard equipment and another skilled photographer using an iPhone. I’d like to see the results compared from the same wedding. And I’d like to ensure the iPhone photographer knew how to use the iPhone properly and was as skilled in composition as the photographer using the digital camera.
@yassassinfo6 ай бұрын
G9ii is amazing.
@kirillkrylov66746 ай бұрын
great decision by sony, as a compact lens, with very high quality, and the 70-200/2.8 is still a must have. Excellent also as a travel zoom.
@chengong3886 ай бұрын
My choice is still the 20-70, same size, WAY more range, even better macro capabilities. Definitely more important to get the shot, instead of getting it at f/2.8
@POVwithRC6 ай бұрын
I usually prefer 60fps but for you two particularly it always drives me nuts 😄
@dergelenkspreizer52726 ай бұрын
Event reportage. And a Sigma 65f2 or SEL8518 on the second body. Perfectly fine.
@hendrixg6 ай бұрын
KZfaq isn't helping the 1080 compression on this one. Bumped it to 4k and what gorgeous production.
@joeysnacht5 ай бұрын
Shoutout for the Haukland Jacket!
@luisneumannp27486 ай бұрын
No Jordan :( also, what happened at 6:23???
@PrimalShutter6 ай бұрын
So small for what it is, we're getting crazy advancements
@jeremyfmoses6 ай бұрын
I like the look of 60fps substantially more than 24/30fps. 24fps to me looks like a series of stills when panning.
@CP-xt5ux6 ай бұрын
I'm waiting for a 10mm to 300mm f/1.2 lens that has everything you need including weather proofing and stabilization, etc., with perfect performance for all occasions. Manufacturers have the ability, they just need to build them. 😊
@SilatShooter6 ай бұрын
I have the 20-70F4, and 24G, 40G, 50G lenses. This is an interesting lens for sure. If I didn't have the 20-70 I would strongly consider it. But it's easy to go down the fast aperture rabbit hole, with why stop at f2.8 get faster primes. And will say I do find I use the 20mm focal length a lot on the 20-70 f4. So yes, tempting but I think I will sit this one out.