As soon as I saw the Sony Pictures Animation logo, my heart sunk. You know why.

0:00 - 0:11 - Wow, they really brought the classic illustrations to life! This could be a wonderful... 0:12 - WHY. JUST WHY.

I'm a simple man. I go on Twitter and Facebook to see insanely happy comments on any movie. I go on KZfaq to see the movies picked and ripped apart like vultures. Man, I love the internet.

0:33 - Did...did Peter Rabbit just make it rain with fucking lettuce?

See's in recommended - Oh No See's Sony - OH NO See's trailer - O H N O

oh no. Oh no. *OH NO.*

This Takes Tom and Jerry, Bugs Bunny and Hop to a whole new level.

He really does sound like greek lmao

HOP 2.0

Why is the screaming back-and-forth gag still being used!? It's DEAD!!!

BASED!? It should says "loosely, loosely loosely based on the beloved Beatrix Potter characters...really, it only LOOKS like them"

didnt know greek made films

What really makes me upset about this movie is that the character models look good. If Sony wasn't making this movie, it would probably turn out pretty good. The problem is that Sony feels the need to stuff a timeless character with dated references and the most overused jokes out there. Why do these things sell? What is wrong with the mass movie going audience?

Leave it to Sony to take something that could be a smart and sweet movie and dumb it down to the lowest common denominator. Sony must be stopped at some point, because I didn't know they were making this and now I don't know what's next.

It’s nice to see Hux as a farmer

I actually liked this... it has the heartwarming scenes that we know and love from the original, but it's also clever and funny! Also it has scenes with the "old" drawings... VERY COOL!

You know, when I first heard about this, I had my doubts. But at the same token, I remained cautiously optimistic when I heard that it was going to be a mostly British cast and that it would have a G rating... And then this came out... I mean... Just why? I grew up with Peter Rabbit. I went to Beatrix Potter's house in the Lake District, went to the exhibition in Bowness, grew up with that wonderful, wonderful animated series from the people who made the Snowman! Why can't they just simply make a movie with the tone of the books?!!? I mean we used to have children's films that didn't talk down and were sincere in their approach. And then Shrek came along and every other movie had to follow in its footsteps!!! Why?!!? Are people just that worried that children will get bored out of their mind with something that's sweet and gentle without bombarding them without pop cultural references or dated dance numbers? Is this why movies like The BFG and Kubo didn't perform well at the box office?!!? I apologize if I'm going on a rant here. But I just hate the fact that something I hold very near and dear to my heart is getting this kind of treatment. And I know that some movies need some sort of embellishing to work for a contemporary audience, but this just isn't the way!!! Maybe I'll be proven wrong about this. Maybe it will be better but this just really dashes whatever hopes I had for this completely away.

Remember people, this animation studio made the emoji movie...

To be honest this movie wasn't bad after all, I just watched it today in theaters and it made me cry and laugh, at first I thought it was gonna be bad tho, but it was actually nice.

This is based on a story set in the Victorian period, by the way.

Wow. I mean... wow. There is so little effort put into this that it's almost beautiful.

I really loved Beatrix Potter books and films as a child. Please Sony, please please please please can you try to gain an understanding of why people watch films. Emotion, escapism, enlightenment, empathy there's important reasons for stories to exist in our society. They're not just a medium for cheap physical comedy, improvised one liners and whatever name you think will put the most zeroes in your bank account. You our stewards for our culture. You have a responsibility greater than making money. Act like it.

Honestly, enjoyed the movie with my family. It was very entertaining. I only just realized that it was James Corden voicing Peter.

yes, give Peter Rabbit, THE CHILD RABBIT, a fully grown man's voice.

See Sony. See Sony bomb. Bomb, Sony, Bomb.

I read Peter Rabbit as a kid and adored it. Of course the books were better. But this movie was very funny and very entertaining. It doesn't deserve all the hate. There were scenes where the rabbits took it to far but there was also scenes in which Mr McGregor took it too far as well. IT IS A GOOD MOVIE.

I personally found this movie very cute. I dont remember peter rabbit much from my childhood though. If you ignore the idea that the movie isn't exactly like the books, perhaps you might enjoy it.

It's moments like this where a dislike bar is so beautiful.

Sony Pictures are not finished with shitting on beloved franchises, I see.

Goodness gracious, I've never seen anything more unfaithful in my life. Even the Nick Jr. cartoon from a few years ago was closer to the source material than this. For shame, Sony.

I Was hoping to write a children's book sometime in the future. I had a simple idea that I hoped to turn into a series if things go as planned. I don't really expect much to come out from this, other than possibly make a small difference in the world. You know who else had that thought? Beatrix Potter; writer of the "Peter Rabbit" books. They were simple, subtle, straight to the point, used simple illustrations to get said points across; and most importantly, Potter was able to tell a story without insulting the reader's intelligence. Sony Pictures then found a copy of one of the Peter Rabbit Books, and then proceeded to use the pages of the book as Toilet Paper, and this is what got flushed into Los Angeles City Septic Systems.

If you listen closely you can hear Beatrix Potter rolling in her grave.

This should have been an animated film with no pop culture references or modern humor. Who else agrees?

What a fantastic movie. Made me laugh at least 25 times. The film deserves five stars in my opinion.

No one in our family had seen such a film. But it was fun to see it. And the interesting thing is that everyone saw it together. And now we are going to see Part 2. And eagerly waiting for part 3. 😊😊

This isn't the real Peter Rabbit. This is like... Peter Rabbit according to Shrek or something.

Beatrix Potter disapproves.

Anybody else just totally unequivocally love Domhnall Gleeson!!

I saw this trailer immediately after seeing the Paddington 2 trailer. It's shocking how one captures the spirit and feeling of a beloved childhood character and the other butchers it by turning it into Alvin and the Chipmunks.

First time seeing this trailer in theater, I smiled because hey, it's good way to introduce a classic to younger generation. Then the Sony logo appeared. "Oh no.." I thought. Then Peter's voice sounded familiar. I thought to myself, please not be who I'm thinking of. After some cringey party scene, James Corden as Peter Rabbit. "Oh god, it's that carpool karaoke guy!"

I am sure that, somewhere in the spirit world, Beatrix Potter is tearing her hair out and shrieking with rage...

A kids film that's teaches kids to inflict an anaphalitic reaction that in the real world will kill someone . No chance I'm ever watching this ever !!

I liked this movie I wasn't like "oh no I HATE this movie" But i also wasn't like "I love this movie im obsessed" It was more like "its a fun movie to watch" i personally liked the movie idk about others

Mother of god it's all toilet sounds

It’s good until 0:13. The animation is actually kinda impressive, but why is it a live action - animation hybrid? Hasn’t Sony learned their lesson with the first two smurf movies? AND WHY JAMES CORDEN?!?!

I saw the trailer before it released and thought it'd suck like everyone else thought. BUT.. Just watched it as an Easter movie and although slow in some parts, the ending ties in well and for its own unique twist. It's actually a good movie :)

" I have nothing to do with this......" - Beatrix Potter

This is so disrespectfull toward the source material!!

Ya never learn do you SONY You just...never learn

And this is why other movie trailers show different clips instead of just two random clips causing everyone to hate the movie without watching it

The movie we never needed but still got

Beatrix Potter is rolling in her grave

As if the "deer in the headlights" joke wasn't painfully obvious enough, they had to have the deer actually say "headliiiights" just in case the joke was too subtle for you to pick up. This is the level of writing we're dealing with here.

Unpopular opinion: I actually liked this movie a lot, but then again I watched it when I was smaller

This should be titled "Peter Rabbit Grows Up to Be a Tw@t."

CAN SONY ANIMATION JUST GO BANKRUPT ALREADY?!?!?!

every animated movie feels skeptical after emoji movie was released

Everyone who has seen the trailer said they hated it but all the people who actually saw the movie said it was amazing and hilarious...

I was so happy when a friends child aged 12 said the movie trailer kinda ruined her childhood favourite book. I thought i was just a grumpy oldy who didn't like the new generation stuff. Peter rabbit had so much charm and adorable childlike character!

This ain't Peter. This is Adam Sandler as a rabbit.

(Beginning of Trailer): This looks promising 🙂 (17 seconds in): shots self in the head!

The movie is like 21th century Peter Rabbit and different from the classic tales, but still very funny 🤣I laughed so hard with the movie

Peter Rabbit: The Movie. What better way to pay tribute to a children's classic than to make the characters hyperactive, reference-spewing disturbingly realistic monstrosities who inflict legitimately painful looking "slapstick" on a live-action human? Brilliant.

Until the 0:13 I though this was going be something, but NO! What classic they're gonna ruin next? The Wind in The Willows? Animals of Farthing Wood? Animal Farm? Watership Down perhaps?

We truly are in the darkest timeline.

In my take: Thomas McGregor contacts the Bug Off Exterminators (whose symbol is that of the ghostbusters symbol, except with a cockroach instead of a ghost), who then rig the whole garden with traps like gnomes that split vertically to reveal deadly spikes, lasers that trap animals in cages using extermination devices like the Depelter Turbo, the most powerful extermination device ever, as well as flamingo ornaments that crush animals with deadly spikes.

Beatrix Potter's ghost is going to seriously haunt everyone involved with this. Hope y'all ready.

after the emoji movie, THIS IS HOW SONY TRIES TO REDEEM THEMSELVES?!?

It's been a while since I've responded to a movie trailer by saying "HOW DARE YOU"

Who here after watching peter rabbit 2

I cannot believe the negative response this film is getting!! It's crazy....this movie I watched today it's incredible absolutely hilarious and James Cordens voice was spot on xx

you're not in Zootopia anymore boi

Oh....my.....gosh.... Are you telling me that Sony STILL have this capacity to take one of the most beloved children books from the past and turn into....THIS?!?

My older brother is 46 years old and big peter the rabbit fan, he got peter the rabbit everything and now he wants peter the rabbit mural in his bedroom!!!!!😆

Although this is produced by Sony Pictures Animation, the animals in the film don’t look computer-animated; they look exactly in their live-action looks

Wtf happened

So relaxing till 0:12..then the real trailer starts🎀

Peter Rabbit: Me and my friends are going to almost kill my friend’s boyfriend because he doesn’t want us stealing his hard-earned work! HAHA I AM INTELLIGENT!

The thing that shocks me the most is that Sony didn’t turn off the comment section after the backlash.

Why did he have to hurt those birds in the opening scene?

But the chart says...

So enjoyed watching this wonderful movie! Having grown up with Beatrix Potter stories, I think this modernized version will create renewed interest in all of her wonderful stories. What incredible special effects, funny (and slightly poignant) storyline, great scenery, actors and voice characterizations. Can’t wait to see it again.

"James cordon can do anything" "... And does..."

Take something beloved and suck all the charm out of it

You could literally give this movie another title and it wouldn't make any difference, they just put peter rabbit on there because it is somewhat familiar to people.

I'm sad. This makes me sad.

Holy crap ! Daisy Ridley,James Cordon ,Margot Robbie,Domhall Gleeson and Sia in 1 movie!!!!! Who’s next? Jimmy Fallon,Jered Leto,Adam Driver and Daniel Reynold?

Sony...you really need to start focus testing your scripts before you create movies. You will realize no one wants the atrocities you are producing.

If love and warmth is not going to be put into a movie based on a world that revels in it, why waste the time and money licensing the property? Why? With an original world, you could invent characters, save money, cater to, rather than alienate, your audience, and be free to make your own project. In other words, why take the beautiful world of Peter Rabbit and staple it to this wreck of an idea?

When general hux takes a week off at a countryside lol

My mom raised me and my sister on the Peter Rabbit books. The cartoons will always hold a special nostalgic place in my heart. They are some of thw most simple, down-to-Earth stories ever. And as an artist, I love the watercolor backgrounds that Beatrix Potter used, how realistic she made the animals look, and how she explored what lives they would have outside of the human's eye. I showed this to my mom, she hates it too. May the Sony executives burn in hell. On behalf of all of us who grew up with your work, we're so sorry Ms. Potter.

Childhood just went down the drain... Beatrix Potter is shaking her head in HUGE disappointment in heaven because of how shameful this trailer is. It also destroys everything you loved about the Peter Rabbit books. At least the Nick Jr show is more respectable to Beatrix Potter than this.

british zootopia looks hella creepy

Guys, chill. I rented it a few days ago. It was actually pretty cute and funny. Just because some people don't like "classic " cartoon animals brought to life as more "human", doesn't mean it will be terrible. Alvin And The Chipmunks, remember? Many people thought THAT would be terrible at first, but they (at least the first two anyway) were actually pretty good. So people should give Peter a chance.

My TAKE: Once Upon a Time, On a Small Railroad, There Is a Tank Engine Named Thomas With a Number One On His Side. Percy Crashes Into Trucks Percy: Sorry!

I literally grew up with Peter Rabbit! I’ve read the books, I’ve watched the 90’s series, I’ve watched the Nick Jr. TV series, I’ve bought all the merchandise of him at Barnes ‘N’ Noble, and I’ve even had a custom-made stuffed Peter Rabbit lie in my room for 8 years! And the plot for this movie just defines the very existence of live-action remakes. First the smurfs, and now this! WTH Sony?! I’ll still see the movie though. Besides, this is only a teaser.

Sooooo, did the producers even READ Beatrix Potter's books? Or did they just decide to take the characters and create 2017 partiers to make them relevant to this decade's humour? If Beatrix only knew what kind of messy concoction was just summoned with her stories and characters.

I love the screaming!!

Saw this with my family the they day! Such a cute movie! I really enjoyed, as did my friends!

Just when I thought The Emoji Movie was the lowest you could sink, you desecrate a literary classic. For shame.