"He's doing a Korean Love sign". Yes Felix, I'm sure that's what DaVinci was going for.

Leonardo: *paints Jesus doing the sign of the cross* Felix: "Kinda cool, he's doing like a Korean love sign, that's kinda sick he looks like Jesus too"

"This is awful. This is just bad art. That probably means it’s expensive" -Felix, 2021

So what I learned is that these “Arts” that costs millions are just ways to send money to someone without paying tax

I took an art appreciation course in college and even my professor who majored in modern art said the fine art world is a scam lol.

"you could save a country" wise words

As an artist myself, who has been practicing different types of art for years, the fact that such a minimal effort piece that’s just 2 big rectangles with a strip of white down the middle sells for $43 million is just depressing when there are so many artists out there that spend hours, days or even months on their artwork, there is nothing wrong with abstract art because that still takes skill and effort to make a well balanced abstract piece. But when someone clearly just put one strip of tape on a big canvas and then painted the whole thing blue, that shouldn’t be worth that much. And it makes me sad to see that a lot of art with such beautiful detail will most of the time go for less money than the art that looks like there was no thought or idea behind it.

"He's doing the Korean heart sign. That's kinda cool. Looks like Jesus, too." Everyone knows Jesus was a Kpop stan.

When pewds owns Antarctica, he can open his own art gallery and we can all put our art up on display

"This is the first one I like actually. This is beautiful." * Van Gogh sheds a single happy tear *

I'm convinced that art that goes for these prices is purely money laundering for the rich.

"I could do that” PLEASE make a video of recreating the crazy expensive paintings in paint

art be like "this is just a blue canvas, why would I pay millions of dollars for it" "ok but the guy who made it is dead" " *you got yourself a deal* "

I feel like Sive's editing has been really on point recently. You're doing an amazing Job Sive keep it up

My mom told me a story that explains a lot as to why simple paintings or “trash” paintings sell for a lot of money. My mom is really good at drawing fictional things like zombies, elves, orcs. One day, when she was in high school, around Halloween, the bar in town was holding an art contest. She and one of her friends decided to draw three pictures. They drew one picture together and it was extremely detailed, and then each through their own style separate. The themes were Halloween based. Several other kids also participated in this contest. Anyways the day of the contest before nightfall, my mom decided to make one more quick piece of art. It was a big yellow moon with a yellow eyed owl sitting on a branch silhouette across the moon. A very simple painting. And it one 1st prize. Her friend who is now angry at this point at her, asked how a simple owl was better than his very detailed zombie apocalypse drawing. And she said, “You’re presenting art and a bar, everyone was going to be drunk, so something detailed would be hard for them to see.” Just know your audience. Also people who spend that kind of money on “art” is more so doing it because to them it’s a pissing contest.

As someone that worked in a jean factory, we used actual rocks for stone wash, sand blasters to get the "worn and faded" look. And the tears are made but just cutting the pants then washing them to get them frayed. Also all kinds of jeans were made in Winnipeg, Guess, Diesel and many many others.

Something about Felix saying "Look at the camera dummy!" to a painting made me laugh way harder than I should have

Iris's was painted by Van Gogh at a time when his art wasn't very appreciated. He considered it just a study while he was in a psyche ward but it's become one of his most famous paintings.

As an art student, I’m crying.

Pewdiepie: "Looks like Jesus." Me: **Face palm** The painting is literally "Savior of the World", Pewds. He IS Jesus.

I study art history and those high prices is a very recent phenomenon. The boom of prices began around the 60' and aver since it's been exponential. Actually Peggy Guggenheim which was a massive figure in the world of art collections and galleries said herself that all of this is dumb and that those prices are insane. It's a process of gentrification of art, which hasn't always been a thing. It's sad because the money often doesn't profit artists.

I like how Felix doesn’t even ask to subscribe anymore he just goes “you’re cool cuz you’re subscribed” because he already has all of the subscribers

I actually covered the onement VI painting (blue with white strip) for a school project and the reason for it being absurdly expensive is not the art itself but the history of owners who have owned the painting. Apparently the painting has gone around many great people according to the internet and hence accumulated value with time.

As someone who studied art history…for a minor so I’m not 100% a nerd….the inflated valuable of these works of art make more sense when you known the historical context of why that painting was significant. It’s not necessarily about the aesthetics, more the value of owning that piece of history. Also for a lot of these painting that were “cheaper” it’s because there’s iconic pieces that were purchased by museums a long time ago that will NEVER be put on the market again. But if for whatever reason they went for auction they’d shoot up in price ~ especially those Van Goghs.

Art when the artist is alive: that’s worth nothing just a piece of paper Art when the artist is dead: HALF A BILLION!

Rothko died by his own hand. He was super depressed. It's sad and it's even more heartbreaking how his work became more valuable because of his personal tragedy.

When it comes to expensive clothes I feel like there's two variants, one of the key indicators for a high price is to make it look as worn in and crap as possible, the other is to keep it as boring and clean as possible with subtle details. Where as cheap clothes they try to sell and make a name so they make it fancy and stick out, compared to a known name that could sell a white shirt with some stitching for 5-10 times+ the amount as an identical shirt with a different name stitched on.

PewDiePie: “still down wit my humble routes” Everyone: 😐 that’s three plain shirts for $340

felix: “look in the camera dummy” referring to a painting

pewds roasting and praising van Gogh in the same vid without knowing is everything lol

The reason why some basic paintings go for so much is for rich people avoiding taxes. They buy something, keep it in a cargo container for a while then donate to charity, saying it’s worth heaps. Why rich people pay tiny taxes.

As an artist, I completely agree with all of Felix's wails.

So, general rule: whatever looks the most tacky and inelegant is a designer brand, and whatever is the most low-effort trash is high-end modern art.

"Art is subjective." No, Felix. It's money laundering, plain and simple. 🤑🤑🤑 Washing machine goes BRRRRRRRRRRRR

7:15 pewds turned into jigsaw "wanna play a game" vibes

Rule no. 1 for choosing prices for Art-Pieces: *Always select the exact opposite of what your brain tells you about the price... and you would always win* :)

I heard a interesting conspiracy about art, that a reason why art can be so expensive is that instead of one rich person give another rich person 100mill and being kinda suspicious they buy an art piece from their collection that isn't worth anything, like pewds said its just an exchange between rich people

“Abstract Art gets a bad wrap.” a minute later “Jackson Pollock, this is bad, this is awful.”

As an artist the whole concept of deciding how much art pieces will cost really ticks me off I'm an art major in college and we have to study a lot of principles and elements like composition, proportion, value, contrast, texture, negative space, patterns, and different materials we can use for mediums. But you get sculptures and paintings with so little effort that it looks like something a freaking toddler could make, yet somehow they're worth nearly half a billion dollars And the works that actually look like effort has been put into them for some reason is way less It just so insulting, like they're spitting into the faces of the artists that are actually passionate about their work

I’m an Art Ed student (doing my student teaching rn) and while I can certainly appreciate that many of these pieces take more effort, time and expertise than many people probably think…these prices are insane. I just did a “color field” lesson with my 5th grade students last week (the same art style of the Rothko painting and the big blue painting with the white line) and honestly… my 5th graders made some more interesting stuff than that blue painting 😂 like wtf

Art is worth however much someone is willing to pay for it. most art going for that much is usually someone trying to launder money.

Imagine being half a billionaire because you can draw a single straight line on a blank background

Most of the teachers at the art school I went to were like "yea it's pretty much bullshit some of this art is worth so much, people hyped it up a lot". There was even a time where artists made fun of it by making all kind of weird shit and be like "lol watch the rich people go crazy and pay"

When we run out of gaming content, get married and become successful we all become art critics and dealers. Awesome.

Salvator Mundi: A painting of Jesus making the Christogram sign with his hand. Felix: Hey, that guy looks like Jesus.

Andy Warhol is less expensive because he "mass produced" his art work and weren't unique like pollock, Rothko, etc. also, pollock's method of making his abstract "mess" is what made him famous, it's also huge.

i remember what my professor for art history taught us in art college. those easy looking or ugly looking art pieces are usually priced higher because it's the result of the artist's style's refinement. they start off with the typical pieces that usually looks pretty good to us but as they keep painting, they develop a more distinct style, there by adding more value to the piece.

Apparently he hasn't looked into how "fine art" is the most legal money laundering thing there is. The art doesn't have to be good to be expensive because it's all about cleaning their dirty money

I'm convinced art selling/buying is just a way to launder money.

"Art is anything you can get away with" - Andy Warhol.

3 standard white t-shirts for 340 dollars... Pewds: "I knew that, I'm still down with my humble roots"

This art is what happens when rich people are just really bored and start making up nonsense

“I could do that” PLEASE make a video of recreating the crazy expensive paintings in paint

please do more of these AND house tours

"We need to call charlie" that cracked me up 😭😂😂

Art, especially modern art, is often that expensive as a tax write off. A rich person contacts an artist for their work, that rich person has an appraiser claim that it’s worth a ridiculous amount, then the rich person buys it for a bit less than the appraiser says and donates it since charity can be written off for taxes.

The reason for those art is so expensive is there were actually treat like a bond/stock. The riches are not stupid, they generally don't appricitate the art in their home, but rather store them in the auction provider's vault. And after a few years they will trying to auction for a higher price. Also, other company/individual are tend to use them to do money laundary/tax avoidance and other rich people stuff.

“Looks like Jesus too” lmao

More of these videos please 😂 As an illustrator, I really enjoy hearing your perspective on art

Pewds, Art is traded as a non suspicious currency, That 250m on that one painting could have simply been untraceable ransom.

"Modern art is just a way for really rich people to launder money" - My economy teacher.

Jackson Pollock was the first artist to break away from using traditional painting techniques, he was ahead of his time considering it was the 40’s at the time. Most of his huge canvases were on the floor, he used a dripping technique and he never had a formal painting background. Sometimes the more you know about the artist and their decision to make this art, the better you understand their reasonings for their creativity

You would enjoy this essay by Walter Benjamin - "The Work of Art in The Age of Mechanical Reproduction" it is a very interesting take on the way we view art through the years and how it actually ruins the original aura of the artwork. John Berger also had a chapter on it in "Ways of Seeing". Very philosophical and sociological.

I love his suffering when he says "Art is subjective, Felix". XD I feel you. Felix! Hey, Felix! Wanna hear about a man named Yves Klein? He was the first person to make an expo called "Le Vide" ("The Void") where there was.... absolutely nothing. People would purchases "pieces of nothin" and receive a certificate that they had bought some "Void". The most expensive piece of nothing sold at the time was I think around $1600 or thereabouts, in 1958. On the opposite side, there was a rival painter, Arman, who made an exposition called "Le Plein" (The fullness) in 1960, which was a gallery so packed with crap crammed inside that it was too full to even step inside. Unsure if there were any purchases made then.

How about all of us just start dressing like artists, getting a reputation, and then selling a blank canvas for 20 million because you cried on it and it is now filled emotion.

please do more art guesses

People are evolving backwards from buying good things for cheap to buying trash looking things for expensive.

8:20 the rule is the more famous you are in the art community the more expensive your art will be. The prestige of the artist is more important than the art itself, unfortunately. I can paint the most beautiful abstract painting of a tree and it won't sell for shit because I'm no David Hockney. It's all about who you know in art, not what you do.

It’s sad that “Irises” by Van Gogh sold as one of the lower pieces.

I just love how Felix gets progressively more and more pissed off as he scrolls through the art.

6:13 me who been studying art history and came to enjoy this artist's works: * pain *

When Felix said Irises is the first one he liked, my Van Gogh loving self was like VALIDATION

this video just confirms that i don't understand art

For your record, Pollock’s art is based on the randomness of the artist’s inspiration. He just throws some bits of paint with aleatory movements ;)

There are ppl who took art history and have the appreciation for those “scribbles” and “doodles” that are actually expressionist and post modernism. And there are ppl like felix, who want ‘pretty’ art and expect pieces from someone who’s good at drawing 💀 Like boi you said yourself art is subjective, always has been. These movements are about the artists emotions and experiences, or how they perceive the world around them. That is still art and requires skill to create that perception. Jackson pollocks work in particular was all about his technique, random yet controlled lines of watered down paint that he would drip onto the canvas on the floor. He was inspired by a number of things, such as the grand canyon where his dad worked, and how the rock and cliffs would fill the space below. These are the kinds of paintings that you gotta just sit with and look into them deeper than face value to connect to them.

there has to be some sort of money laundering involved with some paintings, because I can't believe that there are this many billionaires in these auctions to outbid each other until the price skyrockets that high. with 200m they could buy literally anything including whole companies, cities, skyscrapers, stocks, biggest diamonds, which would also increase in worth over time and aren't useless if you drop them once

When a single painting with a single line is worth more money than you will ever accumulate in 100 lives

I knew that was a Jackson Pollock painting thanks to GOTG. “If I had a black light, this place would look like a Jackson Pollock painting.” - Peter Quill / Star-Lord

Do more of these videos but but with countries

Buying and selling fine art is the rich person equivalent of trading Pokemon cards.

Imagine being the dude who just spent 53 million dollars on a painting just for felix to call it cheap

as an art major graduate, i understand his pain lol all you have to understand about art pricing is that its based on who bought the painting last/clientele. im surprised i got all but 1 right for the fashion quiz

"Just look in the camera!" says Felix to an oil painting 😂

Pewds knows the prices because he actually owns all of these outfits

as a graduated art student who had to learn a f ton of movements and the artists who represented them, it becomes easier to tell the complexity and various elements of the paintings youre viewing, sadly you cant do that to the paintings similar to that blue one lol

*Felix draws parody of art in MS Paint *Sotherby's auctioneer: "The next lot is a piece called 'Parody #1' by KZfaqr PewDiePie. Bidding starts at $30 million."

Jackson Pollock has a nice story behind his paintings, he used to paint amazing paintings and they just would not sell, so he just started splashing ink on canvas and voila....its unique now Theres a movie about him, pretty good one actualy

To be fair to "The Card Players" tho, Paul Cezanne is one of the most iconic artists ever. I can *sorta* see a price tag for that when it's basically buying a piece of history as an investment. Definitely depressing tho that even after the fame following his death, the Van Gogh (Irises) is still one of the cheapest ones on here lmao

Art as an industry, at this level, is most certainly all about tax evasion and money laundering. I think a lot of people don't realize this lol.

With the one about the Jeans you can tell which ones are expensive by the way the Model is posing in the photo. With that one it is about the photography more so than the look of the jeans.

Sees a di Vinci painting of his portrayal of Jesus literally called Salvator Felix: hey that kinda a looks like Jesus

You can literally say "This water is made with an extra oxygen!" and rich people would buy it.

That blue line one was ridiculous though, a child could do that patchy mess with a messy line through it

do more of these

Artist alive: **dont care** Artist dead: *omegawd.... their art is so high level! Gotta buy for MILLIONS!*

For art sometimes it's the story that sells, I think. If I remember correctly A Wheatfield with Cypresses (11:17) was the last piece Van Gogh painted before he killed himself, so I'm sure that added to the value.

The "We need to call Charlie" part killed me, lol

The thing about art is every sence cameras came out there’s no need for everyday objects or realistic paintings cameras do that now the harder it is to replicate more likely it’s going to be more expensive and with abstract art is where that really shows

"Everyday, Felix strays further and further away from the process of ageing." -Master oogway~

Art back in the eighteenth century: portrait of a market or a area with a lot of detail 🏞 Art in 2021: red square 🟥