Phantom Thread - Exploring The Twisted Relationship

  Рет қаралды 106,305

Jack's Movie Reviews

Jack's Movie Reviews

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! This week's video essay is a look into Paul Thomas Anderson's Phantom Thread and the twisted relationship between Reynolds and Alma.
/ jackmoviereview
Help me subtitle this video
kzfaq.info_cs_p...

Пікірлер: 203
@DoktorZhivago
@DoktorZhivago 6 жыл бұрын
Movie like this doesn't need any Oscar. This is and will be timeless classic and masterpiece. We, people who loves great movies, knows it.(sorry for my grammar)
@amanms1999
@amanms1999 4 жыл бұрын
It won an Oscar for costume design. It was also nominated for best picture, director, Actor and supporting actress
@braceyourself3537
@braceyourself3537 6 жыл бұрын
I totally disagree that making a dress "out of passion, not financial gain" is rare for him, and that the last person he did it for was his mother. It seems like something he does for every girl he's interested in, I thought that was obvious during the entire scene.
@mdnblues
@mdnblues 4 жыл бұрын
Exactly, that is why his sister was there in one of the scenes to help Woodcock take Alma's measurements. They have done this many times before, it seems.
@alisha_1972
@alisha_1972 2 жыл бұрын
I think the point might’ve been that the dress wasn’t commissioned by any sort of client and instead was made likely for free.
@condimentking7039
@condimentking7039 2 жыл бұрын
I dunno, I think passion may be involved but not REAL passion. Not something he has for the girl we follow through the whole picture.
@multiplepassions3694
@multiplepassions3694 Жыл бұрын
So you’re saying he was interested in the lady with the green dress getting married to the dominican dude that passed out? I don’t think so….
@chewygad7899
@chewygad7899 Жыл бұрын
@@multiplepassions3694 How do you think that’s what being mentioned here? Obviously the post is about making the dress (taking her measurements for it) for Alma on their first date
@ianharrodlondon
@ianharrodlondon 5 жыл бұрын
As a cast member, I'm delighted to find this very intelligent, interesting, and thoughtful review. Regards, Ian Harrod.
@friendlypup5650
@friendlypup5650 4 жыл бұрын
ian london just watched the film today. Absolutely stunning
@AMYV3
@AMYV3 4 жыл бұрын
ian london You did a wonderful job in this role. I just loved the sound in this scene and how it trails to the next :) 🇨🇦
@ianharrodlondon
@ianharrodlondon 4 жыл бұрын
@D. Hodson Thank you so much 😎🎥
@cameronhowe1110
@cameronhowe1110 3 жыл бұрын
ian london you’re definitely committed to this joke
@sammytweedy7655
@sammytweedy7655 3 жыл бұрын
4:09 woah there you are, Ian!
@acnbk
@acnbk 6 жыл бұрын
I love this film, it's fucking hilarious!! the dinner scene is a masterpiece in and of itself, it's simultaneously funny, disturbing and tense... and Jonny Greenwood was robbed, his score is an all-timer.
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
The Shape of Water score was pretty great, but I totally agree it was awesome!
@iv0rysh0es39
@iv0rysh0es39 6 жыл бұрын
Lou Bloom I better check every corner of my room in case I'm ambushed by fucking asparagus!
@HQBacon
@HQBacon 6 жыл бұрын
Shape of Water is one of Desplat's weaker scores and it pales in comparison to Greenwood's imho
@meta409
@meta409 3 жыл бұрын
I thought I was the only one laughing out loud at times throughout the film. 😂
@MrDumpydoop
@MrDumpydoop 6 жыл бұрын
How Vicky Krieps didn't get an Oscar nom I will never understand
@mammontustado9680
@mammontustado9680 5 жыл бұрын
The oscars are shit and those who still follow it are fools.
@largelump3613
@largelump3613 2 жыл бұрын
Because she wasn't at all good? She portrays the character as snippy and rude.
@cinemonger1270
@cinemonger1270 Жыл бұрын
Ask Gwyneth Paltrow why she won an Oscar
@guy5529
@guy5529 Жыл бұрын
@@cinemonger1270 Harvey Weinstein is why she won
@theahulkushwah
@theahulkushwah 7 ай бұрын
For real, she was a highlight for me in the movie.
@geordangullock1237
@geordangullock1237 4 жыл бұрын
This film took quite a dark turn indeed! It's like a tale of a narcissist and a sociopath's toxic relationship.
@nanoryalambert5238
@nanoryalambert5238 3 жыл бұрын
I felt the same way when I looked at it. So I watched it again and came to that conclusion. NPD relationship. It was surreal. I will look at it again and again. I loved when she told him he needed to settle a bit.
@VladaPechenaya
@VladaPechenaya 2 жыл бұрын
@@nanoryalambert5238 who was the Narcissict -him or her - in your opinion? or both?
@nanoryalambert5238
@nanoryalambert5238 2 жыл бұрын
@@VladaPechenaya He was in my opinion....she just developed 'coping techniques' in order to deal with him because she loved him.
@YvieT81
@YvieT81 2 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts! I almost yelled narcissist at my screen watching him act the way he did. But then she started manipulating him in one of the most psycho ways to get him the way she wanted him…and in the end he just voluntarily let her! Which kinda made him a masochist as well I suppose
@marktesoro9578
@marktesoro9578 2 жыл бұрын
@@YvieT81 hence why in the end they were perfect for each other.
@Melissa-tw2gp
@Melissa-tw2gp 6 жыл бұрын
Love this movie and this video. Small correction. He makes a dress for all his love interests. When his sister breaks up with the first woman in the movie, she tells her she can keep her dress. It’s his way of controlling and containing his love interests then putting them to rest.
@TheDiscardedImage
@TheDiscardedImage 6 жыл бұрын
Agree it's up there with PTA's best. For me it's his most moving too. And after seeing it a few times now I don't even see the relationship as twisted, just truthful!
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Definitely, it perfectly fits into the overarching message of his films (as you pointed out).
@realrecognisereviews
@realrecognisereviews 6 жыл бұрын
This is my 5th favourite movie of his, which goes to show how great a director he is lol
@KungaMatata
@KungaMatata 4 жыл бұрын
Aaron Nichols Same! I gotta put Master, TWBB, Boogie Nights and Magnolia above this, but this is just as great!
@manolorca2185
@manolorca2185 5 жыл бұрын
Even though this video is already a couple of months old, I will give my two cents for it: Good capture of the nature of the movie. However, I would like to add something you basically forget: His relationship to his mother, better said the symbolism of his mother, which is like most obvious tool he uses to show us the character of Reynolds. He searches for the warmth and security of a parent (mother) and tries to fill this hole in his life by control of the environment and his life by perfection. You can see how disturbed and how uncomfortable he gets when suddenly he starts to chase Alma down to the party because of his feelings for her (maybe jealousy or trying to protect her) and realizes his vulnerability. He can't be vulnerable because then "somebody takes the corner of my room", as he put it in the dinner scene. So, only when he has to get vulnerable, and there is no other way than being weak (by getting sick) he starts to let himself fall in the warmth and security of another person - remembering of the security and warmth of his mother. This is my view, nonetheless I really liked your vid!
@seekeroftruth101
@seekeroftruth101 4 жыл бұрын
Very well said.
@lornai7171
@lornai7171 2 жыл бұрын
@ManoLorca I agree. Alma even says after she's poisoned him, "He is like a baby". Very Freudian subtext to this film!
@deprofundis3293
@deprofundis3293 5 ай бұрын
I'm 5 years late and just watched the movie, but I agree totally with this assessment!
@username4570
@username4570 6 жыл бұрын
I find this channel fascinating because you always interpret things so differently from the way I or the people I talk to do. For example I didn't think that him making that dress at the beginning was something at all unique to her. I thought it was very clear based on the way we are introduced to the girl that comes before Alma that he has a pattern of finding and discarding muses. The way it was shot and acted showed all the signs that this was a systematic approach that Reynolds has perfected over the years. Until she starts actively defying him I don't think she was any more special to him than any of the other girls have been. I also don't think that Reynolds is motivated by what other people think of him at all, otherwise he wouldn't be so childish and rude to everyone around him. He's motivated by his mother and by a desire for stability and control which he gets by making dresses and telling people what to do.
@glee7007
@glee7007 6 жыл бұрын
I think you're right about the muse aspect, but I would argue they are all each singularly special to Reynolds, until they aren't. He enjoys the honeymoon phase, so to speak. Alma finds a way to remain relevant beyond that.
@redsonja2291
@redsonja2291 5 жыл бұрын
I agree with you Brandon. I actually really like Reynolds as a character, I'm drawn to him, and he fascinates me. I also enjoy the relationship between him and Alma, not everything has to be on a bed of roses, and I loved the development of it throughout the movie.
@davidlean1060
@davidlean1060 6 жыл бұрын
I was wondering how often Reynolds was 'under the influence' during the film too. He sees a vision of his Mother while ill, so it is not a jump to think the mushrooms have psychedelic properties. It only dawned on me that he could be often under the influence frequently when he goes to the New Years Eve party. Wow, that set piece is beautiful....all those animal heads, if that is not a hint at Reynolds having a bit of a 'trip', I'm not sure what is! That scene also reminded me of The master, the first thing that came to my head while watching was Lancaster Dodd doing his 'man is not an animal..' bit. Like Reynolds sewing messages in to his dresses, PTA is sewing little messages in to the film.
@parisjej
@parisjej 2 жыл бұрын
HELLO
@marichristian
@marichristian 5 ай бұрын
You've obviously never been to a Chelsea Arts Ball.
@vicenteortegarubilar9418
@vicenteortegarubilar9418 6 жыл бұрын
The first time I heard about this film I believed it was a superhero movie, like "phantom threat" or maybe a bond movie title, Bond vs The Phantom Threat, and then Shirley Bassay starts singing PHAAANTOOM THREAAAAAAAT
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
You got something VERY different!
@SaberRexZealot
@SaberRexZealot 5 жыл бұрын
Metal Gear Solid
@RedSpiralHandTV
@RedSpiralHandTV 6 жыл бұрын
I thought it was so well made but was appalled at the dynamics of the relationship....I was completely shocked.
@redsonja2291
@redsonja2291 5 жыл бұрын
I was really drawn to the dynamics. I could see myself in both characters.
@1mancult
@1mancult 2 жыл бұрын
yeah its kind of crazy to have such a crazy relationship like this but i feel that this deeply intimate movie uses the romanticizing of this relationship in order to sort of try to give you a view of how the characters feel. it sort of puts this filter over the movie to kind of trick you into thinking this is a beautiful relationship like how the characters see it but deep down you know this is not good.
@andreastinellis23
@andreastinellis23 Жыл бұрын
Well that was the whole point of the film.
@robfalgiano
@robfalgiano 7 ай бұрын
I feel the film creates such interesting ambiguity that it leaves the viewer unable to judge whether their relationship actually “works.” If it DOES work, then it’s indeed in a twisted way. I mean, if I dated someone and knew they had intentionally poisoned me I’d have to walk away, but if we think metaphorically sometimes we end up with people who poison us emotionally yet there is something that keeps us there. In short, I have no f***ing idea.
@ScribblebytesWorldwide
@ScribblebytesWorldwide 2 ай бұрын
​@@robfalgiano😂😂😂 art
@briancollins1296
@briancollins1296 5 жыл бұрын
I feel like Phantom Thread is a sort of anti-Magnolia in how restrained it is. It's a movie that, bar some f-bombs and what have you, could easily have gotten a PG-13 rating, and a light one at that. It's missing some obvious Anderson tropes, but it still focuses on Anderson's central theme of how two people can find happiness in each other. It's strange, because in his previous films the main relationships tended to shift between healthy and abusive, keeping the two elements separated to a degree, whereas in Phantom Thread the relationship between Reynolds and Alma turns out healthy *because* it is mutually abusive. That's a very unorthodox dynamic, and I can see some people finding issue with it, not without good reason. At the same time that's what makes it so troubling and yet so endearing to me, because it makes sense that these unusual people would need an unusual dynamic in order to work out. Regardless, it's a great film that will probably only creep up my ranking of Anderson's films with time.
@travisspazz1624
@travisspazz1624 6 жыл бұрын
The best of the BP nominees from 2017!!
@nicolasfernandezmontes6820
@nicolasfernandezmontes6820 6 жыл бұрын
Agree
@talukdarripunjoy
@talukdarripunjoy 6 жыл бұрын
The Master and Phantom Thread are the two best films of the decade, IMO.
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
They're definitely up there for me too. I'd probably give it to Birdman and Shame as the two best, but these two are both up there too!
@DocSportello838
@DocSportello838 6 жыл бұрын
I agree, and there will be blood is the best movie from the previous decade
@smokeylonesome4328
@smokeylonesome4328 6 жыл бұрын
Mulholland Drive is the best film of the previous decade, but There Will Be Blood is a close second. I agree on The Master, though.
@sadboybb5570
@sadboybb5570 5 жыл бұрын
Y’all are sleeping on inherent vice.
@sadboybb5570
@sadboybb5570 5 жыл бұрын
Also her.
@szaboorsolya7433
@szaboorsolya7433 5 жыл бұрын
I listened to many interpretation videos but finally this one is really reaching the point. Thank you!
@gbrodey
@gbrodey 6 жыл бұрын
Great analysis! PT Anderson adds so much depth and subtext to his films that it's fun to explore and analyze. This is up there with my favorite of his films but it's under There Will Be Blood and The Master. Despite that all of his films are underrated masterpieces
@HerbalistGuybrush
@HerbalistGuybrush 3 жыл бұрын
Underrated? TwBb is best film of the century on almost all film best-of lists :D
@amanjaiswal9389
@amanjaiswal9389 6 жыл бұрын
Another great video of such a beautiful film by one of the best directors alive!Thanks
@AlonsoRules
@AlonsoRules 2 жыл бұрын
Phantom Thread is cinema at its absolute finest
@markparker4672
@markparker4672 6 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you did this. I absolutely loved this film and love hearing your essays.
@stephaniestanley8041
@stephaniestanley8041 2 жыл бұрын
The film was magical for me. I saw it twice in the theater. My Foolish Heart ❤️ sequence and the soundtrack swept me away and broke my heart.
@vscr
@vscr 6 жыл бұрын
Another great video! I was really excited by the idea of you covering this, and you didn't disappoint.
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ethan!
@luciabraithwaite3446
@luciabraithwaite3446 3 жыл бұрын
Beautifully put together, thank you
@cigsindoors
@cigsindoors 2 жыл бұрын
i am so certain this movie will be my favorite of all time by the end of my life. i see so much of myself in reynolds and it truly breaks my heart. this movie is so amazing and i’m glad i was on acid my first watch it rlly opened me up emotionally to the themes and cinematography and relationships
@ubermensch8022
@ubermensch8022 6 жыл бұрын
She Deserved The Oscar.
@tomsaer705
@tomsaer705 6 жыл бұрын
Couldn't WAIT for you to have a look at this one Jack. I listen to the soundtrack quite a lot on its own. Thanks for another amazing video, keep them coming
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tom! Will do!
@originaozz
@originaozz 6 жыл бұрын
Love your analysis!
@sharonamos6109
@sharonamos6109 2 жыл бұрын
Merry Christmas, Daniel!
@Abhishekisfunny
@Abhishekisfunny 6 жыл бұрын
Love this film so so so much!!
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
You and me both!
@LuisMartinez-rw2lj
@LuisMartinez-rw2lj 4 жыл бұрын
Also the fucking soundtrack is amazing and should’ve won best original soundtrack.
@mikeletaurus4728
@mikeletaurus4728 7 ай бұрын
Very good review. Thank you.
@aarond9563
@aarond9563 8 ай бұрын
Such a good video!
@alonzalmon1062
@alonzalmon1062 6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful video
@nurelhuda5684
@nurelhuda5684 4 жыл бұрын
After I have finished watching the movie, I did not understand it, I've enjoyed it and liked it, yet I did not understand it. I searched through youtube for a review, watched some, but they did not help. Until this one. Thank you for the great work.
@JacobiCreations
@JacobiCreations 6 жыл бұрын
You sold me on this movie. I'll be sure to check it out!
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Enjoy!
@Lampshade7
@Lampshade7 Ай бұрын
Really good analysis!!
@seekeroftruth101
@seekeroftruth101 4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic film. Must watch.
@jackfahy2283
@jackfahy2283 6 жыл бұрын
You should do a video on Tarkovsky’s film “ *Stalker* “ , very good film.
@sarahoshea9603
@sarahoshea9603 3 жыл бұрын
One of my top 3
@yusufalsanad
@yusufalsanad 6 жыл бұрын
Haven't yet watched "Phantom Thread", though it has been on my list of Must Watch since its' release, and after learning Daniel Day-Lewis has officially retired as an actor, which is sad to be honest, it's all the more the reason to do so! :D Awesome analysis as always!
@snowyfieldsforever
@snowyfieldsforever 3 жыл бұрын
This film is just so beautiful
@souryaanshagarwal9482
@souryaanshagarwal9482 4 жыл бұрын
Goddamn that was good. That totally changed my perception of the movie. Please start making videos again.
@NoblePringles
@NoblePringles 5 жыл бұрын
Greenwood was robbed man, the score has points that are legitimately up their with Debussy's great works.
@anass503
@anass503 4 жыл бұрын
Someone should explain to me the reason why I find this movie so relatable. I saw it and i'm having feelings I can't explain
@fullmetalheart9817
@fullmetalheart9817 6 жыл бұрын
I didn't necessarily like this movie but surely can appreciate it.
@samcad-ho3ze
@samcad-ho3ze 6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant analysis
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@andrewramirez739
@andrewramirez739 2 жыл бұрын
I didn’t even notice the butter symbolism! Great analysis
@truefilm1556
@truefilm1556 6 жыл бұрын
Haven`t seen the movie yet. The story doesn`t seem like much, when read as a synopsis, but after your usual (great) analysis I am positive that this is a fantastic movie about the human condition with incredibly nuanced performances and a gorgeous 1950s period look and feel. They say this is Day Lewis final performance before he retires. Well I hope he will change his mind. Thanks or sharing your great insight as always!
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
You summed it up perfectly! A great exploration of humanity performed by some great actors. I'm hoping this won't be his last performance, but if it is, he went out on a high note!
@pokerpickles2306
@pokerpickles2306 3 жыл бұрын
She buttered the frick out of that toast
@danielmusfeldt6393
@danielmusfeldt6393 5 жыл бұрын
Superb, dark film. Great analysis as well.
@dianafromcanada516
@dianafromcanada516 6 жыл бұрын
Hi. PTA is one of my favourite directors but I wasn't taken by this movie. Thank you for the review.
@JOEYNOSEBEATS
@JOEYNOSEBEATS Жыл бұрын
At the time of its release, Phantom Thread was predictably labeled a piece about toxic masculinity. Such croppage is common in mainstream (and even scholarly) publications as they adhere more and more to trendy topics of a given period. Six years later the story's branches are lot easier to identify. The main relationship in the film is a classic case of narcissist and co-dependent. Reynolds Woodcock (the latter noun is hardly coincidence) hosts a revolving door of women (fuel), triangulates each of these relationships with his sister (and main flying monkey) Cyril, and uses his profession (art) as a cover for the balance of his emotional distance and abuse. What makes Alma different is the understanding that she'll eventually be discarded and replaced. See her quote: "whatever you do, do it gently" or "I'm waiting for you to get rid of me". She knows what's at play yet is still taken by the built-in lovebombing in dating one of London's most sought after designers. Who wouldn't be? Despite her instincts, Alma challenges Reynolds with verbal quips and consistently attempts to detour his strict work/life routine. Fortunately for the audience, there's an absurd charm within Reynolds' rigid pretense. Is there a genuine gentleman deep down? Or has this act simply been refined with time like his art? It seems paint by numbers: an invitation to an elegant dinner, modeling Alma for a dress, the walk along a gorgeous landscape of the countryside, refraining on the first night (or until there's clear signal) but cutely pulling her toward him into his room on the second. And so on. It's no surprise that the very next morning after they consummate, Reynolds berates Alma for buttering her toast too loudly. In fact, he compares it to riding a horse through his dining room; a shot to her social status in contrast to his. Over time Alma quickly learns that it's probably best to immediately find a withdrawn, upset Reynolds and shower him with apology. It gets to a point where Woodcock doesn't even have to say anything as Alma acts as if she knows what's going on his mind. "Allow me to drive" is very reminiscent of Cyril's suggestion that he leave for the countryside a night early while she handles his dirty work in Joanna. All of these women are forced to interpret this silent treatment as "what would Reynolds most like at this very moment and how can I grant him such?" The plot veers from reality as it tries to rehabilitate Reynolds with Alma's pure love (or undying desperation, take your pick). Who else would marry someone that is only bearable whilst on their deathbed? Sadly, I'm not sure that's even enough for a narcissist to take responsibility for anything, let alone their abuse. PT Andersen deceptively tugs on the audience's heart strings with the allure of 50's British etiquette and glamour where a dress and tuxedo is suitable for every restaurant, everything is candle lit, and set to omnipotent evening solo piano. The initial manner of the upper class presents itself as quiet, gentle, and respectful of space. Beneath the obvious, the audience clamors for Alma to accept Reynolds' marriage proposal. She stalls (and we feel it) only to accept (and boy do we feel that too). Would you?
@_Azagoth_
@_Azagoth_ 6 жыл бұрын
please, PLEASE review *Gattaca* and *The Proposition* , both are criminally underappreciated masterpieces of 90's cinema, and both have so much to say on not only their respective genres, but humanity as a whole.
@BatDevilSpawn
@BatDevilSpawn 6 жыл бұрын
Still yet to see the movie, but I'm definitely going to since PTA is one of my all time favorite directors. Just wondering, is PTA one of your all-time favorite filmmakers? If so or not, who are your favorites at this point in time?
@willpalmer7266
@willpalmer7266 6 жыл бұрын
Can we get another video in a similar style to the shame one? I know it's a lot of effort but it's really interesting to listen to! (Great vid by the way)
@JacksMovieReviews
@JacksMovieReviews 6 жыл бұрын
Those are very tough to make-it essentially is 2 or 3 weeks worth of work. I definitely hope to do more, but am unsure when I'll have more time...
@willpalmer7266
@willpalmer7266 6 жыл бұрын
Jack's Movie Reviews K it's cool man good you=good vids keep it up
@C1216MC
@C1216MC 6 жыл бұрын
When I saw the movie I only saw it beacuse it was nominated at the oscars, I had already heard the score, but only that I didnt knew who was PTA and only knew that Daniel is an acclimed actor. This is the best movie of the year, the score is in my top 5 and I'm gonna watch PTA movies.
@C1216MC
@C1216MC 6 жыл бұрын
Screw best movie of the year, best of the decade, the only movie that I think could top this film is The irishman, I know it wont come out until 2019, but were talking about a Scorsese crime gangster film, with De Niro, Pacino, Pesci, and Keitel so the film has a lot of potential, and the guy who wrote it has a lot of talent. Or maybe just like with this movie the best will be another one I have no expectations.
@nateds7326
@nateds7326 5 жыл бұрын
I think Kubrick really is the stanly Kubrick of our day. Much like Kubrick his style just evokes a specific emotion that’s impossible to describe and yet instantly recognizable. He’s also obviously a great director,thats part of it.
@salvatore.MJP7
@salvatore.MJP7 6 күн бұрын
In my opinion, he knew deeply that he was a weak person because he couldn’t manage his manners alone or perhaps because he was too demanding of what to eat, drink etc etc.. in which he lacked any capacity to cope with normal daily circumstances unless it is put down the way he wants, this bothering weakness is something I suffer too, which is why I relate to him and it’s why I too would be attracted to a person like emma, she embraces mess which is a power I have no potential for. Yet, even after, things don’t settle down, putting two people of inherently different ways in which both of them can’t change for the other and doesn’t have to do so creates ambiguous conflicts.
@marichristian1072
@marichristian1072 3 жыл бұрын
Truly insightful analysis.My only point of disagreement is that Alma has been feeding him mushrooms before his collapse. If she had, there would be no contrast between his former insufferable self and his post collapse "rebirth" self.
@sarahoshea9603
@sarahoshea9603 3 жыл бұрын
This was a truer depiction of a BDSM relationship than the horrifying abuse-porn that was 50 Shades. A good complement to Secretary (if you've never seen that, watch it and you'll easily understand my comparison).
@film_magician
@film_magician 4 жыл бұрын
This was the only blu ray i've ever pre-ordered. I love it so much. PTA and Lewis need to team up again. But if they don't, we have this as their swan song
@Beyersdorff
@Beyersdorff 4 жыл бұрын
they're together in There Will Be Blood as well
@F3ldman
@F3ldman 5 жыл бұрын
this is a very good analysis but, and this is a testament to the film, i think you vastly oversimplified a few aspects of the relationship.
@uncledexter9210
@uncledexter9210 3 жыл бұрын
Stupid to assume she's poisoned him multiple times throughout the film when it is never mentioned or hinted at. Nice vid!
@rasmust.
@rasmust. 6 жыл бұрын
You are a genius
@thomasmclaughlin6793
@thomasmclaughlin6793 4 жыл бұрын
I smiled for the whole movie
@ruukaoz
@ruukaoz 3 жыл бұрын
i don't agree that Alma controls him in the end. I think its just the process that matters. She needed to break his ego. I believe that after Reynolds realises that Alma's been poisoning him, and she confesses in spectacular fashion (no pun intended :D), the poisoning is no longer necessary. Either way, I don't think that she becomes the dominant, only he realises that he needs her, and he'll never find another woman who will be equal to him, and accepts her as so. And also through the hallucinations by poison, he achieves closure with the ghost of his mom. A "ghost" he probably made many of his ex lovers in the house... Who knows, maybe some of them still work there.
@pam0626
@pam0626 3 жыл бұрын
“Mastering the self”. Do you think PTA knew that this was the running theme he wanted to explore at the beginning of his career?
@danielmusfeldt6393
@danielmusfeldt6393 5 жыл бұрын
Astute analysis
@AndrewHunterMusic
@AndrewHunterMusic 2 жыл бұрын
The film is a clever tale about S&M.
@nelisezpasce
@nelisezpasce 6 жыл бұрын
Please do not put visual spoilers for other movies without a warning. Consider using the description for that!
@smokeylonesome4328
@smokeylonesome4328 6 жыл бұрын
Why would you watch an analysis for a film you haven’t seen?
@nelisezpasce
@nelisezpasce 6 жыл бұрын
Sorry, I mean the other PTA movies mentioned near the end. I want to watch The Master since that one wasn't shot by Elswit, and it makes me curious!
@smokeylonesome4328
@smokeylonesome4328 6 жыл бұрын
Oh. The Master is his best film, and one of the 20 best of all time.
@maulcs
@maulcs 6 жыл бұрын
There was no visual spoiler that I saw for The Master.
@1qwasz12
@1qwasz12 4 жыл бұрын
If you love cinema, you'll love the unfortunately named Phantom Thread. This is PTA's best movie since There Will Be Blood.
@TracyWerner4Prez
@TracyWerner4Prez 2 жыл бұрын
The sickness brings humility to Reynolds. So he chooses the pain in order to remain in a state of gratitude. Inflicting physical pain for spiritual gain is what I also do every day I wake up early and destroy my body in the gym. I inflict the pain because my flesh is weak and I can be a b$*ch really fast like Reynolds. I don't think their relationship is sick. A sick relationship to me is like the one from leaving Las Vegas. Also isn't Alma giving him shrooms? 🤟
@SLE3PR
@SLE3PR 3 жыл бұрын
It's my personal favorite of his, but I'm also a romantic by nature.
@ssimpson3288
@ssimpson3288 6 жыл бұрын
In regards to the question asked I would have to say no it's not acceptable to do something negative so in the future something positive happens. Take gaming for example. I love video games but I'm not a fan of the Dark Souls series. I played and beat the first game and the whole negatives of having to fight and die a million times until I was finally able to beat a boss and receive a positive out of it just wasn't worth it in my opinion and as a result I have no interest in playing 2 or 3. Alma and Reynolds putting themselves through the abuse(negative)just so they can realize they love each other later on(positive)in my opinion just isn't worth it. Their entire relationship is going to be one of mainly abuse with few fleeting moments of positivity. Any kids they bring into the world are most likely going to be either on the receiving end of said abuse or subject to watching their parents do it to one another so that's just going to fuck up any kids they have. Both Alma and Reynolds are absolutely horrible people with one being a sociopath and the other being an elitist douchebag. This movie should be used as a learning tool to show what abuse looks like in a relationship and when to walk the fuck away.
@divyababu8327
@divyababu8327 5 жыл бұрын
Exactly!! I was waiting to read a comment like that. It's a great movie, but the characters are 'f....ed up'. She sought to wait n manipulate her way when the signs of abuse were there from the beginning. She could have left but she did not. One would never wish a daughter to do that!! n the whole mushroom thing is so off!! How do they trust each other I wonder n kids!!!
@nievesshiratama3964
@nievesshiratama3964 3 жыл бұрын
Very much true!
@SalixAcroCat
@SalixAcroCat 3 жыл бұрын
When I read the synopsis, I was so fascinated by it; I could swear I would love it. I watched it, and hated it. Reynolds is a man-child; Alma should've jumped ships.
@georgekokivanegas7083
@georgekokivanegas7083 3 ай бұрын
After watching Phantom Thread and The Killer I think both actors could've switched movies and nothing would've changed. Same personas
@redsonja2291
@redsonja2291 5 жыл бұрын
This is not how I viewed this movie at all. I'm in love with this movie, the movie I see from my point of view that is.
@jqyhlmnp
@jqyhlmnp 2 жыл бұрын
Bruh, that’s a tough order to remember
@davidphillips3925
@davidphillips3925 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone besides me see that this movie is a remake of My Fair Lady and Pretty Woman--perhaps with much deeper emotional content but nevertheless the same story. Man meets and "fashions" girl into his vision of the perfect woman and then falls in love with her. The primary give-away being when DDLewis says that Alma can go back where she came from.
@tomd6053
@tomd6053 5 жыл бұрын
You left out how she is with him when they take the dress back. How she defends his work, how they’re on the same page with that. Good movie just fucked up. People are crazy. What ever happened to normal relationships!
@krisxxxxw
@krisxxxxw 4 жыл бұрын
Wow
@kshitijkamble2894
@kshitijkamble2894 4 жыл бұрын
i feel it's just an updated and more mature version of the beauty and the beast, just saying.
@josephmorales652
@josephmorales652 4 жыл бұрын
Kshitij Kamble hahah in a way, yes.
@randomguy6679
@randomguy6679 3 жыл бұрын
In a weird way
@assbitchfuck6927
@assbitchfuck6927 6 жыл бұрын
s&m this story is
@RespecttheScreenplay
@RespecttheScreenplay 7 ай бұрын
Just finished this film for the first time 😂the toxicity
@aretnap3653
@aretnap3653 2 жыл бұрын
"They're *Co-Dependant!"*
@parisjej
@parisjej 2 жыл бұрын
You know I wondered why she was so joyful and smiling everytime he got sick 😂 She was doing witchcraft on that man he was right when he pleaded for his sister help. He was on Shrooms lol 😂
@ilqar887
@ilqar887 5 жыл бұрын
How we become masters of our life's ?
@rosevanguard
@rosevanguard 7 ай бұрын
So what can he do do for her.
@RufusMcNasty
@RufusMcNasty 11 ай бұрын
I feel like there's something much larger to this movie. They're constantly cutting back to alma talking about how Reynolds is this unstoppable force. Let's not forget how old and wealthy Reynolds is in the movie. He doesn't need love and there's a very prominent scene where he wants to dismiss alma to make "the house" of woodcock great. (he's talking to his sister whom I think you should've discussed more). Let's go back to Reynolds and why he loves Alma. I think it's much more primitive. Alma represents the ultimate mother figure. What does he miss? What does Alma want to do for him most? If you listen to Alma near the end of the movie, she almost describes him as God. "living in HIS world" "I can see the past future and present". I believe PTA is bringing a more spiritual view of relationships. Reynolds is God and Alma is Shiva. She destroys and recreates God and the world as they see fit. She's only there to judge and nurture the failure of God
@RufusMcNasty
@RufusMcNasty 11 ай бұрын
They're both tragic characters and when you describe them as "twisted" you undermind their brilliancy
@RufusMcNasty
@RufusMcNasty 11 ай бұрын
But it's a good video. Way better movie
@CC-mr5xq
@CC-mr5xq 3 жыл бұрын
After I watched this, I tried the same thing on my boyfriend but it didn't turn out so well.
@gorequillnachovidal
@gorequillnachovidal 6 жыл бұрын
Nothing in life is gained without sacrifice.
@meta409
@meta409 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much me and wife’s relationship 😂
@RabidMortal1
@RabidMortal1 6 жыл бұрын
"it begs the question"...when you meant "it prompts the question"...
@DamjanPlamenac
@DamjanPlamenac 4 жыл бұрын
She poisons him twice. Not more than that.
@marichristian1072
@marichristian1072 Жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@doublediamond9226
@doublediamond9226 4 жыл бұрын
Phantom Thread makes me laugh more than most so called comedies.
@sharonamos6109
@sharonamos6109 2 жыл бұрын
What are you doing?
@dortvela
@dortvela Жыл бұрын
#staytoxic
@wispboy0704
@wispboy0704 2 жыл бұрын
They are both very creepy .Great acting though
@raymondergarcia
@raymondergarcia Жыл бұрын
I write this interpretation of The Phantom Thread not to ignite debates or arguments, but to state the truth. Because at its root, the truth, simply - cannot be reduced. I give fair warning that this post will be long and challenging to both read and to come to terms with its claim, as with the story of Daniel Day Lewis the actor, it comes with grave consequences and a heavy heart. A true matter of life and death. So for those without the intellectual stamina to engage in critical thought, I will spare you the agony and suggest you allow your mind to wander to a more shallow end of the pool. And to those who as Shakespeare writes, would rather choose death over life, "To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;"... I recommend you return to your slumber of the mundane. As we souls trying to awaken continue on our journey, there is no room to haul around dead weight. I begin by addressing the elephant presently in the room, which at the time of this film's release, had yet to stomp on stage. But that's neither here nor there, as today is all we really have and today Daniel Day Lewis has made his first "public appearance" in over 4 years. The legendary giant of an actor had chosen quite the non-public setting of the Big Apple to publicize his private will. Now I will extract the meat from a recent yahoo article to lay the groundwork as they are integral clues and will connect the dots of this layered story, with his life being a sort of parody, or extension of his movie making career. The article states, "Daniel Day-Lewis will no longer be working as an ACTOR," his rep (re-present-ative) at the time, Leslee Dart, said in a statement to Variety. "He is immensely grateful to all of his collaborators and audiences over the many years. This is a PRIVATE decision and neither he nor his re-presentatives will make any further comment on THIS SUBJECT." Essentially this is saying that DDL (his name abbreviated for short) will no longer be a public character, but is choosing to be a private man. Suggesting he has served his term and is NOW aware between the difference of being PUBLIC vs PRIVATE in a legal sense. I will expand on this later. Furthermore, the article again quotes DDL, "All my life, I've mouthed off about how I should stop acting, and I don't know why it was different THIS TIME (referring to the post part dum depression of making the film as we will find he admits to later), but the impulse to quit took ROOT in me, and that became a COMPULSION," For clarity, Webster's defined compulsion as, "the action or state of forcing or being forced to do something; constraint." That theme of being forced to do something against one's will, by force, is not only present in DDL's life, in the characters of the Phantom Thread's fictional lives, but in all of our fictitious lives. To quote DDL once again, he states, "BEFORE making the film, I didn't know I was going to stop acting," he told W. "I do know that Paul and I laughed a lot before we made the movie. And then we stopped laughing because we were both overwhelmed by a sense of SADNESS. That took us by surprise: We didn't realize what WE HAD GIVEN BIRTH TO." Presuming the laughter stopped AFTER making the film. Spoiler alert, the action he had given BIRTH to was compulsory in nature, carried out by force and we will see both in the movie and as in Shakespeare's Hamlet, we also face the same sea of troubles of outrageous fortunes that Daniel is navigating through. How we decide to face those troubles is the ultimate way out of the storm. To be or not To be. In what? In war? I choose peace. Finally, the article ends with the admission of DDL: At the time, Daniel said he had no intention of watching the FINAL CUT of the movie. "Not wanting to see the film is CONNECTED to the decision I've made to stop working as an actor," he explained. "But it's not why the SADNESS CAME TO STAY. That HAPPENED DURING THE TELLING OF THE STORY, and I don't really know why." The article concludes with no cliffhanger. It ends with clear confirmation that his decision to stop acting is DIRECTLY connected to his contribution to, as he puts it, "THE BIRTH" of this film, which told a story so steeped and rooted in sadness too literal to believe. The tragic hero. The failed antagonist. The role we have all been deceptively given on the world's stage. If you've made it this far, I commend you. We've pushed and fought through a field of thick and thorny brush, but rest assured we've made it through the other side, and have reached the meadow where the flowers of truth shall reveal themselves. And as with the blossom of a flower, inevitably comes the death of its petals. As the story begins, the tragic hero, Alma, recounts her blossom as her story unfolds. She imagines for the audience a palace of sorts to the likeness of a castle. One that only the eschalant of society has access to, one that she only dreamed to be a part of. Throughout the story, her character buds with exuberance as if displayed at the wedding of a royal court, only to be tossed overboard and meet the same demise of her metaphoric death once the last of her petals had fallen. Here is where you brace yourself for the ultimate truth. The same root that took hold in Daniel Day Lewis after making this film. DISCLAIMER, I speak generally as I am making the assumption that the reader of this post is part of the "known" world which has been colonized and commercialized. But I will tell you who Woodcock is, who Alma is, and who Cyril re-present in YOUR fictional, but legal life. Because all allegories are about you. A tragic yet true poetic allegory. Like the bible, like Shakespeare's Fair Youth Sonnets, ALL stories are about - you. All the world's a stage, and we are merely actors in it. Pull the curtain. Let the show begin. Black's law dictionary defines a "delivery" as the expulsion or extraction of the FETUS AND ITS MEMBRANES. Now I want you to conjure up the image of the opening scene that depicts the words Phantom Thread written in white cursive against a black backdrop. Simple, minimal, yet layered in meaning. Straight to the point of the needle. Can you see the shape I am seeing? With its native hue of resolution? It is a fetus in the mother's womb, cohesive and uncut. All pieces are still consistent. Void of space between the lines as it continues from beginning to end with no CUT. This symbol is the fetus, as it evolves in the womb of a pregnant mother, connected to the wall of her uterus and what I will refer to as the "extra embryonic material" of baby, or more scientifically referred to as, the PLACENTA. As a side note yet an important note, the word placenta is of Greek origin and it translates to "cake", which should give you pause the next time you celebrate, or as I like to more accurately put it, memorialize the person attached to the "birth" date, blow out/ex-spire its candles to make a wish, and as Marie Antoinette so brutally said, "let them eat cake". Are you beginning to see where I am headed? Now's your chance to like Woodcock tells Alma (in a more derogatory way), exit stage left. Go home if you can't handle the truth. Because the truth is bitter and has no concern for your love. You can offer up a plate of the most delicate asparagus coated in the finest butter, and the truth will shit all over your plate without remorse. I must address one more useful fact before we get to the MATTER of fact. The term birth is akin to "berth" which Black's Law defines as 1. a place where passengers sleep on a ship or train. 2. where a boat is moored when loading and discharging passengers or cargo. In other words, the arrival of a vessel at sea that enters a port and docks with permission of the dock master. An interesting fact, till this day the dock master of a port still issues a berth certificate which has been registered and incorporated into some sort of commercial body of law. A copy of this certificate is handed to the captain of the arriving ship. Coincidence? Are echoes of citizen-SHIP ringing in your head yet? We've only yet to arrive at the crime scene, the violent act has yet to occur. The sin is still brewing. But I'm sure this puzzle is beginning to take shape in your mind. Now I want you to recall as best you can, your memories of being born. I will use my own story as the prop as it tells the tale of the most recent metaphoric ship to arrive here on MY Earth. From the moment of fertilization to the 40 weeks thereafter of our first child, was all a blur. In over my head, all I could anticipate was the birth of my to be child. Ill-informed, naive and ignorant that within my wife grew a single cell zygote, and was developing into a multi-organ'd fetus with a very special organ and a very special function known as the extra embryonic material that bonds baby and momma in the womb. I gave it little thought as I was preoccupied with work and the mundane of life. And before I could stop to take it all in and meditate on the gravity of the situation, 40 weeks passed by in the blink of my bright eyes. And it happened one night. In the middle of the night. I found myself driving myself, my wife, and my expected baby to the scene of the crime.
@raymondergarcia
@raymondergarcia Жыл бұрын
As my wife lay strapped to the hospital bed with a catheter intruding one end, and a needle pierced through another, she struggled in labor as if reduced to a ward in an insane asylum, trying to fight off both the pain of labor and the humility of incarceration. But we "had faith" in the institution we had trusted, and believed they knew what was best for her, thus we had no hesitations as my wife was monitored by machines like a mouse in a cage, a test subject of sorts, injected with foreign fluids, violating her most intimate space as they conducted "internal checks" at an excessive rate, and worst of all, induced a numb sensation throughout her body as they administered a drug in the form of an epidural that sent shockwaves of depressants through her central nervous system; sending her body to a momentary death. A death just long enough to deprive her of the natural God given sensations of bearing her first child. That Nirvanic and beautiful pain was stolen in the sake of discouragement and pity... Vanishing by the wayside of artificial chemicals whose potion was crafted to sensor the truth. But Alas, our baby had traveled through the metaphoric canal, still connected to the nautical naval, now ready to exit the waters of mother; The contractions (meaning to bring together or to abridge) had emerged closer, her cervix had gone through waves of dilatations (breadth, widening, the opening of the puerta/door/portal) and baby's crown was finally visible. Ahhh!!! With nervous excitement and blood filled anticipation, I ready myself to meet a Queen, a King, I don't know the gender yet, but I do know they are sovereign and royal as I can with clarity see a CROWN! The ghost of my wife in all her visible agony, yet void of complete sensation, then pushed out the evolutionary entirety of our 23 chromosome donation that has for 40 weeks evolved from a single cell zygote into a fully developed unique, original, vintage fetus with a 46 chromosomes "original package" that belonged to her and only her. And she is born. It all happened so fast, gleefully and still flushed with nerves I let the dockmaster do their job as they checked the vitals of the baby. Then they handed our child to her mother for the first time and in my vulnerable state of ghostly presence, the dockmaster asked me, "Dad, would you like to CUT THE CORD?" As if an honor only meant for the most deserving had been bestowed upon me, a twisted milestone of sorts. I stupidly, ignorantly, and hastily fall for the trap. And I commit the crime of aborting my own child from all her extra embryonic material. Her possessions. The ark that guided her genetic covenant through the allegorical 40 days and 40 nights of her Noah's flood. The Church that housed and sheltered her most holy of sacraments, and the baby Jesus that was her sacrificial lamb and bore her crossing of her motherland from the country where no man returns. In an instant. Without even asking my baby or considering her wishes, I abandoned her property that was so pure and innocent, unblemished, and without defects. She is now the phantom of the opera as the French saying goes, "Le Mort Vivant". The living dead. All the while, her placenta was still pulsating and yet to be naturally delivered from momma. And as Shakespeare so eloquently put it, her "Fair Youth", had ended before it had the chance to begin. The dockmaster and his goonies then yanked my baby's extra embryonic material out of her mother and disposed of it as if dumping a bag of trash. Unappreciated and neglected. Still alive and pulsating with blood, on its way to becoming a deposit and the MATTER of fact. THEE specimen that gave rise to the birth certificated decedent estate known as my daughters name. Held in title. Held in trust. Abandoned, unclaimed by it's rightful owner, and pirated at the Cestui Que Vie trust law of the holy sea. Oh Henry VIII, you murderous king! You are to blame! You are the fault which caused me to de-fault on my child! She is not at fault! How could she be? She is but a precious jewel who's my job it was to protect. Ahhh!!!! You useful idiot! Not only have I failed to protect my child in her arrival, I am an assailant to the crime. A stumbling fool caught red handed with the weapon. Running with scissors never ends well. And as the saying goes, "the first cut is the deepest". And this is just the first of many natural shocks the flesh is heir to. Allah Shakespeare speaks truth once again. Like a drunken fool, I had offered up her dowry as she readies for her consummation. Enter Woodcock stage left. The proverbial Woodcock is behind the curtains in the backroom, fashioning her a new wedding dress, as the marriage between Church and STATE is about to commence. And with the weaving of a spell, with bright eyes I am handed a form. This form that con-forms to the will of another. An unseen force, yet one that strikes fear and as Alma puts it. Demands respect. Demands every piece of you. I handed the form over to my wife who was still in a state of pain and agony. And with her sign of nature, through her voluntary consent, and on my dumb watch, she offers her sig-nature as the legal guardian and informant letting the receiver know the cargo is ready for the taking. Like a chattel branded with hot iron and coal, my baby has been given a name. Not not just a name, but has been assigned a TITLE in ALL CAPS to signify her place in office. Still bright eyed with incompetence, I am told that I must take this evidentiary piece of paper to an elusive office of vital records to Re-chord her TITLE in a ritualistic registration. Ahh, she is now regal like Alma, the courting ended faster than it began. She had been placed on a pedestal and her dimensions have been taken by the metaphoric Woodcock with meticulous precision as his bookkeeper Cyril jots down her statics for the re-cord. Head circumference, length of arms, length of legs, body, belly. It is done. Her identification has been alchemized. And she is now part of the House of Woodcock. What was once the property of one becomes the property of another. From gill breathing sperm to encapsulated egg, this single cell zygote which has the handprint of God, Da Vinci's Sistine chapel, has been desecrated. Though the water creature fish had fully developed into a healthy amphibian fetus, simultaneously living in the waters yet breathing oxygen through the interface of her mother through the holy bond they genetically shared via the placenta. To finally, a walking, breathing, spirit filled bipedal in its entirety... I ruined, in the act of the cut. Dis-ease. To be out of ease. Without peace. Unwhole. In the eyes of the Church, this child now needs salvaging which can only come through salvation. The church is there to offer her Jesus, Buddha, and Allah. In the eyes of the STATE, she is incompetent and inconsistent. Another loony in the loony house. The STATE is there to offer its services of administration, benefits, and the management of her Cesqui Vie Trust as an incestuous and wretched trustee. And Woodcock. The middleman. The one who sewed her phantom limb back together again. Daniel Day Lewis. The useful idiot, so pompous and well respected. Revered by the masses. Whose name carries clout! The truth is out of our control yet it is inside of us all. Oh you stranger on KZfaq! The gull to speak such blasphemies about my life!?! You digital avatar dare rain on my parade?! Well more often than not, the things we most cherish in life, are the things most toxic for our health. Ask Alma, as she desperately tries to gain the love and affection of Woodcocks, yet ironically faces the constant growing scorn of his condescending abuse. Toxic and un-natural. The marriage of CHURCH and STATE. Ultimately Alma is marginalized to an empty vessel without a soul. Le Mort Vivant. She has fallen for his trap. And is now the living dead. From the moment they had first locked eyes in the restaurant, Woodcock had found his mark. She was both his mark and his beast, his frankenstein to defame. He would chip away at her spirit, until she had little resemblance to the purity she once had. Expressed by his insatiable appetite, she would be something too grotesque to salvage. The first meeting of the two at the restaurant is the most important scene as it begins her downfall. Naively she enters into a contract with him as she takes his glutenous order. He asks her to re-member it, to make it part of her as if a member of one's family. He takes the original paper, symbolic of the evidentiary contract. He asks her out for dinner, knowing she would accept as she never stood a fighting chance. She then seals the deal in the act of handing him a document giving her Name (title), date, and initials, and most important; her voluntary sign of nature. He found his mark. She had given her signature and symbolically registered it into his keeping. The act of registration. This was not the first time the house of Woodcock needed a new body. Not a woman, not a soul inspired by God, but a vibrant, youthful body of whose soul was to be sucked away. That was the real deal. She had entered into a commercial trust that would revolve around her body being the collateral for the agreement evidenced by her birth certificated decedent (dead) estate. The part of her that was living once, as Shakespear says, " For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, When we have shuffled off this mortal coil". That mortal coil, reader, is the toroidal, spiral, umbilical cord that attaches baby to mother through the interface of the placenta, which is then alchemically sewn back together by the dressmaker with his phantom thread.
@raymondergarcia
@raymondergarcia Жыл бұрын
Woodcock made it clear on their first intimate rendezvous that he was not interested in her love, but her equity, strictly a matter of business. He would use her and abuse her without remorse, just a subject to be profited from. Commercialized. He would parade her around in the manner that his aristocratic clients would do in his dresses. His job was to fashion, to fabricate and weave a story of lies, and extort her essence by deriving an artifact in the form of a dress that had a link to her God given biological estate. And he did this with the phantom thread as the bond holding that TRUST in place, re-attaching her metaphoric deposit, a.k.a. the phantom limb. Her anty, her chip in the game. Her placenta. As Shakespeare Hamlet says, "Ay there's the rub." She was to suffer the same fate as Joanna did in the very early onset of the story once Alma's asset had been fully depreciated and sucked dry. Nothing more than a tax write-off to be sent to salvage. Alma, being a native of the land, Cyril instructed Woodcock to visit "the country" to find their next SUBJECT. Cyril said, "I will be there tomorrow". Alma, the indigenous woman, had begun her journey innocent and without defect. Sovereign. And had fallen into a conspiracy too evil to be believed. We readers, if you are still there, have suffered the same trap as Alma. Our God inspired/spiritual native, indigenous manhood and womanhood has been stripped of its sovereignty. We've been domiciled and domesticated from the people of the land to the souls lost at sea. Dead souls at that. A resident of the Situs. A citizen of the STATE. In her fit of jealousy and insecurity, Alma confronts the French princess by reminding the princess that the House of Woodcock was her residence. Do not make the same mistake as Alma. Do not be Hamlet and let the seed of injustice rot into a fruit of passion and revenge. You must be a pacifist and learn to forgive and forget. In full disclosure, I haven't even finished watching the film, but I think I know how this story will end. As Hollywood partakes in the soft disclosure of the truth, with an insidious twist that is; Alma becomes the tragic hero by devising a plan to murder and poison Woodcock. She is the Hamlet of Denmark. Enraged in madness, stooping to the same level as her abuser. She has made the decision to not let bygones be bygones, or let dead dogs lay, she seeks vengeance to, "settle the score". The world is a game and I'm just a player in it. That is my prize and I will compete for its deed. I think I will end here. I've beaten this horse to death and there is no more water for it to drink. Now that you've made it to the end, you can now re-watch this movie with a new frame of reference. The reference of TRUTH. Once you see the truth you can't unsee it. It will crawl out from the underbelly of the beast and shine like the brightest star. Daniel Day Lewis knows this. He has perpetuated this story in many of his "his-storically" based films. Glazing over the past, romanticizing, dramatizing, and propagandizing the "jus cogens" to the people fallen victim. Crimes of humanity. The trafficking of the innocent. Oh the twisted irony of the holly-wood. Now go. And return the authority back to yourself by the only means possible. Not through the sword, but through the word. Become the author of your own story and correct the fault that was not yours to begin. I gave you a shovel. Now dig.
@Jarski225
@Jarski225 2 жыл бұрын
I disagree with your interpretation. Great movie.
Paul Thomas Anderson | Crafting The Perfect Scene
14:53
Spikima Movies
Рет қаралды 63 М.
A Film With No Cinematographer: Phantom Thread
10:32
In Depth Cine
Рет қаралды 385 М.
WHY IS A CAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN A GIRL?
00:37
Levsob
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Кәріс өшін алды...| Synyptas 3 | 10 серия
24:51
kak budto
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Cute Barbie Gadget 🥰 #gadgets
01:00
FLIP FLOP Hacks
Рет қаралды 51 МЛН
Phantom Thread | Daniel Day-Lewis' Quotable Confrontations
8:49
Focus Features
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Phantom Thread | "You Might Wish You Were Going To Die"
8:28
Focus Features
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Narcissistic Facades | What Makes Amy Dunne SO Disturbing
28:07
Paul Thomas Anderson | Creating Romance With Camera
9:44
Spikima Movies
Рет қаралды 37 М.
Her - Exploring Love
11:50
Jack's Movie Reviews
Рет қаралды 127 М.
PHANTOM THREAD | For The Hungry Boy (Deleted Scenes)
4:52
ANNAPURNA
Рет қаралды 153 М.
Eyes Wide Shut | Moral Of The Story (Film Analysis)
14:05
Life Is A Story
Рет қаралды 331 М.
True Detective's Hidden Philosophy Explained
18:03
zuttoshow
Рет қаралды 147 М.
Phantom Thread reviewed by Mark Kermode
11:47
kermodeandmayo
Рет қаралды 210 М.
Funny AstroLOLogy Meme - Past Time Fun Taurus  #shorts #cartoon #haha
0:18
HooplaKidz TV - Funny Cartoons For Kids
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Who will eat Nutella? 🥳 Challenge #shorts
0:18
Balashik show
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН