You are right. We can have science, when the world is regular most of the time. We don't need 100% of the time.

Same here, my husband had the same theory

preciselly because otherwise " we? " could not have had this " conversation ". It's beautyful isn't it..?

It seems that speculation can take you anywhere you wanted to go. We have a long set of wish lists (religious theologies). All putting us in the center of the action. When it is pretty obvious that we are not.

OK, I'll bite. Your video of images matched to rad beats got me. I have been perceiving existence as polarity of +1 and -1. Are you implying the polarity is +1 and 0? I recently had a discussion on reddit (chat) with someone arguing that position. To me, the zero state/ lack of activity is the womb and the positive and negative polarity is our world. In a Trinitarian sense, God is the void, God's Son is the "matter" spoken/vibrated by the void and God's Spirit is formless breath/ energy. If I am speaking to a similar aspect of your book, how does my metaphor differ?

​@@guywhoisnotbob *"Your video of images matched to rad beats got me."* ...KZfaq's automated bots took down the video even though every segment was pulled from other KZfaq videos. It was deemed *"too violent for community standards"* by KZfaq. Amazon KDP's automated bots also refuses to publish this same book. Support emails stated that the author's name *(1)* _"may be too confusing to their customers."_ Even CTT's own comment thread has automated input filters that prevent me from posting certain words, links, or phrases. Yes, even on a channel that's dedicated to '"discovering the truth" will screen and censor our information. Ironically, all of this bot-blocking is discussed in the final chapter. *"Are you implying the polarity is +1 and 0?"* ... No. *0* and *1* (Nonexistence and Existence) represent the most rudimentary state of Existence. Anything prior to this most basic of all possible juxtapositions cannot exist. ... Polarity doesn't emerge until much later. *" God's Son is the "matter" spoken/vibrated by the void and God's Spirit is formless breath/ energy. If I am speaking to a similar aspect of your book, how does my metaphor differ?"* ... You have a personality that is more open to differing views than most, so you'd probably understand this book better than most. However, yours and my thinking are different. You are taking the accepted, historic understanding of a metaphysical God and rebranding it with the many new discoveries of modern science. In my book titled *"0"* there is no God in the way that we have it defined. ... Everything is connected (even atheism and theism). Humans represent the tail end of a 13.8-billion-year evolution of Existence (information) seeking more information via conscious exploration. There have been 6 different information-seeking "Recursions" (including the one we are in right now) that demonstrate how Existence has been pursuing a single piece if crucial data. It's not some unimaginably complex mathematical formula, metaphysical revelation, or an unobtainable state of knowledge. In fact, it's the same information humanity has been seeking all along. *The big question is:* What if Existence has already discovered this information via the life experiences of billions of _Homo sapiens_ ... but we're too self-focused to realize that this has already happened?

Guys pantheism are fallacies because he Not understood Spinoza than Einstein nature .concept .

@HelloThere Spinoza GOD nature. Christian GOD is necessary emocionaly.

"All opposing gravity rise rise rise" Zdzislaw by Rishloo

@@guywhoisnotbob Snow is falling everywhere Snow is falling all the time All the time - [Yoko Ono] Galaxie 500 - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p75dopajs5-doH0.html

Indeed that would be very interesting and probably provoke altogether new questions and theories, not just in the viewers' but even the interviewee's mind. Though I'm sure he must have thought of this only to have submitted to time limit.

Think of the life of Kyle Rittenhouse, teenager who took it upon himself to "protect" a city from rioting, and ended up killing two people, and now he's been raised as a right-wing hero, proof that guns are good and allow us to protect ourselves and our possessions from people who would destroy. What sort of relationship with God can he have, where the world must be divided between good and bad people, where good people can shoot and kill bad people and self-justify that they had no choice. Science and materialism can't touch his moral dilemma. His yet underdeveloped conscience has a tough battle head, and he has no incentive to feel the pain of what he's done, and now has a culture that defines it as good. Only religious language can help him face that, and religion can be just as good at justifying violence than facing a wounded innocence when you take a life out of fear.

or maybe you can scientifically prove his existence, but that would mean “He” is playing hide and seek with humanity.

lazyness...

That Alien it would be an idiot not to wonder where this "structure" of the universe comes from

The evidence points to supernaturalism as existence cannot ever be explained by logic.

@@ksdogg Evidence grounded in science does not point to supernaturalism. Only anecdotal personal subjective experience and its erroneous perception and interpretation points to the supernatural. "Existence cannot ever be explained by logic." I wouldn't bet on that. Perhaps not by logic alone, but together with evidence. At its fundamental layer, existence is physical.

@@georgegrubbs2966 ''Only anecdotal personal subjective experience and its erroneous perception and interpretation points to the supernatural'' _All epistemology and all evidence is ''subjective'' and doesn't exist absent of a mind. And The mind itself cannot be explained within a materialistic framework or scientific method as it is the requisite condition for the creation of the scientific method. This essentially fits the definition of supernatural(beyond the limits of scientific knowledge)_ _The concept of existence is not logical, pertaining the question: why is there actually something? Also physical is an illusion as all physical must obey the Schrödinger equation ,that states all matter exists as a probabilistic waves at it's fundamental layer, that doesn't exist in physical form until collapse occurs. What causes collapse is an unknown phenomena within QM for a 100 years and is another example of a supernatural occurrence_

@@ksdogg It seems that you do not exist.

if i were a god, i'd have bigger fish to fry. KEvron

@HelloThere Yes , convinced Atheists are stup*d . You would have already known it if you ve seen Robert's over 5000 videos .

@HelloThere Religion teaches Morality and Spirituality , they are not fiction . They are called moral and religious truths . There are also many theologians (Religious Studies) who earn Phd's just like other sciences. Science and Religion-Spirituality are philosophies on both sides of the same COIN. (The old name of Science was the Philosophy of Nature, and when you get a PhD degree in Physics or whatever field of study, it means Doctor of Philosophy.) … … Science and religion are two sides of the same deep human impulse to understand the world, to know our place in it, and to marvel at the wonder of life and the infinite cosmos we are surrounded by. Let’s keep them that way, and not let one attempt to usurp the role of the other. .

Yes, the Real Reason for the season…Winter Solstice. Happy Saturnalia. Peace.

Absolutly WRONG. Distance Sun light are so millions. Light from SUN is coming Earth fastest. Please per attention. Einstein theory was proof while you comments over his theory wasnt.

Ujjwal, that was painful to read. I will give you the benefit, and assume you were attempting to be humorous. Peace.

there's an Up and Atom video that just arrived that describes this very well I think, the speed of light remains the same and the circumstances change, or something like that :) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gLuno7KItM2Ulp8.html

@@maxwellsimoes238 I'm saying wrong. Yes wrong. Light fast is wrong. If light is fast we never would have able observed sun. If light is fast than we have able to observe only few distance at ones. We just have see like light travel Distance distance per second. . Yes we should have see like light/photons travel.

@@cps_Zen_Run Light is not fast e=mc² is infinity times wrong. Because if it is fast we are are are observing sun like light travel some distance at some some second. We never ever have observed at ones.