Thank you Professor, great course!

If anyone is wondering where the last quote is from: It is from Confucius The Analects. Thank you Prof. Bonevac for this great lecture series, especially for the care taken to place photographs and editing it for online viewers. Cheers from India! :)

Thank you for the fantastic lectures professor Bonevac! Greatly appreciated!

Thank you for the course.

Good lectures professor. When are you uploading classes of advanced logic? Greetings from Mexico.

This is quite a bold career move from Will Ferrell, but given the quality content, I'll accept it.

There's a Blackburn Avenue in Uptown Dallas. I usually call it Simon Blackburn Avenue. Ha!

Bart Simpson wrote a physics book, in which he has a cow?

it is not clear to me why is it that you look for some additional facts to justify the statement A="1+1=2" (at 20:20). I mean: i think that this is the "simplest" possible kind of statement you could make. The statement A is somewhat misleading since it is not "complete". It does not explicitly expresses the mandatory assumtions one has to make in order to state it. A more "explicit" version of it should be something roughly like A_c = {axioms; definitions; logic rules; "1+1=2"} That is, you could ask "why those axioms?", "why those rules?" but that isn't really a pure mathematics's concern (it would be about its utility, its relation to the "real" world). Once you see that A is really just a shortcut for A_c i don't see how can you ask for more justification. In other words: you can either accept the whole of A_c or reject it but it don't think it makes sense to ask for more antecedents.