🧠More material & talks here: community.sci-circle.com/checkout/community-member 🌎 Science Courses: courses.jousefmurad.com/

+1 for Oxford PhD saying "timesing" instead of multiplying... respect! :D

Thanks for sharing this recording from the workshop. Thanks, Ben!

A great introduction and massive thanks for sharing the knowledge!

Nice lesson and clear presentation. Thank you!

Fantastic introduction, much appreciated!

I love all of the questions!! 🤓 Ben is a great teacher!

Very nice and clear presentation.

Great work!

great work

nice tutorial. thank you.

Great video on this fascinating field. Thanks for sharing.

Thank you for such an informative lecture on PINN.

well done,the trend information is also very important,and it can be involved by a partial differential equation.i think maybe the parameters of the partial differential equation can also be the parameters of the neural network PINNS

OMG, very cool video!!! The training performance is highly dependent on the "lambda" value, do you have ideas about how to define its value? Many thanks.

at 14:30, it seems like external force will not operate on Unn. External force will be a constant term in the physics loss function.

We are talking of relatively simple oscillator problem. How about if we have complex geometries for which FEM methods are most suited today? I have been reading of physics informed graph nets for the purpose of complex geomeries. Do you have any references for complex domains? Lets say i have a complex shaped mechanical component subjected to pressure fir which i normslly use FEM.?

similar question as some others. When we are solving even standard physics electrostatics, heat transfer etc, forget time domain, so only elliptic equations on complex CAD, I am wondering what applications can PINNs be used for. as opposed to using FEM. maybe shape optimization type problems? or inverse problems?

Great 👍

Where can we download the python script file

A possibly useful method would be to have the neural network identify the invariants or a Lie group for a differential equation. Another approach, compute all scalar quantities and have neural network find the right combination of scalar quantities to find a Lagrangian for a physical system.

could you please provide the example code of PINN?. Link in the comments not working.

I wonder if this give better results with PDE for option pricing

Thanks for PINN , is code available ?

code link where can I get?

Im a beginner in PyTorch and OpenFOAM since the last few years, but today i learned that my "dream" is called "PINN" 🙂

Very nice lesson! I'm stuck on the Task 3 though, I can't get the network to converge for w0=80. Here's the code if anyone can spot what I'm missing here: torch.manual_seed(123) # define a neural network to train pinn = FCN(1,1,32,3) # define additional a,b learnable parameters in the ansatz # TODO: write code here a = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.zeros(1, requires_grad=True)) b = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.zeros(1, requires_grad=True)) # define boundary points, for the boundary loss t_boundary = torch.tensor(0.).view(-1,1).requires_grad_(True) # define training points over the entire domain, for the physics loss t_physics = torch.linspace(0,1,60).view(-1,1).requires_grad_(True) # train the PINN d, w0 = 2, 80# note w0 is higher! mu, k = 2*d, w0**2 t_test = torch.linspace(0,1,300).view(-1,1) u_exact = exact_solution(d, w0, t_test) # add a,b to the optimiser # TODO: write code here optimiser = torch.optim.Adam(list(pinn.parameters())+[a]+[b],lr=1e-3) for i in range(15001): optimiser.zero_grad() # compute each term of the PINN loss function above # using the following hyperparameters: lambda1, lambda2 = 1e-1, 1e-4 # compute boundary loss # TODO: write code here (change to ansatz formulation) u = pinn(t_boundary)*torch.sin(a*t_boundary+b) loss1 = (torch.squeeze(u) - 1)**2 dudt = torch.autograd.grad(u, t_boundary, torch.ones_like(u), create_graph=True)[0] loss2 = (torch.squeeze(dudt) - 0)**2 # compute physics loss # TODO: write code here (change to ansatz formulation) u = pinn(t_physics)*torch.sin(a*t_physics+b) dudt = torch.autograd.grad(u, t_physics, torch.ones_like(u), create_graph=True)[0] d2udt2 = torch.autograd.grad(dudt, t_physics, torch.ones_like(dudt), create_graph=True)[0] loss3 = torch.mean((d2udt2 + mu*dudt + k*u)**2) # backpropagate joint loss, take optimiser step # TODO: write code here loss = loss1 + lambda1*loss2 + lambda2*loss3 loss.backward() optimiser.step() # plot the result as training progresses if i % 5000 == 0: #print(u.abs().mean().item(), dudt.abs().mean().item(), d2udt2.abs().mean().item()) u = (pinn(t_test)*torch.sin(a*t_test+b)).detach() plt.figure(figsize=(6,2.5)) plt.scatter(t_physics.detach()[:,0], torch.zeros_like(t_physics)[:,0], s=20, lw=0, color="tab:green", alpha=0.6) plt.scatter(t_boundary.detach()[:,0], torch.zeros_like(t_boundary)[:,0], s=20, lw=0, color="tab:red", alpha=0.6) plt.plot(t_test[:,0], u_exact[:,0], label="Exact solution", color="tab:grey", alpha=0.6) plt.plot(t_test[:,0], u[:,0], label="PINN solution", color="tab:green") plt.title(f"Training step {i}") plt.legend() plt.show()