Plane Descends Too Low

Рет қаралды 369,702

18 күн бұрын

Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Boeing 777 approaching below glide path in Phuket, Thailand
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLN8dauTqarWiJ8.html
Lancair LX7 runway overrun on landing
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rqmDiKanytzDkn0.html
SWISS Boeing 777 encountering 50 knots crosswind
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL-goamdyrndd4k.html
LOT Boeing 787 Dreamliner autopilot fighting turbulence
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJOhgsRp2syoY5c.html
Avianca Airbus A319 cockpit view takeoff in Rio de Janeiro
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/orWkiNmgmr-spGw.html
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minutes-of-aviation
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it!

Пікірлер: 323

@Youtub77W 18 күн бұрын

Everybody on the beach: "Wow a 777" In the cockpit: "Too low terrain…20…terrain Terrain PULL UP…10…"

@eisbeinGermany 17 күн бұрын

@hilman94 17 күн бұрын

i love how russian pilot always consistent with "we pay for the whole runway, then we'll use the whole runway" principle 😁

@crossfield. 17 күн бұрын

The callouts dont work like that.

@u2bear377 16 күн бұрын

Too low, fence!

@tomb1345 16 күн бұрын

The terrain alarm doesn’t sound within the approach minimums

@Erik_Jorgensen 17 күн бұрын

1:04 "Hi car insurance, I'd like to file a claim." "What happened?" "I hit an airplane" "Can you repeat that, please."

@BillHinnoude 17 күн бұрын

🤣🤣

@starpawsy 17 күн бұрын

ACtually, it was "an airplane hit ME"

@PearlCityBeats 16 күн бұрын

followed by the claim being denied because I'm sure the insurance company wouldn't cover it.

@paulis7319 16 күн бұрын

Police report: You're at fault for driving past the end of the runway. Insurance company: Denies claim and drops coverage

@hollylovesgiraffes 11 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@pilroberts6185 17 күн бұрын

To be fair, there's a bit of an optical illusion (parallax view) effect on that first 777. The camera was further away and there was a small bluff in front of the camera. The 777 was higher above the threshold than the slight rise directly in front of the camera.

@koleknight 17 күн бұрын

Yes, and it was not filmed from the same place at all.

@tonamg53 17 күн бұрын

While you’re correct, the plane is still coming in way too low than usual. You’re supposed to be at 50 ft above the runway threshold when landing…. I’ll give that 20 ft above max.

@petesmith1924 17 күн бұрын

It was too low, whatever you think about parallax.

@Geofs_339 16 күн бұрын

And I think that the pilots approached deliberately that low, maybe for some planespotters.

@shireenbegum9166 12 күн бұрын

This beach needs to be turned into maho like in st.masrten, there needs to be a fence and a bar at the corner

@almightytitan2354 18 күн бұрын

"Coming in low is just something you have do when you're landing." -- Ted Striker

@tonyf9076 17 күн бұрын

Surely you cannot be serious ?

@rixxy9204 17 күн бұрын

Don't call me Shirly. I picked the wrong week to quit horse tranquilizers!

@tonyf9076 17 күн бұрын

@@rixxy9204 shall we get you to a hospital? Why what is it ? Well it's a big building with doctors and patients in, but that's not important now....

@tedstrikertwa800 17 күн бұрын

You know it

@Mom-USMCRichardUSMCChristopher 17 күн бұрын

🥀🇺🇸🥀 I read your comment and couldn’t stop laughing! Great sense of humor!

@DrHarryT 17 күн бұрын

I suspect the Lancair was fast on approach too, after the bounce or even before should have done a go-around.

@lbowsk 17 күн бұрын

Hell of a way to ruin a perfectly good airplane. He appeared to be absolutely hauling ass and had plenty of energy to GA and try it again.

@iMin00 16 күн бұрын

@@lbowskhe did not. The power lever broke. That’s also why he was too fast.

@celderian 15 күн бұрын

@@iMin00 Then why not put the prop in beta range as soon as he hit the ground?

@tiemji 18 күн бұрын

The Santos Dumont departure is very nice

@vip3rnb762 18 күн бұрын

It was only 10knots of cross by touchdown, wind is always stronger higher up.

@petesmith1924 17 күн бұрын

Indeed. I paused the video and zoomed in. 10kts across at 50ft, zero wind at touchdown. Not exactly challenging!

@stuka101 14 күн бұрын

yep - this channel sometimes has the dumbest quotes.

@johngraves6878 18 күн бұрын

My favorite is the Rio takeoff. I took off from that airport a couple times. That's not even Rio's main airport, but it is the most scenic.

@vieuxbal1253 17 күн бұрын

Amazing indeed. Have you experienced a take-off at New York La Guardia? This is something, too.

@Leonardokite 18 күн бұрын

That Lancair was sickening..... such a beautiful slick airplane. 😪

@SirKober 18 күн бұрын

Wondering why no go around...

@Leonardokite 18 күн бұрын

@@SirKober I'll bet the pilot is still saying the same thing.

@TC-bz9dz 15 күн бұрын

the power lever broke

@Matticitt 17 күн бұрын

Extra 4 seconds of aviation today

@landingslowly 18 күн бұрын

Nice to see the comparison between those approaches! Really shows how low the Aeroflot was!

@JohnyG29 17 күн бұрын

No, the camera wasn't at the same angle.

@ChuckieFinzter 17 күн бұрын

It looked like the video was taken from a lower position. @JohnyG29

@3MinutesofAviation 17 күн бұрын

Glad you liked it!

@petesmith1924 17 күн бұрын

It is irrelevant what camera angle each was taken from. The first aeroplane was WAY below 50ft crossing the landing threshold. That makes it dangerously unstable, which should have lead to a go around.

@patricknerl1375 17 күн бұрын

How do you come up with 50 knots crosswind in the Swiss Clip? At the beginning you can see a wind of not more than 45 knots on the NAV display which equals a crosswind component of around 43 - 44 knots. And later on as they get closer to the runway the wind calms down to just round about 10 knots. And if you take into consideration, that the wind is coming from the front right, you get a crosswind component of round about 8 - 9 knots when overflying the runway treshhold. Not any second was there a crosswind of 50 knots during the whole clip

@galxieranger8277 17 күн бұрын

"Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for flying with us today. I hope you have a pleasant day, welcome to Phuket." "Captain, that's not how it's pronounced. Though I do now understand that landing you just did."

@fluchterschoen 18 күн бұрын

Can someone in the know suggest what went wrong with the Lancair LX7? I can see from the caption that it lost a bit of runway due to the bounce - but apart from that it seemed to come in faster than expected for a light aircraft, and then didn't seem to slow down very much at all. Based on the engine note - the rpm didn't seem to change much - am I correct in thinking the pilot didn't cut the engine? I'm interested to hear an expert take please! Also, that seemed like a go-around would have easily saved the day (and a million dollar airplane), correct?

@kevelliott 18 күн бұрын

It looked like a downwind landing (I haven't checked if a windsock was visible) as the aircraft lost NO speed at all - and you're right, a go-around would have been the best choice.

@Cantthinkofahandle117 17 күн бұрын

I've seen that clip before. If I remember right, he came in to fast and should have just gone around. I think that was not his first attempt and he got frustrated and didn't want to go around again so he said f' it. Problem with standing on the brakes like that, when he locked up the wheels he lost most of his braking ability.

@johnmorris7815 17 күн бұрын

As I understand it he couldn’t get the prop into beta range which means he had thrust on throughout the rollout, should’ve gone around.

@fluchterschoen 17 күн бұрын

@@johnmorris7815 Ah. So it was correct that the engine revs didn't seem to drop, but the propeller pitch stayed in thrust instead of going into neutral or reverse? I guess maybe in that situation, once the pilot had selected the beta range, even though it wasn't happening it might have caused a decision-making conflict around whether to continue with the landing or to go around. If the prop-pitch actuators were malfunctioning there would be concern that neutral or reverse thrust could kick in at any moment (and after pulling the nose up, sudden loss of thrust could be catastrophic).

@MeppyMan 17 күн бұрын

The knob fell off. No joke that’s the pilot’s excuse.

@dimitrimendrinos2049 17 күн бұрын

Swiss B777 wind on landing was only 8 knots from the 2o'clock position. So total crosswind component probably 4 knots.

@fluchterschoen 18 күн бұрын

I bet a lot of people on that first plane were yelling "Phuket".

@hessranch 18 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@Sklounst_Actual 17 күн бұрын

That doesn't really make any sense

@Emmettb08 17 күн бұрын

@@Sklounst_Actualyes it does

@Sklounst_Actual 17 күн бұрын

@@Emmettb08 Nah

@767_Aviation 17 күн бұрын

@@Sklounst_Actualit’s probably a bad word in Russian

@tusharsinha94 15 күн бұрын

I was there at Phuket yesterday! Unfortunately they were taking off towards the ocean, but I landed from this side and the weather was stormy. Quite a landing!

@christian-jakobgrasl 18 күн бұрын

the Aeroflot T73/ER is every plane spotters dream :-) !! can`t get too low enough :-)

@renevile 17 күн бұрын

1:51 i like this sentence structure, where you start with the "importent" part wich is what to look for in the clip, and then after that you give the aircraft data and follow up info. It's especially nice for us non-native english speakers that read a lot slower and some times have trouble reading all the text before it goes away.

@BK-qp8zp 17 күн бұрын

You can slow down the playback speed in the settings. I find it quite helpful.

@A7-BBI Күн бұрын

Don’t listen to the hate comments. Your videos are perfect

@Farbrorsallad 16 күн бұрын

Love your garden! Nice job!

@user-jl3ex4ik1t 17 күн бұрын

Awesome episode!

@rexhinlo3398 17 күн бұрын

Nah. That "nominal landing" was taken at a different angle at a different spot and that made it look higher than the other landing.

@tamezjaime1 17 күн бұрын

The Swiss 777 landed with 10 kts cross wind you can see on the ND. Above 1000ft was 40 kts.

@jeffreydeeds9225 17 күн бұрын

I like flying in and out rof Rio's Santos Dumont airport. You get an excellent view of the city and the magnificent scenery.

@flyingmyles 18 күн бұрын

Wonderful videos as always! The runway excursion one... was that bloke playing golf next to the runway😅?

@chrispop99 17 күн бұрын

Gardening, I thought. He was more chilled than I would have been!

@flyingmyles 17 күн бұрын

@chrispop99 yes that would be a very big golf club looking at it now

@FunYl 16 күн бұрын

Right, airfields are perfect for it

@flyingmyles 16 күн бұрын

@@FunYl Google golf course at Bangkok Airport, its as close as this video!

@miked9958 5 күн бұрын

looks like a weed whacker

@HELSINKIspotting 18 күн бұрын

Awesome 👌 Greetings from Helsinki

@3MinutesofAviation 17 күн бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

@ryanfrisby7389 17 күн бұрын

Great video!

@cut-- 17 күн бұрын

Some of those remind me of my first few weeks of MSFS.

@friendofenkidu3391 18 күн бұрын

0:36: The Lancair LX7 crash occurred on 11 November 2023 at Aero Country Airport (T31) in McKinney, Texas. According to news reports, the motorist sustained minor injuries but the pilot and passenger in the LX7 were not injured. The NTSB preliminary report for accident number CEN24LA037 is worth reading.

@ifly135 17 күн бұрын

Door seal fail, throttle knob unscrewed and came off, failed to go beta. Maintenance issues will get you, but there is no way that the pilot shouldn't have noticed the knob was loose. Bounced, then applied brakes half way down the runway. Pilot error, anyone?

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 17 күн бұрын

@@ifly135yup. Touched down too fast.

@WingWarnings 17 күн бұрын

great capturing.

@TheTishbite 14 күн бұрын

Your videos are the only ones I can hit a thumbs up BEFORE I view it LOL

@josetaveira7094 14 күн бұрын

Best 3m I’ve ever seen and I’ve seen almost all of them

@airbus12345 18 күн бұрын

Nice video!

@dnhug 17 күн бұрын

Thank you for the credits! Anytime again! Cheers,Dominic

@3MinutesofAviation 17 күн бұрын

Thanks for the cool videos you have, keep them coming 😍

@spookyaction8917 17 күн бұрын

Thanks!

@Deionburns114 18 күн бұрын

Nice video

@arnesw2647 18 күн бұрын

Very cool! 😁👍

@BariumCobaltNitrog3n 17 күн бұрын

"Plane descends too low" to land. That would be underground. A 50 knot crosswind with the nose pointing straight down the runway. Amazing. No yaw. That flaperon was working really hard. So much work. And here's a plane taking off, filmed by the -hijacker- flight engineer.

@tomlee7956 17 күн бұрын

There was NO 50 knot crosswind. If you check the instruments, the wind was from about 40 degrees to the right of the nose, 194 degrees at 11 knots, which means, there was virtually no crosswind, in other words, it was a piece of cake. At 50 knots direct crosswind, you see the runway off your side window and not directly in front of you.

@theozonloch 17 күн бұрын

Well, the crosswind on approach was ~45kt but during the landing itselft it was 10kt at most, so the title is kinda misleading and that's why there is almost no yaw. Crosswind limit on the B777 is 38kt so you'll never see an actual landing with 50kt crossind ;)

@theozonloch 17 күн бұрын

@@tomlee7956 pretty much what I said xD

@tomlee7956 17 күн бұрын

@@theozonloch You might see an actual landing with a 50kt crosswind because the 38kt is maximum demonstrated and thus, it is not limiting.

@theozonloch 17 күн бұрын

@@tomlee7956 I know it's a reference but I can guarantee you that no pilot would land in a 50kt crosswind. And in most cases airlines SOPs are inline with the recommendatios from the manufacturer

@augustinep6193 17 күн бұрын

Good. Thanks.

@MrKrr87 17 күн бұрын

О, наш Аэрофлот первым приземляется))) Красота))

@Ex-AshMain 17 күн бұрын

The Aeroflot 777 wasn’t even that low, it is the perspective. The first clip is filmed from higher compared to the second clip which is almost at sea level and also different angle.

@mostlydollshelicopters4799 18 күн бұрын

Super 👋😃✈️

@claire8699 12 күн бұрын

We own you 4 seconds of aviation

@slippydouglas 16 күн бұрын

I appreciate that this is located in “Fuck it”, Thailand. Makes sense.

@informationalpha1 18 күн бұрын

nice!

@willcall9431 17 күн бұрын

The first two were taken from different vantage points and were about the same hight.

@scottwhitmire6577 17 күн бұрын

Perspective.🛫

@claudevieaul1465 17 күн бұрын

"Captain, you need to approach a but higher!" "Oh, Phuket..."

@betsymoore8057 15 күн бұрын

Pilots are awesome…. Most of them! ❤

@ge2623 18 күн бұрын

Was that a car hitting that plane after it left the runway?

@--SPQR-- 17 күн бұрын

Nope, probably just a big cow doing 55.

@ge2623 17 күн бұрын

@@--SPQR-- I hate speeding cows.

@Theiliteritesbian 11 күн бұрын

Pilots are so cool

@exsaper 17 күн бұрын

Pause at 0:21 and measure the distance between engine and fence (not even ground). The engine diameter is around 3.3 meters. I clearly see that 2 engines can stack up and fit on top of the fence. This gives us around 6.6m, which is 20 feet.

@paulis7319 16 күн бұрын

**in the ER* Doc: What happened to you? Patient: I got bopped upside the head with a 777 tire. Doc: WTF

@Red_Lamborghini_aventador_J 18 күн бұрын

Lve the video

@dominiclester3232 16 күн бұрын

The Texas airport seems to have a busy road much to close, with minimal barriers?

@Stefan_Boerjesson 17 күн бұрын

Time 01:13 and on. Where is the sidewind? The land with the node straight forward as it looks.

@Papaondas 17 күн бұрын

50ktz X wind without any crabing that is the joke of the week 😂

@3057luis 16 күн бұрын

1-The different position of the camera makes not a good comparison; 2-50 knots crosswind?; 3-those camber flaps always work a lot, even in normal conditions (the external ailerons only work at low speeds, nowadays), they are less powerful than external ailerons because of less momentum

@youp9546 17 күн бұрын

Non aviation guy here but I love the videos. Question: when landing is the voice giving the distance in meters or feet?

@CZedby 16 күн бұрын

Feet, apparently.

@ElectricPics 17 күн бұрын

Strictly speaking that's not the autopilot manipulating control surfaces itself, but the flight computer simply maintaining stability.

@israel_started_it_ALL_in_1948 17 күн бұрын

oh wow

@LevinKeller-mo6cz 15 күн бұрын

Crazy

@adb012 17 күн бұрын

The 787's autopilot fighting turbulence to keep the plane stable is doing more than just keeping the wings level. In the 787 the ailerons also act as "direct lift" devices to counter increases and decreases of lift due to up and downdrafts, thus smoothing the ride, acting like the suspension of a car.

@Coretron 17 күн бұрын

Fascinating. That was my favorite part of this video

@RomeoJulietCharlie 16 күн бұрын

It’s the flaperons and elevator which move to reduce the effects of turbulence. It’s called gust load suppression. Supposedly helps to reduce airsickness by a factor of 8! The ailerons are locked out at high speed, so the flaperons and spoilers provide roll control in the cruise.

@adb012 16 күн бұрын

@@RomeoJulietCharlie ... Thank you for correcting me. This "piece of control surface", that is, the "aileron" between the inboard flap and the outboard flap, was called "high speed aileron" in older models like the 727 and 747 (among others). And I am older so... 🙂. In those planes the outboard aileron (called "low speed aileron") was also locked at high speed and the "high-speed aileron" would do the rolling together with the spoilers. At low speed, high-speed aileron, low-speed aileron and spoilers would work together for roll control. The difference was that this high-speed aileron would not deflect together with the flaps when extending them. In the 787 (and 777) it does, hence "flaperon", as you said. But we were both talking about the same control surface.

@RomeoJulietCharlie 15 күн бұрын

@@adb012 thanks for the info! I never did get to fly the 747. We were retiring it, unfortunately, so I went down the 777 then 787 route after about a decade on little Airbuses.

@adb012 15 күн бұрын

@@RomeoJulietCharlie ... I never flew the 747 either, or the 727, or anything with more than 1 piston engine... 🙂. Hey, derailing the conversation, it's not every day that I have the chance to chat with someone that flew A and B. Quick silly survey 1) Sidestick or yoke? 2) Airbus's or Boeing's approach to FBW?

@MidwestMotor 16 күн бұрын

1:05 - the people in that car can say "I was in an airplane accident," and we weren't even in the plane! Scary!

@williambyrnes4198 17 күн бұрын

Love the 1st video trying to show the difference in approach from two different angles. To me I think they were both the same.

@jonathonhymel1802 16 күн бұрын

The first pilot was like “my approach is off, Phuket”

@8020drummer 8 күн бұрын

2:39 - runway heading. C'MON. You can make it.

@chriswestring1974 16 күн бұрын

That didn’t look like a crosswind landing at all. At 50 knots of crosswind, the runway wouldn’t be at 12 o’clock. It would be visible out the side window.

@TurningGuns 17 күн бұрын

Poor Lance, by the numbers baby.

@abiboy2412 15 күн бұрын

The humble flaperon works extremely hard whilst passengers sleep comfortably on their seats.

@BuriramBaz 15 күн бұрын

Aeroflot allowed to land in Thailand? Or old video?

@rallyden 17 күн бұрын

Hmmmmm, don’t think that was 50 kts of crosswind. During flare the wind was quartering down to less than 10.

@ellenherstead586 15 күн бұрын

Unbelievable!

@vieuxbal1253 17 күн бұрын

At 0:55, I still can't believe there's a road at the end of the runway

@user-by2ew9ys8u 6 күн бұрын

Good job, autopilot.

@ecbfilms001 17 күн бұрын

I never noticed how much Boeing's landing altitude voice sounds like Hank Hill

@MeppyMan 17 күн бұрын

1:25 notice the lack of crazy fast and excessive control inputs.

@abdulbari7809 17 күн бұрын

Why did the Boeing 777 300ER blush? Because it saw the runway threshold and approached below it to fast!

@user-mp9rd4hg8b 17 күн бұрын

isn't the maximum crosswind component for Boeing 777-300 something like 38 kn?

@lbowsk 17 күн бұрын

37 if my memory serves me correctly. Max demonstrated. I don't think that was anywhere near 30 let alone 50knots Xwind

@user-mp9rd4hg8b 17 күн бұрын

@@lbowsk yeah, the yaw factor didn't look that severe. And I don't know of any plane that is certified for 50 knot crosswind.

@MikeC2K10 17 күн бұрын

The SWISS 777-300ER clip would have been more interesting if the camera had stabilized on the cockpit, instead of the landscape outside the cockpit screen. :-)

@hughrexon900 17 күн бұрын

50 kt crosswind? The nav display shows single digit wind velocity in the flare. 😂

@hattrick2219 17 күн бұрын

When we had rough air at cruise two things happened quickly....auto pilot turned off and speed was reduced. You let the aircraft go and gently corrected the pitch and roll.

@heartfeltteaching 17 күн бұрын

The second one is funny 😂

@wta1518 14 күн бұрын

0:37 To be fair to the pilot, it's hard to land when the heat index is 101105.

@bgw33 17 күн бұрын

❤

@52robbo 17 күн бұрын

I think the Aeroflot 777 was fine; different camera angles distort the appearance.

@aditay 16 күн бұрын

Stood on that beach many times and lots of planes come in really low though I think that one takes the biscuit

@felixx321 17 күн бұрын

0:41 hasnt this clip made the rounds several times already?

@petesmith1924 17 күн бұрын

The Swiss had a 50kt crosswind at the start of the approach, 10kts across at 50ft and zero wind at touchdown. Hardly ‘challenging’.

@bluesatsunset 17 күн бұрын

777 X-wind limit is 38kts - The wind direction/speed indicator on the navigation display shows 11kts of crosswind for that approach & not 50kts. Clickbait.

@rosemontterrace3469 14 күн бұрын

Lancair was a throttle handle coming off. Not late braking

@AnaPaula-kp1rw 17 күн бұрын

Aeroflot, more than 80 years! 🗿

@JohnnyBean78 13 күн бұрын

I personally have never seen an plane crash on this channel for all the videos I have watched. @0:39 seems like a plane crash. WOW Hopefully no one got hurt badly. WOW

@galdavonalgerri2101 17 күн бұрын

0:52 11 November 2023 ? "aircraft experienced pressurization problems shortly after reaching FL250. A rapid descent was conducted, and the airplane continued towards its destination. ... It overran the runway, and struck an occupied moving car on the road.

@Seawing44 17 күн бұрын

1:09 …. 50kt on final but wind calm during flare, no wind on ND !

@gregedwards1087 17 күн бұрын

The Lancair @ 0:50 the only option at this point is a "Go Around", the pilot should know from the calculations and landing performance charts that after a certain point there would not be enough runway to stop safely, the pilot just pushed a very bad position into an almost fatal one, bad choice.