pls make that

They made her a frickin' youtube channel 😂 I think we can safely bet that they've embraced everyone's desire to stay aboard this meme train Edit: I overestimated chesscom and I will never forgive them for blundering Mittens

Do it

That cat is about to parish from another bot

Naah M3gan wont let that happen

Stockfish gets revenge on all the fishes Mitenns ever ate😅

@@user-wf6bv7iw9i 😺

​@@user-wf6bv7iw9i Hi! There's a small grammar error in your post; normally I don't make a point of correcting those since it's usually unnecessary & just mean, but this seems like a case where it's a natural error someone might make if they don't natively speak English (or even if they do), & it's an error that could easily cause misunderstanding depending on context, so I just want to clarify it quickly in case you or another reader can benefit. The verb phrase "to take revenge" can be used with "on", but this construction describes an action taken toward the original wrongdoer, e.g. "to take revenge on Mittens for eating all those fish". To discuss taking revenge in terms of how it relates to the original victim of wrongdoing, one would say "to take revenge _on behalf of_ the fish", or the simplified "to take revenge _for_ the fish". Side note, another common error that's related to this is how people use "avenge". Some will use it like "to take revenge upon [a wrongdoer]" but it actually means the inverse; to "avenge" is to take revenge on behalf of a victim. So people often say "He avenged the killer" when it should be "He avenged the victim". (People also get this backwards the other way by saying "Revenge me/the victim" instead of "Avenge me" lol.) I hope that's useful to you or someone else who comes across this thread! It's a pretty tricky little nuance. I love languages & geeking out about the complexity of how subtle implications affect usage, so even if it was just a typo all along, thanks for prompting me to think about it & practice wording an explanation!

​@@ItsAsparageese Well in bro

@@ItsAsparageese k 👍

lol

Bro im first time playing her and looked that will more easy than anyone bots that it 1 and i played it and it was soo hard i checked how to play chess and always lose and i found this

I bet you I could defeat mittens

​@@tdm_nicky5603 if super GM's cannot beat mittens when starting in even position (no odds), how will you? Someone like Hikaru was only able to draw against Mittens without odds, I don't think you would have any chance (unless you use stockfish)

Nah the reason is M3GAN

🧢

fr I recently started playing chess n was frustrated to win against a bot I thought it having 1 elo means it's an easy target mate in 5 moves ig 🙂

@@BuraBeast just read the description and also it's at the last one

@@Brainstormer99 I was a newbie unfamiliar with the site and so many options confused me tbh.

@@BuraBeast i've actually started chess more than 2 months ago

No shit

Yeah... totallly

You are a legend

Levy is the worst chess influencer ever

@@TbV-st8ef you are definitely on drugs

​@@TbV-st8efWhy?

Pure evil

For real

Hilarious in context, yet also horrifyingly profound both in context and out

They fooled us 😭😭😭

stockfish is number 0 then

Hikaru already knelt..

​@@vanderstewart not his bot

No, mittens is rank 1, you get it?

@@Hagurmert it's a joke dickhead

Meow

Elo*