Its real good to have US on back😊greetings

LOL @ ALLIES AIN'T NOTHING STOPPING A NUKED EARTH

세계 최대강대국과 동맹인점은 든든하죠 특히 근비경쟁이 심한 동북아에서

Why? Both countries geostrategicaly present no strategic benefit for US. They dont contribute to US security but their long standing historical beef with their neighbours can implicate US in wars they don't need to fight.

@@hrvojehajdic2729 Brother, read the history books. As long as the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth existed, Russia was a country on the border of Asia and Europe, we were a wall protecting Europe from eastern barbarism. You can trade with them but trust them - never.

That's why we buy the best. with an active defense will be even harder to destroy.

We only acquired about 100 m1a1 but our main version of abrams will be the newest m1a2 sepv3

W polskich rękach taki sprzęt dobry zrobi 3x wiecej niż może

This gotta be ai

In 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea with military aid from the Soviet Union. Without any tanks in its army, South Korea saw its capital, Seoul, fall within three days, and the country was on the brink of complete destruction within a month. Fortunately, the intervention of the U.N. forces saved South Korea from near annihilation.

Over the past 70 years, South Korea has achieved remarkable economic growth and risen to the 6th place in the world militarily. As someone born and raised in Seoul in 1972, I had the opportunity to witness this entire journey. Education played a crucial role for Koreans, especially those who lacked resources, as it became the key to success. It's truly heartening to see how South Korea, once reliant on foreign aid for survival, has now developed and is exporting its own weapons.

​@@rohrichbeau1004교육이 그 나라에 도움이 될망정 발전의 원동력으로 보긴 힘듭니다. 한국말고도 교육열과 똑똑한 소규모 국가들이 있으나 못살아요. 이는 교육 때문이라기보다 국제관계의 행운과 강력한 질좋은 지도자 때문이란 걸 반증합니다. 교육은 그냥 말할게 없어서 하는 말이죠

@@helloareyouthere 교육도 한몫한게 큽니다 그 질좋은 지도자들도 집권했을 당시 투자도많이 하고 교육을 중요시했었습니다 교육+외교+지도자+국민성이 종합적으로 이뤄낸 성과라고 봅니다 저중하나를 고르자면 작성자와같은 외교가 1 교육이 2 국민성=지도자3 이런 순위를 주고싶군요

And what would have changed and 1000 such tanks? The Polish problem lay not in the lack of effective tanks, but in the lack of military vehicles in general, obsolete aviation, lack of or erroneous military doctrines bad management and command system and many other things. In 1939, no German tank had thicker armor than 30mm. All of Poland's problems at the time can be boiled down to a few points: 1. too little time had passed to build a strong country after 123 years of partition and World War I. 2. The country's elites focused on power struggles instead of expanding the economy and later modernizing the military. 3. No real alliances were built, through their own stupidity, as well as the stupidity of politicians from other countries. Returning to tanks, a simple M4 sherman would have been fully sufficient to destroy any German armored vehicle in 1939, itself immune to enemy hits.

You don't know much about ukraine, do you.

I have a lot of Ukrainians at work in Poland. Very friendly people

@@da9mi5an61 no doubt, there are good people among them. But we can see the Wehrmacht symbols on the american M113s, we have seen the civilian victims of ukrainian shelling, pro-russian people burned in Odessa, tortured and killed POVs, purge, and many horrible personal stories from those, who come to us, and so on...

@@petervincze3868 Putin bot. Nobody buys your BS. There’s only one person responsible for this horrible war: Putin. He’s the Hitler of the 21st century

@@petervincze3868how much for a post, putlers doggie?

@@user-qr4tw8hv3k Greetings from Poland Brother!

why u know? never was in active fight

Dzięki ci bracie z Korei, ufamy wam bardziej niż jankesom

Jesteśmy bardzo zadowoleni ze współpracy z republiką Korei. Ufamy wam i bardzo doceniamy to jak szybko i profesjonalnie przebiega współpraca z waszym narodem. Uważam że nasze narody skorzystaja na tej współpracy. Pozdrowiam i serdecznie zapraszam was do Polski.

@@rom_troy4784 faktem jest. Wstyd.

@@kjererrrt2381 Przecież wszyscy wiedzą, że to komentarz trolla nastawionego na podziały między narodami. Kacapy już przegrały, Ukraina i Polska wygrają.

The Polish deliveries were built/intended for the ROKA, which got stripped of its planned procurement schedule.

​@@sehoonkim2131 지속적인 필요성 그것이 낮은가격과 높은 퀄리티를 가능하게 합니다😂

But not Abrams version Sep3.

Poland didn't get the export version... the ones already in delivery ar the same tanks used by the US marine corps... the main order is for the latest sep v3 version... So basicaly Poland will be operating the same versions as the US as the only country.

They buy both mainly because they wanted fast arrival of many modern tanks. Germans were not able to offer huge amount of modern Leopards 2 in a short time. Only US and South Korea were able to deliver enough of them quite fast (so 2-3 years).

Not exactly. Abrams - the best protected tanks in the World - will be defending big open plains of south eastern Poland, while K2 - which is not well armoured on its sides, but is lighter and good in crossing water obstacles - is about to serve mainly in north eastern Polish territories, full of lakes, swamps and small rivers, near the Kaliningrad oblast. Leopard 2PL tanks (Polish modernization of Leopard 2A4 and 2A5) will be send back to the south western part of the country and wait to be used as a second line of defence.

@@wojtek1582 they won't save you. poles don't enter ukraine.

@@kjererrrt2381 What you? Are you so stupid that you think I am Ukrainian?

@@kjererrrt2381 Yeah, protected by keeping them far from the front.

slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre

🫣 Puk Puk

@@kjererrrt2381 russian agent

against ukraine?

@@kjererrrt2381 Poles should know!

those tank will be used on polish-belarus border, terrein there is heavly soaked with water and so there is a lot of swamps, massive forest etc.

K2 and M1 have many interchangeable parts.

It's supposed to be an American model. abrams, heavy bwp, apache. . change, unlike in the American army, a lot of rocket and gun artillery.K2 divisions will also have a lot of barrel and rocket artillery with IFV Borsuk. We don't have enough aviation.anti-aircraft defense rocket and gun artillery. we entered into a partnership with the UK to have short range battery effectors.

half right and half wrong In fact, the Korean War broke out when the US announced the Acheson Line. So, in one of the reasons for the outbreak of the Korean War, it is inevitable that the United States is pointed out as the cause. All Koreans know that very well. Koreans do not forget their history.

@@goodjob3314 This claim is only the claim of pro-North Korea leftist forces with the intention of making South Korea communist. The people of South Korea believe that they survived the war thanks to the United States and the UN forces. And the cause of the war is only North Korea's Kim Il-sung and the Soviet Union's permission.

I am a Korean. It's a heartbreaking history of the 1950 war. Poland and Korea have the same history. As a Korean, I want to say thank you to the countries that participated in the war. The Korean people support Poland. I think we're brothers. Let's cheer up! 😁😁😄😄

Od czego armia USA uratowała Polskę i kiedy?

​@@user-hj9bo4uo1rjesteśmy braćmi

한국도 k3 개발중입니다. 130mm 포와 전기추진 하이브리드 엔진에 첨단 전자장비등 탑재 계획입니다. 터키 알타이어도 사실 k2 전차 기술이전으로 개발된 전차인점 상기 시켜드립니다.

All of the new tank designs, KF51, Leopard 3, K-3, Abrams X have been designed with the 130 mm gun.

@@jimpark8379 With *a* 130mm gun, rather. The Rh130 produces over 20 MJ of kinetic energy when the projectile leaves the barrel - that's a 50% increase over the Rh120 L/55 (which again produces about 4 MJ more than the previous L/44 - still being used in the Abrams, though today's Abrams probably more than makes up for the 4 MJ with it's proprietary high tech ammunition). The 20+ MJ of kinetic energy the Rh130 generates is even quite a bit more than the experimental 140mm ASCALON that the French want to put on the MGCS. As it stands the Rh130 can destroy any tank currently in use with a frontal hit from 2km away. Now I'd be surprised if the new American gun were less capable, especially given the high tech ammunition American tanks are equipped with. But development of a new 140mm or 130mm cannon for the Leopard started in the 1990s ("Project NPzK"). Work on the 140mm stopped when it became clear that the necessary changes of the Leopard to carry the 140mm gun weren't going to happen but afaik, Rheinmetall at their own expense continued research on their Rh130 all those years along with the improved Rh120 L55A1 that will have it's debut on the Leopard 2A8, which manages to eek out a further 8% compared to the normal Rh120 L/55, so about 1MJ of additional kinetic energy for your APFSDS and they also developed an improved round for the new tank, making it a very decent stopgap for any client who feels they need to replace or add to their 50 slightly upgraded Leopard 2A4/5 in light of the Russian threat RIGHT NOW rather than wait at least two more years when you can realistically expect to order the KF51 Panther. According to Rheinmetall we should see the beginning of serial production in Ukraine towards the end of the year. Around that time they should also become available to other clients, with a production line being established in Hungary. Apparently Viktor Orbán wants to create jobs and establish a defense sector in Hungary. Even though he only ordered less than 300 Lynx (and already spent his tank money on 50 Leopard 2A7HU) he had Rheinmetall build two quite large production and testing facilities. And now he gave them €300 million to develop a custom chassis for the Panther (the only part missing) and the tooling to have it produced at their Hungarian plant.

@@hisredrighthand5212 I am glad to hear that Rheinmetall is doing pioneering work on the successor to the smoothbore 120 mm gun they basically invented and which took over the market, and everyone either licensed or copied in some way. My guess is that the basic Rheinmetall design for the 120 mm smooth bore has been out for a while and the variants are pretty similar. If anyone comes up with a massive improvement it will get licensed. Any ammo improvements can also be licensed or the ammunition can just be purchased. Each 120 or 130 mm gun will have to use ammo that meets NATO standards so the Rheinmetall ammo should not be exclusive to the KF51. I'm glad Rheinmetall is stepping into the Ukrainian market. Korea actually received a tech transfer from Russia in the 90s and the deal was we couldn't use weapons that has Russian tech against Russia, so Korean weapons are sold to Europe with a restriction on transfer to Ukraine. So that's a market needing weapons that Korea can't supply, so I'm glad the German firms can build economies of scale in Ukraine and provide better, cheaper weapons to everyone. The Russians and Chinese kit is completely crap, but they're armed to the teeth and their leaders are desperate. They're gonna probe for weak countries to invade and there's not enough supply to meet demand or needs. So Germany and especially a legendary company like Rheinmetall stepping up is great news for the Western alliance.

The bearfoot houthis can destoy the best tanks in the world, ha, ha

the russian lancet drones will figure it out.

@@kjererrrt2381 they cant figure out their own ass

@@PiotrSobierski why? rusisans hit jets, dont u see how they are able to shoot their own jets down

and what m1 mbt based on? on kpz70. also, The shape of the hull and turret is based on the German Leopard 2 main battle tank and the American M1A1

the people's republic of korea will be happy to have them.

We've had many ruzzian tanks - destroyed ones from Ukraine on display 🤣🤣🤣

@charekuu and now Russia is going to display so called game changer tanks as well the difference is about a million dollars each 😆 🤣 😂

@@richardlee3502 ruzzia better invest into toilets and plumbing - it's 21st century and over 20% of ruzzians needs to go outside to take a sh*t 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre

@@kjererrrt2381 wake up watnik, you've shit yourself :)

Up to this point we had 3 (T-72, PT-91, Leopard 2 in three versions) with two different calibres so that's still a progress

welcome to ukraine. the drones are waiting for you.@@Dexter8393

I'll explain. Germany proved to be unreliable with service and deliveries, not to mention their initial "involvement" at the beginning of the war in Ukraine. US won't agree to share the technology, but it's always good politically to pour them some money and at the same time keep German lobbyst a little bit more at bay. Korea proved to be reliable, meeting deadlines and is open to license its construction.

너 제 정신이니? 그것은 기동하는데 2배의 돈이 들어, 달리면서 백발백중이 가능해, 밧데리로 무소음 조준과 10발 연속발사가 가능해 , 로켓 적외선기능 마비 가능해, 영국이 불쌍하다.Are you out of your mind? It costs twice as much to operate, it can hit with all ten shots while running, it can aim silently and fire 10 shots in succession with batteries, and it can paralyze the rocket's infrared function. Korea did it. But I feel sorry for England.

미국 탱크도 너무나 약하다. 한국은 얘기 해줬다. 미국은 듣지를 않는다.American tanks are also very weak. Korea spoke to the United States. America won't listen.

달리면서 자동조준 자동발사가 가능한 탱크... 다른 전차가 단발 소총이라면 한국전차는 40발 기관총이다.A tank capable of automatic aiming and automatic fire while running... If other tanks are single-shot rifles, the Korean tank is a 40-shot long gun.

독일도 항복했다. Germany also surrendered. 노르웨이 정치인들에게 돈주기 바쁘다. Germany is busy giving money to Norwegian politicians.

@@user-qd6bt9hi5u Germany is busy giving money to Norwegian politicians...uhm WHAT? lol why norwegian? why we should give norway country? for what lol? and again what we surrender? would be a new thing, hear that first time lol

우리는 abrams와 k2 탱크가 모두 최고라고 생각합니다. 우리는 파업을 위해 하나가 필요하고 기동 전쟁을 위해 다른 하나가 필요합니다.조준, 레이저 유도로 사격할 수 있도록 155mm 대포와 120mm 박격포용 포탄을 급히 준비하고 있습니다. 다른 이펙터.정확도, 30km에서 최대 30cm의 오류.이제 통신 장치에 도달했습니다. 가볍고 작으며 동시에 주파수가 다른 여러 위성과 지상 서비스와 통신합니다. 몇 개의 위성을 감염시키면 전환됩니다.우리는 그들이 GPS를 방해하거나 끄지 않도록 합니다.그것이 러시아인들이 이미 himars 미사일로 시도하고 있기 때문입니다.

쪽팔린다 지워라

이점도 있지만 이제서야 비등하거나 좀 밀리는 수준임 무조건 좋다고는 당연히 말 못하고 개좋다는건 헛소리

창피하니까 지워주세요

케이팝과 케이드라마로 흥해서 너같은 국뽕환자들로 망할 대한민국이다.어쩜 그렇게 중국애들이랑 닮었냐

slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre

🫣Puk Puk

다덤벼

T 90 rules

@@anprzewlocki1934 T-800

Merkava is not suitable for vast Polish flat spaces.

so u say, leo2, abrams, k2 merkava? thats good, lol

lol,yes destroy 2 or 3 ;)

Search the Norwagian Test results between K2 and Leopard 2a7 in 2022.

a end to it? sure thats why they do their job in ukraine. btw dont usa lost abrams not also.and not tank is undestroyable, and most leos was lost because ukraine used them wrong that one time.

slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre

Puk Puk 🫣

Jak leopardy czy Abramsy nie dadzą rady, to wejdą polskie PT-91, dobrze zmodernizowana postsowiecka broń, idealna do walki przeciw rosyjskiemu sprzętowi.

저 에이브람스 사양이 폴란드 제식사양은 아님. 수입된 M1A1은 M1A2 SEP V2나 V3 모델로 개량되어서 측면 방호능력을 개선할 예정이라 드론공격에 취약하지 않음.

To widocznie słabo ich szkolą, w polskich rękach taki sprzet to skarb my walcsyliśmy z pistoletami na czołgi

탱크 무용론이 있는데 탱크가 터지는곳에 보병밀어넣어보면 탱크의 가치를 알게될것이다

Tanks as part of the enemy's peer combat system are essential. I just need the right tactics to use them.if we had artificial intelligence which will be reliable. it will be a group of combat vehicles and a headquarters with a crew of people. The combat vehicles will be lighter but there will be a hunt for a transmission core to destroy the decision center.for now, we are creating such an IT system, we call it "topaz", which will cause situational awareness on a completely different level.whoever or whatever device sees the enemy, everyone involved will know about him.crews will know where their own and where which enemy. the command will be able to choose with what to destroy the enemy.why hit enemy tanks with tanks. how can you destroy artillery with precision laser-guided projectiles.and enemy infantry entrenched first with cluster or thermobaric missiles.that's right, we haven't signed, like russia, korea, usa, a declaration not to use these weapons.

탱크는 그냥 필수 요소다. 점령지역에 파견해야 하기 때문에, 폭격은 일시적 해방일뿐. 미군이 탱크개발을 하고있는 이유

As long as they have infantry, artillery and close air support they will be necessary element of the battlefield.

@shahhin11 Oh, you're talking stupid things stupid.. I am Korean and I have been to the army. You can charge with infantry, but there are many sacrifices. Did you work on the front line in Korea and wonder if tanks will gain strength? It's best to go to the army and train yourself. Why you need a tank. It's good to defend, but it's the best weapon if you minimize the sacrifices of infantry and shoot at enemy troops hiding in tanks

Poland will produce 800 K2PL in poland haha don't worry ~

@@user-zh9fg6hd7n 또 한가지 기대할 수 있는 점은. 폴란드에서 전쟁이 나서 폴란드 공장에서 K2 생상력으로 힘들거나. 또는 생산 불능 상태가 되었을때 한국 공장에서 생산해서 보급이 가능 하겠죠. 한국도 한국에서 전쟁이 나서 K2 생산에 문제가 생겼을때 역으로 폴란드 공장에서 K2를 생산해서 그걸 수입해서 사용 할 수가 있겠죠. 양국 다 든든한 우군이 생기는 거죠.

K2's will be made in Poland and Abrams will have extensive maintneance facilities.

sure its not. esp the leo2 and abrams based on the same design the kpz70. oh plus the abrams use just a bit modified canon which is also in the leo2, it just a license canon usa use

@sebt-sy2ok even based upon the same prototype from the 1970s can still have huge differences, the engines e.g., electro optics and BMS

they are asking to be nuked.

No brawo brawo. Szkoda ze zapomnieli nam powiedzieć o kredycie zaciągniętym w Korei na 77 mdl PLN

A jakie to ma znaczenie człowieku wszyscy mają jakieś kredyty 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍✌️

@@jerzy2023 A takie że o czymś takim powinien komunikować MON a nie dziennikarze człowieku

A po co wszystko komunikować nie te czasy wróg patrzy 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱👍✌️

Trochę z tych "Leo" zostało zidentyfikowanych jako John Deere... Mało tego, ruskie już je niszczyły na Ukrainie, mimo że ich tam nie było 😂 Zresztą bieganie za czołgami na tyłach wroga, by je wysadzić, świadczy tylko o tym, że Ruskie nic zazwyczaj używanego w takim przypadku na nie nie mają - to jest taktyka partyzantów, a nie armii mającej się za drugą na świecie...

Na chwilę obecną potwierdzone jest straconych kilka Leo2 wersji 4. :) Czyli te najstarsze. Sa natomiast filmy jak Leo2 ver 6 spokojnie wytrzymuje uderzenia pocisków kierowanych i się wycofuje ;-)

@@PyzaBezFarszu😂

well it's not actualy about wwII but bcuz germany is totaly not reliable at any international field at this point.. not even mentioning the low production rate and lack of spare parts, and supplies for leopard tanks...

@@RoozyyK thats why we are after usa the BIGGEST supportet to ukrainn with money and military equipment. but uk

this is why we will never see the english tank in that s-hole called ukraine. bad for PR.

Wrong. Poland got the best armored tank in M1 and the best tank in the K2. The Leopard and Merkava are old designs that have received repeated face lifts, they are clunky and flawed in several ways. The K2 is the latest designed tank. It has by far the best electronics.

​@@jimpark8379What are you talking about? The basic design of the M1 is just as old as the Leopard 2. The Leopard 2 was further improved in the final stages of development in terms of armor, weapons, optics, electronics and drive. With the M1 only the armour was improved. The K2 black panther is constantly being changed. It also has the drive gera, engine and cannon from the Leopard 2. The only thing new about the K2 is the full digitalization. This will get the other tanks too. And again, there is no such thing as the best tank. There are a number of tank models that are among the best and are constantly being developed. Successors to the K2 Black Panther, Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams are now being developed.

@@marcom.2793 Are you high? You just said the K2 is the only tank with modern electronics and that the other tanks are being "developed" to have modern electronics. Modern warfare is about electronics. The tanks that you say are "equal" to the K2 don't even have modern electronics, you even said they're being developed. A tank that is being "developed" to catch up is not equal, it's much worse. The K2 would blow away an Abrams, Merkava, or Leopard. The K2 will fire 3 shots in 12 seconds before any of the other tanks can fire one shot because of electronics these other supposedly equal tanks don't have. They're not equal. You don't know what equal means.

Amatorem to jest twój kraj widać to jak sobie radzicie z ukraina I jakim sprzetem operujecie jakoś Ukraina nie narzeka na sprzęt otrzymany z Polski okazał się w dobrym stanie czego nie można powiedzieć o zardzewiałym ruskim złomie

what tanks offer better parameters?

​@@jakubknopik9218украинскую армию мы уничтожили в первые месяцы войны а сейчас воюем с прокси армией НАТО... Украинское на этой войне только люди и то не все... Вы в курсе сколько поляков так называемых ,, наемников,, там погибает? Вы не увидите как их берут в плен , им режут головы и конечности... Тебе твоя пропаганда не рассказывает об этом? Ты должен верить в ржавое русское оружие😂

​@@fr0y505длительность и интенсивность современной войны требует от техники высочайшей надежности и вместе с тем ремонтопригодность в полевых условиях... Техника НАТО хороша но только против заведомо слабого противника.. В глобальном противостоянии с использованием всей номенклатуры оружия , уничтожения спутниковой групировки , с уничтожением тыловых оборонных и ремонтных предприятий , внесет корректировы в военную доктрину.. Стоимость и сроки восстановления и производства будут играть основную роль.. Много что изменится... И кто бы что не говорил но для нас сейчас важно что мы проходим отличную тренировку , появилось очень много хороших офицеров младшего звена.. Такого опыта нет ни у одной армии.. Мы за это платим кровью но в будущем это позволит нам существенно сократить потери и врагу нанести поражение... Вы же знаете наверное что после Украины американцы кинут в бой поляков и прибалтов? Вот там и посмотрите на этот корейский танк😂

​@@mazafaka7242właśnie zniszczyliście swój kraj na dziesięciolecia a ty się jeszcze z tego cieszysz. Macie największy kraj na świecie, z największymi zasobami a ciągle atakujecie sąsiadów. Politycy was okradają, okłamują, a wy wierzycie że to dla dobra ojczyzny. Włącz myślenie.

I believe the M1A1 are mostly for training purposes. They do have contracts for the lates variant of Abrams.

Wrong. The K2 tanks sent to Poland use a German Renk transmission, the rest of the tank is all manufactured and designed by Korea. The German transmission will soon be replaced with a Korean transmission and then the tank is 100% Korean.

Ten stary m1a1 jak mówisz ma być zmodernizowany do m1a2 sepv3 masz jeszcze coś do powiedzenia?

Weź to na logikę. Skoro jeździły po miękkich piaskach Iraku, to dlaczego nie mają jeździć po Naszych łąkach/lasach?

Acha no super, nie wiem tylko czy wiesz ,że Abrams został własnie zaprojektowany na Europejski teatr działań , zresztą patrząc po Twoim wpisie tak naprawde g... wiesz o tym czołgu.

@@PyzaBezFarszu nie żądaj od gościa niemożliwego, logika to nie jego dziedzina

Ale jesteś poniżej normy, dobrze, że Ukraincy mają polskie PT-91, no one nie mogą być gorsze od tych ruskich...

@@kamilzakrocki1406 pt91 czy 92 jak przejedzie sie po minie albo spotka Koroneta lub Lanceta to bedzie po zawodach. czasy rudego 102 dawno minely.

@@robertduklus6555 tak samo jak ruskie czołgi, które są nic nie warte, wg ciebie.

Bełkot kremlowski

ah yes the wisdom of russian watnik xD

mini M1A2=K1

mini m1 = k1 mini m1a1 = k1a1 mini m1a2 sep ver. = k2

@@dingdingdangdong read about it again. m1 = leo2 = from kpz70= k1= leo1/m1

Bzdura...hahahaha

Dlatego powstanie K2PL

@@robertkowalski7932 czyli co powstanie? Bo nie ma żadnych uzgodnień. Najważniejsze to że pancerza nie da się wymienić na mocniejszy

Chyba nie zrozumiałeś tego co gość powiedział w filmie. K2 wytrzyma frontalne uderzenie pocisku wystrzelonego z działa nawet 120mm. Co do swojej wagi, są najbardziej mobilne... nie wspomnę już o ulepszeniach pancerza, który jeszcze Polacy przerobią pod wersję K2PL. W dodatku będziemy produkować je sami u siebie ;-) Czego chcieć więcej? Co do samych Abramsów, na pustyniach w Iraku dawały sobie radę a u nas nie dadzą? Przestań czytać powielane bzdury przez moskiewską agenturę.

@@PyzaBezFarszu nie wciskaj mi działania zgodnie z czyjąś myślał czy w ramach czyjejś agentury. K2 nie da się dopancerzyć i koniec. Pogadaj z kimś z branży to może Ci to wytłumaczy. Zostaje tylko pancerz reaktywny. Abram na pustyni nie musiał przejeżdżać przez mosty, a u nas musi i to sporo. Niestety nie ma u nas wielu mostów które uniosą wersję SAP3.

LMAO

Witzbold!! Seit 20 Jahren bekommen die den Motor nicht hin! Schrott

Armata will only get a shot at being the 'best' tank if it actually makes it off the production line lol

Considerign even Russian army has no way to get armata i wouldn't consider it no 1 xD poor watnik.

u mean they NEVER get the worst tank of all , the armata? thats not a bad thing i would say lol

Jealousy Jap, 走行中に軌道が離脱する戦車を持つ国は羨ましいです。

何文句あるの？

@@piotrbratek3996 tak, stoja na półce i czekają aż Dudu je kupi. Prosze cię.

Like Good Korea k9 k2 천무239 👍🇰🇷

damn old japanese tank one thing is sure jap tank shit

source: Trust me bro!

If you see polish solider on real, yor pants will be full

Have you ever seen a Polish soldier akhmad? You would be in your so called heaven (hell in reality).

And an anchor in the ass for those who liked it...

If you see Polish soldier, that would be last thing you have seen in your life Sadam.😂😂😂

typical tik tok pedo force logic...

madrzejsze o tym nie wspominac, to wcale nie podobne, wcale.

Glos rosadku!

To prawda. Ale czy rzeczywiście były to polskie czołgi? Czy Polacy mieli wpływ na to gdzie te czołgi pojadą i w którą stronę będą strzelać? Jak silna była gospodarka PRL? Ja trochę pamiętam tamte czasy choć byłem wtedy dzieckiem.

slava bandera slava UPA slava wolyn massacre

@@kjererrrt2381 Сколько стоит лук в России? Веками русская армия была насильниками и ворами. Ничего не меняется. Видимо, сиденья для унитазов в России подешевели?

To buy from one agressor and 2 traitors from the past?? No thanks.

Leopard? It is made by the are Russian ally. It's European open secret.

Germany has been flooded with easy money earned in Poland and in Eastern Europe. We know it and you know it.

Poland good decision to buy Abrams and Black Panters!

france is untrustworthy, unreliable.... germany is untrustworthy, unreliable (as war in Ukraine swhowed) and they collaborated with russians to co-dominate our region again.... UK has no capacity to fill our needs in numbers Challenger, Leopard, Leclerc are either models that are fading away, industry has no capacity of building them in numbers or have substantial flaws in their core designs also.... "subventions" - these are in rality LOANS... why do people in west dont understand it is beyond me... besides from these loans 'western' or 'old EU' countries benefit the most, as stated by german statistics bureou, yoshka fisher, and it is estimated that germany alone benefits of combined markets 5x the ammount of they put in so ye.... stop spreading ignorant BS

ukraine has proven the opposite

No worries, Poland has LEO2A5 and Leo2PL. Take your pick !

@@Jurk844 it burns like the others. armata is teh best tank in the world. period.

Some argue that Markava could actually be better than Abrams …. Any thoughts ? ;)

​@@hetman3196The Merkava was created to murder civilians, and the armor is created to protect against HEAT shells. So Merkava is worse.