why do

@haha haha youtube tutorials are very useful but online courses are also pretty good to get that sharp edge

@@personfrmperson and books!

@@yung-megafone that too. although I would recommend youtube --> online courses --> books as books are way more of a chore to finish unless you're a bookworm type while courses and videos are allot more gamified and thus easier to finish, especially for the novice.

​@haha haha go to school

how did you post this comment if you're literally dead /s

Not just any hacking power. It's "the hacking power"

I have the power of God and hacking on my side.

right click -> hack

Sumsub is an IT security company that dabbles in KZfaq.

@@Pysslis TIL

facts

It’s all gone downhill since Bradley left.

@@Pysslis whatever happened to that duo, why didn't they start their own channels?

Found Bradley's channel -> www.youtube.com/@Bradjpeak/

@@defo2638 cool subbed, although he doesn't seem to be doing so well.

Lol

among us

It's sort of funny if not sad, that SumSub has no longer money for quality production, yet instead they pay for promotion… (so their failure to keep quality of their production is visible for more ppl)

@@FalkonNightsdale RIGHT! No knocking on seytonic here Sumsub was an amazing channel. I want them to come back with something halfway decent :( Sucks to see a tech youtuber explode so amazingly then just fall from grace

@@BWAC It was never really a "tech KZfaqr" but mere PR department of a company, but still - it's a waste of previously spent resources…

What happened?

I think they just didn't find it economically feasible to keep up the production value and just sent them on their way to get a much more efficient setup going

Same

And still going down, last video was disaster.

host albania bunker secure

Seriously. "Search warrant?" Never heard of it."

2 comments

@@ASRocketry so? I didn't realize I woke up in Nazi Germany and could only leave one comment per video...

@@yung-megafone No, you woke up in Nazi Germany where police don't need a search warrant to read your private messages.

because a bogus product being used for illegal means serves no good purpose to public use.

@@dietrichdietrich7763 I don't agree with that conclusion though. You can't seize an app because you believe it has no good purpose to public use. Thats a subjective conclusion. If I make an end-to-end encryption messaging app right now and gets used mostly by people committing crimes (because the average person is just gonna download Telegram or signal because its popular), I would be subject to the same treatment despite having the exact same functionality as the more popular apps. Also how do you know its bogus? They could have easily found a loophole or entry point to listen in on the data but the app was legitimately designed to encrypt data. This happens with major services all the time and has a higher likelyhood of affecting a smaller developer. Irregardless of whether or not it encrypted messages, they didn't take it down because of that and thats my main issue. It wasn't about false advertising or anything like that. They took it down because the found criminals using it.

@@AnesuC listen bro, I love the explanation, it's beautifully written so you got good agreement points especially from a developer's POV but my disagreement is this, about this product app because if it doesn't work then it's a P.O.S. that needs refixed or trashed since that just not going to supplement very well for public supply.

@@AnesuC I understand the difference when a productive software is your baby/mod project/your cash cow, but if something is a placebo fake being exploited than it's just not a useful service.

because it's made and advertised for criminals, if the developers of the app are aware and actively selling to criminals then they too, are criminals. This is blatantly illegal to do and it's definitely grounds for seizure. Just look at the history of such messaging apps/encrypted phones, even ones that were a lot more subtle about their criminal target audience end up getting arrested and shut down because they can't hide their intentions for long. Signal is different because it's basically just whatsapp without being owned by meta, every type of person uses it and they don't encourage or advertise criminal behaviour

Oops! Just added it :)

@@Seytonic still not showing.

@@lfcbpro Try refreshing, if not it's here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m8t-aMSgmZmwXWg.html&ab_channel=Seytonic

@@Seytonic cheers

If you need sources, check out FitMC and SalC1’s latest videos

decentralized isps are a security issue aswell

@@ItIsJan ya decen opens a lot of new challenges. From verifying every block or node to distributed data to multiplying the parties you need to trust.

you had 5 months to correct the word "peace"

@@biohazarddetected792This comment had no replies at all. There’s no reason this person would have looked back at the comment within those 5 months.

Im gonna you@@gabe_owner

Since they have no money for keeping production high enough to attract viewers…

@@FalkonNightsdale oh dear god....tbf sumsub does make fairly high quality content

@@drishalballaney6590 They used to… But then they got rid of most of their team…

What about search warrants?

lol, were you living under the rock this whole time ? They are satirical magazine. They deserve this breach due to their type of content and mocking every serious issue worldwide

@@userharrisel Lol, why would I hear about anything French? But alright, so it's an outlet that outrages fragile people every time they encounter something even slightly politically incorrect, like the The Babylon Bee? Even more reasons for me to support them.

@@userharrisel Free speech, retard

@@userharrisel freedom of speech?

They are more than a satirical magazine, they have journalists too. And they are GREAT. I´ve been reading Charlie since I was 12 and I eagerly get my Charlie every week. JE SUIS CHARLIE et CHARLIE JE RESTERAI

For something else I'm guessing.

because they made it for and advertised it for criminals, if the developers of the app are aware and actively selling to criminals then they too, are criminals. This is blatantly illegal to do. You can just look at the history of such messaging apps/encrypted phones, even ones that were a lot more subtle about their criminal target audience end up getting arrested and shut down because they can't hide their intentions for long.

Without side channel of some kind that requires local access beforehand or physical access it's incredibly difficult to break modern encryption.

Nope.

@@ananayarora Yup. (3rd) {Just messing with ya…I never understood the infatuation with trying to be the first comment}

Lmao

Yeah because tails is a messenger and PGP is super convenient. Imagine being this ignorant and thinking you know what you’re talking about

Nope.

Thanks my dude :)

First after 16th

They used to rock