Tolerant police, well-trained officers . We have dumb dumbs with fragile egos.

The one saving Grace is that our police do NOT carry guns like US officers. Guns put how police treat members of the Public in a totally different realm. US Police are buzzing from the off due to gun carrying citizens and many are impatient and trigger happy in return😞

That's what the UK 🇬🇧 had years ago, oh, how the standards of the British 🇬🇧 police has fallen in recent decades.

The British police force have lowered their enrollment IQ to become a police officer so low that anybody can become one, and then they are not trained properly because they are being trained by police of low IQ. So it is a kind of catch twenty-two.

​@@01matthewcTREVOR HARRIS POLICE 🚓😤🤬😞😡

💯

@@realest21310 1000 percent.

Well, apparently someone said a naughty word so . . .

And guess what, they went straight to the man with a camera breaking no laws.

You forgot tyrant cops breaking the law.

I'm convinced that's because they are unable to investigate. Their only ability is asking for your name and hoping you incriminate yourself.

@@peterwentworth9181 i tell them that line & i tell them someone breaking the law else where like raping ur wife after they break in who knows cuz there 3 dumb armed cops here for a person with a camera breaking no laws also im allowed to swear in public all i want so fuck this fuck u & fuck ur buddys all u cops are the fucking same around the world fucking bulls make up false charges over nothing also cops are racist KKK white trash..... if u force fake law try me cuz of ur feelings fuck them go home

Looks like UK police force is being Overtaken by small, weak, child like, But we'll groomed females,, of which When the going gets tough they call Big boy backup... As on most American,UK, and Australian Videos this happens often...

Not with police, they treat you like you are guilty first, and the way they use the badly written badly understood laws, they are probably correct, they certainly can't "learn" judging by the many emails and updates they never read

He takes the cake on this.

One more thing:Her cute ass didn't flinch.

Look ant is eye s is he on the wackie backie 😊😊😊

he did outsmart the auditor still, which says a lot.

these kind of pigs are the worst

He doesn’t know what clever means, you’re giving this dimwit too much credit!

@@kensukadventures628where, I’m watching now and can’t see anything but the cop trying and failing to be a bully.

And he's a moron to boot

Allen, 😂 the police love to say that.

I lad

And "forthright". Cop speak. Bet he doesn't talk like that with his one friend.

And when did the auditor tell the police man he was filming, where is the auditors GDPR policy? On the auditors website where are the company details, or contact details that are a legal requirement? Where is his policy for copies of footage/deletion from footage etc? Cannot go around saying cops should be perfect if you come across as not obeying rules yourself surely. Or is auditing just a hate fest against cops.

@@kensukadventures628 I do filming and haven't done any GDPR training

@@MikeEves you wont need to if its personal and your not collecting identifiable data etc, its more when you are doing things like going round shoving cameras in to workers faces and showing that to a large (often VERY) large audience, especially if doing so commercially as many auditors do... Filming your trip somewhere and not having any info or identifiable data on the video about others for your own personal small audience is one thing... Filming peoples ID cards, where they work, what they do and showing it to thousands of people - doing this over and over as a business (self employed for most auditors, if they actually bother with tax etc) is something totally different. It is worth reading up on policies etc to make sure you don't fall foul of them at any point. Saying that they are rarely policed, it only if someone was to make a complaint to the ICO or take legal action that it would raise its head usually.

@@kensukadventures628 A member of the public is under no obligation to inform people that they are filming. The police are, by their own rules.

@@jannenreuben7398 People filming for commercial purposes are not really members of the public.....

Probably showing off to his female colleague.

Massive FAIL.

these police are sanguinary pathological LIARS as `` Time & Realty benders ¬`or BIPOLAR DISSORDER.

🤣😂🤙👏👏👏🤡🤡🤡

You talk too much "I don't answer questions" and the policeman has nothing.

Unaware of what his job his except make stuff up nd lie

@@am-jddr Police Recruitment Interviewer: Do you ever lie? Applicant: No Police Recruitment Interviewer: What's your name? Applicant: Mickey Mouse Police Recruitment Interviewer: You've got the job!

If they fail to ID walk away. If they fail to provide RAS, walk away. If they attack, inform them they are under citizen's arrest and defend yourself.

Whoever let him out after police training needs to take him back for a few more months. His knowledge on photography in public is appalling.

Sorry but you got step 3 wrong, Start abusing the public and hide in the station to make the shift pass quicker would be more accurate :)

Step 4 realise you cant handle a real job. Step 5 Become an auditor

Brain?

@@kensukadventures628 Nah, Auditors have social skills.

Before step one, they have to make sure one doesn't have any social skills. Then one gets an uniform.

They firmly believe they can that’s the laughable thing!

They can seize the item to obtain the footage under section 19 of PACE, if the footage pertains to an offence. However, they would first have to procure a warrant under section 8 of pace in order to seize the item under section 19 of PACE.

High dose of SSRI medication

been on the nose beer

I thought that maybe he needs testing

I bet none of them can spell it.

They don't have a clue about anything including tge law

The cop is a robot, very apt, he acted like a idiot to a member of the public.

A problem only arrises if the footage from their camera is used in court. Also you don't need to tell someone they are being recorded if to do so would result in somebody being hurt or a crime committed. It's all very wishy-washy and making such a big thing of it is a waste of time. It's just them trying to cover themselves, no one gets in trouble for not telling someone they are being recorded.

They are all as bad they don't expect us their employers to know the law

Also a violation of policy dress code with his slouching and hands in his pockets. It is in my Police Scotlands policy anyway.

would they even care?

Do you even know what the word auditor means. It certainly doesn't refer to the brother from the gutter we hear in this video Lol.

@@SalvageMasterEssex it's not what he sounds like that matters. It's the principle. Police harassment of individuals going about their day on public property will have ramifications for us all. Anyone can take photos or film anywhere. I live in a tourist city and I've probably ended up in loads of tourist's photos and vid footage. I don't like seeing camera's pointed in my direction but they're free to film or photo anyone anywhere. The guy in this vid wasn't doing anything wrong. That's the point (that you seemed to have missed).

as usual.

​@@SalvageMasterEssex'Brothee from the gutter' is a description I could use to refer to you. Bigot !

4King hell 🙄

It's an opportunity for the police to piss about wasting time.

@@MikeEves They were summoned, they attended as they were obligated to do.

@@Audit-The-Auditors Yes, they were, by the people who control the big capital, weren't they?

Whenever one calls the police to report an emergency, one should tell them one is working for a firm which represents a lot of money. Success guaranteed!

@@Audit-The-Auditors they completely ignore burglary and drug dealing in my area. Get a camera out and start filming a private building, they are there in a flash

Except .......... If you are arrested - you have the right to remain silent. So, if your photo/fingerprints/DNA aren't on their system, they can't get sh1t. That's how stupid police are.

and thankfully now if they suspect you were flying a drone, but annoyingly few police are aware of the legislation so its very rare to see it used.

Dipp dipp old Boy Scout 😊😊😊

This cop is a joke like all cops they know nothing

because they don't have any officers who know the law. They don't receive any training.

I think it was a mixture of genuinely dumb and playing dumb to suit his purposes.

They are not ignorant they just don't want you to know

thats a nice way for society to fall apart, but they type of behaviour one can expect from "auditors"

1966...plus Judge Bean 2011. You can call the turns, tyrants and tossers in a calm voice and there aint nothing they can do about it.

@@kensukadventures628 Love your master like a good gimp.

@@kensukadventures628 Oh you think Rice v Connolly means you don't have to help the police when they're catching a real criminal. Nothing of the sort. If police are having trouble with a real criminal and you can help then it's a good thing to do. What it means is that you, when being questioned by the police, don't have to help them in their investigation.

@@TheSadButMadLad bootlicker cuckold seems hurt 😅

He was evaluated as being perfect for the job.

the police employed him he is a test albanian migrant for uk service

Well the auditer himself admitted that an offence had be committed and he had the evidence on camerea ,so there's that.

Misinformed nonsense. Section 43 of the Terrorism Act 2000 gives officers have the power to view digital images on a camera or mobile phone when they are searching a person under S43. You mean 'delete' not 'reveal'.

@@Audit-The-Auditors Misinformed nonsense.....in order to conduct a s43 search, the officer must have reasonable grounds to suspect that the person is a terrorist...a man with a camera is not reasonable grounds to suspect that someone is a terrorist. In this case the guy above is correct, the officer has no right to view the camera footage to see whether a public order offence has been committed.

@@shortbreadbiscuit2002 No, the 'guy' is 100% incorrect, he states that ONLY a court order can make you reveal what is on a camera, when that is blatantly wrong. S43 provides the power to do so, yes, under certain circumstances, but a court order is NOT the ONLY way.

It's not up to the Police to prove your guilt. That happens in a court of law.

@@gwaponobby it is up to the police to gather enough evidence to pass on to the CPS to prove your guilt...

They can only refuse id in scotland if they feel if giving it puts themselves under threat or their colleauges funny thing is the subhuman police refuse names to my 10yr old nephew with a bow bag scum that they are gave numbers and repeatedly said theyd take his bow untill court case to a 10yr old such shamefull dirty dirty cowards panicking a we boy into giving details peado PC must of liked the look of him

Yeh but Auditors need the interaction otherwise there's nothing to watch.

I am sure i have saw that arrogant scruffy looking cop on other vids.

I thought he looked familiar ..... Yup its Spot-a-Cock !!

Me as well. Where is he from.

Exactly, Billy big balls trying to look clever in front of those two birds. 😂. Bet they are saying, "damn i hope we aint sent out with him again "