I have to be fair here, he's clearly just a techie who didn't think through all of the implications. The real villains are still Venness and her cronies.

So far I get the impression Mr Jenkins was not the nasty co-conspirator he's been made out to be. I've worked with guys like Jenkins, he's a software dev, a database/data modeling guy. His bosses told him to provide answers to technical questions, he wasn't well briefed by the lawyers that he should be an independent expert witness and what that means. He's clearly not the kind of person to naturally grasp linguistic nuance or legal implications of key phrases. "does it work as designed? yes. were you able to see the error? no." all technically specifically correct, but he's not going to go outside the lines and offer "it was designed badly and the error may have been present but I could not see it from the test data provided, I could check the message store if asked". The PO and the lawyers knew the kind of guy he was and used him as the ideal expert witness, one who can quite easily be put on rails to to give the output needed to win at court.

Failing to do an in-depth investigation of the sub post offices that were subject to a trial. Failing to do a summary check of all errors and repeating errors in the whole system . Failing to admit significant errors and impact at trials or in his various witness statements. Not knowing as an Expert Witness he needed to fairly report any/ all faults and possibilities.

For a man who is a graduate of Cambridge University he does come over as remarkable dim and shallow.

He had dark hair when he started…

Errors, Bugs and Defects buddy…!

I think he comes across as a genuine guy but extraordinary badly led by the lawyers

I'm guessing the Post Office got most of their staff from the Job Centre.

Ironic that a 'bug' (a fly) in this system allows the offer of a break .. when the 'bugs' in the Post Office system were ignored...

Did he not state, that he wanted Immunity before giving testimony, It is staggering to think of Firms like Cartwright King, Bond Dickinson other External & Internal Solicitors of the PO & Fujitsu. Who under the Duties of Prosecutors, that not one of them thought to Instruct him in the Duties of an "Expert" witness

I was sort of deciding that he was, as others have said, a disconnected tech person without a real understanding of how his actions did harm. I have now gone back and re-listened to several of the individual testimonies that Mr. Beer brought up. With that fresh perspective, this is a very bad person. He knew and just did not care. He needs to be prosecuted.

Does anyone know Who is paying for his (and others at POL) legal representation? Is it the taxpayer?

I eagerly anticipated Gareth Jenkins's evidence. Though we might get some insights.... how wrong I was. More of the same as POL and most of the lawyers we have heard in this phase. I am sure that we are all baffled by how much these shysters can't recall.....and how totally incurious they all were into what was actually happening around them....

This guy. This guy who helped put a pregnant, innocent Mrs. Misra in prison. This guy is should be in some serious trouble.

I no nothing ‼️

The person in the room has a Covid cough and should be removed!!!

Don't even pass GO go straight to jail!

If I was a post master I would not except any apologise that all a sham once again I say the post office and the goverment have taken the great out of Britain but made us the laughing stock of the world And the cost of this case will make more people rich and it won’t be the postmasters compensation should star at least £1,000000

Sir Arthur Streeb Greebling is alive and well.

Seems a bit thick to me😮

Comes over as not very bright 😮