+

That's because his design and movement in the original game were 100% rotoscoped. Where as the remake just uses a basic 3D model taken from the Sands Of Time.

Yaron Shaked I disagree. Animations are just as good in this version, besides, there are more animations here (back-flips, running on the walls). It's just that animations in the original Prince were revolutionary for its time and this game is in the "nothing special" category now. But if you look at them objectively now you can see that modern animations are NOT worse.

Booruvcheek I personally think the acrobatic movements in a remake are a good thing, because they speed up the pace of an otherwise slow platformer, while still giving you just as much control. It made it feel like a nice blend of classic PoP and modern PoP. If they ever remake the sequel, the barrel rolls would come in handy for dodging the slicers pretty quickly!

Yaron Shaked

And the part of being saved by the rat?

Barquillo Depapel 17:10

Where is mouse?

Mouse 14.38, 17.10, 17.36.

Thank you for time marks!

@Manveru31 That mean, it is easier.

Prince of Persia gameplay/controls were tight af

@Manveru31 i'm pretty sure that the game was coded like that on purpose, the prince's jump was supposed to be delayed

Yeah easier because of better controls the original has sluggish controls which makes it harder.

Good. The original is painful.

and that is the biggest problem with this release, it takes away the proper timing you had to do to jump and hung from the edge, a key element of the PoP series. its basically made for little kids.

@@giornikitop5373 I hope they redo it again and get the gameplay and music right, the dungeon lighting is a bit strange too...a lot of yellow and blue. Though its maybe best to just leave these things alsone (I'm not sure)...they did a remake of Another World too, I need to have another look at that, remakes though are a bit strange.

its, joder.

back then people have a lot of time. kids can play hours upon hours. Nowadays people don't have that much time to spare. Some of us just play for fun.

@@yokowasis people don’t like the mechanics or the maps. Me? I don’t like the character designs. I’d like to see a mod of the game with SoulCalibur made models of the 1990s PC98 and Macintosh designs.

I never understood the point of shadow in the game. And it always annoyed me that he stepped on the lever to lock you out at the end of level 6. And you ended up falling into level 7

RandomGuy1994 DOS version was awesome, it was my first game in my life and I loved it. :D

+RandomGuy1994 lololol no way

+Butter of Sorrow My thought exactly. The original version literally had better transitions between individual animations.

+Butter of Sorrow The DOS version is awesome, is one of the best and beautiful DOS games along with System Shock. The remake is not that bad either :)

+Butter of Sorrow Note how the gaming community is so dumb now, they needed to add signs and glow to everything.

LITERALLY

street fighter 2 ending theme vocal version: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m52fh71qx72odX0.html

@AnimationStation I know it's been 2 months but could you share this story? :)

​@@scorporion7884Play Sands of Time for the story.

He probably became so fat he couldn't fit through that door

Hahaha

In Japan they probably thought "why a Sumo wrestler is in this game? This is Arabia"

Go play Mario

Because this "game" does not have any realistic moment

Hello again mister DooMer :)

@@Dondlo46 Sometimes even I am surprised by thr videos I have commented under :P

pantcake so good!

And long gone are the days when these platform games were made for gamers, who had to memorize which of the switches on the ground triggered what, instead of having colors indicating which switch will open or close a door.

and those blades gave you the creeeeeps

Fallen Virtue Games Yeah - no other port has really nailed the sickening and abrupt "crunch" the blades did when chopping you in half, the way the DOS version did. As kids it gave us an adrenaline shock each time it happened, and facing one of those things took all the courage we could muster, each time.

+Clint Hobson Even just watching the DOS version here on KZfaq still managed to make me centre cringe

Plus, forget the chomp noise when they hit, the sound of them just clanging together on a miss was so heavy you knew those things were business. This version of the game looks awful, I have to say. The jumps are clearly instant, they give you all kinds of auto-turning and jump-to-climb moves and charging sword attacks that the original didn't have. I'm not saying "different is worse" here, but they took out all the cool little nuances that you had to learn and use carefully and replaced them with easy, auto-win crap. Even switching sides with guards now has a special, canned animation that gives you lots of time to see what's happening, instead of a quick switch, often with you stepping in fast in the hopes of closing the distance before the sword slash from the guard could hit you and push you back. The SNES version of this game is the king of them all. That version was just amazing and added so much cool stuff to the original, not to mention the incredible music and graphics.

The SNES version is just as good.

SNES is number one along with the DOS

@@moviemetalhead SNES is better. Has BGM, better mechanics, more levels and Vishnu

@@lrc3847 Ok, you're just agreeing with me and preaching to the choir. 👍

@@lrc3847 agreed..

Because the original had controls like tank. Its controls made it difficult to move.

@@digimaks the controls in the original werent touchy due to overbearing difficulty, but to give the player a sense of realism.

Randy Dane my hero

Raziel Milky acho que não é preciso misturar as coisas , os dois são bons mas esse ai da mais desenvoltura em vez de ser mais travado.

I'd say the original's playability isn't bad, my best time is 20:15 (39:45 remaining), I'm currently trying to beat the 20 minute mark.

Hard control doesnt mean it more difficult I know why you said this easy cause you dont realize this guy replay the game and master it

having played multiple versions of the original and the xbox360 version i can say this is an inferior game because of poor game play mechanics and reduced challenge.

Only for the comands and for the input lag

Mrtaker23 Look at his name... Irori Mimasaka.

Street figther 2

hahahahaha!!!!

I saw a playthrough of the original version, and somebody commented there that as a child, he didn't realise how hard it can be to hide a sword in your trousers ....

Literally was the Apple ][ and DOS

Because you can just play the original?

The SNES version is where its at bruh!

Same here. I played this game when it was on DoS ( I gave up but cannot forget the game) but I love this "fake" 3D style, much more than the real 3D version.

TheBloodswordsman You did not grow up on snes, you were born after 2000 lol. be honest.

Guy Snowy Ikr no pop will ever beat the shadow and the flame!

Guy T TRUE😀

DCLeadboot I was expecting a ""Cherry Pie" at the end. Then I realized oh wait this is not his spoof..awww.

Hey, at least a new generation can experience the original game in some way.

Who said they cpuldn't experience it/ There are lots of DOS simulators

DOSBox is a godsend! So many games are currently 'abandonware' that it's a gold mine for anyone who has interest.

In all fairness, without those runes on the pressure plates, they would be a lot harder to see than DOS release. on DOS release they rise above the ground more, making them easy to see.

So does the original game.

when anything had that, that anoying me hardly!

На чём можно поиграть в эту игру?

In the original opening switches were above, closing under the path.

Which one is it exactly ? PC Version?