I'm thinking that the radiative energy is lost and the molecular kinetics are held by the impermeable barrier. This explains the powder because as the prince rupert cools, the ouside holds its shape creating an artificial volume. the interior's pressure is likely a gradient to vacuum, and once the surface of the object is broken, it allows the latent vibration of molecules to shake themselves to pieces as they "cool" to normal size.
@nickpitlosh8 жыл бұрын
+nick pitlosh this is the same reason that we beat metal to make armor. however this pales in comparison to heat treating, which youre seeing a 3.5k degree shift.
@wil38 жыл бұрын
Awesome video and channel!
@Skinnyrd8 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@pc-fc9du8 жыл бұрын
It took moment for me to realize that the bubble must also be a vacuum. With regard to wondering why there are no shards: I am far from an expert in this, but due to the intense though equal pressures in all directions, the result of the breaking glass are particles that are as near to round as they can be, though as a crystalline substance (I have no direct experience with this stuff) would appear more like sand or powder. Doesn't the equalization of pressures when the tail is broken also mean that the glass to some invisible degree (may need special equipment and cameras) shrinks/contracts? It may also be that when forces are a lot less equal is why shards would be created in broken glass, though I cannot guess exactly why the fractures necessarily choose their paths as they do. Light bulbs spring to mind as being similar but they are not vacuums since they are filled with a gas which enhances the glowing filament and they are manufactured somewhat differently I believe.
@Skinnyrd8 жыл бұрын
+Curt Dox (Tigersharke) Your comment has me thinking. It would be interesting to see what happens to a normal piece of single pane glass under very high pressure. Could you force it to turn into the sand like substance we see from the explosion of a Prince Rupert's Drop? I suspect you could.
@latzobear7 жыл бұрын
so many books :O
@Skinnyrd7 жыл бұрын
Mostly my wife's collection. She loves young adult and children's fiction.
@azlhiacneg8 жыл бұрын
Like, I mean, I don't know a lot about these things but I would imagine that the force is so huge that it will turn any big piece of glass into shreds, so you end up with only the tiny sand-like structures sticking around. And maybe bigger glass pieces end up with bigger stress differentials, or something of that sort, and want to break up with pieces of roughly uniform stress?... I'd imagine you'd have to take concepts from physics, chemistry, and material science to fully understand this. Again, I don't really know. My intuition was shouting "it must feel like sand" at that point in the video, since safety glass is made the way a prince rupert's drop is... But why safety glass doesn't break into shreds that can cut you is another question...
@Skinnyrd8 жыл бұрын
+azlhiacneg The Prince Rupert Drop does feel like sand after it explodes and does not cut you. I'm now curious to know if other types of breaking glass under the same high pressure conditions (internal or external) can render the shards into harmless, sand-like shards.
@azlhiacneg8 жыл бұрын
I think there could be. Like, glass is really just a liquid that got cooled down really fast and didn't have time to form a crystalline solid, right? Since that's the case, engineers should be able to cool the liquid down in various ways to make internal stresses build up the same way a prince rupert's drop does. Safety glass is a really good example. I guess the most counter intuitive part about this for me is that having glass explode is literally safer than having it break up into multiple pieces.
@JasonFuller6 жыл бұрын
you need to run the audio though a denoising app...