kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fdZnrZOesNa9pKc.html this is the one they copied in The Crown

This is much later.

I didn’t know Charles could dance. What an idiot, Charles had the perfect wife and killed her.

They always dance so fast

He danced too fast, forcing her to follow at an unnatural pace. @@laurajonhson1794

Boyish broad and stiff. Why not atleast have girly haircut.

Veronica Bhrams what do you suppose? She’s so beautiful he has a mother fixation on Camilla she could still be with him an ALIVE! Charles I hope u pay one day!

Lo que tú quieras... But histérica la pobre.

@@1171 I y24 h4u uki it

@Denise Longtin but Charles did not love her he killed her

She was the most elegant and beautiful royal of all time! Beautiful inside and out!

Flat?

Charles was not the best but he certainly was not the worst dancer either. Diana was very very tall -

I felt the same way in both videos! He is just pushing her off it seems.

You don't know what you are talking about. They are JIVING. To do it effectively, then the two people act as counterweights, balancing each other, They throw each other outward and then pyull in together again. That is how it is done. There is just ONE PROBLEM. Diana is wearing a long tight skirt which is totally unsuited to THIS type of dancing. It means that both she and Charles are taking very small steps, and doing a lot of spinning on the spot. If she was wearing a full skirt, they would be putting on a much better show.

This is how it is done...kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iMxlaMp5sJqchoU.html

@@MandyJMaddison lol sorry fred astaire. Most people don't like Charles so don't bother trying to find positive comments about him in yt sections. Also I doubt people are judging his dancing from a professional aspect like yours lmao. I love how you're defending it down this comment section it's not that deep, you're way too defensive over it

Rightly said sir.

Paul Linnane, Your comment is wishful thinking. At this date, 1988, they were in Australia to mark the Bicentenary of the founding of Sydney and European settlement in Australia. What they are doing here is putting on a very GOOD SHOW. They are simply collaborating because in fact they were unofficially separated and had not shared a bed for four years. Dina, at this date, had had at least four lovers, brokn up the marriages of two of her employees, and was in the middle of a five-year relationship with James Hewitt. Charles had spent 1984 and 1985 in deep depression, and then returned to Camilla, having been faithful to Diana for the first five years of the marriage. Diana, here, indicates her amazing ability to be utterly charming. She looks totally gorgeous, she is a stunning dancer, and no doubt, by the end of the dance, every man in the room was in love with her.

@@MandyJMaddison How do you know when they shared a bed and when they didn't?

@@songbirdy THat was Diana's claim.

@@MandyJMaddison not true He cheated on her right away

@@joyceanderson3165 There is no evidence whatsoever that Charles cheated on Diana within the first five or six years of the marriage, either with Camilla or anyone else. Pople have made this accusation over and over, based on the fact that Diana said "There was always three in the marriage." This was a very cunning implication of Diana's, made in the 1995 interview with Martin Bashir. Bashir had already, early in the interview, stated the date 1986 as the year Charles had got back together with Camilla. Diana DID NOT correct him over this date. She simply made an implication, much later in the interview. In fact, living with a person who suffers fron jealousy, suspicion, paranoia and an eating disorder IS very much like having a third party, ever present, in the marriage. The person who suffers from these things an can turn into a raging, sulking, blackmailing, threatening and accusing person, whenever these feelings are proked... and this can be quite unpredictable. The mental illness sits in the room, like a monster, the whole time.

😂🤣😅

You are absolutely right Diana she didn't stand a chance with that bore

Yes, that's what they say..... It was surly fun to watch, because Diana is always a pleasure. Charles' moves were as mechanical as a robot, or worse.

That really does show your a bad person

Camilla the horse

he didn't love diana they had nothing in common

Now he’s a little bitch 🐶

@@hubert4061 What a horrible, nasty comment

Ilcia Taracena-Del

If Diana is suffering any pain here it is because she was in the middle of a five-year relationship with James Hewitt, and she was probably missing him. She and CHarles had not been in a full maritial relationship for 4 years. This is purely for show.

Donna Obviously Charles was the one who could dance. Diana just looked awkward. He looks so charming and masculine.

Agree. He is a great dancer

PLove

o.j t.c bi

Única nunca te olvidaremos

Exactamente !

Que buena vida tuvo no?!

lunar.que le pasa cual buena vida, si esos mounstros se la destrozaron desde el principio. La buena vida para ella fue el Consuelo de tener 2 hijos, pero no la dejaron disfrutarlos.

Too bad idiot Charles was thinking of horse face Camilla the whole time while dancing with beautiful Diana !!

@@veravaladez1525 so what if he loved Camilla, Diana was quite simple and not his equal in intelligence and wit for sure.

@@dorismc1712 I wonder how you can defend Camilla!!!.....she ruined Charles and Diana's marriage and her own... She did'nt give a damn that there were 2 children involved who were badly hurt emotionally.....Princess Diana was, not only beautiful but also caring and sensitive...she helped many good causes around the world....she was and still is the People's Princess and would have made a wonderful Queen....can you imagine old horse wrinkly Camilla wearing a crown? as to being simple and he intelligent, I think i was the other way around.... Disgraceful couple!!!

Seriously? They danced terribly bad ... I wouldn't even call it a dance. He almost harmed her arm in one moment. Are those who liked this comment simply blind? Or it's enough to call some ugly people royal and everybody will cry and scream how beautiful they are? :) funny people

It was lovely to look back on.

Ann Carper no

No tiene ritmo. A mi ella me agrada pero la verdad parece una estaca.

This isn't the beginning.. their marriage was already pretty much over during this tour

Christine McCarty caring people, not carrying

No. It's hard to look back and second guess, especially when you don't think you've done anything wrong. It's just sad.....all of it.

Sure, he knows he never had to get married with this bad woman full of head...

Yes I expect he does and can’t help comparing who he ended up with - and the moral of this :- be careful what you wish for or in his case who you wish for 🤔

El pprincipe Charl2s no sabe bailar pobre Diana como la trae Solo da vueltas

I feel the same

So happy BEAUTIFUL

Si lo único bueno que ha hecho y que hará; y ese es su castigo. Y también que nunca podrá igualar a Diana y a Harry.

Las o los demás son malas imiacoones que se quieren parecer ayer . Pero solo hay un original de cada persona e irrepetible . A menos que hubiera una hija igualita a ella , hubiera sido lo única forma . Pero como no fue así , nunca habrá otra como ella.

Tem certeza gue a princesa ñ estava dançando com o sapo homen feio esse princepe feio ogue ele fez com ela filihno da mamaē😨😨😨😨😨

hehe

Bet Muñoz Error. Nuestra princesa argentina Máxima de Holanda es bella, muy inteligente, excelente hija y madre, altruista, generosa y muchas otras condiciones por la que se la reconoce no solo en Holanda sino en todo el mundo.

@@alevanek9388 en Argentina existen Príncipes y Princesas? soy Argentino y nunca supe de esto jajaja .

She was either cute or beautiful !!

@@veravaladez1525 when she was young she was cute, later (after giving bird to her 2 sons) she become very beautiful young woman!

La cara de caballo Camilla teniendo a Diana tan bonita viejo estupido !!

Pero como la camila es tan fea y mala, el se siente a su lado feliz, POR SE SIENTE "superior", esa es su pareja - igual o peor que el.

Así es, pero la bruja mayor y sus secuaces no la dejaron, pero Harry les ha dado una leccion.

Princesse Charlotte is Elisabeth II mini me. Nothing in Charlotte remember Diana.

Yes ! If he would have love her a bit more than Camilla Story would have been a true fairytale marriage and their country would have love having her for a Queen and sons will still have their Mom enjoying her grandkids now.. 😱😱

Jane McGrath yes what a shame this wasn't a real relationship Just think what it could have been Enjoying their grandchildren with the world adoring them Diana would still be alive and Charles would have been popular Unlike today .what a shame .

Jane McGrath theyre whole should have been like this and with him and with him giving her a good time only and loving her only!

It's shame, Diana was beautiful. Charles ended up marrying a whore who looks like a man. Smh.

globalcoupledances a mi no me gusto. Diana no tiene ritmo.

Camilla never went away! Than there was Janet Jenkins for 21 years, and Charles’s favourite mistress the late Lady Kanga. Than there were Elizabeth Buchanan, and Susan Townsend. The Cunning Camilla had sent them all packing, including the young Diana. Camilla is a schemer. The one who totally controls the weak, bouffant Charles. Camilla babies him, and is the mother figure he never had. In fact she is a spitting image, of Charles’s nanny.

@@millyherzog4640 Ewww-dipal

He was one of the biggest Ahole I come to know

@millie- Wow, I’m impressed with your knowledge about Charles; it is spot on. It’s true that he had other mistresses but the Royal Family is doing this revisionist history that Camilla and Charles had this great love story when Charles only wanted to be Camilla’s tampon. It’s reported that they do not even live with each other right now. I think that insecure and petulant Charles deeply resented Diana’s natural star power and popularity with the public and he made her suffer because of it. Charles is comfortable with Camilla because she will never steal the spotlight from him with her ugly face.

She deserved to be divorced. After she threw herself down the stairs while expecting Prince William she should have been exiled to a mental asylum.

Oye porque escribes con tanta puntuación, aprende aescribir por favor, gracias!!

Gladys Nelson SI. SERÁS. TARADA. ESCRIBÍ. MEJOR. VOS ES. MI CELULAR ESCRIBE. ASI

Lilian Flynn if the first time Prince Charles married with camila maybe no need Lady Diana pain like that. She already happy with someone she loves.

Lilian Flynn, The person who said that was Diana, fifteen years down the track. It was a lie. There is no evidence whatsoever that Charles was unfaithful to Diana in any way, in the first five years of the marriage. What you see here is 1988. They married in 1981. 1984- Diana, pregnant with Harry, fell in love with her security officer, Charles moved into a different bed. and that was the end of the marriage. 1986 Diana has had four or five affairs and broken up two people's marriages. She takes up with her riding instructor, James Hewitt. It lasts five years, on and off.... 1986 Charles, deeply depressed, and not having told HIS MOTHER that his wife was committing TREASON (i.e. she was endangering the Royal Line of Succession. We do not know for sure who Harry's father is, and Charles refused the suggestion that he should be tested.). 1986 Charles reunites with his old lover Camilla and has been with her now for 34 years. . 1988 Here they are, still not having made a PUBLIC announcement that they are in fact separated, putting on a GOOD SHOW. And they do dance together extremely well. I am sure that like almost everybody else on the plant, you WANT the problems of their marriage to have been caused by Charles, but they were not. Diana was Narcissistic, promiscuous, a bully and a liar. Yes, and VERY VERY charming and good at getting great publicity.

MandyJMaddison Actually she was borderline. You’re the narcissist coward fangirl who hides herself behind a screen and keep on spread lies about someone who can’t defend herself anymore. Go get a life! Shame on you!

@@Annais1211 It has been proposed a number of times that Diana had Borderline Personality Disorder. But she doesn't fit quite well enough. The main area in which Diana does not fit Borderline Personality Disorder is her ability to show sustained empathy and care for other people. This is typical of a FRAGILE Narcissist. Your typical Grandiose Narcissist does not give a damn about anyone, and can be charming and apparently magnanimous ONLY to create an impression. This is not what Diana was doing. Part of her motivation, I am sure, is that she wanted to SEE HERSELF as a "good person". This goes much further than just creating a public image. Her self-perception was very fragile...... and by "doing good" , she was achieving something for others, and maintaining her own self-esteem, in so much as she could. Regardless of her motivation for her charitable actions, what she actually ACHIEVED was remarkable. And it was all the more remarkable simply because she WAS a person with a personality disorder. 1. She succeeded in overcoming the general public's aversion to people with HIV/Aids 2. Her involvement in the Land Mines issue greatly influenced attitudes. 3. She personally gave joy and encouragement to so many people, particularly to people who were suffering. All this is wonderful. But it does not reduce the fact that the Royal Family are still to this day badly affected by lies that Diana told. And the points that I make are not about diminishing Diana. now she is dead. They are about restoring the dignity of people WHO ARE LIVING and who continue to suffer because of Diana.

@@MandyJMaddison Treason? Give me a fucking break. Perhaps if Diana hadn't been lied to and had been truly loved she wouldn't have had to go looking for it outside her marriage but Charles couldn't give up the Rotweiler. Diana was used by those people. So fuck em.

By then she had already realized he had conned her. Not a nice guy.

@Cardinal Red No. He NEVER abandoned her. That is exactly what he did not do. He was faithful to her for five years. But when he found her, pregnant with his child, and with her security officer..... it was the end of the marriage. He moved into another room, and simply kept quiet about it. It is forty years since he made that unfortunate marriage to a violent, suspicious, neurotic woman , who was also beautiful and enchanting........ And in those forty years he has never told the world about the misery that she put him through, or the betrayals, and TREASON (a crime against the crown) of her frequent extramarital relationships. You might THINK you know what went wrong...... Nobody wants to blame a blonde beautiful smiling angel, when they canblame Mr Big-ears and Old Horse-face, do they?

@@vcoonrod You are exactly wrong. She is the person who her sisters called "Duchess" because she had pictures ofPrince Charles stuck on her bedroom wall, and had a plan to be Queen of England. Diana was a trouble-causing, emotionally disturbed, narcissistic bitch. But she was also very very charming, charismatic, exceptionally beautiful and built like a catwalk model. She targetted him quite deliberately, and charmed him She convinced him that SHE was the person that he needed to stand by his side, through all his troubles "I saw the film of you, at your Uncle's funeral. You were SO ALONE! You just NEEDED SOMEBODY who would be there, ESPECIALLY FOR YOU!".......... Cam you imagine that magnificently beautiful young woman, saying this to a man whose favourite uncle had been blown up, and whose remains he had had to identify? Can you imagine Charles, sitting here at a barbecue, with THIS YOUNG WOMAN gazing at him out of her huge blue eyes, and telling him in her gentle, hushed voice that she could SEE how much he needed someone? And when Diana was telling this story, she gave her usual little mean, self-satisfied smirk, and said "And after that, he followed me around for the rest of the evening, like a pet puppy-dog!" What you do not know about beautiful sweet Diana was that she said cruel, demeaning, spiteful, sarcastic things about people habitually. She could put on a good show, briefly, for people in a nursing home or hospice....... But she had no empathy whatsoever for the people she was close to. Charles, contrary to what you have heard, remained faithful for five years..... while from 1984 Diana commenced having affairs. I have recently been told that she was already involved with an employee between the birth of the children, but possibly Charles never knew about that one.

@Cardinal Red You have just made the claim " Sad what he did later when he abandoned her." What you are saying is nonsense. This video is from is 1988. You obviously do not know what the time-frame was. > Married mid 1981 > Mid 1982- William born > Late 1982- A Photoshoot taken i in which Diana is keeping the baby away from its father, jiggling a spewy baby above her head in a stupid manner, and throwing the spewy cloth at Charles, in front of the cameras. > Jan 1984 -Sept 1984 Diana pregnant with Harry, Diana knows the baby is a boy, but withholds this information from Charles. Knowing he is hoping it is a girl. She later states that she was TERRIBLY HURT when he said "Oh, it's a boy!" > !984- Diana later stated that in this period she fell in love with a wonderful man who was "the best man I ever had". Keep in mind that she was pregnant with Charles' child. > 1984- Charles ended marital relation with Diana and moved into another room > 1984-86- Diana had at least four lovers including Barry Manakee the security officer. > NOTE- Diana's infidelities were TREASON. This is a crime against THE CROWN because it puts the line of succession to the throne at risk. > Charles action was to terminate relations with her but to keep completely quiet about it. An English Noble NEVER blames the Lady........ and he NEVER has. > 1986- Diana started a relationship with James Hewitt that was on and off (with a few other lovers) for five years. I think Hewitt really loved her, but sh was not faithful to him. She was the toast of the Officers' Mess at Wellington Barracks. > 1986- the same year as Hewitt came into Diana's life, two of Charles' friends asked his old girlfriend Camilla to get in touch. > Diana was FURIOUS. Even though she did not want or love Charles, she did not want to give up her hope of being Queen of England. i.e. She did NOT WANT a divorce. > 1988- Trip to Australia- This is the trip shown in the video. In fact they had not been a couple for four years. > Diana kept on putting on a reasonably good face in public, because she still wanted to be Queen. > About 1989 - Diana started blurting things out to the Press. > Because Charles had been with Camilla for about 3 years, Diana was able to pretend that they had ALWAYS cheated on her. > Why was she killed? > She wasn't. It was an accident waiting to happen *Faulty car, broken seatbelts, *Incompetent driver who was not licensed for a large limousine and usually drove a small morris. *Driver on a cocktail of medication. * Look at the photo taken just before they left, through the car window, Henri Paul is totally razzed up like a little boy in a dodgem car..... but he is about to drive a mercedez over a hump and into a tunnel at 90 mph. > The person who was responsible was Mohammed Fayed, who negligently hired that car and that driver, and an inexperienced security officer. > Why did th Fayed's want Diana? > Why would two Muslim men want an English "Christian" princess who had cheated on her husband, and who SHOULD have been under the control of her sons, her brother or some other male? Undrstand that if Diana walked in the main square of Cairo, in her short skirt, she would have been raped....... so what did the Fayeds want with her? * Money. .... *.Fame. They were business people. Diana, was worth a FORTUNE as advertising promotion. For that reason Fayed senior had told his son to drop his girlfriend and have Diana instead. They hadn't known each other long. Fayed LIED about her being pregnant. Diana was fairly dumb, but not so dumb that she would have got pregnant in the first 12 weeks of knowing Dodi. And if she WAS...... would she have told his father? ANY WOMAN will tell you NO. > Fayed then did his best to get as much fame and money as he could out of her, after she was dead. Poor Diana was duped by a couple of users.

@Cardinal Red It has lost its spacing. I will put the spacing in, because there is a chronological list. it isn't "incoherent." There may be topos becasue my sight is very poor now, and I have to double check everything

He's not a dancer.. He was there to dance with his wife at a social event, not to help Diana look like a ballerina

Aura que la princessa Diana se tronpesara !! Viejo feo !!

C Mac, What you are saying is almost certainly right. The reason why, from quite early in the marriage, they had mostly operated as individuals was that Diana was extremely uncooperative. And she never enjoyed meeting high-ranking people at official functions. Within the Royal Family, there is a lot of scope in the types of duties that people take on. This is a State Visit to am important occasion and they are there acting on behalf of the Queen. So it was important that Diana accompanied Charles. (Anyway, there were a lot of really fun activities taking place in Sydney at the time) > The reason why Diana did so many visits to nursing homes, hospices and infants schools is that these were her preferred options, and ones that she could easily handle in a charming manner. So those are the charities that she was allocated by the Royal Family. She was not expected to go and visit Prisons, for example. Nobody sent her out to deal with protesting coalminers. She avoided universities, where she might have been required to produce intellectual conversation. > The reason why Charles does not appear particularly thrilled to be dancing with her is that at this time *Diana was in the middle of a five year relationship with James Hewitt. *Charles had resumed his relationship with Camilla.

@@MandyJMaddison you seem to know quite a bit about the ins-and-outs of Princess Diana and that dog Prince Charles are you a journalist photographer paparazzi writing a book already wrote a book or are you just interested I don't think the last question is right but whatever you're saying what's good for the goose is good for the gander and he was cheating on her from the get-go give me a Heir and a spare and let me go to my dog face Camilla you almost speak as if Charles was right. Remember those words in sickness and health and richness and poor till death do you part well it took hard test for the country to accept Camilla and also his family a bunch horse radishes

And Mandy the Jitterbug Drive is all about jumping around jumping over each other pulling onto the floor used to be done in Harlem New York and they had a specific night called The Harvest Moon ball in New York City where they competed but the rest of us did Regular dancing which would be a fox trot a Rumba Tango quick step and the waltz

Look here I am so sure that they could have come to a happy understanding in the marriage if only Camilla had not butted in. she got attention just by being Charles honey. I am only 1/8 th English, but I really hate that woman.

@@lesliebroderick2913 - Leslie absolutely right!! If camila would have gone away I too believe they would've still been together today!!

Leslie Broderick you really are IGNORANT, and if you can't say anything nice about Camilla, then don't say anything at all. A very NASTY COMMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leslie broderick. ..100pc agree. ..old horse face caused it all by being involved with him!!!!. She could have said NO!!!!!!. ..BUT SHE WOULDN'T LET HIM GO!!!. .DIANA WOULD STILL BE HERE NOW IF SHE HAD DONE THE DECENT THING .!!!!...THE THOUGHT OF HER BEING QUEEN JUST FILLS ME WITH DREAD. . 😠 😢😨😈..ALONG WITH MILLIONS OF OTHERS!!!!!!....