Yes! Fullscreen is a must if you want to have the least amount of visual delay

@@kajzoo Thanks for the tip and also for all the useful vids , keep up the great work m8

Cristi -- Did anyone answer you? Full screen vesus windowed or windowed borderless? I do not see a difference, but want to hear from others. Thanks.

@@michaelmichael8147 Check my answer above :)

@@kajzoo Thanks, much appreciated.

I'm old so it would be nice if you spoke a little slower. ty

@@bbraun4966 what are you allowing yourself lol.. you can repeat what you havent understood on youtube as many times as you like. Just because youre old doesnt mean you need to give yourself those stupid excuses. Turn you brain on.

I had to scroll through these comments to see if anyone else caught this

ur own fault for not thinking about that

@@PizzandCodeine lol

Yep! Unfortunately was a long exam day and I mixed up the 2. Thanks!

@@kajzoo so you want to increase your horizontal resolution and decrease your vertical from your monitor's native resolution to minimize latency?

Or cheats today i was playing with 430u and enemy 430u* same tank was blamimg me for having cheats becouse I pend him 4 times in a row and he bounced 3 shots xD

It should only take one time :) GLHF

If theres a cluster of tanks and everyone is firing in close proximity of each other it can get very annoying very quickly, but true

But it does matter when it comes to objects, since if objects do not get rendered and theres a guy hiding behind them, problems arise

@@kajzoo Yea, that still applies. Anyways leo bad m60 good.

Messed that one up, sorry and thanks for correcting me :D My minds on a lot of things lately including exam stuff.

@@kajzoo No problem mate, keep it up, youre a rising star in wot youtubers!

It spares me time to not care about reaiming that much when I try to look around after firing

FOV is preferential once again, but I prefer the highest value possible

sure, just keep 1440p at the end of your resolution :P

0:16 That is exactly why server reticle will not deceive you. Getting more fps than your monitors refresh rate does indeed matter, although very small bit when it comes to making snapshots or shooting faster after you click the mouse button. Resolution downscaling does do a lot actually, even attached a guide how to do it, I was not talking about performance improvements, but about different aiming outcome once said resolution has been lowered. Draw distance does remove some objects that might be in your "way" while aiming at targets at longer ranges, I do not stand corrected here either. As for the vegetation quality maybe, yet still easier to use the lowest setting because that helps you tell the bad bushes apart from the good ones based on their ingame visual appearance.

@@kajzoo For me this still doesnt make any sense. Either my non native english fails me here or the reasoning is completly off here. Changing your resolution from 1920 by 1080 to 1800 by 1080 is a difference of ~6% less pixels that need to be rendered. The framerate gain on PCs isnt parralel to the pixels you have to render. Even if nothing else is considered here (no Performance loss for scaling, no output matching whatever), this jump would gain you at best a difference of 6% but you lose a whole lot of picture clarity. In reality most people cant even gain close to 6% performance with this drop due to their default driver config trying to smoothen non native game resolutions to better match the monitors native resolution. This resolution drop is soooo tiny that most people getting 100+ fps anyways wont feel the smoothness difference but will definelty notice the overall added blurryness of the picture. I also dont know what you try to tell me with "That is exactly why server reticle will not deceive you.". Of course it does somehow. It doesnt matter how fast your PC can pump out those frames or in which resolution you shove your crosshair arround, your crosshair is updated 20 times per second, no matter what you change in your settings. More FPS wont change anything because the server wont accept anything that doesnt allign with the servers crosshair anyways. Even if you turn server crosshair off in the options, you cant shoot until the server confirms the position of your crosshair (that weired delay some people talk about when turning off server crosshair). And if you actually didnt talk about the performance gain of a resolution drop, you kinda suggest differenet in your own wording. "Smoother aiming" doesnt happen just because you chose a non native resolution. Its possible that you might prefer this resolution but from a technical side this doesnt make any sense. Maybe its a placebo.

@@3mimin3 To word it simply, your mouse will have to cross through less pixels than before, therefore making its movement faster, or in other words "smoother". Try it out for yourself. My reasoning has nothing to do with the performance or video quality.

@@3mimin3 You are right about the resolution. Any non-native lower resolution causes the image to blur, so there is no reason to change the resolution especially since the game is not so demanding.

Everything you said here is true, if anything the guide is quite wrong on the technical aspects and is more a preference thing of Kajzoo himself. Reducing your vertical or horizontal plane to create more 'smoothness' is basically a non-statement in the first place. It's effectively the same as increasing your x or y axis on the mouse. I guess he played PUBG in the past since it's literally what the kids used to do for better fps. Funny enough the decrease of pixels is so tiny it doesn't matter. By creating a custom resolution you introduce input lag to the system since it needs to be rendered in a non-native resolution. Wot also has about 200 ms delay built in to how the game functions.. this obviously is imposed because the entire game is server side / accommodate for lower end users that are playing on soviet laptops from 1990. Having high fps in wot is good to have in the sense of having less motion blur and a generally smoother experience. Like playing on 60 hz feels horrible compared to 240 hz, but if you are used to it both will be absolutely playable. In technical terms, wot has a very low tick rate and is server sided. This game in it's core is literally designed to be playable on a potato, or dial up modem 10 years ago. Running ridiculously high fps will always feel nicer but will have no technical benefit over say the median 144 hz. Draw distance on maximum is also a horrible idea, it has no effect on tanks but purely static objects like buildings. Anything above the first tick just renders pointless stuff outside of the map and just tanks performance. My guess, is that wot players are generally pretty clueless, but for some reason some of them started introducing custom resolutions which strain the GPU additionally. This boosts the hz, voltage etc of the GPU so it can actually increase performance. Modern gpu's adapt to the amount of processing they need to do, and if a game like wot, that is very CPU intense, gets pushed into rendering more it could take some of the load away from the CPU bottleneck instead of staying in a lower boost mode. Especially since GPU scheduling is a thing in windows. Anyway this is still world of tanks. It's one of the slowest games known to mankind in terms of mechanics and user inputs. You have top players playing in all sorts of varied settings and configurations. In the end this game is mainly about positioning and experience. If someone can't be consistent in hitting shots it's more likely due to them just being bad at hitting shots and not technical restraints or errors. Even v-syncs induced delay has no real noticeable effect on wot's gameplay.

It’s mostly the gaming mouse yes, check my pc setup below my stream at Twitch.tv/kajzoo

That was possible before some Patch (It's only in Replays now). You can't get it afaik. Maybe with some Mod, but I don't know of any.

@@Aquila. thanks mate! hopefully wg might bring this back, cause I think lots of us would welcome that

@@patrikmatejzik8239 Would be nice, but i highly doubt it. They are too focused on ruining the Game

Hey! Nothing besides MoE mod

Motion blur is a must to disactivate in any game that you need awareness of what's happening in the screen if you're aiming for score results since it artificially blurs your image and difficoults your vision while moving your camera, but it's always up to you if you really like that effect ofcourse

@@Okmuchacho Motion Blur is an issue because of LCD panel tech. But even if you had an OLED panel, you'd still only turn it on if you are at 240+ fps / hz.

pleb, L

Yep, if you have terrain Quality on minimum, you'll often hit terrain when hull down or sneaking around a corner

Try both

so where can i do it?

True, but good video