Over 20 in any one borough

I play in these games regularly and I’ve been to at least 20 individual games Over my time here. There are so many more that I have never heard of.

Loads, everywhere

Edit 2,4 & 5 card

easily 50

Yes… Thank you Bart for the introductory lesson on Home Games; I learned a lot just from this video.

It’s not 3k an hour .... it’s a lot but not 3K that’s $50 a min you sound stupid

That’s why he does bluff though cause he has the cash to do it and not care

If its not a tough game I'd say medium pair they aren't high on 3betting like JJ or 99 against a player who said they are tight imaged

No. Villains line didnt make sense.

Thank God players aren’t balanced bots or id need your program

That seems like not a bad approach. It seems to me you can neither fold nor call all of your over pairs. You need some way to separate them, and your approach seems reasonable.

Just realized $75 rake, that will definitely offset a majority of the 20k mixed with some chip palming lol. $75 a half, if they probably get 20 hands an hour and play for 8 hours do you freaking realize that is 12 thousand dollars in rake? Wtf is that? How is this allowed? Bro can run that game 10 times a year and that could literally be his job. He wouldn't have to do anything else the rest of the year and if his guys play 8 hours on 10 separate occasions, my dude walks away with 120 grand 😂😂😂😂 I have got to get in on this home game thing. I should start running one. Sht id be happy with the same rake casinos take. $10 per hand I'd take. You'd take over a grand a night home.

@@JTmakesfunofdiabled-hs9khlet’s do this! Where u at?

exactly. Pocket KK, QQ are not much different than 4th set in this hand context. The only difference is that high pair loses to two pairs which is out of question in this hand context. V cannot have 65/46...SO, if I'm calling with low set I supposed to call with high pair, too.

@@pot_kivach160 It’s a bit different because low set beats two pair, if I’m remembering this hand correctly. So I think you can call all your sets but have to sometimes call/sometimes fold over pairs.

@@ewallt Which two pairs? (read my post above).

Id play with a runner because they are usually looser. The house is going to take, regardless, so it doesn't affect my odds if he has better odds

Thats only when ur the fish. As a pro i show my hand as much as they want to see cuz im so polarized they cant read me

There's a ton of money to win in these games. It's usually well worth it. Wild.

Yes. And I've played in games with higher rake, and - you might be shocked - they're beatable!!

I've been to PLO games in New York that take 300, no joke.

I play at home games with 5% no cap rake on hold em and 75$ dollar cap in plo 5 card

Soooooo many more hands a set is beating compared to how many nutted hands he could have

Thats a green screen, goofball

Wow it’s as if you could see into the future

poker is a coffin

@@MrAgmooreif u suk

I think it’s good. It’s simple and clean and not distracting

Reminds me of the expression where you look around the table and don't see the patsy...

Funny you said this…and then Nik Airball + Wesley have come out and said Mars cheated them using a card mechanic during private games.

I don't usually 3 bet 55 from an OOP spot, but I don't see much to question after that. I do find it interesting when Bart includes the "nuts" in his MDF discussions though. I mean... if hero has a 7 there is no decision to make right? So it seems to me we should define our MDF range with hands that actually call for a decision. I think the top of hero's range here is 88. He could also have 66. If hero sometimes has 99, I could never fold that.

@@EllieBanks333 I wouldn't typically 3B over a raise from LJ and a call from CO with 55-99 in the SB. I'm mixing up my SB play between 3B or fold and some calls/over-calls. I think with most small and middling pairs, I'd just be calling, unless the original opener is splashy and the CO isn't the type to slow-play I'm mostly 3B'ing TT+, AK, AQs,, A5s, and KQs. It would suck to squeeze with a middling pair here, and get back-raised by the CO. I don't want to take the betting lead away with a hand like this when I'm OOP. I don't see how we could ever fold a 7 here, if we somehow got here with a 7. If V double-flatted pre with T7, he's just getting my money. But there again, hero shouldn't be here with 77, 87 or A7s any more than he should be here with 55, and V really shouldn't be here with T7. It's always a weird situation when we over-play some hand that shouldn't even be in our range, and we actually make a strong yet vulnerable hand with it. What's interesting here is how often the CO is double-flatting with 66 or 87s. Hero made a 5x 3B. I wouldn't think V would have much 66 or 87s in his range, so flopping any set here would seem like the nuts on the flop. But because hero really shouldn't have sets or straights here, I think I'd bet bigger, just to avoid giving 77-TT, 33 and A7s a good price to peel. It's hard to figure out what CO is double-flatting with that calls the flop and bets turn, especially if hero goes larger, like $500-$600. My pre-flop 3B range is going to mostly be hands that aren't strong here, so the theoretical top of my range is going to be TT+, which is why I'd have bet bigger on the flop, if I was way out of line pre and got lucky enough to flop a set. If I bet $500-$600 on this flop, get called, and then the turn is an 8, I think I'd just check, and hope V checks back. The fact that the turn brings in a BDFD would make it impossible for me to fold turn if V stabbed at it. On river, I'm probably just block-betting and praying V doesn't raise, or maybe just check-calling. As hero, I would just flat pre and look to set-mine. I'd check-raise flop huge, and probably just take it down right there. If LJ or CO calls my flop x/r, I probably barrel turn and check-call a reasonable sized river bet, though I'm not loving it with this run-out. The way hero played this, his hand is way under-repped, and way above what I'd think his range should be. Don't know how we fold river when we get here like hero did.

Lots of 7x. 87s/76/A7s/77. If he's really playing a lot of hands, then he has some offsuit combos, as well, but I doubt he has many. He also has some higher sets.

He might also check some of these two pair hands on turn or river narrowing his range even more polar on the river

I'd think 66/44 would raise flop.

@@1vailchris sometimes, maybe, but there's not a lot of reason to. If you flop a set here against a normal 3 bet range, they're so often drawing dead or to two outs.

@@Jermo484 As CO, I don't think I'd be double-flatting with 44, and probably not 66, so if I did happen to double-flat, and then flopped a set, I'd be raising with it, especially on this board texture. A lot of hero's 3B range is going to be happy to get money in on the flop, whereas hero's not going to be as enthusiastic on a lot of run-outs. For example, this one. Hero's not going to love the turn or river if he's got JJ+. CO could have some bluffs in his range when he raises flop after double-flatting, but I'd think they'd almost all have a 7 in them, or be 88. Maybe 33. Other than 33, all CO's flop bluffs get there on the turn. It's weird for CO to double-flat, and it's hard to think what CO's range looks like, but if it includes middling pairs and middling suited connectors, this board would seem to smash it. So raising to punish hero's c-bet with over-pairs, because the board is more favorable for CO, seems at least somewhat theoretically correct.

@@Jermo484 Just to simplify - I think you're saying there's no reason to raise 66/44 for value. I think there's reason to raise those hands for value, but also for CO to raise flop with some bluffs, simply because I agree with you that hero really shouldn't have any sets or straights here after 3B'ing pre from the SB.

It would be odd enuff to double flat QQ pre, but then to turn it into a bluff on river for pot size bet? I'd be shocked if villain turned over QQ here.

More likely he had some AX of diamonds that bricked out, probably AdTd, blocking the nuts (T7). If he double-flatted pre with QQ, and decided to turn his hand into a bluff on the river, he's beyond terrible.

Or you could just not watch the video and move on with your life. You think Bart is making these videos to please YOU specifically? This may come as a shock to you, but the world doesn't revolve around you.

I often listen to these as audio only. I enjoy the recaps. To each his own, I guess.

Dude.. this is also a podcast where it's audio only

What an awful thing to post.

lol classy

Dude WTF is wrong with you?