HELP ME PLEASE !!!!! This all happens after the police came to the apartment 15 X in 9 months . My ex called the first time to get me evicted that day . Police told her she needed to get an eviction. She never did . Eventually it got so bad i called the police because she wouldn't stop harassing me and yelling and slamming doors . After ther police got there i left to a hotel for 2 days . I called the police and told them she was going to change the locks with no eviction and they told me to call back after she changes them. So i did , but within the two days she had moved all my stuff out into her storage unit without my permission. 30 days after that she tries to commit suicide which she blamed me for and them 30 days after that she was back in the ICU for 8 days where she told me it was because of septis from a dentist visit.. I dont believe her story.. I was going back and forth from hotel back to apartment for over a yeer and then in July they pretended to be my customer baited me into Sandy Utah and arrested me. I didnt get a court date for 3 months . Officer sent me a fb pm saying that he thinks im a good guy and i just got caught up in some things.. He also said he wanted to help me find a job.. Thats weird becasue he knew i was self employed.. He also left a voicemail that it was his understanding that i was arrested and booked into jail.. Well hes the one who arrested me and took me there . i didnt know he was officer white the day of . It was only after i was released the next day that i learned that. I called everyday for 2 .5 months before i was given the first court date. In both messages from the officer he wanted me to come down to the [police station and sign a citation... I refused because everybody including a lawyer told me not to sign anything since it was after i was already arrested and booked into jail. Below is an email from officer White supervisor . I dont understand how they can issue a warrant for an arrest that happened 3 months prior ?? Why fill out an affidavit for my arrest if ive already been arrest on probable cause ? Did the magistrate not determine whether or not probable cause existed Or Did the judge not find probable cause and the police tried to trick me into signing a " citation" but really a probable cause statement to substantiate the arrest to cover it up?? Is this a violation of due process , right to a speedy trial and illegal arrest ??? I think the officer and my ex gf were hooking up... I have 60+ vids of my exgf acting like a child screaming slamming doors getting in my face , i reported her assaulting me 4 times scratches and boke a laptop on my arm police never did anything . They arrested me took my truck that had all my tools and all my cloths in it , missed a job that day and the next day when i got out i literally had nothing .. both my ex gf and i lives got worse because they allowed her to illegally kick me out at the same time her mental illness got worse to the point of suicide and that was after i was illegally kick out. __________________________________________________________ Email from officer white supervisor From: Dennis Burbank Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 4:04 PM To: Heather Blanco Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Sandy Police Case SY2021-***** I am touching base with you to check on the status of that warrantless domestic violence arrest 37 days ago? I left you a voicemail I have talked to you another lawyer out of state everybody has told me not to go sign anyting. If you could please update me I would appreciate it thank you On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 7:56 PM Heather Blanco wrote: Mr. Burbank, Per our conversation, Office White is investigating a domestic violence incident under the case number listed above. In order for us to move this case forward into court, we need to either issue you a citation for the charge of domestic assault, or complete a probable cause statement which will be submitted to a Judge for approval. Upon approval, a warrant for your arrest will be issued by the court. Should you choose to sign a citation, you are not admitting guilt, you are simply promising to appear before a Judge to enter your plea of guilty or not guilty. In order to take this option, you will need to contact dispatch at 801 799 3000 and refer to Sandy Police case SY2021-31333. Let them know you need to meet with an Officer to receive a citation. Once that citation is issued, the case will be referred to the City Prosecutor’s Office and you can contact the court to set up a court date. If you are not comfortable with the citation, Officer White will petition the Judge for an arrest warrant. Once the warrant is issued, you can contact the court and let them know you need to set up a court date. The Judge CAN recall the warrant, but that is up to the Judge. I cannot guarantee you will not be arrested on the warrant, and I can’t tell you how long this process will take, that is up to the courts.

They don't know what they're doing and the Supreme Court says it's fine and that's reasonable and the constitution is void if these people think they know what they're doing...

this happens in coucil meetings alot for city ordnances violations.

Right. Someone runs a red light in front of a cop. The cop should be required to get an arrest warrant for the driver before initiating a traffic stop. Cop comes upon a homeless person stabbing another homeless person. Cop should get an arrest warrant first instead of stopping the threat or detaining the suspect. Cop responds to a domestic disturbance and hears a female screaming for her life. Cop should turn around, leave, and go get a search warrant and arrest warrant first before entering. All of those warrant affidavits would be thrown out based on particularity because you don’t know who anyone is because you didn’t identify any of them. In your fairy tale world the cop would never be able to compel identification because he could never detain any of the suspects under reasonable suspicion.

@@seanmcmillan3455 there is no such thing as reasonable suspicion under the 4th amendment warrant clause, probable cause is only to get a legal lawful warrant. Therefore yes they by law should have to get a legal lawful warrant to arrest anyone. They can detain the person hold them there until they get said warrant from a judge if the judge decides it is legal. They have cell phones and fax machines/printers they can easily call a judge and give the details and name of the person that judge can issue said warrant to them to arrest (seize) or search said person or search and seize their property (effects), there is no excuse for any officer not to get one.

So you completely ignore the fact (or don’t realize) that a detention is a seizure. Your example would have a cop, under your definition/understanding, illegally seize a person without a warrant so he could get a warrant to legally seize him. And not every jurisdiction in the US has the capacity or even allows for telephonic or electronic warrants. There are a lot of areas that still wake up a judge in the middle of the night if necessary. So now you would require that for EVERY SINGLE arrest. I also don’t know where in the 4th Amendment it says a warrant is required for an arrest. Oh yes I do. It doesn’t. It says probable cause is required for a warrant. It doesn’t talk about arrests. You’re adding things that aren’t there. You also ignored my point about traffic stops.

I started learning how this court system works cause I can feel it in my bones that it's a great deception and I made it my mission to walk in that court room and just post up in the gallery and watch them like a hawk on how they fooling everybody and I've learned quite a bit from just watching them like a detective would watch me and you. One example is I watched a defendant plead guilty one time and the judge ask the (female prosecutor) what sentence he would like the defendant to receive and the prosecutor gave the judge his recommendations and judge quickly replied "as well as court cost"? And the prosecutor said " no this case has no affidavit report". The following day I enter the court room and it was a male prosecutor and everyone received court cost I even brought a notepad to take down all the name that were called and look up their cases and 3 out of 5 that I pulled up had no affidavit reports so if you really want to learn thier deception I recommend watching them in the courtroom it's the best way and you'll learn something new every time.

@@Reff370 🤭 you sneaky Wow I wouldn't of thought to do that, but I'm also not a subtle person, I'm 6'1 around 250 muscular with tattoos and very intimidating especially around cops, Lol if I tried they would definitely ask me why I'm there with at least two lol. But I absolutely dig what you are saying, I'm currently in every court there is as a pro se from 4th circuit appeals, federal district, state appeals, state circuit, traffic, Traffic court I don't go into, I handle them with written motions and challenge jurisdiction and just recently started removing cases on constitution questions or 14th 6th amendment substantive due process infringements. One of those challenges to traffic Quasi administrative jurisdiction courts is the AFFIDAVIT, or lack thereof from an actual damaged party... It's an abuse of process and malicious prosecution, and their stupid Quasi administrative jurisdiction doesn't recognize civil or criminal rules of procedures and constitution and rights and all that junk 🤭🤭🤭 But you are correct, the affidavit is fundamental in both civil and criminal cases, without them there's absolutely nothing that could rebut your affidavit... Plus attorneys or bar members cannot testify they are not witnesses or have affidavits on the record, Trinsey vs pagliero... Court cost don't get me started, I motion for in forma pauperis and have gotten it all but the state court of appeals, I've made objections and motions on my right to access the court but I had to pay the filing fee... Funny how much effort you see go into claiming immunity and just doing a job when you hold accountability, but constitution and rights they seem oblivious... It's the new good ol boy system and I promise you if you look at every major political seat in every state and even federal government you will find a Bar Association member either ex attorney turned senator governor blah blah blah... Like seriously if bar cards could be lit up on a map it would look like Cancer...

They can cite a false reason for stopping you then be wrong and the court says it's reasonable if they were wrong so the constitution is void if the officer made a mistake.. the rights don't exist now..

They make law when they decide the case. It's how the common law works. I was called for jury duty in a federal case and the judge asked us all if we were comfortable with him being the only source of the law. Meaning during the case we couldn't research law but he would tell us what the law is. I assume that means they were hiding law and manufacturing it..

Thats what a Grand Jury is-citizens who decide probable cause!

I notice on the notice of motion form the defendant is listed in all caps and the state attorney is listed as first letter capitalized and the rest lower case.

Or, it could be that these mock lectures are to present the information in a palatable format for those that want to distance-learn and become interested in law practice. Now, while his teaching methods may not be “traditional”, his explanation and grasp of the cases he presents is exceptional.

Did you say you took an oath to the bar association could you perhaps share the oath with me word for word I had no idea lawyers too an oath to be a member of the bar. I would greatly appreciate it. And thank you for sharing your experience in dealing with your law professors. If it was me I would have got his phone number and made a post on OfferUp and craigslist for a free car right before class and watch his phone blow up 🤣

Commiefornia wouldn't know legal law if it bit them in the but😂🤣😂.

Most of what you just said is either ridiculous or nonsensical. Are you one of those folks that thinks the right to travel means you can drive with a suspended license?

@@TheCorrectionist1984 Have not had a license in 16 years and use my roads all the time, because I am NOT a US slave/ subject...YOU are just ignorant and he was 100% correct.....

@@6StimuL84 , we'll as i have stated to other sovereign citizen types, please show me one time these legal arguments have worked in court. Cuz i can show you a fuck ton where they don't.

@@TheCorrectionist1984 Mike you're proving everyone's point by saying that any arguement against a cop will be thrown out because citizens are not seen as equally truthful as police. Police are regarded as expert witnesses and can manipulate police reports and fuck people over whenever they want to.

Where does it say in the 4th amendment that reasonable automatically equals a warrant? Or that unreasonable automatically means without a warrant?

@@panama2468 the right of the people to be secure in their persons (that means their bodies), houses,papers (that means every document they own, possess), effects (everything a citizen owns, their vehicle is their effects) against unreasonable searches and seizures ""SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED "". The fourth amendment explicitly states NO WARRANT SHALL BE ISSUED BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE Therefore the only reasonable search or seizure is only done so with a legal lawful valid warrant, and probable cause is only to get said warrant.

@@panama2468 4th amendment explicitly mandates a warrant is necessary to search anyone or anything.

@@panama2468 legally under the fourth amendment all officers/officials should have a legal lawful warrant before they even ask for any form of ID, driver's license, insurance, registration, title, deed, contract they are all papers(documents) and therefore protected under the warrant clause. The fact that they do so without a legal lawful warrant is unconstitutional and therefore illegal.

@@panama2468 a tery search without a legal lawful warrant is unconstitutional therefore illegal in violation of the 4th amendment warrant clause. As well as the 14th amendment section 1.

This is a classic case of Federalism. Each state has the right to legalize marijuana or restrict speed limits and a variety of other rules, policies and regulations. . Equal protection under the law means that pot can't be legal only for a person of a certain race, or only older drivers have to drive 55 MPH.

As the professor said, The attorneys and judges or The American Bar Association along with the 50 State Bars makes the rules.

You think sworn servants make the rules? You and the traitors of the BAR, are the real problem with America.

James Barnes: Are you accusing me of being the real problem? Because I commented that we are living under case law? I find it is best to check my post before I accuse people of things. To be clear, I believe the problem with America is the American People and to some extent the Constitution. It takes a lot of effort to change the Constitution but only 50% plus one to ignore it. I propose we do as the Constitution allows and increase the House Of Representatives to 10,000 members (no more than one per 30,000) and see if we can get a true idea of what the American people want. Get them out of Washington with all the lobbyists and into their communities. I would then like to see the census changed from dividing us up by our differences into a straight counting (not accounting) of heads.

@@timsteinkamp2245 They have no authority without our permission and no "cause of action" that has "standing" no "case."

He’s not that bad, simmer down and work on yourself. Lol.

What the fuck are you saying? Stop skill-fucking your keyboard grandpa.