you all prolly dont give a damn but does anyone know a method to get back into an instagram account?? I somehow lost my password. I love any help you can give me.

Glad it was helpful!

Agreed 100%

Have you looked it up yet

The Head Engineer would be in charge of all facets of engineering(structural/mechanical design) pertaining to a project. They are more adept at addressing the technical aspects of the project, and delegating the various engineers effectively -- whereas the Architect would be more equipped to assume the role of a Leader, mediating between all the various facets(Contractors, sub-contractors, Local Authority, Regional Administration, Quantity Surveyors) of the construction process. From what I gathered in the industry, the Architect articulates the preliminary design of the project to the Employer/Property Owner, along with the Quantity Surveyor's guiding hand, as to ensure optimal fiscal, environmental, and sustainable outcomes for the Property Owner. The Head Engineer would only report to the Architect, Quantity Surveyor, and the Contractors, as to ensure that they are following the overall design, and are completing the works in accordance with the variables set out in the Prime Contract... The Property Owner has little utility for the Structural/Mechanical reports of the Head Engineer, thus they would report to the Architect and the Quantity Surveyor. This line of command would dictate that the Architect assumes a Leadership role, preferably, over a Head Engineer. Also, Architects complete modules during the course of their tuition which equips them to manage and mediate between the facets of construction inter-and-intra-personally. This leadership should not be mistaken for a rung among the competency hierarchy, I believe both the Architect and Head Engineer are equally invaluable to a successful project! My knowledge on this is admittedly pretty elementary, but that's how I have it. Correct me if I'm wrong!

because the engineer is busy

In simple terms, the architect designs the building so they are responsible for it. The architect is the “professional of record” and is legally responsible for the health, safety, and welfare of a building. As he stated in the video the architect has a contract with the owner, and the general contractor has a contract with the owner. The architect hires structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing engineers as consultants for a project. Technically they work for the architect and not the owner, so that is why they report to the architect. Engineers don’t design buildings, they design components of a building.

In California, Contractors need 4 years Journeyman experience, and pass a 2-part test to get GC licensed. Engineers need a relevant college degree, min. 4 years experience, and pass 1 test to get PE licensed. Architects need a relevant college degree, min. 8 years experience tracked nationally by NCARB, and pass 5 tests to get licensed. Gee, who has the most (legal) responsibility here?

What no he just understands that this is for the smoll brain folks who dont want to be engineers but still want construction money 💰

Hindi Songs Lover you are mistaken baby. I am a license contractor. This video is gold.

I'm a student and I've obtained invaluable guidance from this video... Idk how one could state this is irrelevant, if you've watched the whole video...