No video

Profit Maximization

  Рет қаралды 42,780

Katherine Silz-Carson

Katherine Silz-Carson

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 36
@shanebrennan2121
@shanebrennan2121 6 жыл бұрын
thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you a millions times thank you. so grateful to have found this channel. studying micro from a textbook is literally impossible
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 6 жыл бұрын
Glad you have found it to be helpful. Thank you for watching!
@oneen1957
@oneen1957 4 жыл бұрын
Your video is easier to understand than what my prof teaches in online class. Keep up the good work! Love from Philippines!
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 4 жыл бұрын
I am glad that you are finding these helpful! Thank you for watching!
@ecoexperts5944
@ecoexperts5944 4 жыл бұрын
Great video. In 6:59 it will be clearer if it said the "slope of revenue curve"
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 4 жыл бұрын
Yes - thank you for catching that error!
@Mr.Eminem
@Mr.Eminem 4 жыл бұрын
Thanx a lot... I regret paying for my tution... Love from India...
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@LR2yt
@LR2yt 2 жыл бұрын
Hello Is it possible to make a video on how to calculate the profit max in the short run with cobb douglas ?
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 2 жыл бұрын
The example function in the video in the long-run profit maximization section is a Cobb-Douglas production function. Hope this helps!
@LR2yt
@LR2yt 2 жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson so for the short run i only solve for 1 of the xs? And for example if i chose to solve for x1 in the short run , is it the same way as we solved for x1 in the long run?
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 2 жыл бұрын
@@LR2yt Yes. In the short run, at least one input is fixed, so you would only solve for the input that is variable, and treat the fixed inputs as constants when you take the derivative. You will use the same methodology for the short run and the long run, but the math will be slightly different for the long run, because you are differentiating with respect to multiple inputs (at least 2), and you have a system of n equations and n unknowns (where n is the number of inputs), whereas in the short run, you are (usually) only differentiating with respect to a single input and solving a single equation with a single unknown. Hope this helps!
@sagarkumawat7417
@sagarkumawat7417 5 жыл бұрын
Ma'am why u r not posting videos of other chapters...like uncertainty and all from HL Varian book?
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 5 жыл бұрын
Hi Sagar - I have only made videos for those chapters that I include on my syllabus. I can certainly add your request to my list for the future. Thank you for watching!
@Madhavsinha
@Madhavsinha 5 жыл бұрын
At 11:27 , Shouldn't the equation for factor demand for x1 have w1^2w2 in the denominator?
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 5 жыл бұрын
Yes Madhav - you are correct. The x1 should be a w2. That is a typo that I hadn't noticed before. Thank you for catching it! And thank you for watching!
@mhdlamin
@mhdlamin 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Ms.Carson, I have a quick question about the methodology. I am using this same method that you have used in the video yet I am still not sure what method it is. At the beginning i thought it was the lagrange multiplier. Could you let me know what the method is called please
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 3 жыл бұрын
Mohamed - it is just straight maximization. Since there is no constraint in this problem, there is no need to use the Lagrange multiplier method. You use that in constrained maximization problems (like utility maximization problems). Hope this helps! Thank you for watching!
@mhdlamin
@mhdlamin 3 жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson Oh yes thank you! it is already assumed that the constraint is within the production function right? F(x1.x2)
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 3 жыл бұрын
@@mhdlamin - yes, the production function is basically the constraint.
@josecarlosgrizendi553
@josecarlosgrizendi553 4 жыл бұрын
Mis Carson sorry but if you work with wi / w2 you will enter x2 / x1 soon the optimal value will be x1 = p ^ 2/3. (w2 / w1) ^ 1/2 which remains if w2 increases x1 increases and if w1 increases x1 decreases
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 4 жыл бұрын
Jose - yes - I thought that's what I said. If there's an error (I'll check), thank you for catching!
@josecarlosgrizendi553
@josecarlosgrizendi553 4 жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson I'm an electrical engineer and I' ve starting to lear from your amazing class
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 4 жыл бұрын
@@josecarlosgrizendi553 I'm glad you're finding it useful. Thank you for watching!
@handler654
@handler654 5 жыл бұрын
Love from India. Hope u put up more videos.
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching Abdul!
@simonebarents5389
@simonebarents5389 5 жыл бұрын
Another question about an equation! :) How does it work at 6:15 when taking X2^1/3 out... Why does the W1 get caught in the division and turn into 3W. I have looked at it over and over again... but I do not get it. Thank you in advance! :) Also... maybe it might be good for such equations to be at the middle of the page/ top of the page... Lay-out wise. Because now, when I pause the it to take extra time to figure it out, the red 'play' line goes right through it... Makes it harder to read it.
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 5 жыл бұрын
Hi Simone - here is how it works. The goal of doing this is to get x2 by itself and everything else on the right-hand side of the equation. Step 1 is to add w1 to both sides, so there will be no w's left on the left hand side and w1 will be on the right hand side. Then, I want to get the 3 out of the denominator, so I multiply both sides of the equation by 3. This gets rid of the 3 on the left-hand side, and the right-hand side becomes 3w1. Hope this helps! Also, thank you for your comment about the red line cutting through the equation when you pause the video. No one has pointed this out to me before, and I see how this can impede your understanding. I'll put this on my list of things to fix. Thank you for watching!
@simonebarents5389
@simonebarents5389 5 жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson Thank you for the quick reply! I do see it/ get it now. Thanks a lot!
@simonsaruggia
@simonsaruggia Жыл бұрын
9:06 "I will use the first equation to solve for x2 to the 2/3", but the first equation doesn't have x2^2/3. It only has x1^-2/3 and x2^1/3 can you please help me?
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson Жыл бұрын
@Simone, you are correct, I solved for x2 to the 1/3, but then if I square that, I get the solution for x2 to the 2/3. That is useful because x2 to the 2/3 is in the second equation, so once I have an expression for that in terms of x1, I can just substitute directly and the 2/3 power magically goes away. Hope this helps!
@simonsaruggia
@simonsaruggia Жыл бұрын
@@KatherineSilzCarson Thank you so much Katherine! After all these years still answering questions, you're the best!
@LaksanSakthiruban
@LaksanSakthiruban Жыл бұрын
Hi, at 9.16 where you wrote X2^2/3. and then you squared it all, I don't understand the power of 2/3. can you please explain that
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson Жыл бұрын
What I did was use the first equation to solve for x2^1/3. Then, I square that to get an expression for x2^2/3. The reason why I do that is the second equation contains x2^2/3. Thus, if I can get an expression for x2^2/3, I can substitute that expression directly into the second equation, and the ugly 2/3 exponent magically disappears. Hope this helps!
@diamonddogsgaming7059
@diamonddogsgaming7059 5 жыл бұрын
Miss carson, what would be the best way to contact you if I still have further questions? I don't see an email here? Would greatly appreciate your immediate response thank you.
@KatherineSilzCarson
@KatherineSilzCarson 5 жыл бұрын
Hi! I would prefer that you post your questions in the comments, so that everyone who watches can see the answer. If you have questions, chances are that other people do too, so it is helpful to have the answers to those questions visible to all. Thank you for watching!
Cost Minimization
21:17
Katherine Silz-Carson
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Intermediate Micro: Profit Maximization
21:16
Ben Zamzow
Рет қаралды 16 М.
OMG what happened??😳 filaretiki family✨ #social
01:00
Filaretiki
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16
If Barbie came to life! 💝
00:37
Meow-some! Reacts
Рет қаралды 78 МЛН
Production Function Profit Maximization Problem
6:23
Economics in Many Lessons
Рет қаралды 70 М.
RevealedPreference
16:10
Katherine Silz-Carson
Рет қаралды 37 М.
Maximizing Profit Under Competition
13:16
Marginal Revolution University
Рет қаралды 262 М.
Monopoly Profit Maximization with Calculus
4:13
Economics in Many Lessons
Рет қаралды 216 М.
Profit maximization | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
5:00
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 250 М.
SlutskyEquation
10:20
Katherine Silz-Carson
Рет қаралды 182 М.
Cost Curves
16:07
Katherine Silz-Carson
Рет қаралды 7 М.
OMG what happened??😳 filaretiki family✨ #social
01:00
Filaretiki
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН