editor messing up, 5th attempt gave up after that

@@KevinTalbotTV Sorry to here that

@@KevinTalbotTV i was gonna guess it was the phone microphone problem you were having a while ago

@@KevinTalbotTV everybody makes mistakes😂😂

@@KevinTalbotTV Lol

The dude is driven and disciplined. Much respect.

Yea to be honest tho it's because he makes his living by selling on eBay amd because of his youtube status amd kickback and doesn't work a 9-5 or in my case a 7am-7pm job/day. I barley have enough time for work and my family let alone all my other projects.....😭😭😭 lol

Living the dream 😎👌🏻

@@1982james111 living a dream to be sure. My dream involves a wife and kids so wouldn't work for me but I would love to live like Kev for a week. As long as I got to come back home after.

@@sofghost6663 yeah kev probably works 16 hrs a day 7 days a week, but he doesn’t think of it as work, I’m his mind it’s just what he wants to do every day. Only the eBay feels like a “job” to him. Huge respect for his accomplishments and work ethic

Looked perfect to me too. Kevs welding skills (which he has plenty of) clearly paying off!

Great idea. I love battlebots

I agree Great idea

We all have. And we would have seen it rocket today if it wasn’t for that clown Dave acting like a 5 year old. Flashing his arse at his age….really?? Boggles my mind.

Welcome back

Welcome back, if you disappear again we are coming for your head, lol.

I love this idea and second it wholeheartedly

Unless you're gonna have active aero control surfaces, I think a simple steering gyro would be about as effective. At the speed this will be going, any deviation beyond viable pitch/roll will cause a flip much faster than can be corrected effectively - keep in mind planes are able to continuously adjust all axes of movement, without any interference from the ground. There will also be a gigantic amount of vibration which planes typically don't have to deal with, that will confuse the hell out of accelerometer measurements. You would find yourself needing to do some programming too, because the typical FC firmware is not oriented around cutting power based on pitch/roll etc. If I was doing this I might experiment with moving the CG forward as much as possible for more passive stability, use larger vertical stabilizer (more rearward), and I'm skeptical that 4WD is necessary, or a diff for that matter. I think Kev might be underestimating the effects of airflow at these speeds. I have a RC plane that weighs 2.5kg and lifts off at less than 50km/h. Sure, it has a larger wing, but at 200mph this car would be deflecting a similar amount of air upward, so lack of downforce is not likely to be a concern (if anything maybe the opposite). Any small rough spots or gaps in the body will be causing a not insignificant amount of drag which increases exponentially with speed. The sexy curves of the body between the wheels are also probably not helpful.

Tbh, if the car is flying it's already too late.