No video

Promissory estoppel

  Рет қаралды 81,148

TC Hon

TC Hon

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 31
@kelvinkofikwesie4895
@kelvinkofikwesie4895 7 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thanks very much. The explanation and examples is so much clearer than that of this textbook i've been reading for hours.
@tonyb.3796
@tonyb.3796 7 жыл бұрын
Are you a 1L too? If so, I share your sentiments. I have a Contracts exam in less than 48 hours. Good Luck.
@Fatmazekigray
@Fatmazekigray 4 жыл бұрын
I wish thick law books could explain this any better than this. Well done. Thank you very much
@anastasiaxo1384
@anastasiaxo1384 4 жыл бұрын
These videos save me!Thank you so much.
@justmwa145
@justmwa145 4 жыл бұрын
The best example. Thank you.
@nighty516
@nighty516 6 жыл бұрын
Detriment is not required for promissory estoppel, only reliance is required. Detriment is necessary for proprietary estoppel. I am speaking in English law.
@gurulc
@gurulc 6 жыл бұрын
Likewise, in English law, promissory estoppel is a shield and not a sword, which means that it can only be used as a defence.
@cyrineguessmy6563
@cyrineguessmy6563 5 жыл бұрын
@@gurulc hey , can u clarify more ?
@gurulc
@gurulc 5 жыл бұрын
That means one can't make claims acting as a claimant based on promissory estoppel but he/she can use it as a defence when being sued.
@cyrineguessmy6563
@cyrineguessmy6563 5 жыл бұрын
@@gurulc thank u :)
@lbboardingb3356
@lbboardingb3356 5 жыл бұрын
Exams are coming
@RJghs30
@RJghs30 6 жыл бұрын
Explained so well
@nd1106
@nd1106 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation
@alisabart7178
@alisabart7178 2 жыл бұрын
Low-key thinking of the incident in which Nikocado Avocado bought a ticket to come to see Trisha Paytas after being under the impression that there was a plan to meet (he also reportedly bought gifts that he would give her upon meeting her).
@yasminhabibti721
@yasminhabibti721 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation. Thank you.
@faathee8740
@faathee8740 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your work
@sarweenabdulla6243
@sarweenabdulla6243 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your effort
@MikeJones-Who
@MikeJones-Who 4 жыл бұрын
Does this apply to a vehicle loan that was taken out? Party A signed as the primary owner and Party B signed as the secondary owner who promised to pay the loan in its entirety. Two years later, Party B turns the vehicle in (still not paid off) and gets a new vehicle. Party A takes no part in the tuning in of the vehicle and demands for the car be released. Vehicle is released and Party B refuses to continue to pay, leaving Party A with a broken promise and a car note.
@sirbalsac
@sirbalsac 4 жыл бұрын
Party A and B jointly share the property. However one party functionally seizing it would have to refund the other's investment. Contract law isn't a factor here, it'd be property law. QED, the car is worth 20,000, party A put in 2k, party B put in 8k. Party B returns the car and reinvests the equity into a new car. Party A seizing the car would be obligated to pay 8k to party B, and would then be responsible for the remainder of the loan.
@dcnzel
@dcnzel 4 жыл бұрын
cheers for the video aye
@kimjinhwan7792
@kimjinhwan7792 2 жыл бұрын
「あなたの動画はとても良いですし、メッセージがた
@leshiaaweekeshart1366
@leshiaaweekeshart1366 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this.imformation
@aneelamody9939
@aneelamody9939 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊.
@timothylim3462
@timothylim3462 5 жыл бұрын
Hi morning, I’m confused on something. I thought promisorry estoppel cannot be used in action to sue the other party? In other words, can only used as shield and not sword. I’m confused on this point
@MsMegan7777
@MsMegan7777 5 жыл бұрын
You are right. This video is wrong. PE can't be used to get someone to do something that they weren't bound to before. It can only be used to stop someone from insisting on the rights they previously had. If there was an assurance to the person that those rights would not be enforced and they relied on that promise, then PE can apply.
@incub8
@incub8 5 жыл бұрын
Hello, @@MsMegan7777. Would it be correct to suggest that how PE was applied in the case shown in this video was based on USA Common Law and not British-Commonwealth Common Law? In Canada, I always understood that PE can only be applied as a shield and not a sword.
@js012a
@js012a 4 жыл бұрын
You are right in relation to English law. USA law must be different?
@baizidahmedzidan170
@baizidahmedzidan170 4 жыл бұрын
Thankjjj youuu so muchhhhh 😍
@KELLENKASH
@KELLENKASH 5 жыл бұрын
Linda is that you doing voice over?
@kelvinize
@kelvinize 3 жыл бұрын
Poor McIntosh
@manojkhandve5024
@manojkhandve5024 7 жыл бұрын
jivon
Promissory Estoppel | Contract Law | Consideration Subsitutes
26:55
Law Simply Explained
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Promissory Estoppel and Contract Law
32:32
Anthony Marinac
Рет қаралды 15 М.
白天使选错惹黑天使生气。#天使 #小丑女
00:31
天使夫妇
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Bony Just Wants To Take A Shower #animation
00:10
GREEN MAX
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Nurse's Mission: Bringing Joy to Young Lives #shorts
00:17
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
What is Indemnification | Indemnification Clauses and Indemnity Explained
8:27
Elizabeth Potts Weinstein
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Bob Sutton: How to Outwit Workplace Jerks [Entire Talk]
56:08
Stanford eCorner
Рет қаралды 606 М.
Proprietary estoppel after Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27
11:10
Wilberforce Chambers
Рет қаралды 4,4 М.
Contract Law - Consideration
21:31
marcuscleaver
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Williams v Roffey Bros: Getting Paid More for the Same Work
6:30
What Is Law Even
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Promissory Estoppel | Contract Law
8:07
The Law Academy
Рет қаралды 2,3 М.
Concurrent Claims and Issues arising (including res judicata/issue estoppel etc)
1:01:36
Property Law - Proprietary Estoppel
8:58
The Law Simplified
Рет қаралды 34 М.
CONSIDERATION
10:06
LearnLoads
Рет қаралды 100 М.
白天使选错惹黑天使生气。#天使 #小丑女
00:31
天使夫妇
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН