Put side by side the 6 griffey is yellowed. Could have been sitting in a display maybe to where the light exposure yellowed it

The Griffey card is a crime.

The O-Pee-Chee Griffey got a “6” because PSA grading consistency is ridiculous, and that company better get their sh#@ together. I hope more collectors start using SGC, or maybe CGS instead of this absurd PSA grading. It’s up to us in the collecting world to force PSA to hire, or fire these suspect graders.

Maybe it's just me, but the 6 griffey looked a little more yellow than the 9. Not sure how that affects it.

Interesting grades. Thanks for sharing. I always thought it would be interesting for resubmission option at PSA. You send them the graded card - they Crack and regrade. If the grade is 2 points different they pay for the grading, if not you pay.

The Ken Griffey card that got a PSA 6 is out of register ( or out of focus ) and also the centering is slightly off to the right. The main reason it got a PSA 6 is primarily due to the card being out of register. Look at the outline of his body on your left (Griffey's right) and you can see the line of fuzziness all the way up his body outline which is caused when a card is out of register. Everyone thinks corners, edges, centering and surface are the only factors in grading. Not true. You have to take into account register (aka focus) and coloring (Are the colors vivid and bright). Hope this helps. Cheers and happy collecting!

Its because PSA doesn't know how to grade Yet people still travel on the psa train,except its ok because its psa. Should have sent them to SGC to start with. Love the cards.

I stopped sending PSA my 90's cards because of this reason. I think I will submit if the card is either worth it or they go back down to 10 bucks a card. I cannot justify paying the current amount and get hit with 6 thru 9. grades.

Cracking and regrading is such a waste of time and money. It also screws up the pop counts, so they're even more useless

that little black dot on the o pee chee premier Griffey is not on every copy ... after this video I went and checked mine because I wanted to see after hearing you say that if mine did or not lol and I have 3 of them and that black dot is not on any of mine

That Griffey 6 i think they must have flipped the 9 upside down.

The first griffey you pulled was more yellow. It looks like it there was more discolloring on that one. Not an expert, but that's the only thing from what i've seen that could make a difference.

Everybody's thinke their cards are 10s! 😆

So annoying, that Bagwell is perfect!! Just ripped my first Toppps hobby jumbo, have a bunch of top rookies , torn where to send them

That new stuff...not for me..just put them in sleeves & toploaders ...Frank Thomas I have nice one, might be 92... just be a pc guy....be happy that you have these cards that are over 20 years old, and under rated.....the sport flix low pop... NOW, you didn't get any 93 finest.... I have all refractors , just need Sandberg....all sleeves and top loaders.... you have nice cards...

you predicted a 9 on the Pippen?

Wtf was that 6 about?

Do you use a loupe 15x to look at your cards before sending in???

🎉

Too long just to see th randy johnson. So skip.

I think PSA was very hard on your cards

You overgrade and set your expectations too high…kind of annoying to listen to you cry about it as I am looking at the off centering or a small dinged corner…