🎉a

Nothing Pakistani intelectuals hote to kia aaj bangla se bhi neechay hote.? 🤣🙏

​@@khurramkhalil559 apna inferiority complex dekh pojeet... Jal mat😂

@@osamarehman3120 really ? O come on you youthiya parjaati it does not suits u guys ONLY YOU GUYS ARE GOOD AT MUJRAS ON D CHOWK PRADE GROUND OR ZAMAN PARK app sab issi kaam me mahir hain issi lye 20 SAL SE YE KAAM har hafta har maheena har sal hazaron bar karte huye sari dunya ko nazar aye hain baqi to aur kuch BHALAYI ka ya neki ka kaam karte huye 20 sal me apka LEADER NIAZI tak kisi ko nazar nahi aya 😂🙏

He didnt elaborate those hadiths, where it is mentioned you have to obey illegitimate rulers. If anyone can show them, plz show me. Secondly from his ulemas he mentioned I believe he is from deobandi sect which is stern enemy of ahlul bait in my opinion. I mean according to his logic clearly imam hussain was a rebel then? So I dont believe you have to obey an illegimate ruler, yes if he comes in power legitimately and then proves to be a tyrant then muslims should do sabar but I dont believe muslims are bound to obey an illegitimate or forced ruler at the first place! Thirdly when imam Mehdi comes, do you think the corrupt muslim leaders today will happily give him leadership over them? No I believe he will have to go against them and establish justice on earth, then what will these ulemas call imam mehdi then?

Bta ,, zindgi b ASi banao

Lucky teacher to have such student.

sahi kaha

reference.?

​@@chemistrylearner2096 reference ko side pe rakh k ap k khyal main eik Muslim country ka Haakim kaisa hona chahiye??

Bilkul. He didnt elaborate those hadiths, where it is mentioned you have to obey illegitimate rulers. If anyone can show them, plz show me. Secondly from his ulemas he mentioned I believe he is from deobandi sect which is stern enemy of ahlul bait in my opinion. I mean according to his logic clearly imam hussain was a rebel then? So I dont believe you have to obey an illegimate ruler, yes if he comes in power legitimately and then proves to be a tyrant then muslims should do sabar but I dont believe muslims are bound to obey an illegitimate or forced ruler at the first place! Thirdly when imam Mehdi comes, do you think the corrupt muslim leaders today will happily give him leadership over them? No I believe he will have to go against them and establish justice on earth, then what will these ulemas call imam mehdi then? Btw I am a sunni muslim

@@chemistrylearner2096 اسکا ریفرنس اور ثبوت احادیث میں بھی ہے اور یہ بھی ہے کہ اسلام میں حاکم یا خلیفہ اسکو بنایا جاتا ہے جو دین پر عمل اور علم رکھتا ہو اور خلیفہ کا کام اسلامی نظام لاگو کرنا ہوتا ہے کوئی اور نظام نہیں اسلئے اسلام کی شروعات میں امام حسن علیہ السلام سمیت پانچ خلفاء کو حاکم بنایا گیا جو سب سے زیادہ اسلام پر عمل کرتے اور علم رکھتے تھے۔ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9uSoal_39jVZKs.html

​​@@chemistrylearner2096 یہ لیں قرآن سے ریفرنس، یہاں لیڈر بنانے کا طریقہ موجود ہے، طالوت علیہ السلام نے اپنی بیٹی بھی داؤد علیہ السلام سے بیاہی تھی۔ Holy Quran 2:247 ------------------- وَقَالَ لَهُمْ نَبِيُّهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ بَعَثَ لَكُمْ طَالُوتَ مَلِكًا ۚ قَالُوا أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لَهُ الْمُلْكُ عَلَيْنَا وَنَحْنُ أَحَقُّ بِالْمُلْكِ مِنْهُ وَلَمْ يُؤْتَ سَعَةً مِّنَ الْمَالِ ۚ قَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفَاهُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَزَادَهُ بَسْطَةً فِي الْعِلْمِ وَالْجِسْمِ ۖ وَاللَّهُ يُؤْتِي مُلْكَهُ مَن يَشَاءُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ ابوالاعلی مودودی Urdu translation ------------------- اُن کے نبی نے ان سے کہا کہ اللہ نے طالوت کو تمہارے لیے بادشاہ مقرر کیا ہے یہ سن کر وہ بولے : "ہم پر بادشاہ بننے کا وہ کیسے حقدار ہو گیا؟ اُس کے مقابلے میں بادشاہی کے ہم زیادہ مستحق ہیں وہ تو کوئی بڑا ما ل دار آدمی نہیں ہے" نبی نے جواب دیا: "اللہ نے تمہارے مقابلے میں اسی کو منتخب کیا ہے اور اس کو دماغی و جسمانی دونوں قسم کی اہلیتیں فراوانی کے ساتھ عطا فرمائی ہیں اور اللہ کو اختیار ہے کہ اپنا ملک جسے چاہے دے، اللہ بڑی وسعت رکھتا ہے اور سب کچھ اُس کے علم میں ہے"

Yehi to jawab he, ke himayat party ki nhi, hukumuran ki krinthi

Jazakallah ❤❤❤

Fazloo to murda bad he...fazloo ko mirchon wala danda dena chahye😂😂😂

ameen Elahi ameen

He didnt elaborate those hadiths, where it is mentioned you have to obey illegitimate rulers. If anyone can show them, plz show me. Secondly from his ulemas he mentioned I believe he is from deobandi sect which is stern enemy of ahlul bait in my opinion. I mean according to his logic clearly imam hussain was a rebel then? So I dont believe you have to obey an illegimate ruler, yes if he comes in power legitimately and then proves to be a tyrant then muslims should do sabar but I dont believe muslims are bound to obey an illegitimate or forced ruler at the first place! Thirdly when imam Mehdi comes, do you think the corrupt muslim leaders today will happily give him leadership over them? No I believe he will have to go against them and establish justice on earth, then what will these ulemas call imam mehdi then?

Bhai! Jb keh dia keh jaaiz kaamon ma ataa'at hogi tw uss main ye baat apne aap shamil hogi... Kisi ki behn beti ji izzat uchhalna obviously na jaaiz kaamon ma se ha

did Muhammad s.a.w not teach us how to select a leader?

There is nothing much that Muslims can do to defend Islam in India. The history of Islam in India is synonymous with invasions, violence, looting and pillaging, subjugation, oppression and destruction of local cultures. This is as far as history goes. Isalm, despite its tall claims of being a religion of peace, was never one. It was never intended to be one. Then comes the diabolical role of Islam in splitting the country on the basis that Muslims are a different “nation” compared to other Indians and the basis of this nationhood was not language, ethnicity, or race but religion. Partition of India brought to the fore the completely intolerant, supremacist and separatist ideology that is Isalm. The basis of Islam is the distinction between believers and non-believers. The Quran is very clear in this distinction and in how believers should treat non-believers. As many as 165 verses in the Quran out of 6500 exhort believers to either extort protection money from non-believers or slay them. And, the history of the sub-continent is a factual record of this. Then comes Islam’s idea of women empowerment. Women are treated as properties … as field which their men folk can plough to their satisfaction. Muslims gloat over how Islam freed woman from slavery but in reality, except the re-marriage of widows, there is nothing wonderful that Islam gives woman. They are second-class humans as far as Islam is concerned. Misogyny rules, Next, is the concept of slavery. Islam does not forbid slavery including keeping sex slaves. Last is the intolerance to apostacy. The Quran is very clear and explicit in its denouement regarding apostates. They have to be slain. In short, Islam was a cult meant for the seventh century Arab tribes and had nothing new to teach mankind. Its practices are all plagiarized from other religions including, Judaism, Christianity, Zoaroastrianism and Animism. It should not have left the deserts of Arabia. This is what ex-Muslims have to contend with. Sachwala is not only and Aalim but he is a scholar of Arabic. He spent years in SaudiA with clergymen. He is very adept at deciphering the text of the Quran. He does not depend on sugar-coated translations of the Quran into Urdu which is what majority of the clergy and Mullahs depend on. He exposes the hypocrisy of the Ulema and their lack of knowledge of the original text of the Quran. Sachwallah has laid bare the fact that Mohammad is absent in the Quran. It is the biggest surprise for Muslims who have always believed that the Quran was transferred from Allah almighty to Prophet Mohammad. Sachwallah has proved that this is false because the Quran does not mention Mohammad by name at all and even the four times he is mentioned he is shown to have been dead by the time the Quran was written down. Next, Sachwallah also successfully paints the picture of the Nabi (Prophet) as a person who is surrounded by woman of all kinds. He has laid bare Islam’s obsession with sex and woman. While ordinary Muslims, already indoctrinated from childhood to believe that Mohammad was the ideal they should follow, cannot comprehend this, the Ulema and the so-called scholars have no defence to the arguments put forth by Sachawallah. Adam Seeker is a Pakistani-born ex-Muslim. He has immense knowledge of the scriptures. But, more importantly, he is very well educated about the history and origin of Islam and its appropriation and derogatorization of ideas lifted from other faiths of that time. Unlike Sachawallah, who focuses on the Quran and its text to debunk Islam, Adam Seeker brings in historical data to buttress his claims against Islam. He is also much younger than Sachwallah and very feisty. Sahil is the only ex-Muslim along with Sameer, who has revealed his identity and openly challenges Muslims and their Mullahs. Being a youngster, his opponents in debates, the long white beards have a tendency to thumb him down but that is where they are slippery slope. he does not lose his cool, does not couner-abuse them like Adam Seeker but goes on the job of demolition of his opponents with logic and knowledge. It is noteworthy that these three ex-Muslims along with a host of others have been hammering away at Islam and they have collected a huge fan base. I keep listening to them on their KZfaq channels and they make mincemeat out of the ignorant but self-important Muslim scholars. Their knowledge of Islamics texts is so profound that the Mullahs are now fearful of coming to debate with them. The effect of their campaign is so profound that every day newer and newer Muslims are leaving Islam. However, keeping in view the very nasty repercussions that these new-ex-Muslims have to face once they announce their apostacy, a lot many of them are silent ex-Muslims. So, there is no visible apostatizing by Muslims followers of these ex-Muslims but the undercurrents are very strong. This is causing a lot of anxiety among the clergy and the recent controversy surrounding the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind chief Mahmood Madani was also a result of the fear of the churn within the Muslim community with youngsters just leaving their faith in droves. All in all, it is too early for Islam to disappear from India very soon. After all, Muslims have been indoctrinated from their birth by self-styled self-serving politicians like the Owaisis and the wily Ulema. The ex-Muslims movement in India is in its infancy and it will need constant chipping away of the fundamentalist ideology of Islam in India. As the ex-Muslim movement makes headway, more and more Muslim youth will either leave Islam or tone down their religiosity. This will be overall good for Muslims as this could lead to decrease in radicalization and separatism among Muslim community, which is the need of the country at this stage. Courtesy: PSubra, Quora.

جناب ان کے لئے خروج کا لفظ استعمال کرنا بے ادبی ہے، باقی اس موضوع پر تفصیلی بحث تاریخ امت مسلمہ جلد دوم مطالعہ فرمائیں

@@learnwithus4198 Like seriously?😂 مطالعے کیساتھ عقل شریف کا ڈھکن بھی کھلا رکھیں

@@shifa6874 اس عقل سے کورے ہی بھلے جو کسی صحابی کے خلاف دل میں میل پیدا کرے،خصوصا۔نواسہ رسول جگر پارہ بتول سیدنا حسین رضی اللہ عنہ سے یا ہادی و مہدی سیدنا معاویہ رضی اللہ عنہ سے باقی اس کتاب میں عقل و نقل ہر طرح سے تشفی کا سامان موجود ہے اگر کوئی سلیم الطبع شخص مطالعہ کرے تو وہ ہر پہلو سے مطمئن بھی ہوجاتا ہے اور ان بزرگوں کا مزید عقیدت مند بھی

Swal to bilkul jame' mane' hai lakin shayad ap ki zati tawaqqu'aat k mutabiq nhi hai is wja se acha nhi lg rha ap ko

Woh ek great fitnah aur shar hai Pakistan ke liye

Ameen ❤❤

​@@handlewithcare333 Imran khan ne Pakistan ko 70 salon se lootny walon ko exposed KR Diya hy

Ameen

Fitna hai d chwk aur zina park bs ise wajha se yothain usay chahtay hain us ne Zina aam karwaya ouratin nachwaya

یہ ہے اصل بات حسین رضی الله عنه ہی کسوٹی ہیں اس معاملے میں نبیﷺ کا بیٹا وہ لکیر کھینچ گیا ہے جو انتہائی واضح اور صاف ستھری ہے فضول کی توجیہات اسکو ہرگز دھندلا نہیں سکتیں