Can’t have the common folk forget their place.

@@chrisb9960 that's right the peasants are revolting.

Fence snips and 2 minutes. Problem solving 101

@@ericjones9725 They would claim destruction of property. I saw a post that said something about returning it to its owners via the pool. That resonates with me. 😁

@@chrisb9960 it ain't a crime if you don't get caught. Their property is littering public property.

then the city should maintain it and stop being so cheap

I don't understand why the city just doesn't remove the signs

@@DxModel219 WHY?

Rafael Estrada ummm because it’s a public pathway?

@@DxModel219 The contract is from over 20 years ago, I am sure that this will change that agreement. Still not right of them to have the agreement and then refuse to follow it.

Busted!

White

@@alixyarrow5821 Racist

I’ve seen too many a-hole homeowners doing this. They put up “Private Property No Trespassing” signs 75-100 yards away from their own backyards that are adjacent to a state park to stop people from using a wooded trail that belongs to the state. The entire area is a part of a state park and all of the trails are state’s property (There is even a map that shows it), but when a few residents are allowed to build their homes adjacent to the park the residents try to cut people off from using part of the park that is close to their homes. They treat a part of the public park as their own property and that isn’t right! I use it anyway because I’ve been using that area for years before the signs were put in place and I knew it is public land, not theirs. Other people do the same as well.

@@alixyarrow5821 she looked asian

I believe the developers was the ones that entered the agreement and not the owners. Often they might might not know that they own it or need to maintain it. These several videos on KZfaq where people learned they legally own a cemetery on their property and there are family members wanting to visit or have their loved ones buried there.

@@brianhaflin9799 It's one of the things you have to agree to when you buy into the property.

I Agree. WPLG Local 10 needs to retain a new legal 'expert'. The right of way maintenance agreement between the developer and City was in all probability placed on the title of each condo. When such a notice and agreement is placed on the title of a property, the individual purchasing it is accepting that agreement. In this case, I would be looking closely at the role of the management company. Have they been charging a maintenance fee for the pathway and then pocketing it? Essentially, they don't have a leg to stand on. It really comes down to how aggressively the City wishes to pursue the matter.

Like when people whine about their taxes and having to shovel the sidewalks... boo hooo bbooooohoooooooooo!!!

@@brianhaflin9799 they have an HOA, which is started by fhe developer and supposed to take over any responsibilities of the developers like this, their HOA is the one that had all this crap put up, besides its what the home owners agreed to when they bought the property

Ik,... 🤷 Wrtwf...

The developers made the agreement not the association.

@@augere9620 When property is exchanged, so are the deed covenants, easements, and rights of way.

Knock it down, if it's public, treat it as such.

@@augere9620 then the association has no right to block the path

I don’t know why the city doesn’t send out a crew to reopen it. It’s a right of way being obstructed by the condo association.

Yes, it is a form of Littering, just as if a political posters were left in place long after the elections are over. Trash is Trash, it doesn't matter what is written on it, it is literally garbage on public lands.

Not really. The law, unfortunately, doesn't work that way.

@@nikolnolastname4473 it does bc the law had nothing to do with it. it wasnt something the city put up, it is a public pathway, and there is nothing anyone could DO even if someone did pass the fence. police wont remove the individual seeing as it is a public pathway and there is no legitimate danger.

@@mikkihesson3509 I said nothing about removing an individual. People have been succefully sued after they removed illegal fencing, etc.

And she says it with a fkin cam right in front of her

@@gabrielw2655 yeah it’s called a joke

Why have none of these criminals from the condo association been arrested. So disgusting.

@@Pygmyz06 and the "it's just a prank bro" excuse is never valid

I like it

I love this.

Near where I live a rich landowner decided to do the same thing. Legal advice from lawyer - get some boltcutters and cut locks. Done. No more problems.

It is NIMBY gone going too far.

Well, I live in Hollywood, & when this reopens I'm going to ride my bicycle over there & just ride back & forth on the path!

But, the owners. CEO, and managers will NEVER pay, no jail, maybe a slap on the wrist.

we did exactly that when homeowners put up fake signs and a fence to block off public access to the beach in Tacoma since they didnt like divers parking and walking down. we ripped the thing down and later the state put up sign public access and cussed out the homeowners.

@Jordy H. so they can get tax write offs.... big whoop

Yup

@@EviLLivEClan they signed a contract. Are you saying that any of us can just arbirtrarily disregard any contracts we just feel are unfair?

@@EviLLivEClan Liberals are the greediest people I know!

Those aren't rich people in the condo. They're wanna be rich people.

They say it's unsafe, they aren't "fixing" it but agreed to maintain it? Okay. Hire someone to go and inspect it and then someone else fix even the slightest issue (go ahead and work the weekends!), and then send the bill to the condo.

Open path or have your condos bulldozed, your choice richboy

Maybe there is safety or liability issues with the path and the condo association cannot have the general public on the path at this time? Coming up with the funds and getting the proper construction company does take time especially after many are backlogged due to COVID.

@@brianhaflin9799 if that was the case, then one would expect the condo residents would also be blocked form using it, and they *should* be able to easily provide proof they are working on it. ... Maybe, but I suspect that's not the case.

@@benjaminshropshire2900 That would be the way most places outside the US would do it. If you are contractually obligated to do something for the public then either you do it or the public does it for you and sends you the bill. You didn't trim your public facing hedgerow? City does it for you at 3x the cost. That tree in your front yard is hanging dangerously over the road? City will remove it at 3x the cost You didn't clear your sidewalk of snow and ice? City does it for you at 3x the cost and ohh that nice policeman over there has something for you too

That wasn't even that long ago either.

Nice! I absolutely agree with you.

Why would they want it littered with tents and homeless?

@@HazelJuanitaMillanHoffman It was sarcasm Hazel, a joke. However, it would be hilarious :) Personally I think it would make an awesome TV show. lol

Abraham Lincoln? Are you sure you're not Martin Short

Damn it! That's what I was going to say! They let the homeless sleep everywhere else and they have a perfectly closed pathway there for use.

Best answer.

Lmao.

Ruff Ryders

I would put up a sign that says loud midnight parties welcome!

The louder the pipes...... the BETTER!! *BRAAAP!!*

Technically it was open then. It’s not, and never was, a legal closure.

Its civil issue, not criminal you moron.

@@TripleWhopperWithCheese talking about moron. If they keep doing this, it’s no longer civil. You must be a beijing biden supporter- they don’t know the difference between criminal and common sense 😂

@@TripleWhopperWithCheese Ummmm, so you are saying if I build a fence across the public road in front of my house I have violated no laws?

"...if they have done this many times times." WTF ! ONCE is Once Too many. One time = one bullet. Two times = two bullets. Etcetera ...

@@TripleWhopperWithCheese Nope, illegally blocking a public right of way is a criminal issue.

Right? I really wish this reporter wouldn’t use language that makes it seem like the condo is in the right.

me too, but I'm in England!

Ditto, but in Wisconsin

As a kid I use to walk the beaches and shellfish with no problem, now it seems it's all "PRIVATE"

Seriously

I was gonna say that myself.

yeah...but you know there will be some dick cop that will arrest the person.

But they said it wasn’t fair.

No it's actually a right of way situation. Since it is illegal to obstruct a right of way without just cause then it is legal for anyone to remove the obstruction.

"Also the developers agreement with the city is binding " Yes. That is why they are playing the safety game! No one is against safety, right? ;) That is a very ingenious ploy. It takes someone smart and tough to stand up to them. Smart tough people don't go to work with a city so the city has no one with the chutzpah to call their bluff. And hey, why should they bother? City people will go no more or no less pay by ignoring or by fixing the problem?

And then sue you for damaging private property... Probably

The city won’t do much about it. The liability from removing it and it being true, then someone getting hurt is enough to keep them away from immediate action.

@@stuckgrenadepin.225 BS - someone on the city council probably lives there.

@@stuckgrenadepin.225 there is no liability to the city. its a city owen walk way

@@dknowles60 if the city owns it then there is liability to the city.

@Stuart H the condo may have agreed to maintain it but the city still owns the property. Everything the city owns, controls, every employee and their actions carry a measure of liability. What they do or do not do carries a measure of liability. It doesn’t matter if another entity agreed to maintain it. If they didn’t and the city did nothing about it, the city is liable along with the condo. Maybe you should pay attention. You obviously don’t know what you are saying. I didn’t say the city is 100% liable. I said if the city removed the sign and someone got hurt because there was something wrong, no matter who put the sign up, the city *could be* liable. Most cities are extremely slow to act when liability is an issue.

It was weird. I thought it was because I was laying down on my left ear that had an AirPod

Shh.....shhh 😂😂

I was looking for this comment before I wrote it myself! 😅

Brilliant idea, punish the hundreds of people who live there for the administrative sins of the property manger.

@@HandGrenadeDivisionActually, it's an AWESOME idea. Sue the residents and they can then sue the property manager. MORE HASSLE for the guilty partieS.

Most that I have met hate HOA's and find them always led by some power hungry Karen that often is stealing the funds or using them to employ their families.

Would be a shame if the fence mysteriously vanished one night

If she lives there, She might be allowed to. Even if the path is unsafe, Liability coverage might protect her.

Also, if there was a safety concern they wouldn't be access from both sides not just one side. This is clearly an attempt to keep the public away.

@@brianhaflin9799 No it wouldn't. When you knowingly put yourself in danger your issuance won't pay a dime in fact they may remove it.

@@brianhaflin9799 Did you not watch the video, or are you just not able to comprehend words? Your post makes no sense.

Hell I'd be tossing the pieces of their illegal fence and toss it over the condo's fence into the pool area.

Maybe there is safety or liability issues with the path and the condo association cannot have the general public on the path at this time? Coming up with the funds and getting the proper construction company does take time especially after many are backlogged due to COVID.

@@brianhaflin9799 "Maybe... the condo association cannot have the general public on the path at this time?" You're not understanding. They don't have any authority to bar the public. For any reason. If they think they have a liability issue then they need to get their workers on it ASAP to fix it, not to fraudulently block the road.

That could easily be the definition of both condos and HOAs. May as well just rename them as Karen and Kevin zones.

Karen, Kevin and their boy Kyle. Yup.KKK

Give people a little power and it goes to their heads. It’s illegal for them to stop you from going on public land per 4th Amendment. And I use the 2nd amendment to protect the other amendments.

ABORIGINAL ONE 😂. Well god forgives so I think I’ll be just fine.

LOL, those liberal cucks think courage is drinking non-soy creamer in their 10$ coffee. They probably even voted to remove "Trump's" border wall. LOL!

@@justinallen9104 I agree with "liberals" on some things and other things totally disagree; same way with "conservatives". It is the way that "libs" do things and the real reason they are doing it. You mentioned the wall. I say put the Border Patrol agents back on the border and not impeding free travel on the interstates and highways within our borders. I see the wall as a two edged sword. Used to keep out or to keep in. Put the wall up in some places but not along the full border. I see our military fighting for our rights and freedoms and cops and politicians fighting to take them away.

@william bush No. You don't want to get charged with destruction of private property. Need just a couple of pliers and screwdrivers. Take it apart and throw it over their fence. Make sure you document everything. Before you start walk down the pathway and video it.

No need to organize a damn committee. That's the kind of thinking that got us in the mess we're in now. Just do it, go deal with the problem. I lived in California for a time and the one thing I noticed above all else is how everything seems to be somebody else's problem. I moved back home where people know better than to pull that kind of crap in the first place.

Just call the fence racist and it will be gone overnight

Coz they're lazy!

Because it's still private property, just has a right-of-way easement on it. The city has to go through the courts on a matter like this.

There most likely is some storm damage which whilst not a danger at present could be tomorrow, or next week. They do not want to pay for the walkway to be inspected everyday so have just closed it. I assume that they would still be liable if they put up signs warning of the risk. The city should tell them that they have to repair the damage or the city will do it for them and send them the bill.

@@dodgeplow Nope, they even stated it is PUBLIC. The condo owner (likely a company) just agreed to take care of it as part of an agreement to develop the land.

@@SilvaDreams public pathway on a RIGHT OF WAY. Read the contract they show. A RIGHT OF WAY is not owned by the city. It is owned by the property owner with an easement for public use. There is a significant difference. If you've ever owned property with an easement on it, you would know.

Fight it!

IS the park a public park? If so, take down the fences. It's illegal for the business to close the park if it's public.

Who owns the park?

And you aren't taking any action if it was done illegally? The park is still closed because you're just sitting on your hands. I don't mean to sound harsh, but that's what it takes sometimes to get something done.

It would get stuck on your horn.

God forbid you have a lemonade stand on the sidewalk. Public works comes with sledgehammers. But they leave this up?

Nor can anyone LEGALLY stop them.

Just as it was not their path to close, neither is the lock your property to destroy.

Throw the lock in the water.

Those portable light towers are no joke. Those things are bright at full power.

Occupy it with homeless people, just like in Venice.

@Hiccum Blurpaedius no it doesn't.

@Hiccum Blurpaedius lay off the crack

@Hiccum Blurpaedius smoke some more crack

@Hiccum Blurpaedius you are suppose to be scary? 🤡🤡🤡 lol

@Hiccum Blurpaedius did you really just use a derogatory term from the 1940s?

LOL! Thank you Chris for making me laugh. In Chicago the city blocked part of the lakefront for reconstruction before 2020. No one is ever there working so people just pulled the fence through the dirt a bit and walk on through. I think the condo in Hollywood and the City of Chicago are just taking advantage of this emergency situation to pull this crap!

We’re from the government and we’re here to help.

Shows what you know.

I have an older truck, would just push through/drive over the trash left on the street.

I agree, he is handsome too!

Check and see what board members of the condo has a connection to anyone in the city government

Path,not road. No cars.

@@stasiaspade1169 The alternate route has cars.

Don’t sussh me

20 minutes or so

Cali too...

@@richardwhite6288 nah we go after them with whatever is handy. Or pose. 🤣🤣🤣

Certainly gonna change that bs

@@perryfefchuk637 wealthy will pay a peasants from different society to make sure that don’t happen. Hard to knock down 1,000 years of 1% wealthy peoples