nice

"fitted" ....what Grammar Hitler forced me to type this

@@radioguy1667 Chill man

@@xoreign Oh wait did I come across as Passive Aggressive? XD sorry about that. I try to make my comments mostly friendly, and only raise the heat when needed. ANd even then its not by much. Sorry it came across that way, no hard feelings.

Joe

@@radioguy1667 Relax man, you were right to correct me.🤨🆓

luciferangelica Ketch-up. By the way, was it a surprise that someone replied to a comment you posted a year ago?

A man said just "ketchup" and got 88 likes. That's tarantino fan base there.

Yes

it do be like that

@@isakdahl7054 no. is it a surprise i answered you after 4 months?

There is a policeman in the movie.. Zed :D

@@TheKuni25 Zed? Who's Zed? Zed is dead baby, Zed is dead...

You're full of shit, man

Don’t listen to Julian, this is a fantastic interpretation.

Dude youre ficking brilliant! Yaaaaaas. Message me about your perceptions if you have more. Ive been eating this shit up recently. About to start watching the movie for the 100,000th time

+Greg Wojciechowski Exactly, the real question is "is that nobility or self interest?"

And the essential amorality of Marcellus is evident after he tell him to “be gone and stay gone” despite the fact he risked both their lives to stop him being raped and didn’t had to. But in the meantime Marcellus cannot show he is friend with Butch again because he would be going down. It’s a movie about the endless cycle of American violence and how you cannot get out of it once you’re in. Jules never really had any redemption; he doesn’t put his gun down on the table along with the case and leave his whole life behind. Instead, he puts the gun back in his pants, get the case back to Marcellus - and thus decide to perpetuate is older way of life. Chances are he gonna get right back at it despite his religious conviction because *he is a profesionnal* (same thing for Vincent, might be oppposite in the how it shows but it is essentially the same). Butch is both one of the most noble and one of the most evil character. He doesn’t feel bad about killing someone he didn’t had to kill at all; Also, when he kills Vincent, it’s completely unnecessary. He could’ve off walked out with the watch. In fact any non-psychopath in this situation would run, get the watch, and get out without stopping for pop-tarts (seriously...). Marvellus try himself to stop killing : after all, he decide to engage Butch knowing what he can do, but rig the fight. However, Marcellus isn’t able to get out of the violence cycle, since Buth is touched in his ego and decide to kill the other boxer himself, or at least decide to win the fight no matter the consequences. While Vincent is a character who accept his destiny, Butch do not give a fuck. He take the risk to kill a whole bunch o people when he encouters Marcellus in his car. Vincent, on the other hand, is the more cool character. He’s a nihilist, someone who knows what’s going on but pretend they don’t really know it. Marcellus likes him because he doesn’t give a fuck about anything in life, accept Marcellus and his wife. Marcellus knows that Vincent care for his wife and also knows that he would never cross certain boundaries, and this is why he send him to look after her. It isn’t Vincent’s fault when Mia overdose. It’s her own damn fault. But Marcellus knew that was a risk and knew Vincent would have really helped her, while Jules would’ve have probably just pray God or something. Marcellus like Jules because he instills fear in his ennemies. Marcellus likes Vincent because he is just like him yet doesn’t care about being in his place. Butch doesn’t like anyone but his wife. He is the only who kills for personal reasons only - even Marcellus had to do something to Tony after he touched his wife for obvious crime business reasons, and overreacted on purpose. The only character that isn’t playing a role is Butch. And Butch wins. He fly with his wife / gf away from it all at the end of the movie. Yet he is truly the only one succeeding because he, and only himself, decide when and how to be violent. The rest of the characters all play a role. Jules mostly didn’t wanted to kill Pumpkin and Honey bunny because he got fed-up of cleaning the car, and decided to put an entire *act* to justify this to himself and Vincent, and to them. He couldn’t give less of a fuck about the money. For him, not killing an ennemy is disrespecting that enemy as someone who isn’t even worthy of his redemption. In the end, both the mysterious characters with the least screen time - Marcellus and Butch - are the ones who decided to live their own fucking lives. Even Wolf - one of THE most important characters btw - is playing a role. The classiest gentleman in town - specialized in corps recovery. Damn. In the end, the only respect they have in common isn’t for authority, God, the elders, or any of thay shit they make up in their minds. The only respect they have, all of them, for anything at all... is violence. They all respect violence. Except Butch, who just doesn’t care. Think about it.

@@jas_bataille I thought about it. No. The main point of the film is that Jules gives up his violent life. You're saying that because he didn't give the thieves his gun that he's lying to himself and going to go back to being violent. That's Shaq levels of reach. Jules even shows up in another Tarentino movie as a nonviolent drifter. I get it though. You don't like theists.

@@jas_bataille you got too high

New sub here I also love your video on my favorite foreign language movie: City of God

I love it!

I N D E E D

A B S O L U T E L Y

Y E S

massic clovie

Yes!! I love this movie!!

I'm glad I could provide some insight!

I was either four or five when I first saw it.

For me, I understood it from the first time because I knew what to expect, but Jack has an amazing ability to make me like films more. I still think it's a bit overrated(I never thought it was a bad movie, just that it's not the best ever), but I do appreciate it more with Jack's comments on it.

same just not this one but inception

William Palkow this movie seems a bit mature to see at 5

I never thought of that, that is a great point. I didn't mention the pacing, but the structure does make that a lot better.

Source?

We were going to do a black mask movie and it kind of went in a different direction - also QT Thats why i hate this movie. He didnt have a plan when he started.

@Cynical HE DID SAY THAT THO look it up

@@blaisemacpherson7637 Just because he did not exactly have the movie planned out in his mind from the start does not make it lesser of a film. When an author is constructing their piece, there are two forms of in which they achieve its completion. One could be where the artist carefully and meticulously plan out the plot of the story, what each point and chapter of it will be, allowing them to have a firm grasp of how the story would be paced and projected on the reader. The other method is the contrary, the writer would just write without regard about hitting certain points or chapters, and just see where the words take them. I phrased it as just being two forms of writing before, but in reality it really is a spectrum, all writers, to various extents, plan out what parts they want their story to have and simply just let the pen flow and see where the ink takes them, with each of these own methods having their own pros and cons. Yet, to get to my point, not having an exact plan when creating a piece of media, as to what that exact piece of media will be, does not invalidate the quality (or lack thereof) of the media in question. I am not trying to say there isn't a reason for you to dislike the film, I'm sure you have your arguments for that, but what I am trying to say is: You cannot hate you birthday present off of only how the box was made, but better instead, what are the contents inside upon being opened.

That's stupid. 1. ALL ART CHANGES DURING THE CREATION 2. He did have a plan and then i grew from there. 3. You are an idiot.@@blaisemacpherson7637

Natsu Dragion77 what about the saw he picks up

you do know that pulp fiction came out before all of those other movies

I guess "Easter eggs" was bad terminology on my part ... More like little things Tarantino incorporated into his future films. Or maybe I'm just Fanboying

The "sword" is actually a Hatori Hanso Katana. I love that easter egg. There is an other easter egg, which can be found in every Tarantino movie, the "Red Apple" cigarettes.

Nah, it’s because Tarantino is unstuck in time

Absolutely correct. I’m glad to see you pointed this out because I came to the comments to do exactly that.

I never looked at it like Butch breaking his word. He was forced to take a dive by a mob boss but he never had any intention on losing, he was to proud. He just told Marcellus Wallace what he wanted to hear so he wouldn’t kill him. He won the fight, got his big pay day and was going to split town. I never saw him as a bad person, he was being harassed by bad people. As far as the fighter he killed, it’s part of the game, I also think that him acting the way he did was more of self defense mechanism, deep down he didn’t want the man to die but at the same time he wasn’t going to let it eat him alive. Butch saving Marcellus also showed what kinda person he was.

I disagree. He had no redemption arc. The only reason he went down to the basement was in hope of clearing his debt with Marcellus.

Wrong. They crearly want to kill Marcellus After the rape. Its so obvius..

@@paolobogli458 he wanted to kill trim for his benefit too. He thought killing two birds with one stone. Killing the ones who tried to rape him and clearing his debt with Marcellus

if you like long takes, watch the films of bela tarr and andrei tarkovsky

@@cometcourse381hmmm, burger

Awesome Jimmy, I'm glad you liked it!!!

Тhis mоvie is nоoооw аvаilablе to watch here => twitter.com/da4fdfee3410d8ad8/status/795841364185333760 Lеееet s Еxplоre Рulp Fiction Film Disseeеeсccсtiоn 30

Plzzzz

@@peppino3609 I hear ya !

Interesting

I mean Once Upon a Time in Hollywood as close as you're gonna get since it's technically about the Manson murders. I love slashers, but one written by Tarantino? Nah he likes to make the killers cool guys. Tarantino works best when he's making homoerotic action flicks lmao

@@abarbienamedken3334 death proof

Nah I think Mia did fuck Tony Rocky Horror. I think she was completely prepared to deny that story. That’s why the foot massage story caught her off guard and then she reveled in denying that. Marcellus assigned Vincent to take her out to make sure that she wouldn’t be with anyone else. He trusted Vincent with his life. Mia didn’t know that. She thought he was just another one of Marcellus’s guys she would screw. She was eccentric and bored. The whole night was just a game to her to get Vincent to bed.

I'm glad to hear it! It's kind of tough to talk about movies that EVERYBODY and their dog has talked about this movie. I didn't want to focus on fan theories but instead try to look at why it has held up so well and why it is such a great movie.

This movie is really something special, the original plan for the video was to have it focus more on the cultural impact, but this movie is so much fun to talk about, I didn't want to spend time talking about what isn't part of the actual movie.

I'm right there with you Justin. Thanks for watching and I'm glad you enjoyed!

You have a great mom then

👺

Thank you! These comments are my favorite to read!

Thank you! Glad you've been enjoying!

;-) It's always fun going back and watching videos I made almost a year ago and remembering tiny details I put into them!

You got it Fred!

House? What do you think is in the case?

Thanks, I really appreciate that, I have been growing faster than ever, 28 days ago we hit 2,000 subscribers and now we are over double that!

Jack's Movie Reviews how time flies 😆, you deserve it jack , you work very hard

Awesome! I'm glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for joining the team!

Thank YOU, I'm glad you enjoyed!

Thanks for watching!

I've never thought of it as a 5 act play! Thanks for the insight!

It's a 2.5 hour long movie. I left a LOT out of the video. I felt what I had was most relevant to my discussion

@@JacksMovieReviews Non worries, I still appreciated your work, I just wanted to add more to a discussion on a two year old video haha

@wonder mike heart of gold that emotionally mistreats his girlfriend, murders a man, and illegally bets a load of money on himself, based on a lie to a crime boss

@wonder mike Eh, accident or not, he didn't seem to feel any remorse after killing Floyd in the boxing match. Butch's downfall with his character is his pride and ego. But other than thats, he's alright I guess. Personally, I liked Vincent and Jules better, despite whether I was supposed to root for them or not. Thing is, I don't think Pulp Fiction really had a "hero" in the story. But if you really wanna break it down, It goes as such... Vince was the protagonist on "Vincent Vega and Marsellus Wallace's wife" Butch was the protagonist in "The Gold Watch" And lastly, Jules was the protagonist in "The Bonnie Situation"

Thank you, I guess I prefer a happy medium between visual and literal storytelling. Someone like Steve McQueen always has actors tell you so much based just off of facial expressions, that is always so impressive to see throughout all three of his movies.

I never noticed that, that's a great find. I'm going to have to rewatch the scene now. Thanks for the help!

Yeah from the moment I saw that curtain hanger, I thought it was a crucifix. I thought it was just me.

That is a coincidence!

they're listed as pumpkin and honey bunny in the end credits of the movie so i guess it's whatever people wanna call them tbh.