we won't take you for granite

Stay healthy!

Pure Blood 4 Life^ Get better stay away from dat mRNA ;)

Just get that robot voice everyone else is using! Just kidding - glad to have you back :)

Great channel! If you haven't heard of Crichton EM Miller, I think you may be interested in his work. It blew my mind. Miller, imo, has shown in great detail how these ancient builders made their measurements so precise.

Agreed.

I like this channel, but it contains a lot of speculation that's stated as fact. He's assuming every pyramid was an ego-driven burial tomb. We don't know that.

​@@paulwal222 No ego-driven but politically-driven. And it makes total sense even if there isn't much evidence. Why would a king build those big monuments if not to cement their political power? We do similar things in modern times too, after all.

@@1idd0kun I like us speculating on that idea. We can also speculate that they were power plants or temples. But we shouldn't state any of it as fact because we don't know.

​@@paulwal222 He wasn't stating it as fact. He made it clear it was his interpretation. Bu it makes sense considering the context in which those pyramids were built. That been said, I don't agree that it's the same as those "alternative" speculations that has no basis in reality. Power plan, really? Next you're gonna tell me aliens built them.

Get a grip fast.

a question for all : has there ever been, or at least planned to be, an even greater pyramid then Khoufu's Great Pyramid ???

I'm not sure that the Tura limestone can be traced after it is re-cut, sadly. But there's a much better chance with granite because it isn't homogeneous. German authors Rosemarie and Dietrich Klemm did a thorough study of the different types of granite in the quarries, but I'm not aware of any follow-ups that attempt to match loose stones with monuments.

Not enough aliens though 👽

You people are so lucky to get the chance to see all those ancient wonders ....wish I could go there one day 😂😂😂

You’re very kind. I don’t expect to be right about everything but I believe I can push a dead line of inquiry forward. The pyramids are a mountain of evidence and it’s worth looking at them closely.

@@HistoryforGRANITE My old friend Spock would say: "His logic is sound !"

Hey Darren: I AGREE 👍!!! All The Best!!!

Also tie in the quarry stones from Across the Red Sea transported by road through the desert.

Agreed, I wish to see a linear time line layout too.

Yes, agree. We are counting on you, History for Granite: " I would love to see you do a definitive timeline of all the pyramids build dates as well as their deconstruction and any other pertinent details."

Great idea, I would like to see that too

Agreed!!! Because I will definitely admit even after all the different videos I’ve watched on individual pyramids or brief time periods- I can’t picture an even remotely accurate timeline, timespans, how they tie in with Sphinx/other monuments, etc.. it would be great to see tied in as well: the outside world’s knowledge of Egypt and the pyramids, the internal knowledge of their own civilization and potential periods where knowledge was lost and why. But ya, there isn’t a video idea I’d like to see made more than the one you’ve suggested because it will give a greater return on investment to the viewers being able to better grasp every other video

I agree. Really hoping Dr. Miano is able to grow a bigger following particularly.

Highly insulting. If these people actually had the answers there wouldn’t be tons of questions still unanswered. Anyone who denies there absolutely was a lost ancient world wide culture is a fool. The evidence is everywhere and overwhelming.

@@Stonecutter334 still waiting to see that 'evidence'. :-)

@@SteveHoutmeyers Careful Earthling! Your name is on the list! 😱😜🙄

@@Stonecutter334 "Anyone who denies there absolutely was a lost ancient world wide culture is a fool. The evidence is everywhere and overwhelming" Anyone who is incapable of actually looking up the evidence for themselves is just insulting the hard work of thousands of people vastly more dedicated to this pursuit than your armchair self raving behind a keyboard will ever be. For barely a middle class wage (or less for interns) they spend weeks in less than hospitable climes with minimal amenities spent bent over dusty trenches slowly scraping away dirt and cataloguing what they find in a long and labour intensive process that would make the likes of Erik von Danicken quit in a few days at most. Then you have the Hancock's of the world who travel 1st class to some ancient (pre excavated) sites and take a few photos/videos on a whirlwind tour before returning to their comfy richly appointed homes paid for by millions of books sold so that they can crank out a new book every year or 2 - such hard work, much trust 🤡 The body of evidence for the archaeologists perspective of multiple independently originated civilisations across the world (even in the Americas alone) is stacked as high as a mountain in paper, and worth millions of man hours of excavation, data sorting and analysis before being published to academic journals that are today FREELY available to the public within a year or less. Contrasted to the vague hand waving speculative style of people like Hancock who cherry pick out of context from the vast works of archaeology and use it to profit from ignorance of the average reader too intellectually incurious or lacking the time and energy to find out for themselves - all while making a mountain of cash from it. Between the hard working vocational types and the soft handed, lazy authors that merely profit richly from rehashing the formers work with a speculative angle I know which I trust.

You've been such a big support since my first upload! I really appreciate it, and I always look forward to your comments.

@@HistoryforGRANITE Always a pleasure to support a fellow creator, and your content is top notch in all aspects! My youtube journey has been rough, and i know the struggle any new channel is experiencing, and i'm glad to see you are finding succsess so rapidly!

It seems that pyramid and cathedral construction have similarity in the way they evolved . We know the histories of the European cathedrals and it seems that one building team , or parts of teams , would be employed to build another cathedral , take ing their knowledge and experience wither them . Over time Bishops would request larger and different aspects in their new cathedral designs . Sometimes a new idea would fail , sometimes new methods would work . This is probably what happened with the pyramid design evolution , with obvious differences due to the differing uses of the two types of building and thousands of years of building methodology ( not so much as we might have imagined ) .

Well there's plenty of evidence. Just depends on who you know I suppose but no the rocks aren't going to tell you anything in that sense. But common sense and logic suggests that the process of building pyramids did not "evolve" , it was discovered and then we much later , made poor attempts to re create it but were never remotely successful.

We couldn't cut those stones as precisely with lasers today, much less place them together. We honestly still may not even have the computing power to legitimately even design something to the same degree that the great pyramid is much less physically implement that design in 20 ton stone

@@Redbird10 "We honestly still may not even have the computing power to legitimately even design something to the same degree that the great pyramid is much less physically implement that design in 20 ton stone" You have vastly underestimated the efficiency of modern structural engineering simulations and the computational power to run them. JP Houdin and Dassault Systems modeled the Great Pyramid kings chamber to calculate the effect of the weight above pressing down on the granite ceiling beams combined with the 'relieving chambers' - the simulation matched almost exactly the cracking of the ceiling beams observed in the detailed photographs of the real kings chamber. This was over a decade ago now mind you - the rise of GPUs in modern datacenters and supercomputers has raised the bar to a whole new level since then. Also the pyramid was clearly not "designed" beyond the core sections and perhaps the exterior (harder to tell with the exterior as most of it is now missing sadly). By far the greatest volume of masonry is roughly cut limestone blocks of varying sizes from the Giza plateau that have been leveled out to fit requirements with a combination of limestone slag and building mortar to provide stability to the overall structure (stability/durability lacking in the mostly mud brick pyramids built later). The building mortar is also the most significant and abundant source we have for dating the pyramid construction.

While there are plenty of mysteries, this is quite of a myth. The earliest work is by no means the best. In all cases evolution can be clearly seen from the beginning to the apogee (stone vessels, pyramids, sarcophagi, statues. obelisks, mummies etc.)

I have a feeling your request will come sooner than expected.

My pleasure!

Thanks for obeying

@@cotey7744 Meaning that you take the alternative view correct? Some people take an alternative for no other reason, but that it opposes the main stream view and yet has no good evidence to support it.