Full discussion here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q6merJqlmrTWc5s.htmlsi=6vwX6Nz1q1DwRdvh
@imogenradley5368Ай бұрын
!
@ilanzelig5454Ай бұрын
Jews in UK about 2000 years. Jews did not gang rape, did not live on welfare, did not try to change the local religion, did not commit terrorism. ❤️🇮🇱❤️
@Hal-hq8fxАй бұрын
Who was Harvey Weinstein? How you call him?
@bman6065Ай бұрын
Wrong. Plenty of terrorist actions occurred leading up to and beyond the founding of Israel by Zionist groups. We can argue on the context of those massacres. It is certainly more of a grey issue than people give it credit for. But they did happen and that's a fact.
@bman6065Ай бұрын
@@Hal-hq8fxyou've got your eye on the ball. But for an entirely different sport. Calm and sit down
@barcodebattler2587Ай бұрын
I concur. Not all cultures are equal, jews have clearly improved the uk
@lystein1070Ай бұрын
@@Hal-hq8fx harvey weinstein was an individual, not a group of people from the same ethno cultural background and religion commiting the same offense
@skatersteve126Ай бұрын
Douglas is outstanding in every regard.
@paaltje81Ай бұрын
Douglas is a great speaker and he have a great mind. We need people like this today.
@martinearl5913Ай бұрын
LOVE MURRAY ❤❤❤❤
@slainegwalchmaiАй бұрын
The ongoing defence of the West against Islamism is very important.
@petem.3719Ай бұрын
We have our hands full already with White Christian Supremacy.
@HNH421Ай бұрын
💯all Abrahamic cults, should be discouraged, if we hope to move on, from the bronze age.
@rachelbuzaglo904Ай бұрын
Douglas Murray is a magnificent man,he delicately himself to the worst problems that all the world 🌍 afraid of. thank Britain 🇬🇧 to Douglas Murray
@CarlosSanchez-dv1ewАй бұрын
There is no truth for any religion ...if there was then why could not god make it all clearer
@rachelbuzaglo904Ай бұрын
@@CarlosSanchez-dv1ew you are wrong.there is a religion that advocates for violent,for death ☠️ not for living,and on on and on,you know the radical Islam.
@jasegalaxy74Ай бұрын
In English please
@ashleyturner3998Ай бұрын
He’s a racist!
@saerainАй бұрын
and doesn't afraid of anything
@robsawalkerАй бұрын
+1000 points to Douglas for using the phrase "duff up" 😄
@josephinelamkins7661Ай бұрын
Douglas you are an absolute treasure and thank you also for taking the extra word and speaking up on behalf of Dr. Jordan Peterson❤
@habanillos7391Ай бұрын
Thank goodness for Murray’s valuable contribution!
@antoniom4099Ай бұрын
Murray is a Zionist propagandist. He has no problem lying.
@mihaelaabramovich316Ай бұрын
We love you Murray ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@hilicohen257Ай бұрын
❤Douglas the best we have today god bless him for telling the true of what is happening in this world now
@davidcoates1958Ай бұрын
Murray is a living legend. Love the way he pierces Dillahunty’s noble yet relatively naive personal views. Dillahunty is a smart guy, but his views appear to be shaped by very personal experiences. I find the Murray’s and Petersons of the world have a very broad knowledge and breadth of experience. They consider so much more than just their own personal experiences. It’s the difference between caring for yourself and that of caring for broader society that I feel the Murrays and Petersons of the world do.
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
Then you don’t know Matt Dillahunty at all especially compared to Jordan Peterson
@HNH421Ай бұрын
Petersons personal experiences is that if you get on the band waggon you get moor money .
@mjtheway4wardАй бұрын
The world cannot have one government when we are not all on the same page. It would be nice, but not all cultures are inclusive, and a lot of them are aggressively self serving. Like Islam.
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
Not now but hopefully in the future.
@HNH421Ай бұрын
ALL religions are a self replicating self interested organism trying to find a monopoly on the habitat of the human mind
@MarcusN-kp1jnАй бұрын
Why exacly was "heads" censored?
@Epoch11Ай бұрын
It's nice to see intelligent debates like this where people aren't screaming at each other or proclaiming their devotion to a leader or demeaning each other. We are all just human beings. Sadly there seems to be a group of people for whom their particular politician can do no wrong. I called them the slurpers. When their favorite politician walks up on stage drops his drawers cops a squat and let's lose, they are there on their hands and knees slurping it up.
@CarbonbankАй бұрын
These guys are always risking their reputations / highly intellectual thinkers, not afraid to debate anyone - so for anyone to comment negatively in petty manners, seems brazen behind the cloak of the social media. Be bolder, say something decent…or rather be quiet as they attempt to express observations, concern and solutions.
@zapkvrАй бұрын
No YOU SHUT UP
@user-kz5cw2gj3wАй бұрын
Screw you.
@Daniels656993Ай бұрын
Im living my life with respect to everyone untill they dont show the same and Im not religeous.....what is so difficult to understand that you dont treat other people in a way you wouldnt want to be treated. You dont need a godly figure to get that.
@_Feyd-RauthaАй бұрын
Chopping off heads, blowing off heads, what's the difference really?
@rkb4897Ай бұрын
One main issue is related to how do you solve conflicts, i.e. eye for an eye vs turn the other cheek.
@SonnyDelosSantos-y6m28 күн бұрын
explain the turn the other cheek part, does it mean pacifism???
@rkb489728 күн бұрын
@SonnyDelosSantos-y6m in the new testament , Matt. 5 Verses 38 to 48 38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.
@TheGianni2711Ай бұрын
Murray is 99% right and has always been .
@MeeseManyMooseАй бұрын
Is Matt incredibly sheltered? The culture that the West has managed to establish is incredibly special and unique. Most other cultures, at this point in time, are vastly inferior and trying to mash them into ours is only going to diminish ours. Matt doesn't seem to grasp that many if not most other cultures are backwards and/or pathological and he seems to ignore just how tightly these people want to hang on to their broken culture.
@zapkvrАй бұрын
Utter drivel. The "west" took longer to abolish slavery than did the East.
@MaisieDaisyUpsadaisyАй бұрын
Where does Matt ignore just how backwards some people and their cultural beliefs are?
@LlamaOccidentАй бұрын
"The cultures with birthrates above replacement levels are pathological" If you say so, moosey. Let's see how that works out for you. In the future they'll have exhibits of extinct animals and one of them will be the skeleton wearing a fedora called "the western man".
@jen7662Ай бұрын
@@MaisieDaisyUpsadaisytrans ideology
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
@@jen7662He is pro LGBTQI+. That is human rights and compassion.
@sulljoh1Ай бұрын
Please mention how OLD these videos are in the title or description
@leahben-israel2380Ай бұрын
It does say how long ago it was uploaded
@sulljoh1Ай бұрын
@@leahben-israel2380 It was uploaded recently. The video is much older than that. I think the publisher is trying to make it look new.
@colinmarshall4778Ай бұрын
Very pertinent now though...
@leahben-israel23805 сағат бұрын
@@sulljoh1 Could be. I can only go by what is given in the info section, since I am also new to these videos.
@chiefswife1212Ай бұрын
These are the same Palestinians who danced in the streets when America was attacked
@maggiefitzgerald1276Ай бұрын
I have a video of very different people dancing. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
@megansummersides4255Ай бұрын
@@maggiefitzgerald1276 Where can I find it?
@Xhw328816 күн бұрын
How is that possible when most Palestinians at the point were not even born until after 9/11?
@Foxbat1961Ай бұрын
The prophetic Led Zeppelin wrote a song about it.
@yancowlesАй бұрын
You know it's about vikings, right?
@MrGgjackАй бұрын
For a second I thought Dillahunty was saying Robert Spencer was a white nationalist and then I realized he said Richard Spencer. I was very confused for a second cause I've never heard Robert Spencer say anything that would make me think he's a white nationalist
@joels5150Ай бұрын
Well, Matt clearly didn’t mistakenly accuse someone of being a white supremacist. Richard Spencer is a very open and vocal white supremacist.
@VaishinoАй бұрын
When Murray says they never had nazis in his country, he's either unaware of Oswald Mosley and his crew, or he's feigning ignorance.
@weeg743Ай бұрын
His country had the DUP, close enough
@VaishinoАй бұрын
@@weeg743 Well they literally had the British Union of Fascists and National Socialists right up until they were all locked up for being a secret fifth column during the war.
@carolinefreudenreich7407Ай бұрын
He meant being occupied and ruled by nazis like other countries in Europe.
@andymccallum8090Ай бұрын
Oswald was not a Nazi tho. He was a British Fascist which is itself different from Italian Fascism.
@clare2401Ай бұрын
And this is what happens when everyone uses the term Nazi to describe people. Oswald wasn't a Nazi. If Oswald was a Nazi then so was Mussolini
@elkhuntr2816Ай бұрын
Matt proposing a one world government. Hmmm.... where have I heard that before?
@zapkvrАй бұрын
Well he is an idiot. Johnathon Schell proposed it back at the peak of strategic defense initiative in the eighties. He wrote a book about it The abolition. Of course it isnt the answer even if it were possible. National Governments dont work because of the lack of good will among people. International goverments would increase this by many orders of magnitude.
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
Stat Trek
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
Star Trek
@elkhuntr2816Ай бұрын
@@northernlight8857 Yeah, science fiction. Just like the belief in atheism.
@michvroom8784Ай бұрын
"belief in atheism" what a wildly ignorant phrase.
@leannsherman6723Ай бұрын
There ARE IQ differences.
@rainward2761Ай бұрын
Hmmm. Doesn't the elevation of JP into cult leader/messianic leader underscore the hunger for God?
@Angus1966Ай бұрын
Douglass is taking on top notch demons
@KatarinaDinnarАй бұрын
Nothing wrong with Stefan Molenux . He is just a vilified philosopher that spends most of his time speaking with people who had a horrible childhood.
@AliethАй бұрын
They’re are chopping off the heads of something else🤔
@WhatsTheTakeawayАй бұрын
Like what?
@user-wj6dt5bq3wАй бұрын
@@WhatsTheTakeaway Who do you think runs Hollywood? It sure isn't Muslims. Murray is a shill for Zionists, he might as well sign up as an agent for the Israel lobby because his work definitely serves them.
@AChickandaDuckАй бұрын
😂
@maggiefitzgerald1276Ай бұрын
Watch the children in Gaza. Have a look at their heads.
@SmallWetIslandАй бұрын
The difference between the adulation and cult-like posturing towards Hitch and Peterson are significant, not least because Hitch ridiculed them and distanced himself from such nonsense, whereas Peterson has cultivated and embraced such adulation and revels in his cult-like status. When asked if he thought he was a "messenger from god" he took several minutes to consider... before hesitantly saying maybe not. He seriously entertained the idea knowing that some of his followers would claim he is.
@GirlRichoАй бұрын
I find it a strange critique to hear people say that Peterson has cult-like admirers - and not only that - but he embraces and revels in such a God-like status. Absolute nonsense! It's clearly a fallacy -- and you're assumptions are wrong on multiple levels, not most of all because of the contradiction in claiming Jordan has a god complex and his fans worship him -- while also accusing them of practicing religion itself. They can't both happen at the same time.
@SmallWetIslandАй бұрын
@@GirlRicho Clearly you have never been to a mega-church or heard about Pat Robertson, Joel Osteen, or Kenneth Copeland. Pastors with a cult-like status, a cult-like following and also "practicing religion". Cults and religion are indistinguishable in many respects.
@GirlRichoАй бұрын
@@SmallWetIsland Yes I know how Evangelists can be. Jim Jones is another classic example. But the same could be said for any doctor of philosophy with students or a dedicated following. Leaders and speakers with influence who draw a crowd - all fit into that same box. It's okay to have different philosophies in life. How do you draw a distinction? Peterson thinks deeply about all his responses - I'd be more concerned if he didn't hesitate with an answer to that type of question. A messenger from God would be an angel, and JP has never considered himself an angel. Whether he's delivering God's message is a completely different question and in a lot of ways he has.
@SmallWetIslandАй бұрын
@@GirlRicho The distinction is, as I said if you accept the adulation, if you modify your philosophy or are enamoured of your follower's praise. Peterson ticks all those boxes. you are correct many entertainers sportsmen and singers have followers. some arguably have cult-like status for a few fans. Peterson acquired his fame and fortune not on his academic standing or his lectures. but on (Bill C-16) his rise to fame was on the back of right-wing support and on a political stance. He supports Trump he is affiliated with the DailyWire. He is an atheist who refuses to clearly say so for fear of alienating a large part of his Christian fundamentalist base. His lectures are saturated with religious meanderings. Many of his fans are in effect "followers" and like you, they think he is doing "God's work". Everything screams cult leader. BTW Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, John the Baptist, Jesus Christ, Paul the Apostle, Peter the Apostle, John the Apostle, Saint Francis of Assisi, Mother Teresa and Martin Luther. were all considered to be messengers from god. Not an angel among them.
@GirlRichoАй бұрын
No I don't think JP is doing God's work. It's not even close to what I believe. Your whole complaint is based on 'what other people think' but you don't know what those 'other people think' because A) you're not a mind reader and B) you haven't bothered to understand their position. Which makes your whole argument a fallacy. So you think JP believes in atheism? I don't know if I agree with that. It takes a lot of effort to believe in atheism, it's a belief system like any other but atheism leads to nihilism and genocide. Plus it provides no answers on morality and life. It's not sustainable.
@Dano.GАй бұрын
Peterson is bad at explaining ONE thing in particuliar, which is his actual view on what God is. After watching him closely for a few years since he became prominent in the socio-cultural discussions of the current times, I've realized what he actually means. Bear with me for a moment. The way I understand Peterson is that he understands that God isn't real in the sense of what we can interact with (Reality). However, the IDEA of God is not only real, but it's useful. Here's how: If one presupposes God (conceptually) in their reasoning, it leads to good outcomes. Because God is the ultimate, most powerful and all-encompassing, un-falsifiable concept we can conceive that equates to the ultimate ideal. Jesus being the "avatar" or mythological character that embodies a set of presuppositions on how to be a good person that will conceive good children. Who will go on to create a good society, all agreeing to this ultimate ideal. With a good society that are all on the same side, it allows the maximization of growth, minimizing suffering and hardships, the culture thriving and innovating, further creating the framework for humans to flourish. Example of "sacred" religious concepts derived from this religious ideology (a religion is basically an ideology/worldview): - Marriage - 1 man, 1 woman, for the purpose of procreation and teaching good values and ethics (moral alignment) to the next generation who will go on to build and improve civilization, contributing to a society thriving with increased security, cooperation, trust and loyalty. Marriage means Duty, Commitment and Shared goals, withing the society's currently accepted norms. This is also good psychologically for the society, or else (as Peterson has correctly observed) you end up with a hierarchy of men, where (with feminism, and now online dating) women now all perceive themselves as higher on the sexual marketplace because of their skewed judgement based on their access to "sexual partners" of various positions on the sexual marketplace hierarchy. Leading an ever growing number of men at the bottom, with no access to reproduction and therefore no sense of duty, purpose and their role in society. These are the people that can easily become extremists and go against the society, hurting it. Perterson understands this too, which he wants God to remain, even though he knows full well it's a concept and not reality.
@RalphJBaterАй бұрын
The argument you present in support of Peterson regarding feminism is equivalent to the Islamic justification of the Burka... 'men are awful and have no self control, so society has to restrict the freedom of women so men are not bad'... you and Peterson need to put the blame where it belongs and blame the $#!++y men and hold them accountable...
@ohliddy7945Ай бұрын
I hate when ppl have long drawn out questions. Stop talking and ask your effing question. No one cares to hear you. They're there for the speaker.
@jagodabasicАй бұрын
There is no country called ‘Yugoslavia’ …the name is a Former Yugoslavia, which was a dungeon for my people !
@leannsherman6723Ай бұрын
One world? Very naive.
@claudiusii2863Ай бұрын
I have seen a decapitated baby after the Israelis bombed the Rafah refugee camp. He has seen it too, but Douglass Murray does not consider Palestinians to be human beings, so I suppose that he is not lying.
@EvilMonk20Ай бұрын
Slight difference between what a bomb does (in war) and what an individual does going into a civilian festival and neighbourhood (not in war)? If you can't see the difference in the actions of those two human behaviours, then I don't know what to tell you.
@claudiusii2863Ай бұрын
@@EvilMonk20 There is no difference whatever between what a bomb does (in a refugee camp) or what it does on a military target - it kills people. What you meant to say is that a decapitated baby from an Israely (US manufactured) bomb should not be given the same emotional value or moral consideration as to an innocent Israeli killed in October 7. If you cannot see the sheer hypocrisy, malevolence and racism in Douglas Murray, then I do not know what to tell you.
@EvilMonk20Ай бұрын
@@claudiusii2863 Nope, pressing a button from an aircraft is definitely different to physically walking in and deliberately acting out these things in person. These actions are morally different, regardless of whether the result is better or worse, or indeed the same.
@claudiusii2863Ай бұрын
@@EvilMonk20 I rest my case by simply relying on your response.
@Michael-wq7qxАй бұрын
@claudiusii2863 Who started the war, remember?
@gedonckersАй бұрын
They are still discussing secular humanism as a big idea? There are plenty of moral systems that don't rest upon any religious dogma that have been explored, debated, refined over the past 2,5 years...sorry, millenia. In fact, all major moral systems discussed in Philosophy are secular. Even a lot of contemporary variants. So, as long as these guys aren't going to treat these ideas seriously, I can't think of them as anything more than entertainers.
@thedeviousgreek1540Ай бұрын
As long as at least one of them is holding onto christianity for dear life, secular humanism still looks like a big idea. As you said, this idea is more than 2500 years old and the funniest thing is that it comes from the foundation of this western civilization they seem to like so much. That is the mental disconnect a western person experiences when they choose Jerusalem over Athens as C.Hitchens famously said.
@raphaelreichmannrolim25Ай бұрын
@@thedeviousgreek1540That's because the greeks themselves chose Christ as the answer to their doubts. Plato talked about the Good; Christ was seen as good incarnate. I'm not Christian, by the way. But the difference still persists, philosophy being aimed by intellectuals, and christianity pervading much more capillarly.
@thedeviousgreek1540Ай бұрын
@@raphaelreichmannrolim25 The Greeks didnt choose christ, they were forcely converted or they were killed. Their temples were destroyed, their schools were closed, their books were burnt and their teachers were hunted for more than 1000 years. Plato talked about many things including god, as did many many others, but he definitively didnt talk about yahweh or a jewish messianic figure. Platonism is indeed way more sophisticated than that. You can see this clearly in Paul's own account of what happened when he visited Athens or you can search the edicts of Justinian or Theodosius to understand how a population of philosophers was forced to follow a lesser cult. Christianity spread among slaves,women and children despite what the forged history of the church falsely promotes.
@raphaelreichmannrolim25Ай бұрын
@@thedeviousgreek1540 I didn't know that, but I imagine how it went after centuries of destroying others temples all over Asia. Socrates, as the philosophers, didn't represent greek tradition. This can be seen not only by the treatment Socrates had, but directly from the legends of the original philosopher himself, Pythagoras: mysteries about him travelling to the East always surface, and he is the reason for the monotheistic cult of the unit monad. Indeed, that's why there were, even before Christ, discussions on whether Plato was influenced by Moses. And indeed, Christianity's success was precisely because It established a major dialogue between judaism and Greek thought. Or Rome, as It had no Spirit and had to take the Greek one. But even If it's message wasn't meant for the philosophers, It addressed their language; and I don't think it means lack of sophistication. When talking to children, one must be clear and simple: to achieve that, some sophistication is needed. Indeed the symbolic synthesis achieved in the story of Christ has no competition among Greek philosophy, I think, even If I myself prefer very much to read the works of Euclid.
@thedeviousgreek1540Ай бұрын
@@raphaelreichmannrolim25 First of all, the panhellenic empire of Alexander promoted syncretism in the religious front, just like the Romans did after him. The perfect example is Egypt, where the hellenic pantheon fused with the egyptian. The strategy of religious subjugation that the abrahamic religions used in their empires doesnt represent every empire. Paganism as a religion can fuse with other types of paganism very well but monotheism by definition cannot. The Greeks historically have a very deep connection with the east going back to 2000 BCE with Minoans and Egyptians. After that you got the Myceneans and the Hittites, the Phoenicians and famously the Persians. After Alexander we can add the Indians as well. So, when we read of travels to the east, or influenced by the east in greek antiquity, it doesnt mean judeans, usually its Egypt or Babylon. It would make sense to note that the cult of Moses wasnt the pinnacle of religious or philosophical thought at any point before being forced by christianity. Pythagoras was not the first or only monist, although he is the most famous. The monad as an idea came even before Pythagoras with the pre-Socratic school of thought. The oldest monotheistic religion, thousands of years before Moses and the judaic faith was Zoroastrianism and again before Moses there was Akhenaten who tried to impose monotheism in Egypt. I would assume that those who discussed if Plato was influenced by Moses were hellenistic jews who tried for centuries to combine their bronze age mythology with greek philosophy, which later became christianity and can be considered a form of neoplatonism. The difference between these ideas though, is that one is purely religious coming usually from revelation while the other is coming from logic and philosophical thought. Interesting to note that the Greeks never in their history had a holy book. Usually people think of ancient greek paganism in the form represented by Homer and Hesiod but this view was almost already antiquated in the time of Plato. Socrates was killed in 399 BCE, and was part of a school of philosophical thought that eventually changed the view of religion in the greek world. The common view before Socrates was that every society has their gods and they were to be respected as they are in fact greek gods just with a different name. This worldview was created because of greek trade and the establishment of colonies all over the mediterranean, which resulted into relationships with a whole host of cultures and therefore the need to understand them. -In opposition to that view, we got the judaic or better yet babylonian view of gods beating each other as nations who had different beliefs went to war.- Along with the pre socratic school, who viewed god as non intevening and unknowable, the greek worldview starts to change. The gods arent the cause of everything anymore, they arent the basis of morality and they dont have the answers to our problems rather, man should turn to science in order to understand the world and leave the superstitions behind him. This whole journey culminated with Epicurus and was embraced by the Romans. When the dialogue between judaism and greek thought happened, the western world lost a lot of its progress in order to accomodate superstition and dogma into philosophy. The major part that got lost was the understanding of the divine and freedom of thought. Christianity embraced the known god as opposed to the unknown god and dogmatic thought instead of free thought. Superstition also came back strong as a means of coping with problems and understanding the world, in place of philosophy, medicine and science. The biggest wound on the western Spirit though, was the insistence of the early church fathers to destroy the greek worldview of understanding religion allegorically and their systemic push of literal understanding, a wound that hasnt fully healed to this day. I agree with your undestanding of simplification of philosophy for the masses, just as Nietzche said, christianity is platonism for the masses. But the way this simplification happened and the reason why it happened was far from optimal and left a lot to be desired.
@BookingsTrekandRide25 күн бұрын
Delusional Douglas
@doveven3537Ай бұрын
are you saying Jews, Muslims and Christians do not leave in peace in Israel?..maybe you have some amnesia about the term dhimes.
@Jack-Pi8niАй бұрын
@zenga55 - Despicable! The dictionary meaning of which is - extremely nasty, cruel and evil..! What has Murray physically done or said, that sits in those definitions? Words used to describe modern era despots like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Jong Il, Franco, Mussolini, Duvalier, Pol Pot and Ceausescu, Murray is hardly in this category. If his on the ground informed opinion places him there, then those intolerant and unable to take debate without rancour are also in this category, including you. This is why, without compromise, this ideologically driven, tribal and religious conflict will never end.
@johnforeman634Ай бұрын
Can you imagine the level of force and violence that would inevitably result from the attempt to establish a one world government or leader? Come on. Why would he even make a statement like that? He ought to know better.
@ronishamayАй бұрын
"checks and balances" did not age well considering the new supreme court ruling 1 man 1 vote and immunity from crime as long as its official
@WhatsTheTakeawayАй бұрын
No they didnt
@chiefswife1212Ай бұрын
USA ALL THE WAY!!!!
@ronlavalley732Ай бұрын
Dilahunty is not smart
@lakingpaulАй бұрын
Love that this has a "translate to english" tag for me, since what you said doesn't make sense.
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
Absolutely no sense whatsoever
@romanlyubovny5453Ай бұрын
Jordan is the force for good! Full stop! He helped me and millions around the world to be a better man!
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
He is a force for bad thinking because he has a horrible epistemology.
@romanlyubovny5453Ай бұрын
@@northernlight8857 not to the millions he has helped! You must be doing pretty good so keep up with your way of learning
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
@@romanlyubovny5453it’s good to learn but BE sure it’s true,religion fools people all the time,fools except religion all the time
@tinmanx2222Ай бұрын
Murray sucks
@PlayzBlanstonАй бұрын
Right before Dillahunty went off the deep end. Good times...
@MrzPicklezАй бұрын
Right before Murray began advocating for the mutilation of newborn babies genitals
@zapkvrАй бұрын
He is a dope
@clare2401Ай бұрын
He always does though because he loves the sound of his own voice. He honestly thinks he sits amongst the great minds of our times. But then I suppose when you purposely surround yourself with idiots all day long, you're going to come out as the intelligent one
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
How has he gone off the deep end? And are you promoting the shallows when it comes to growth.
@karenrobertson1673Ай бұрын
❤️🇮🇱💙🇨🇦❤️🇬🇧💙❤️🇮🇱🇺🇸💙❤️
@LeonardoPisano-sn2lpАй бұрын
Israelis executed pregnant Palestinians
@levi5073Ай бұрын
Ironic that matt dillahunty wants the world to be run by one supreme ruler aka a god
@zapkvrАй бұрын
Not irony at all. He is a hypocrite.
@mikeshivakАй бұрын
What is ironic or contradictory about that? Is his problem with God that God doesn't exist, nit that he doesn't want a God to exist? Also are you assuming Christian God? And didn't he say an organization not an individual? You sound like someone scared to lose their imaginary friend, not like someone actually bringing something to the conversation. Grow up, and learn to converse like an adult, not like a brain rot husk.
@Samuel-tq9jxАй бұрын
@@zapkvr difference is he may want a world with "a god" as the ruler but acknowledges that something like that is just imagination and is irrelevant in reality. So no, I don't think that makes him a hypocrite at all.
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
@@Samuel-tq9jxabsolutely he didn’t mean “the world run by a cowardly Christian goD “that would be silly
@colinmattsАй бұрын
I wonder what Dillahunty thinks about Murray's current views on Trans people and his defence of Israel's war crimes in Gaza?
@satiricgames2129Ай бұрын
😂😂😂 'warcrimes'
@colinmattsАй бұрын
@@satiricgames2129 YES! WAR CRIMES! As established by the International criminal Court
@Xhw328816 күн бұрын
@@satiricgames2129I mean, are they not war crimes? They’re not really going out of their way in the slightest to avoid civilian deaths.
@zapkvrАй бұрын
The Eastern church is older than the Roman church so its obviously closer to the truth. The roman church was a political idea first and only marginally concerned with the purpose of life
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
The truth is we have no good evidence for a god.
@carolechapman785728 күн бұрын
… by the very evidence of the creation……it’s complexity… and the fact we have the Bible … written over centuries, with prophecy having come to pass …and the fact it is Gods word … powerful and life changing!
@emiliog.4432Ай бұрын
Be careful with who you put on a pedestal. I have to question some of things said here. Murrays views are highly questionable.
@Rave.-Ай бұрын
You say pedestal but you're inferring platform.
@satiricgames2129Ай бұрын
😂😂😂 why cuz you dont agree lol chuckles
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
Sort of like Jordan Peterson way to many put him on a pedestal,he is right about nutrition,consumer s are poisoning themselves with goods in grocery stores
@Spicoli-CaryАй бұрын
🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
@gratefulbearАй бұрын
SO WHO DO I GO WITH BEFORE THE CAT WAS ABUSESED OUTA HIS HOME WHILE PPL KEPT HAVING THEIR LIFE GO ON IN FRONT OF ME LAFFING WHEN I WROT ETHE TRUMPS CAMPAING WHAT IRRIATED MYH MOM NOW IMRENEDED AGAIN HWO THIS GUY FUCKS AROUND I GO OTU FORNT HES STLAKING ME HYELLING FO ROTHERS TO HELP HNIM
@bradzimmerman3171Ай бұрын
Seems like this person is uneducated or just can’t spell
@craigbikes8831Ай бұрын
they are chopping off something else
@gratefulbearАй бұрын
THE JEWS BEFORE 2000 TOLD ME TO KEEP REPRITNG THIS
@teddyroonАй бұрын
Eh?
@satiricgames2129Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 the jews as in the monolithic jew 😂😂😂😂 fk of abdul ya rascist cnt
@satiricgames2129Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 the jews as in the monolithic jew 😂😂😂😂 fk of abdul ya rascist cnt
@konosmgrАй бұрын
The method of killing is not really relevant, IDF indulges in procedural techniques of maiming, killing and depopulating.
@kazaabitboll2026Ай бұрын
lol rubbish. If the idf wanted to get rid of the Arabs in Gaza they easily could without world condemnation nor knowledge. But they dont
@dogbert52Ай бұрын
Procedural? That is supposed to mean anything? Its an army, they arent supposed to hand out candies to na zis
@konosmgrАй бұрын
@@dogbert52 We have RoE and international law in the 21st century, you should read about it sometime.
@WhatsTheTakeawayАй бұрын
Does it involve invading a neighboring population and butchering and massacring innocents, then kidnapping over 200 people for hostages? Pretty sure the ROE says "Eff em up."
@arushan54Ай бұрын
@@konosmgrAren't beheadings illegal in international law?
@GreedstАй бұрын
What lazy emotionally charged answers. Exactly what I would expect from a second rate writer.
@user-wj6dt5bq3wАй бұрын
Murray is not even a good speaker, he has a pathetic lisp.
@northernlight8857Ай бұрын
Example please
@pmaitrasmАй бұрын
Douglas Murray is overrated. He is not particularly outstanding in any regard. I wonder how he manages to find himself on debate stages.
@colelewis9940Ай бұрын
You just hate jews bro lol
@stowlicters8362Ай бұрын
He is allowed because he turns the reality of racial replacement of Europeans with the fiction of an "Islamic replacement".
@anitareasontobelieve378Ай бұрын
He's a gay conservative and doesn't understand the leopard will eat his face too.
@jwollheimАй бұрын
Hahaha you’re delusional
@anitareasontobelieve378Ай бұрын
And yet Murray still is coming from a country that is fighting a religious cult doing damage in UK.
@user-qz7uu2lt4wАй бұрын
We’re 40 babies The victims Heads chopped off Did this happen
@user-wj6dt5bq3wАй бұрын
No, none of that happened.
@michvroom8784Ай бұрын
No, it was a lie.
@user-qz7uu2lt4wАй бұрын
@@user-wj6dt5bq3w but it keeps getting repeated
@user-qz7uu2lt4wАй бұрын
@@michvroom8784 ditto Sorry
@adriennefried5368Ай бұрын
Wrong yes it did happen. Islamic Muslims practice Teqyya, lies for the protection and advancement of the Arab agenda.