I think. Also burn down everything around it and kill you the engine is so powerful it causes a vibration that can crush your bones and crush you in an instant

@@blazeyt7543 Hey, at least the wasps are 50% dead

Haha! Dude, That must be one huge wasp nest.

​@@joecaruana5036 or he really REALLY just hates those wasps. Which fair enough, wasps fucking suck

Say bye to that nest and 1/3 the neighborhood

this isn’t from orbital atk, this is from nasa.

Bro I died. 🤣 my whole family had to come see what I was laughing at I kept replaying it.

I think that was a bird

i see what you mean although it looks like Donald duck to me...human brains are so complex it will discern patterns in even randomly generated optical phenomena such as a dust cloud...many people assert that faces appeared in the 9/11 dust clouds that followed after the impact of the planes

These are nozzle plugs which prevents heat, dust and moisture from getting into booster

You really wanna waste part of your life working on a bureaucratic monster that won't take off more than maybe three times?

lens reflection

Ферад Реджебов) Nope. The number of rockets required to do that would literally kill the entire planets atmosphere with exhaust gases.

There was a proposed project to do that to Change where nuclear warheads would land. It was called Operation Retrograde

Bommklaus1695 I believe each had 22 million horse power

lens reflection

Karthik V the water for real launches are not to prevent dirt being kicked up, it's for sound suppression to not damage the launch pad, either way the kicked up dirt will fall back to earth as it's not a gas.

It basically is a shuttle SRB but with one extra segment (five instead of four) with about 25% more fuel.

The exhaust would have to leave the atmosphere and attain escape velocity to do that.

its to small VERY SMALL

Acme products best seller

+drbeekjeek 262s in vacuum NASA says, still amazing for that price

+HarryHoppins These types of rockets are obsolete. Impossible to throttle or relight the engine. So it is impossible to attempt reusability. The future is reusability which requires liquid.

+HarryHoppins apart of less efficient, you cant control SRB once you lit it, you have to let it burnt out. no powering down, not turning it off, no reigniting it.

+izzad ibrahim Recently read something about the concept of big dumb booster. just thought could be an option, but obviously solids aren't safe enough, maybe hybrids with pressurized oxidizer in composite tanks could be.

HarryHoppins remember the boosters are there only to power the rocket through the thickest of the atmosphere. Regular rocket engines can't push that weight without burning through their fuel supply before reaching orbit, that's why boosters are used, to conserve the liquid fuel, once they're spent, you're in thinner atmosphere so you can use solely the liquid rocket engines as there is less drag up there. You wanna know about REALLY dangerous fuels. Look up hypergolics.

+Jamie Godman Clearly uneducated.

kbent88 Does my opinion bother you? Too bad. But go ahead and show your maturity by slinging insults. Clearly uneducated.

Hahahaha. I love Hypocrites. Hilarious.

kbent88 Agreed.

+Jamie Godman They are both toast. It doesn't matter that Orbital merged with ATK. Neither has any experience with reusability and they are not even trying. They will likely be out of the rocket launch business entirely after SLS is cancelled in a few years.

Not alot of pollution.