Real People are delusional Especially women can't accept reality about their looks But hey if it makes them feel better about themselves who cares I guess

It is just delusional tbh. The vast majority of us are in the middle area of the bell curve within many aspects of our lives, attractiveness, skills, personality, profession, etc...WIth the most basic understanding of statistics, unless you're really sure, putting yourself within that 4-6 range has like 80% of being objectively correct

Yep. I'm someone who has literally been told several times that I "could model" by women and still only think i'm a 6/10. I can't imagine how guys who are less attractive than me who don't get these types of compliments could possibly think they're 7+/10. Same for women lol.

If you were told you could model, then you are definitely not a 6 and are very likely to be higher than 7.5, probably pushing 9. So you may be delusional but in the opposite sense, that you lower your attractiveness.@@thelonercoder5816

@@thelonercoder5816if you could model then you are most definitely not just slightly above average

Would be interesting to see a test like that But considering how many women literally rate themselves 10/10 perfection I think the results wouldn't be that different

It’s probably because of people viewing the spectrum as if it’s a grade, in which 70% is equated as a C and treated as a decently average score, whereas anything below that is failing. Therefore, 6 and below is terrible, and 7 is average

A 7 is when you have average looks but you make an effort.

@@ShadowJinxXOX agree with this. Our mind goes back to school in which a 50% is terrible but a 70% is just about adequate.

@@ShadowJinxXOX its because people usually dont want to classify them selves as average, its called the "above-average effect" if you ask people their driving skills, looks etc most of them will claim they are above average.

​@@CRM-114what about someone that's not craving for validation? Or an old man, you think grampa gives a dump if he's not attractive anymore?

100%. A truly confident person would say with confidence I'm a solid 5!

​​@@CRM-114that's the problem. A 5 is not ugly. 5 is average. Below 2 is ugly. Below 5 is just off average. For example being 15 lbs overweight makes a 5 turn into a 4. Being a 5 but not fixing orthodontics or having unkempt hair turns them into a 4. Being a 5 but having a great six pack or yoga fitness level turns a 5 to a 6. People clearly don't understand what average means. 0 is Quasimodo and 10 is like reputable model agency picks you out of a crown and offers you a contract.

It depends on the question, are they saying it's specifically about physical attraction? And who determines this objective standard? Someone 10 could be another person's 8

@@Tily-vh3ly exactly, I can agree there is of course objectivity linked to our natural desire to seek out healthy partners, and certain features being markers of health. Things like healthy bodyweight, facial symmetry and harmony, taller height amongst men (generally), wider hips amongst women, etc

spot on

So you mean it's something more Subjective?

With that said. ... I rate myself a minus 5. I'm not compatible with anyone and I would not be a good wife to anyone. I am less than human because I'm a woman.

@@phoenixtoash2396girl, you need therapy.

@@phoenixtoash2396are you trolling?

That’s a really interesting point! I experienced the same thing & never thought about it until just now lol

While I understand that feeling, this year I started uni and the first days I swear I felt pretty intimidated by all the “good looking” people there were on my classes. But after a couple of weeks I realized they were all ugly asf lol like average at most haha and I talked about it with a friend and she said had a similar experience. I guess after spending more time seeing each others faces I started noticing all their imperfections and probably my perception on their personalities affected how (un)attractive I started seeing them

@@agme8045That’s really interesting, back in my 20’s I felt like people were much prettier in my college town than in my smaller home town and it made me feel insecure. Now that I think about it, it propably wasn’t even true.

@@agme8045 Interesting. I experience the opposite affect. I generally find people more attractive the longer I know them, not less. As an artist, I also tend to see most people as attractive because I find unique features so interesting and appealing. It's like looking at variations in landscapes. In my experience, I can find beauty in each one.

@@agme8045 usually you start finding people more attractive the more you see them unless you find their personality really unpleasant, i think the fact that you start finding people ugly stems from your own insecurities and you trying to protect yourself from feeling too inferior, thus you actively look for reasons to find people ugly

I know right how dare these ugly mofos have confidence and see themselves in a positive light. How dare they not think of themselves as I see them

How did you get that emoji

Lol that's true hahahha

Where the hell did you find that emoji 😂😂

The emoji lol

I completely agree. The question specifically asks how they rate their *looks* on a scale from 1 to 10 (at 0:23), not how confident or attractive they see themselves. I think they should have clarified the question or they should have guided the subjects beforehand. They could also ask a follow-up question on how they view their overall attractiveness. The way this was handled makes the results pretty useless and shows how easy it is to miss the obvious problems in such a survey.

@@CaptainPanick Yes this flaw in the study is punctuated by multiple participants saying something like "I don't think others see me this way but this is how I see myself" kind of thing.

Yes, kaelia1118, people were answering the question incorrectly! I was really frustrated with some of "wishful thinking" answers!

This is spot on

Absolutely agree 💯

7 becomes the new average, all the scale is now out of 14

People are delusional

The thing Is they look good for themselves, they base that 7 on how some days they look better, but they're not comparing their looks to the most attractive people they have seen, If they did they would know they're average

@@NoRockinMansLandPoatan is a 10 tho

@@TetsuoTakayamaCyberpunk facts lol

​@@CRM-114 I don't understand, how do you guys go about calculating that

Actually what they don’t understand is that logically on a bell curve a 7 is in fact a LOT above average 😂😂😂

@@Havana428Not everyone automatically tries to gauge a score out of 10 based on where they think it would stand on a normal distribution… that’s like saying you have to rate every average movie you watch 5/10. I dont blame other people for not being on the same page as you…

@@AerisNotAerith well yeah, this may be true. It depends on how you view stuff. If you are more analytical you may wanna be more exact and closer to reality but it’s hard to judge your own level of attractiveness nonetheless.

These people rating themselves a 7 is pretty fair though if you consider a huge percentage of the population is over 40 and obese.

Me too 😬

Same I was really surprised by some of them.

I think the girls tend to overrate themselves more too

Same here there would be a girl I'd rate a 2 and she'd be like "well today I didn't really dress up so I'd say a 7" lol

How dare they see themselves with kindness and optimism right?

Some of these ppl seem to live in lala land so it would still be high.

Why do ppl always think rating yourself 10/10 is unrealistic? If your first way of thinking is to compare yourself to someone else who looks nothing like you, you’re never going to win… why not truly rate yourself by your own standards un compared to others 😂

@@ShutupandListen is it not equally valid to have a concrete assessment of how others see you, thus enabling you to accurately predict and model your expectations on the world's response to you?

​@@ShutupandListenis it healthy to have a high weight, matted hair, unclear skin, and lopsided features? Fetal alcohol syndrome also causes certain facial features

Now that's a good idea. Would hopefully wake up to reality the *countless* males in my country that are in the 1-3 category and have the nerve to act as if they were above-average, let alone "a perfect 10".

Yeah it's not a real rating and they don't even pretend it is. Can they fool themselves that easily?!

They're the same people that when you reject them politely they absolutely flip out and insult you.

Trust me when I say that reality will hit most of them like a truck. Even then some of them will still justify their behavior, thinking it's because they're a 10😢😂

These are the people who install ten dating apps just to ghost all their dates to boost their confidence

You're mixing it up. Many of them are aware of the fact that they're likely not perceived as 10s. They just do so LITERALLY because they feel as though that's going to boost their self esteem

Yeah, but if you’re attract a lot of people regardless of the “objective” standard. You are attractive so the rating is right. Also there really isn’t an objective standard it’s influenced a lot by culture, your personal age, what other people say, social media, and trends.

@@sweetxjc If there was no objective standard, then there would not be a tendency of models to have similar features. All models are tall. All models are lean. All models have sharp eyes and defined jaws. All models have decent hairlines. All models have very clear skin. All models have well-sized lips. All models have good jaw projection. Moreover, these things are on a scale themselves. As in they're normally distributed, so the degree to which you fall into the upper percentiles indicates the degree to which you are model-tier looking. Models are in the 99th percentile for every one of those features. People who are average either are average in all those aspects or they're in the upper percentiles for some features and in the lower percentile for others. Most of the people in the video had some decent qualities but also had major flaws that would make them lean more toward average. Other people were below average. E.g. no person with a recessed jaw is ever going to be at or above a 5. Also, a lot of them were fat. So, that drops you down by 1 to 2 points by default.

Even then, many comments here conflate overall attractiveness with literal beauty, as in looking at the face and ignoring everything else that actually makes a person attractive.

Agreed. That makes the conclusion about familiarity inaccurate. I think people are rating themselves based on their individual potential but rating other people based on comparison. If you have more ability or potential, the standards you set for yourself are higher. Even if the number rating is off, people can accurately pick out pictures that are of similar attractiveness to themselves.

The average individual is out of touch and delusional.

Get a literal 10/10 model to interview them and see them stammer snd sweat when their perception of their own beauty is thrown into their face by a god

@@lizxu322lol you have a really weird value system that you refer to 10/10 as a “god” 😂😂 Closest things to gods in our world are the mega powerful: musk, bezos etc Or the mega successful and respected: Conor McGregor and Taylor swift. I would never feel that intimidated by someone good looking, as being able to fight gives you power over them and they need to submit to you to keeep their life ultimately

@@lizxu322I just looked at your photo and you aren’t even attractive so I don’t know why you subscribe to a value system that harms you

@@Harry-hh1is some people didn't take creative writing classes and it really shows

@@lizxu322 How so? Explain how that relates to you calling someone attractive a god?

Attraction is not purely physical

@@NoRockinMansLand it's like 90% physical

@@ramsaybolton9151 at first yes, and it also depends on what the type of relationship. But how a person makes you feel, their personality unironically, amongst other things can lead to genuine attraction that tips the scale over time

@@NoRockinMansLand Idk man there are people with great personalities that I will never be attracted to because they don't have the physical "pattern" I desire. Personality helps you decide between people that already have the physical "pattern" you desire.

@@ramsaybolton9151 yes, I agree. That's why I said it plays the largest part at first. People typically consider other factors after the person has met the looks threshold (when someone looks "acceptable enough" to date, according to that person).

No It isnt

8 is model material I’d say but not perfect

Sometimes delusional people are more confident than others without delusional thinking.

Yeah it’s her posture that’s bad, she’s very beautiful.

Exactly

Nah I think a couple of the ones who rated themselves as 8s really were 8s and she was like a 7 (but an actual 7 lol).

Some of the men here are delusional too 🤷🏻‍♀️ not just women. Also they asked them to rate themselves they didn’t ask you to rate them 🤷🏻‍♀️

Yes i am so furious

I think most didn’t understand the question. It was not asked the right way maybe 😅

I don't think that real 10 exist, everyone has mistakes, nobody has all perfect features

@@sarazigova1641 ..the closest i have ever seen is a prime Brad Pitt…and im a straight male, ha…but, gdamn, bro was flawless..hair/face/physique…unreal..

​@@kramer1372im a girl and there are tons of male supermodels who are hotter than brad pitt

@@valleyofthedolls hahahaha

@@valleyofthedollsim a man and I say there isn’t

The rating system is pretty stupid itself. I could never use it to determ someones attractiveness

The question wasn’t “where do you see yourself in the the curve of normal distribution” though. Avarage ppl around me seems still very good looking to me and I would still rate them 7. Because I see 10 as perfect, 9-7 as very good looking 5 - not great not terrible 4-3 unattractive 2-1 really unattractive. Everyone is havinh their own scale and I dunno what makes ppl think it should correspond to normal distribution.

@anastazka00 attractiveness is objectively distributed on a normal distribution. Most large data sets in life follow the normal curve where the vast majority fall somewhere in the middle of a scale (3-6 in this case). As you go to more extreme sides (1s and 10s), the number of people goes down because extremes are more rare in life.

I feel like most of the people on this interview are Australian or British. Not American, just based on accent

10s dont exist@@Anastazka00

Attractiveness is subjective, so I actually kinda get them

confidence comes in different forms

@@MultiSciGeek No, it isnt. Hundreds of high quality studies spanning many decades have shown this. Attractiveness is objective.

​@@MultiSciGeek The real world responds to one's OBJECTIVE level of attractiveness.

​@@kylerBD those studies are only done in 1 culture but different cultures really do have completely different beauty standards, and they often change over time. most girls rated 10 in america wouldn't be considered attractive in my slavic country or some asian country.

yea, just like the girl in video said that it’s so that to not “give off bad energy”

Actually a really good point

This + excluding number 7. :)

Well said

exactly. some of them even said it almost explicitly

I do the same but with Megan Fox and Adriana Lima

That man...... 😍

😂

You look very attractive in your pic, unless you have some weird asymmetry with the eyes that is hidden by the sunglasses.

​@@amnbvcxz8650he's probably fishing for compliments.

I suspect it's because the truth isn't as painful for attractive people as it is for unattractive ones. Allowing them to be more honest with themselves without falling into despair.

@@sam1323123 yes

I think it was the channel Jubilee that had a thing where they put 100 people in a room and then everyone needed to find whoever was rated the hottest. Even in the beginning some very good looking people eliminated themselves. The last 10 had like 3 people who were even fuckable. The uggos forced their way into the top 10 by being stubborn as hell and refusing to leave thinking it made them look confident but it did the exact opposite.

One of the best comments I've read under this video. Very well said.

I did the same scale breakdown above lol We disagree but brought up some similar qualifiers! To find someone else so analytical is refreshing

I don’t think a weak jawline or slight overbite instantly qualifies a 4. I’ve seen very attractive people with this trait that make up for it in other attractive features, especially women.

Adriana Lima has a weak jaw

@@joshuasmith7089 idk what planet ur living on but that is not a weak jaw

Well by that I’m a 7! Was. I guess at 40 I’m probably a 6 now. 4 after waking up. 3 when I feel grungy & self conscious 😂

Yeah , social world is moved by what other's think and people's perception on you matters where you stand socially . Which is quite impossible not to care . Probably you can say that , so you can do some out of ordinary stuff , but still how social world will judge you will impact it .

Anybody who doesn't care and means it won't say it. They don't need to.

That's delusional to think. Some people have low fear and low/no empathy, whilst also having high positive impulse.

Got to agree, imo most of those people were between 3 and 5 with the ones who were more attractive being more realistic about how they look...

Well said.

What does the curve mean? Like there are same procentage of people who are 9/10 and 1/10?

@@sarazigova1641 Yes. It is a bell curve, so the majority of people are 5. That is average, so people you see and forget. There are as many 10/10 as 1/10, which means basically none. To find one of those is basically impossible. Like, as humans, we can empathize even with grossly disfigured people, so having them genuinely be a 1/10 is difficult. Most attractive people, then, would fall into the 7/8 category. Same with notably unattractive people really being 2/3.

@@scpdatabase969 why it's so hard to rate your own attractivness then? If it's so obvious

That was overconfidence more often than confidence

Theyd be more realistic

No one thinks that lol. People in the comments simply are calling out on how these average-looking people at best, rate themselves rather high on the scale, and give all of these excuses about how they are comfortable in the own skin and they are very confident, when that’s literally not the point of the video or the question. They are supposed to objectively rate their attractiveness, and the only way of doing that is literally comparing the way you look to how others look. It’s not about getting a passing grade, it’s about truthfully stating your level of attractiveness. Your face is a 5 regardless of how confident you are. The people were literally saying “I know other people would rate me lower but I think I’m an 8”, THATS THE WHOLE POINT lol how would others rate you, how would most people perceive you.

Overrating yourself *does* imply that you expect a certain treatment from others. I've seen and heard of *countless* males in the 1-3/10 category acting as if not only they *deserved* women in the 8-10 category, but also that "they shouldn't compensate by providing" for such women. Nothing short of delusional.

No, I think a lot of people would look negatively at over-rating because it's an indication that you're not able to assess things more objectively, truthfully, rationally, realistically. It's an indication that you're not able to be fine with reality. And this is not a positive thing. Someone who can truthfully admit they are a 4 and be totally fine with it is someone who is actually confident and rational.

​@@agme8045 The video is about how attractive _they_ think they are. Not how they think other people will percieve them.

There is something wrong with overeating yourself; it leads to you being overconfident and delusional.

Bell curves can be highest at any number including 7. For example most people in the English exam scored a 70% so the bell curve is highest at 70.

Golly, just the fact hat youre talking about a bell curve when it comes to people...

And ask them to rate themselves with excluding number 7. And the high one should come and everybody, without enhancement, no make up, no super styled hair, natural hair, no jewellry, no nice clothes, NO surgery and fillers or whatever, a white or black T-shirt and basic jeans. Then it would be more accurate. Everybody in their NATURAL state. This is how you know if you are naturally beautiful

That's really interesting. Great idea! Although I think if they stood next to a 10/10 model, they might still give themselves a 7 because a 7 is still obviously below the highly attractive person. Maybe put a solid seven next to them?

@@xDiananasok but how do you get rid of your fillers 😂

There was a documentary that did something similar, and what was most shocking is that the women (there were no men in the experiment) just rated the model higher. The researchers' hypothesis (which I agree with) was that rating yourself as a 6~7 is safe. It is above 5 which is average (and no one wants to be average) but not so high like an 8 or 9 which would cause them to face reality in the form of negative criticism from objective observers of their beauty. Anyway the model used was about a 7.5~8 but because most of the women wanted to label themselves as a 7 they knew standing next to another 7 would instantly make them a lair so they rated the model as a 10... Oh, and the reason I said the model was a 7.5~8 is because of another prior experiment in which they had a few hundred people rate the model from 1-10. Personally, I thought most of the women fell into the average range 4~5, so I don't know why they were so determined to be 7's.... Seriously! Ask any unfortunate person whose looks rate about 2~3.5, and they would LOVE to be considered at least average (5 out 10) looking.

This would be such a great video

Right! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

Maybe its because of access They believe they are a certain number and once someone they believe to be on the same level rates themselves higher They get angry because they got degraded and cheated of a chance with them.

YES this weird phenomenon where a “ugly” person rate themselves higher on beauty scale and the negative reactions they get is odd. Like so what a “ugly” person think they’re attractive 😭

those people who get mad are so insecure

@@shelby9510none here was ugly tho

If that's you in the profile pic, definitely not a 5. ❤

Maybe on a good day!@@user-du6lc7hq4v

@@user-du6lc7hq4vfacts she is attractive

What's the point of such a video if we can't react to their answers ? Nobody shits on them btw, people are just saying they're delusional.

@@nairdazitro7460 no some of these comments are definitely shitting on these people really harshly

@@BlackCat-qr6gy I have seen none.

@@nairdazitro7460 would you rate yourself a 5 if you were asked on the spot?

@@nairdazitro7460 also there are clearly attractive people being interviewed yet there’s comments saying “everyone is average or below”. imo that’s far too harsh.

It's more like they think 7 is the average. Their scale is just different.

A 6 is not just slightly above average bro, it’s literally above the average.

Probably they wishful think that overrating themselves will magically increase their attractiveness in the other person's eyes. Never the case though. In fact, if someone who's (for example) a 3-4/10 in my eyes starts acting c0cky, they usually become a 2 or even 1.

@@kiravampira1456 esp if the person feels entitled to people because they think they're this extremely attractive person. Literally delusional. I've dealt with this before where below average to average looking women act like they're 10s and get mad when I reject them lol

@thelonercoder5816 Dealing with the same scenario on a regular basis, only gender-reversed.

Thank you! Besides, being confident when you have nothing to be confident about is silly. If you look like a failed science experiment, stay out of other people’s sight as much as you can and be humble. Contribute to the world using other skills

1.5? This is deformed are you really THAT unattractive?

1.5 is literally a deformity, an ugly person would be 4

I thought I'm 1.5 Shit, now I have to go even lower 😢

@@Arka_Das 1.4 will be fine!

Exactly! 😅

LMAOOO exactly what i was thinking

@@aayushimajumdereng1615 Same

😂😂😂😂 this comment took me out. I think it's the audacity. like "😊 how dare you rate yourself high , don't you know you are ugly" 😂

It's more annoying when most of the girls there that are like 5 or 6 rate themselves 8+ as if they shouldn't be dating avg guys.

Some people live in delusion

True none were high on the beauty scale. Most were 3 or 4 at best.

There were definitely above averge people here.... I'm too lazy to find the rest buy 6:59 girl was super pretty. 2:32 girl also has a lot of potential like her eyes are pretty and features

you guys are too judgemental 😂 and yall perception of beauty is screwed.

@@victoriancarwash4393 nah you would just rather people lie to you so that your feelings don't get hurt. I'm begging y'all to be realistic. Not everyone needs to be beautiful but calling everyone a 8, 9, or 10/10 is delusional.

What are you trying to say exactly? A) Normal people don't have eyes. B) Unattractive people are not permitted to speak. C) Only supermodels can form opinions?

​@UnlistedAccount most of the people in this comment section are bitter and resentful tryna hide under a facade of self awareness and objectivity

exactly lol@@jonesyftw9120

The men were also over rating themselves.

No. They are just being honest. The majority of the ppl on this are 5s. Average. Nothing wrong with that. It's just a fact.

They don't put that much effort into their appearance or their guts wouldn't be hanging over their jeans

This

10s don’t exist. Highest should always be a 9. Separate 1-3 with 4. You can be below average but not hard to look at. Some people are legit hideous

In that case everyone below a 3 would have to have moderate to severe deformities

No one has no flaws, for me supermodels should be 10 - we're looking at people who exist, not perfect entities

Level 10 attractiveness does not equal no flaws imo. Perfection is actually less attractive, more of an anomaly or spectacle but not truly attractive, imo.

Where are you from?

@@nicochan1537 Perm, it's a town in Russia

@@gorilla_2282russians are always so negative 😂

no most of them or a 4

@@lookismcel I disagree. 4s were not the majority here. Most people were around 5

I totally agree with you

I agree. I'm a 4 when I wake up, a 5 on average, a 6 if my skin is clear, and a 7 if my skin is clear with makeup

Yes!!! I dont get it! I would give myself 2 (maximum) and i look better than some of them. ( I am a woman)

@@5-es4mnI think that’s the other extreme. People who looking alright but rating themselves a 1-3 are trying to fish for compliments or want to get seen as very very humble

Agreed. I'm starting to extremely dislike this channel and its community for its pretentious attitude about this. Most people simply see 7 as the average, so they're likely to rate themselves as that. Plain and simple. It doesn't mean they think they're above average. It doesn't mean they think they're extremely good-looking. Their scale is just different.

Imagine thinking 7 is average. 7 is literally the start of "pretty".

@@chillblue1650 With the millions of unique people on this planet, the obsession of beauty and the very narrow parameters placed on it is unfortunate. I feel for the younger generation who are exposed to so many videos centered on beauty and altering appearance. Besides TV and magazines, I had little of it growing up. The only people I have ever considered "ugly" have been cruel, mean, or perverted. There is a strong association for me with attractiveness and personality.

​@@LoveAfterPookie No, 7 is above average beauty. 5.5 is average, 6 is pretty, pleasant, 7 is gorgeous anything 8-10 is rare.

Nah people just don’t want to admit that they are inferior. I like to think I’m smarter than average even though I’m probably normal intelligence. People who rate themselves 7 do it because of self-preservation rather than because it’s the objective truth

people do the same when rating shows, anime and video games for some reason people don't understand how to use a simple 1-10 scale

​@@JustAPokemonCommentingOnVideos it might as well be a seven through ten scale at this point

someone said it has to do with the western education system where 7 is the "mid" score in school but i am asian so i cannot confirm but in my opinion this 7 thing is more common in western world @@BitchChill for whatever reasons

​​@@JustAPokemonCommentingOnVideosA 70% is considered a C in our grading system for Americans I know. Can't confirm anywhere else

İt is not about how other see you though they asked how would you rate yourself. Why are you guys that harsh on people just because they love the way they look

No no they perfectly understood the question. They're just delusional because nobody wants to be average.

@@nairdazitro7460that’s what happens when you get told you’re special in school

yeah but these are British people... 7/10 isn't average in our grading

@zara1559 I understand the differences in the grading systems, and I'd say the American one is inferior for sure. I could be wrong, but would you agree that Americans lean on the 1-10 looks scale more than in any other region? If British people (or anyone else) are picking up on certain trends from Americans, like the 1-10 scale, I wonder if British people would adopt the same attitudes even though they would be lifted from the American grading system. But it could also be the case that people are just rating themselves favorably. I would never rate myself because I feel I'd be too much in my head worried about over/under-rating myself to be objective.

A c is below average in almost every American school. A B is considered average

@@bradentrice6615 C is considered satisfactory or good enough. The average grades are higher because of the competitive nature. If you get all Cs the chances you are going to higher education or whatever job opportunities is lower.

How does that make sense in context of the video when they overrate themselves?

I am a solid 2/10

Yeah, and when you look at the population around 5% of people are below 5/10, around 85% are average so 5 to lets say 7-10, leaving around 10% of being those above average 7+/10s.

@@cheytacpraetoriancomposite3413 the problem again is in perception. People often consider 5 as some kind of line for "less is definitely ugly", when 5 is literally just The Average. 5% you mentioned are not "slightly below average", they are on the lower end of the scale, so we should look at 1-2. Otherwise, again, 1-10 pont scale literally loosing it's meaning, because you use 1-5 scale with added 5 free point for everyone only to project "niceness", "positivity" and be "uplifting"

@@vanderdik7185 Yeah you are correct, I suggested that -5/10 being below average because of social experiments pretty much showing that if you are slightly below average in modern days you are basically fighting for scraps, those 5% and 10% people are the only major difference. The top 10% people are going to be attractive to absolutely everybody and the down 5% are going to be ugly for everybody and not a single person will say otherwise unless they are being dishonest. Those 85% of convencionally attractive people will be the target of preferance. I am in that range altho I have few strong features that stand out from the average and for one women I can be super ugly and for other I am a bedtime material.

Yeah, but physical attraction is to a large degree still subjective so how would anyone know it was accurately used? Unless you ask a specific population of the same culture and age range with the same exposure to similar media, there will never be an objective standard

If i ever get an 8 online i will not take it seriously like how is eight average....

Don't take this channel too seriously. If it was a true educational channel they would have some sort of oversight by an authority be it a University or some other Institution. But as it currently stands they can basically upload anything, make it look objective and true when in reality there are possibly many biases involved. Most of their videos are pretty good but there are some where opinions definetly diverge. Point is don't believe everything at a whim. Especially for something which can be as subjective as beauty. They themselves said they changed their opinions over time how much is subjective and how much is objective. Just be critical.

Most of the people in this video were 3s, 4s, 5 and maybe three 6s. no one is over a 6

I completely agree with you

It can't be objective. Beauty is subjectve. What's a 10 to you could be a 3 to me.

Be honest. They wouldn't even qualify for the pageant.

These pageants are mainly an industry

Sure but arent the padgent queens like a 9.9999 Why so angry

But of you look at old old miss uni you'll soon notice your not even looking at natural faces. There's somuch surgery now.

Exactly

Ok so in you world Isabella at 2.24 is pure randomness. Charm, feminity, pretty face, body, the girl has it all, but is a 6 atmost. Alrite alrite 😂

​@@johanna1438 yeah lol she like a 4.5 at best

@@mistertutunga7941 True beauty with disarming charm imo but ok then, de gustibus... Just hope your idea of a 10 isn't the classic work done/overcaked Insta-hoe-type xD

I think that one woman who said 8

@@pcap8810 lool women have a problem with reality

Has to do a lot with their insecurity

Totally agree. I rate myself several points below what other people rate me. I often catch strangers staring at me appreciatively. I think it's cause other ppl have awful taste.

Yeah Im astonished at the comments in here. Many people here must be so miserable with themselves...

A better example here would be some white dude complaining to be descended from Vikings when he’s just a typical dude. Of course that would be annoying. No one likes delusion

Agreed

Felt that

Yeah a bunch of incels using their ridiculous scale who want everyone to be as miserable as them. They literally tell people to give up because of the angle their eyes tilt lmao. And they think other people are delusional.

70's marks are not C, They are B. 60's are C.

​@@princessazula624Where I live 70's are C's. It might be different than where you live.

​@@princessazula624 That's a new invention. 70% is a C- to the adult commentors...

@@videofan1010 but the point remains the same, with grading in mind these people are are actually being humble. But our host thought that they were being egotistical.