❤❤❤

This is the mustache-free variant of Don Lincoln. There is also Alligator Lincoln, President Lincoln, & the one we are all familiar with: Classic Lincoln.

@@theultimatereductionist7592 omg loki seriously good joke anyways

I couldn't figure out what was different about him this video! He looks much younger now,

Maybe if he goes through the double slit, the mustache will reappear? Is the mustache composed of waves or particles?

@MichaelKingsfordGray wtf was that?

@@Tubluer If we assume their names refer to cars, I'd say Mr Ford has issues with Mr BMW and his M5 😋

@MichaelKingsfordGray What?!! What do you mean?!!

@@user-wu8yq1rb9t Must be a lot of local cultural references in these remarks. I give up.

@@Tubluer WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great !! Einstein never nearly understood gravity or time. He was not a high level genius. I have exposed Einstein. I have totally outsmarted Einstein. I have surpassed Newton and Einstein. This is like detective work. Here are the facts. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. The following is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2 AND F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. This is consistent with what is E=MC2 AND F=ma. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great !!!! WHAT IS GRAVITY is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! WHAT IS E=MC2 is F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky (ON BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. By Frank Martin DiMeglio In understanding SPACE, what is gravity, TIME, AND time dilation (ON BALANCE), it is important is it to understand what is a BALANCED displacement of what is SPACE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. Consider what is E=MC2. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. (c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE.) Indeed, the stars are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE, AND notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. CLEARLY, BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. “Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE) consistent WITH E=MC2, F=ma, TIME, AND time dilation ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents, DESCRIBES, AND INVOLVES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Indeed, inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This CLEARLY explains what is E=MC2 AND F=ma ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !! (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) Great. Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. I have mathematically proven why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. (Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) I have mathematically proven what is the fourth dimension, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! I have explained why what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio The gravity of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground is BALANCED WITH and by WHAT IS E=MC2 (AND TIME). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank Martin DiMeglio WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, as the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; as TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Great. It is proven. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank Martin DiMeglio WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS WHAT IS GRAVITY is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Great. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio

He is a h-index of 100+

Yes, I absolutely agree! A lot of people see it as a weakness but it's actually a strength. "I dont know" is what drives the world to a better understanding instead of people inventing fast answers to fill the gap.

Deepak Chopra will be like: yeah, the atom has a brain in a different dimension and it has awareness

@@RedPee2000 Oh yeah. To a scientist "I don't know" means "More work to do". Without "I don't know" the world would be boring.

@@RedPee2000 Nicely put.

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? It takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (Quantum unit).

Yes, and it is very intelligible for non-native speakers. His pronunciation is very clear.

Absolutely. While some science channels go for the hype or clickbait aproach, this channel treats us more seriously. Thanks doc.

This is clearly the experiement that made me interested in quantum physics and sometimes i thinks about this experiment and i'm like : Damn physics is awesome !

@@ghostbroly same it's an amazing experiment

Dear brothers and sisters, I have solved the problem of particle to behave like particle and wave, when observed and unobserved respectively in double slit experiment. "Particle physics based on real dimensions of space-time" [Volume 09; issue 10; 2022] - arcjournals - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. To think, how the electrons entering the slit knows whether an observation is made on it or the detector is switched ON/OFF and change its results (pattern on the screen) accordingly, is the confusion. This even led the scientist to wonder if quantum mechanics is a future deciding factor of human life. The answer is simple, the experimentation has to include the observer such that observer is equal to observing object together undergoing one of two results at a time. One may think, it is like surrendering oneself and cease to think anymore. No, it is not so. I have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity". Hope this new proposed study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics by solving incompatibility between them. [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - arcjournals....thank you

Do you want to develop an app?

I take a lot of time trying to train the KZfaq Artifificial (un)Intelligent algorithm to not suggest sports videos. It doesn't seem to understand that despite all the time I spend on Maths and Physics vids, those are what I want.

Light doesn’t travel in waves. It travels in a spiral, like a spring.

Yeah but like he does look great

What is the Tennessee Valley Authority’s interest in his mustache?

@@pbp6741 Because they love the dam thing.

or maybe we're the variants on the worng universe

Thank you. That's the plan.

@@schmetterling4477 yes dunghead you are absolutely right.

@@schmetterling4477 Good to know that you agree that you are a dunghead.

@@schmetterling4477 You are a typical halfwit who likes to harass people. You know less physics than my cat knows.

Dear brothers and sisters, I have solved the problem of particle to behave like particle and wave, when observed and unobserved respectively in double slit experiment. "Particle physics based on real dimensions of space-time" [Volume 09; issue 10; 2022] - arcjournals - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. To think, how the electrons entering the slit knows whether an observation is made on it or the detector is switched ON/OFF and change its results (pattern on the screen) accordingly, is the confusion. This even led the scientist to wonder if quantum mechanics is a future deciding factor of human life. The answer is simple, the experimentation has to include the observer such that observer is equal to observing object together undergoing one of two results at a time. One may think, it is like surrendering oneself and cease to think anymore. No, it is not so. I have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity". Hope this new proposed study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics by solving incompatibility between them. [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - arcjournals....thank you

Same is going through my head :)

Sadly loss of weight might be also a consequence of health issues.... And at that age too... :/ But hopefully he already got visit from his grandkids from the future who gave him all the cures and stuff for maximum lifetime extension.....

@@spacejaga A lot of us have woken up and started taking better care of ourselves. I lost 30 lbs (via keto) 3 years ago when I got the pre-diabetes warning. I'm now healthy and with normal a1c levels. One meal a day and avoid sugar and carbs. You don't have to be sick to lose weight.

Yeah, he’s definitely watching his food intake.

Been thinking the same. I hope everything is alright.

For a completely different, logical explanation of what is occurring, you can view my video, "Particle 2 Slit Experiments Explained By Paul Marostica".

@@PaulMarostica -- So many important things go unaddressed there, such suspicious methods and language, all stemming from a secret theory that you can purchase ownership of? Let's just patent "π = 3" and be done with the nonsense.

@@TlalocTemporal I find it humorous and pathetic that you're trying to twist and demean my work with no use of logic whatsoever. Good luck with your carefully thought out π = 3 theory. Bye bye.

@@PaulMarostica Yeah, no. That was bad.

It's obviously a high energy particle making waves in a (i'd say definitely quantised, particulate) medium that diffract and interfere, forming wave guides that extra detectors interfere with and destroy.. the particle goes through the slit it is aimed at and hits a wave guide if one exists. This is so blindly obvious I don't see what the problem is.. I'd say the particle is a permanent imbalance in the very same medium.

Or is it that it's actually a cluster of small particles that behaves as a single large particle and a wave at the same time? Like a flock of birds. But we haven't been able to come down to that level of physics yet.

@@ehsnils I used to think that it was related to the phenomenonal rate of vibration of the source emitting the particle ie. because it's so rapid and the rate of particles being emitted, it was a series of pointlike particles being sent from the source that made it appear to be a continuous wavering line. Something like digital and analog at the same time. That's as far as I got and I've never been able to understand it since :(

@@schmetterling4477 please tell me more, professor Ling...

@@schmetterling4477 so amazing profesor Ling! Please tell me more!

@@schmetterling4477 lol

Cool story...although I do think theoretical physics may have peaked nearly 100 years ago

@@ktx49 WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great !! Einstein never nearly understood gravity or time. He was not a high level genius. I have exposed Einstein. I have totally outsmarted Einstein. I have surpassed Newton and Einstein. This is like detective work. Here are the facts. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. The following is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2 AND F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. This is consistent with what is E=MC2 AND F=ma. Now, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great !!!! WHAT IS GRAVITY is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! WHAT IS E=MC2 is F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky (ON BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. By Frank Martin DiMeglio In understanding SPACE, what is gravity, TIME, AND time dilation (ON BALANCE), it is important is it to understand what is a BALANCED displacement of what is SPACE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. Consider what is E=MC2. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. (c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE.) Indeed, the stars are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE, AND notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. CLEARLY, BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. “Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE) consistent WITH E=MC2, F=ma, TIME, AND time dilation ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents, DESCRIBES, AND INVOLVES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Indeed, inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This CLEARLY explains what is E=MC2 AND F=ma ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !! (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) Great. Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. I have mathematically proven why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. (Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE.) I have mathematically proven what is the fourth dimension, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! I have explained why what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio The gravity of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground is BALANCED WITH and by WHAT IS E=MC2 (AND TIME). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank Martin DiMeglio WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, as the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; as TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Great. It is proven. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank Martin DiMeglio WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS WHAT IS GRAVITY is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Great. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio

Very nice explanation.

That doesn't explain anything. That's not how quantum mechanics work.

@@medusaskull9625 Analogies never explain how something works. But they help understanding where some explanation break down.

@@SiqueScarface Good analogy does help. Bad analogy often lead to false understanding of a phenomenon and cause more damage than good. For example, when talking about gravity, people often put a large ball in the middle of a trampoline and show how other mass get fallen into the big mass due to space warped. What worse is they do this with no disclaimer nor further clarification on that it's just an analogy. That's a bad analogy. Smaller object whirl in not due to space warped but b/c we are on Earth and gravity is already there to pull it down. I felt insulted and discouraged to learn from those analogy. How do you know object path get interfered when space got warped? You can't draw a direct conclusion in gravity is a direct result of space warped.

@@medusaskull9625 you're confused about that read general relativity again

Two days ago I was like, Owh no it's been a while

Tommy two times

I actually think it's a little on the big side.

Losing weight is expensive when you have to by a whole new wardrobe.

Isn't it a lab coat?

Underrated comment.

It’s a Black Lab Coat! Silly.

To get a completely different, better understanding of what is occurring, you can view my video, "Particle 2 Slit Experiments Explained By Paul Marostica".

Whatever you do, don't read that "light nighttime reading" (5:27)... ^^

Shutup

@@catfi5h336 What?

Per the various Many Worlds hypotheses the wave function does not collapse so there is no collapse to explain.

@@pbp6741 This is false. In fact, if you do not callapse the wave functions after every measurement, the Schrodinger equation would give wrong predictions in all successive measurements. So, if you want to use quantum mechanics, you have to collapse the wave function after every measurement.

I'm curious to learn what you think of my explanation in my video, "Particle 2 Slit Experiments Explained By Paul Marostica".

@@PaulMarostica I will watsh it as soon as I can, and I'll let you know. I have published three short divulgative lessons on quantum mechanics, in case you are interested

@@marcobiagini1878 I’ll make it simple for you. If a photon is shot at a 50% silvered mirror the Many Worlds hypotheses solves the Schrödinger equation by observing in one World the photon is reflected and in another World the photon passes through. Wave collapse is a construct introduced by Copenhagen to try to explain what happened to the rest of the possibility wave. Many Worlds doesn’t need that construct because in Many Worlds the entire possibility wave is realized.

During Clovid19 the gym was closed and looking up star formations and the like I discovered Particle physics. The double slit, the Quantum Entanglement theory fascinating is all I can say. If I were young I would have studied a whole lot more of math and NO sports what so ever.

you have it backwards. it's single particle pattern when they check on which slit it goes through. and he kind of missed saying that the mind blowing thing is that when you don't detect where it goes it behaves like the particle is interfering with itself.

Dear brothers and sisters, I have solved the problem of particle to behave like particle and wave, when observed and unobserved respectively in double slit experiment. "Particle physics based on real dimensions of space-time" [Volume 09; issue 10; 2022] - arcjournals - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. To think, how the electrons entering the slit knows whether an observation is made on it or the detector is switched ON/OFF and change its results (pattern on the screen) accordingly, is the confusion. This even led the scientist to wonder if quantum mechanics is a future deciding factor of human life. The answer is simple, the experimentation has to include the observer such that observer is equal to observing object together undergoing one of two results at a time. One may think, it is like surrendering oneself and cease to think anymore. No, it is not so. I have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity". Hope this new proposed study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics by solving incompatibility between them. [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - arcjournals....thank you

Id like to read the answer to that. great question!