The World Models Pilatus PC-6 Porter 40 - KIT (Balsa Kit Building)

Рет қаралды 219,649

9 жыл бұрын

Code No.: A340KIT
Wing Span: 64 in / 1625 mm
Wing Area: 592 sq in / 38.2 sq dm
Flying Weight: 5.5 lbs / 2500 g
Fuselage Length: 45.5 in / 1155 mm
Power System: 40 Size Glow or Electric
Glow Power Requires: 4-channel radio w/5 standard servos, 2-stroke 0.40-0.46 engine
Electric Power Requires: 4-channel radio w/ 4 standard servos, Outrunner Motor KM37490750 w/Radial Mount Adaptor HW2340300, 40A Brushless ESC, 4 cells 14.8V 3200mAh Lipo battery and charger.
The Pilatus PC-6 Porter is a single-engined Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) utility aircraft designed by Pilatus Aircraft of Switzerland. The reliability and versatility in all weather and terrain conditions have established the reputation of the PC-6 as a rugged utility aircraft. First flown in 1959, it remains in production for over 50 years. The World Models is trying to capture the characteristics of this legendary aircraft in both Kit and ARF version and present to RC flyers.
Features:
- Interlocking parts cut with laser precision.
- Easiest building with perfect fit parts, takes shape without the need to work on top of drawings.
- Complete hardware package included.
- Optional package of covering, gas power and electric power available.

Пікірлер: 55

@MasboyRC 4 жыл бұрын

This what i called masterpiece !! Every detail of your plane so perfect.

@wwjoesr 8 жыл бұрын

Nice work! That was quick....would love to see the rest of the build.

@NeilJB 4 жыл бұрын

I'm glad I stepped through that quickly.

@ErstO1 3 жыл бұрын

I've put together a number of RC aircraft. I always use glue, not sure how long that masking tape will hold 😏

@robertkbrooks951 2 жыл бұрын

I really love to fly mine. Converted it from Old Nitro to a Power 90 E-flite Electric Motor. 10 foot roll out and off the Tarmac. AIR AMERICA. they use to call it the "JEEP".

@renecapron920 5 жыл бұрын

le pilatus pc 6 est vraiment un bel avion et se pilote tres bien mais attention a se qu'il ne parte pas en vrille oui il faut tout faire a jour avent de coller bravo

@CallmeDaBreeze1971 8 жыл бұрын

I'm getting this. Planning to build it as a replica of the Porter flown by Robert Downey Jr in Air America.

@388gruardian 8 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the colouring books behind the pilot seat. Lol.

@ronfleming6701 5 жыл бұрын

It's all good

@sotm6078 7 жыл бұрын

Where are the links to the kit??

@dioniciogavito603 5 жыл бұрын

Good day sir how can I get a lay out or where to purchase of that?

@rcdogmanduh4440 6 жыл бұрын

I want this lady and her tape dispenser!

@fernandopacheco5596 7 жыл бұрын

Bom dia, sou do Brasil gostei muito desse kit para montar, onde que posso comprar um desse, obrigado

@Barmy50 8 жыл бұрын

ur link to where this model can be purchased does not work. great vid.Tom

@RadarrcHK 8 жыл бұрын

Thank you. We have posted a new link.

@cinderswolfhound6874 5 жыл бұрын

In the old days we used glue to build models i guess thats progress

@damosaffa9564 2 жыл бұрын

is there any fail availieble for sale?

@chito5048 4 жыл бұрын

Que pasa que no tenía pegamento?

@rachidnadori8351 5 жыл бұрын

Dónde comprar todo esto?

@24bellers20 4 жыл бұрын

Boring. Sped through it! Glad i did

@davidwatkin1484 5 жыл бұрын

Looks like plywood, not balsa.

@declanthiele 9 жыл бұрын

Where can you get it? How much?

@RadarrcHK 8 жыл бұрын

www.theworldmodels.com/store/?action=ad_search&cb_kw%5B%5D=Laser-Cut+Kit&range_1=&range_2=&types=in

@declanthiele 8 жыл бұрын

+RadarrcHK alright thanks man

@ratibuss27 4 жыл бұрын

Dommage se n'est pas traduit en français

@user-nz2zt7od5w 2 жыл бұрын

مرحبا ممكن الصيغه الملف حق طايره DXF

@rattraped 5 жыл бұрын

Having built balsa wood kits since the mid 1960's , this is not how it was done then. There was more time and effort put into the kits, which required more time and skill. One never see's the kits from that time these days.

@EvilMerlin 5 жыл бұрын

the only real reason they were done that way is the lack of computer design and the lack of laser cutting. There is nothing wrong with these new kits.

@haraldschevik5213 5 жыл бұрын

Evil Merlin this new kits, it’s not like in the old days, now is all already made, nothing to sand, nothing to cut.. nothing to build by yourself

@EvilMerlin 5 жыл бұрын

@@haraldschevik5213 Doesn't much matter. Kits are almost 100% dead.

@hanspy2 4 жыл бұрын

Plenty of oldschool kits for sale. Just bought an 3m Elmira kit design 1952. Building right now a 3,5m Bergfalke.

@MickB235 8 жыл бұрын

Ahh where's the glue ?

@mickey1299 5 жыл бұрын

I wondered that too !

@robindz8502 5 жыл бұрын

You just took almost 10 minutes to show nothing

@maxwellmc9734 3 жыл бұрын

I didn't hear a thing..

@kabardaninfokreatif 5 жыл бұрын

Anjink... Nunggu 8 menit 25 detik tapi kaga kelar tu pesawat... Buang buang waktu...

@pierrerobin1238 5 жыл бұрын

Aucun intérêt !

@user-oo1pu6bj1c 5 жыл бұрын

Пена бальза круче это пазлы какие то

@PerryCodes 6 жыл бұрын

Yeah.... Why build your own when you can have an Asian factory do it for you?

@artherr2843 4 жыл бұрын

Jason Perry Ah! Building kit is part of hobby and enjoying. Ready plane bring nothing in feeling of accomplishment.

@ronaldmiller6520 6 жыл бұрын

the girl is good at putting it together but she waste to much tape

@johnbravo7542 5 жыл бұрын

but she saved on not using glue .lol..

@scottfirman 5 жыл бұрын

I feel the need to comment again. Looking at the design of this model and what engine it would require to fly it tells me everything I said before is correct. I stick to my original comment. Its a terrible design. I had an Extra 300 that was designed simular to this. The thing was JUNK! It didnt even survive a low altitude crash being two foot off the ground due to engine stall. The body blew apart like a hand grenade. The double sided walls did nothing for strength and there was not enough lateral support long the top or bottom of the fuselage. The wings were supposed to be designed to transfer strenght across front to back but the poor design resulted in complete failure at the cockpit.

@scottfirman 8 жыл бұрын

If you tryed to build a real plane like that,it would fail. The structural design is weak,even in a hard landing,this plane would break up very easily. the design it terrible,the inner supports too thin. Thats the problem with these prefab planes,they skimp on proper building techniques and use less bulk heads trying to lighten the weight,but compromise the structural integrity. Do yourself a favor,get some old school plans,compair them to this prefab junk,you will shake your head at the shoddy workmanship put into these frames.

@roelvandevelde1537 7 жыл бұрын

I disagree. I've been (scratch) building from plans and kits for about 30 years, and I built this kit 2 winters ago (you can see the maiden flight on my channel). It is a very well thought out and engineered kit with quality materials. Light weight yet very strong - you couldn't twist that fuse if you wanted to. It also holds up very well after 2 summers of many flights. Mine even comes with the added vibration of a 4 stroke..... Still looks like new.

@rcdogmanduh4440 6 жыл бұрын

Arfs are built to fly, not land hard!

@rogerking2801 6 жыл бұрын

what?

@landrovered 5 жыл бұрын

I crashed my porter very hard due to an electronic malfunction, it was amazingly well built and was, to my surprise, repairable. So I don't think you can really make the assumptions\ you do on durability simply by watching a video when you lack any empirical evidence. My experience gives me quite the opposite opinion, and I have purchased more models from them with great satisfaction.

@seansoblixe9711 5 жыл бұрын

use a bit of carbon you would be amazed.