when clapping to every beat, it literally makes no difference lmao

when 2+2=5 is really MATH rock

@@MrNoWaya not really, 7/4 is slow enough for ppl to clap to every beats but 7/8 is much faster, ppl would have to clap to main beats 1 2 3 41 2 3 41 2 3 41.... and it's literally too hard for non musical folks

@@birudanh6974 thats why I said 'when clapping to every beat'. Youre right tho, in some specific cases it would be different.

Hemiole

Lol

Same here

7 years later have you seen them yet? I should have seen them three times but the second time I was supposed to the tragedy in Toronto happened :(

@@nicevibe i haven't seen them yet, sadly, they don't come to my city, we're too far away :/

@@M4ut4ll1c4 I’m sorry to hear that hopefully one day something works out for you xo

@@nicevibe thank you, i hope you get to see them too! even after all these years! i posted the comment when i was 16, i'm 23 now, damn, time goes fast! Good to find an active radiohead fan! I wish you the best!

Not really

@@typicalfurry2747 nope, it still has math rock influence, the intro is actually 7/8, then 5/2 and then the rest is 4/4

@@spacetimeduality well the way OP said it implied that because its in 7/4 its math rock. With that logic Pink Floyd is math rock

@@typicalfurry2747 and I am saying it’s 7/8. Did i refer to the OP?

@@spacetimeduality well no, besides wasnt math rock made before this released

I AGREE

soft disagree although your opinion is valid. i come from the opinion that dilf man-bun yorke >>>>> but the emo thing he had going on in late 2000s/early 2010s is solid 2nd place in my book

But the cvnty spiky red hair 🙏🏼

yeah I know.

Covellechi but Radiohead aren't a prog rock band. 😂

Shammo Hamid Paranoid Android's pretty long

@@User-xw6kd A lot of their shit is pretty prog

I'm just gonna drop in here with some pointless genre talk that nobody wanted or asked for because I'm bored at work. In some ways they kind of are prog rock but it depends on which definition you go with. If you see it purely as about experimenting and pushing the boundaries of rock music then they clearly fit right in and I'd say that's what the genre was at its inception. However, since the genre is now fairly old it's less about experimentation or pushing boundaries and more about how similar a band sounds to the already established prog rock bands like Pink Floyd or King Crimson. In that sense, they don't really qualify. I'd play it safe and just call them experimental or something, that's a lot more all-encompassing and less likely to piss off genre purists.

I can't believe I never realized that

Damn, you're right!

+Marv Hunis daaaaamn nice that u realized that

Holy shit dude if that was actually what they were thinking, thats genius, really. Im hoping radiohead were/are that genius to do stuff like that, but anyway that was really nice spotted also

You guys think this is amazing - you should take a look at how King Crimson created their first album.... insane.

Yeah. Try explaining that to a crowd of non-musicions

Lmao I love how the audience just gave up

I love how radiohead samples the crowd on the NOS Alive recording.

Came here to say this

1984 thumbs up!

+Skip Mendler THIS IS GREAT HAHAHA

I see what you did there....and so does your tv.

the first parts is the one thats 7/4 lol, the rest is 4/4

It's not really clapping in 4/4, it's just clapping to every beat. More natural than skipping one. Thom suggested that so they could just not think about the time signature but it still threw them off

they have not been paying attention

@@mauran6646 lmao

Yeah, would say that Nazism just edges it on the crowd manipulation front

+Nate Stein its kinda dissappointing that the new album doesnt have this kind of song, though the new album still sounds awesome

+yoshi64 Burn the Witch fits this category pretty well IMO

+AtlanticSpamHammer i agree. Httt was pretty politically influenced. as is burn the witch if it really is about climate change, which i believe to be true. every album is a reinvention of the band. i think AMSP will really flurish if a "from the basement" is released, or when the tour stars. This was the case with TKOL for me

If you’re looking for Radiohead songs that rock, there’s an albums worth of b sides from the Bends (Killer Cars, Maquiladora, The Trickster,) and the same for Pablo Honey (Inside My Head and Pop Is Dead especially) and same for OKC, (Polyethylene Palo Alto and Pearly are so much like what “the bends 2” would’ve been). I really don’t get why people complain about them not having enough rock songs if you’re aware of all the none album tracks they have from that 1992-1998 period. Asking them to go back to that sound now is kinda crazy. I still can’t believe In Rainbows is nearly 15 years old. I was lucky enough to have older “cool” friends who saw them on their first US tour, and basically bullied me into going to see them on the bends tour in 1995 (I was 15, but already playing in a crappy band and getting into the local DIY scene). They were SO CRAZY good. Maybe 200 kids there, they rocked out. So I get why people would like to see that side of Radiohead again, but to REALLY see it, you’d need a time machine. As much as I loved it when they played “the bends” on the AMSP tour, it wasn’t the same as them as pre-fame hungry 20 somethings in a club so small I could’ve untied Thom’s shoelace.

Because it is not only music it a theatrical Opera

They do have a point tho, radiohead make very sad music (especially post-Pablo Honey). But I really love the delivery

When they say that just tell them they're not payin attention

this makes me want to end it all wym

Yeah, except this track references totalitarian mind-control and the normalisation of corporate tyranny

yeah refrains and verses should come back and repeat a couple times in every song so that you have enough time to get tired of it before it ends, all music should be made the same way. and there should always be a massive drop somewhere and leonardo aviccii should rule the world.

Benjamin Bergström XDDD i was believing in what you were saying, at first yeah i was thinking about the time of the songs, and in fact maybe the shortests songs are the best

Funny thing is what I really love about is that it's short, intensive and leaves you wanting more once it's over :P I think that's what's charming about it!

Magnus Rolandsson yeah! like raining blood by slayer, not the same type of music but you know it's the same construction of the song, very short but very powerful...

It reminds me a bit of Paranoid Android, but sadly it's only about half as long.

XD

I was there and remember getting put off by people not counting in 7! It was funny because everyone had that moment where they started to stop clapping to work out what was going wrong.

To be fair, not everyone is a musician.

DONT QUESTION MY AUTHORITY OR PUT ME IN A BOX CUZ IM NOT. I mean eh sorry, but im actually seeing them in Denmark in a week im so fucking excited i hope and think they will be playing this :D

when 2+2=5 is really MATH rock

@@anastasiakasuga800 its not

@@typicalfurry2747 it does have influences ;)

@@spacetimeduality yeah but it isn't math rock explicitly

@@typicalfurry2747 I said it has math rock influences….

Because thom is snapping and usually endorces the crowd to clap in that part, they're clapping awfully out of sync though

Why not bro anyway was amazing 🙀😸

Why do you have to react?

**Horrible and Off-Beat clapping throughout the first verses**

its 7/4 but yeah lmao

@@zingers4197 7/8

In Rainbows también es muy bueno 😎👍

2 + 2 = 2

arent you clever

So Orwellian

2+2= BB

Referencias.

He's a cool cat.

markusboyd3 he is special, he's so f*ng special)

White & Fluffy

markusboyd3 maybe you have not been paying attention

+Brelck With a Cheshire cat grin

Wendigo Van der Blitz all hail

I thank you alot for letting me notice it :)

Both are awesome! ahah

fake plastic trees

I thought that when I saw the thumbnail!

Oh yas

1:49

Ha

was that a rush reference?

2+2=22 you idiot /s