Exactly! There is something called conscience. But Indian Audience won't be able to accept it. They will somehow try to prove it wrong. Do u know why ?? There are many places where Men are degraded but no one will have the problem. The Biasness and Soft Corner towards Female which people have in their mind is very strong. That's the reason behind the anger and frustration of people towards the movie "Animal". U see, most of the people are going personal to stop people from watching the movie. This proves the anger which Vanga Sir has triggered in these people. And by looking at these Double Standard people, I feel, More and more this thing should happen. These people really need to be strong and mature.

What is ppl plz tell

Dai kena punda mark Anthony block buster da

Vikram Jailer um mokka than 😂

@@sarathr4495 dai kena punda jailer mokka padam.... But vikram nalla padam

@@SureshSureshraja-oo8nd rendume mokka than da thevidi 😂

@@sarathr4495 appo poii vijai nadicha beast kurivi padatha paruda badu

If it's a dogwhistle, then the character won't be consistent to the world. Like plenty of "pious" heroes who casually revels in their sexism etc. and everyone around him eggs him on. Depends on the world, how characters react to them, etc. Take Animal, regardless of what Vanga's intentions are, whatever the guy does is ultimately futile, his wife leaves him, he turns out to be progressively unhinged - except for his henchmen cousins and some enablers, nobody feels he's justified in doing what he does. His obsession/dad issues is comical, like nobody sees Ranbir pointing out how his dad holds his dick and thinks "wow, that's how you love your dad" - it's just creepy as heck. But on the other hand, take other films where the hero gets it all, gets to give misogynistic/casteist lectures etc and be a "hero" and a "saviour" - we have had a gazillion films in this template. Here, there is no consistency to the world. PS: Whether or not and how it influences society is a whole different debate, BTW.

@@sickleboi Thank you for a thoughtful response. I was triggered by Kabir Singh, and therefore haven't watched Animal. I do understand why you think "dog whistle" is the wrong term to use here. I use it because I've seen politicians employ "dog whistles" to awaken the worst instincts in people, by secretly validating their fascism/sexism/whatever, signaling in a way that gives them plausible deniability. Vanga is employing offensive fictional characters to stick a knife in all the women who found his previous movie objectionable. It's baiting, pure and simple; he sets a trap for "feminists", who will promptly be accused of "fake feminism" if they dare to criticize his movie; at the same time, it allows male audiences vicariously indulge in toxic masculine traits. Soon, you have (many) men enjoying the movie, and quickly dismissing genuine reactions of women. I truly believe the movie reinforces toxic masculine traits even while the moviemaker disingenuously protests his innocence(it looks like he employs background music in a way that glorifies problematic scenes - dog whistle?). I would have been content to simply detest the pro(?)taganists in his movies if I hadn't watched the director's interviews where he excuses relationship violence as "real passion", and (the one with BR) he avers that his "heroes" are not misogynists. The primary intent of this movie may have been feminist/critic-baiting, but the effect it's having - judging from all the men who are ridiculing women (including BR🙄)and dismissing genuine feelings as over-reaction - is that of a successful dog whistle.

Adhu avaru eppo sonnaru?

Nalla ilanu solalam but eduka kudathu nu apdika jamila kudathunu tha solla kudathu nu soldraru

Athu avaruku pudikala unaku pudikurathellam avarukum pudikanum nu avasiyam illa atha tha solraru thirumba loosu Mari athaye solra 😅

​@@vasanthp2703indha pundamavanunga inno 10 varushathuku idhaye sollitu irupanunga😂jai bhim jai bhim nu. Adhu onnu dha padama

There's no absolute way - but some films are very obviously made for propaganda - like Kerala Story for eg. - nobody (except certain vested groups) in Kerala would even feel this bizzaro world is Kerala - and this is supposed to be a "based on a real story" - it's just a gaze of some people who have a vested interest or showing certain masses what they want to see and reinforce their perceptions. If it's fiction - then it's a bit tricky, but for me it's whether the characters are consistent to the world. In case of Animal, felt Ranbir was consistent within that film and nobody sane would think that "wow what a guy" if he looks at what he does towards others and his wife and kids and his hilarious daddy issues. IDK and IDC what Vanga thinks of his character, I can only comment on what's shown on screen.

Blockbuster ah irunthaalum (Both Mark Antony and Jigarthanda Double X) oru 100 crores range la iruku but Leo and Jailer 500+ crores la … that’s what he’s trying to say.

In which time he is telling about Mark Antony?