I agree with you 😂

@@lorenzo_romani_rally_videos which one

@@stefanodeanjou8732 the Sebastian one

@@indonesia_playa Lol! They are both Sebastian that's why I asked

@@stefanodeanjou8732 yes that what i mean that Sebastian is faster

Loeb won by being Loeb. Ogier drives like Jesus, but Loeb is God.

But they are retired. Which Seb has been away is a different thing. Where do you see the mistakes that could have been rally ending? The footage here doesn't capture Ogier mistakes, and even if it did, it's stupid to judge that from a few clips. Let me also remind you that Ogier was 24,6s ahead of Loeb before the puncture in SS16. It lost him half a minute but still Loeb beat him by only 0,5 on the road. Loeb's drive was indeed insane at this age and after 9 years in retirement from active rallying in WRC and I'm massively impressed but let's be objective. You can't know what was inside Ogier's head so you can only make stuff up. I think it's also worth to take into consideration that with new cars it's a new start for everybody, but it wouldn't take anything away from Loeb.

@@maciejmaciex819 Ogier lost his cool in that rally. He smacked the barrier 2 times early on and had other close calls. Loeb only lost that time because he did not risk on the ice like Ogier did. That front puncture could of gone bad also was very lucky this whole rally. Loeb did not do any mistakes just kept his cool. Ogier was so stressed he made 2 mistakes in the end of the rally. Jumping the start and cutting too much. Not really a retirement for Ogier yet as he just came fresh from a full season. That only 0.5 came from Loeb not pushing anymore in the end. Its obvious that Loeb knew he jumped infront and got the penalty.

Grazie a te!

@blacknester Loeb was struggling with tires. it's tires were totally done...

same feeling for me !

@blacknester I have a feeling that Loeb knew that Ogier jumped the start that is why he took it so slow in the last stage. He was next in line for the start to see it happen.

Toyota "exit - corner" performance suggest it is better car, but we could argue about drivers.

"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast."

Davvero spettacolare 🔥 speriamo di vederne ancora!

Thank you! 👍🏻

👌🏻👍🏻

They should technically be slower. But they have a lot more go power out of the corners with the 130hp (or kw don't remember) of extra power with the hybrid. But they also have less downforce than last season so they won't be as fast in other areas. But in these condition with Monaco type snow tires and ice they probably have an advantage over last season

Me too, it would be nice to see many races like this!

Grazie a te! Mi fa molto piacere 😉

Muchas gracias!

Grazie! 👍🏻

Thanks to you for the comment!

@blacknester Frankly, while my fan support goes to Loeb, I fundamentally recognize that Ogier had done everything to win this one handily. Even with the loss of time from the puncture in the penultimate SS, he was still pretty much on par with Loeb going into the final stage and although Loeb posted a faster time there than him, could still have won the race. Elsewhere, I have pondered the idea of a rule which would allow each finishing driver to drop a worst stage time in determining final positions. While there are evident potential unfairness and disadvantages with such a rule, something to equalize the other unfairness and disadvantages such as Ogier must feel should surely also be considered.

@Satanic Panic Fun and Games although the Puma is evidently taller and wider than its predecessor the Fiesta, I thought it was developed on the latter's platform? But is it any more gigantic or disadvantaged because of size than, say, the Hundyai i20? And, with a 1-3-5 finish in the Monte Carlo, it certainly did not do badly for itself at all. So, I will be interested to hear more of the concerns that you have for the car, not only for itself but also as compared with, say, the Yaris.

@blacknester A result is what it is at the end of the event, all the incidents, tyre punctures, errors, bad luck etc taken into account. "Ifs" cannot be taken into account for only one driver or team and not the other or others. In comparison to the "if" that you say about Evans, it could just as easily be said that if Loeb had made different tyre choices on the second day of the event, he would have continued to pull ahead of Ogier and all the others and would not have fallen behind. If Evans could have finished second if he had not gone off the road, why wouldn't Adrien Fourmaux have won the rally if he had not shunted on the first day? If Rovanpera or Solberg did not have their respective incidents, where would they have finished? As you can see, in the end it becomes a meaningless exercise of speculation. Most of all, however, I am puzzled by your reckoning that Loeb got up to speed off the bat in the Monte Carlo; the others did not yet do so or have not yet done so; but that they will do so in the races to come; while, somehow Loeb would remain stagnant and would be surpassed. It is not clear to me on what grounds and evidence this prognosis is based.

10000! iscritti, vedo ora! complimenti per il vostro grande risultato!

Grazie mille Gabriele! Finalmente ci siamo arrivati!

👍🏻👍🏻🔝

@Jal de Bucha c'est une évidence en 20ans de rallye, 17 titres eux deux... et les miettes pour les autres

Me vi toda la carrera. Lo que vi fue que Loeb fue muy rápido cuando el pavimento estaba seco. Loeb gano 6 etapas. Ogier era mas agresivo en las etapas donde había nieve con hielo. Loeb las pasaba muy despacio y por esa razón Ogier le aumento 21 segundos. Pero cuando corrían los 2 en etapas secas Loeb corrió igual o un poquito más rápido que Ogier. La victoria se la merecía Ogier pero se le poncho una llanta y por eso perdio. Loeb me impresionó mucho como corrió en las etapas secas donde no había hielo. Felicitaciones maestro, a Ford y a Msport 😀😀

Gracias! 🙏

😉👍🏻

Oui ne sais pas si loeb est plus raisonnable sur le freinage et/ou l'accélération, la ford marche ford mais je trouve que la yaris marche un tout petit peu plus ford sur la relance des gaz à moins que l'un accélère plus franchement que l'autre

@@RYves-dd4ky "fort" = force, "Ford" = marque automobile

@@mehdilasso1456 yes, dans l'action j'ai écrit ford😉

On voit bien qu'Ogier est bien plus rapide, partout, sauf que les dieux du WRC n'étaient pas avec lui à 2 étapes de l'arrivée. Tout comme en Wec au Mans 2018.

C'est une insulte ou un compliment le fait qu'ils se comportent en princesse ?😂

Ils doivent être les 2 un peu timides en vrai

Ogier was 20 seconds ahead of Loeb until a puncture and a jumpstart penalty took that back to zero, I'd say that (plus a great late drive from Loeb) made the difference

So i really dont like Ogier, and I am realky happy wirh the win of Loeb , i think yes, Ogier had bad weekend, lot of mistakes you rsrelly see from him, but also Loeb was hunting him...was way more agressive, so...i really think great job by loeb and Galmiche, and fuck...the M1 Ford puma looks so competitive if not superb to Toyota and Hyundai

Let's be real here. If it wasn't for the puncture, Loeb most probably wouldn't have won. But it still takes much to stay consistent and concentrated during the whole event and Ogier wasn't able to do so (jump start for example) whereas Loeb was.

@@Rudbert67 even with the puncture he could have won, he was about 9 seconds down on Loeb before the power stage and gained back those 9 seconds. If it wasn't for the jump-start he maybe would have won (I don't have the precise times in my head, maybe he would still loose by 0.5 sec)

@@gontran8638 agree. But as I said, ultimately it's loeb consistency that won this day. The jump start was the final killing blow

Sébastien Bourdais multiples wins in american cart formula : I'm coming

Sebastian buemi winning Le-mans and Wec title.

To cool the hybrid system

It will be difficult to find talents like these two, but i think it's right to focus on young talents as well

@21, I agree with your sentiment that the narrative that has been built around the two Seb "old men" given their performance in the Monte Carlo rally might give the impression that there are no young talents. But, there is no doubting the brilliance of the likes of Rovanpera and Solberg, both still only 21/20. Moreover, none of the other regulars is any kind of slouch and are all still quite young, with Greensmith, Fourmaux and Takamoto in their 20s and Breen, Mikkelsen, Neuville and Tanak in only their early 30s (Dani Sordo is I think close to 40?). So, I believe that fans of the sport can be confident that it is safe in very talented hands. And while I admit that I have been very excited this last weekend by the return of Loeb and his battle with his namesake, I do not support the notion that they should be reappear in the sport as its mainstay. It is the time of the youngsters and regulars who I have no doubt will no doubt grow even stronger than what we are seeing from them already.

The thing is, that we had cars that drove better for the last 5 years, where we had a switch of generations. And those new guys have developed a driving style for those cars. I think Kalle showed his adaptation process perfectly where he was so slow on friday and by sunday he was faster than Loeb.

Ford Puma (Rally 1 hybrid)

Facebook o Instagram "Lorenzo Romani Rally Videos"

It seems that Ford is very competitive this year..

Thank you!

Loeb against the greates ??? The greates Who ?? Galli ?? Wilson ?? Duval ?? rautembak ?? villagra ??? Hirvonen ?? PG Anderson ?? Put Loeb in the 90's against the real greates like makinen kankkunen burns mcrae Sainz Auriol when they were on top.. 9 titles I DONT THINK

@@lovetherally4518 its hard to compare but i really think hes the goat man. i saw them all and the only one in his generation dominant is Loeb. no doubt about . idk loeb in group B, but he never run it and we never know. I ask u you really thik that someo one 1 v1 in the same car could defeat that man today in a rally car?

​@@lovetherally4518 also he defeat many of tose u name whe he was a rooky. i dont cace about loeb. but you talk abut him as a nobody and if you dont recalla him as one of the greastest you simple dont deserve the name you pu on your tag...

@@lovetherally4518 he would smash them. They had a technique that was very spectacular and slidy, and it's proven that a cleaner and '' flatter'' driving is faster. If you bring them back now, everyone at their prime in equal cars, Loeb and Ogier would win because they have the best/fastest technique. Now if the old legends adapt their driving maybe...

@@gontran8638 cleaner driving style with cars full of elettronic help paddle shift ecc.. tommi makinen with the Subaru paddle shift was not able to be fast and same McRae with Citroen.. the cleaner driving style of Loeb for sure Is not Good without elettronic help.. and anyway its a fact Loeb drive Always against mediocre driver.. I prefer 1 Championship of McRae against kankkunen, Sainz, Auriol makinen ecc that 9 titles of Loeb against vilagra duval Wilson ecc..... I see all these in Sanremo rally and Loeb Is not the fastest driver. In the wtcc and rally cross he dont win nothing..

Thanks!!

Ok 👍🏻 Loeb is driving the purple Ford Puma

Llaman de gaes,que te saltaste la cita