Ranking Functional Programming Languages (Why I'm Biased and Excited)

Рет қаралды 7,085

Impure Pics

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 55

@amr3162 Ай бұрын

Based, and absolutely unbiased :)

@NiDeCo Ай бұрын

My man just disguised an introduction to which functional programming languages there are as a ranking video, just because it gets the clicks... touché.

@HonzaPokorny Ай бұрын

Where are the lisps? 🙂

@pierrefley5000 Ай бұрын

If Lisp counts as a functional language, then so does Perl.

@ninjaaron Ай бұрын

@@pierrefley5000 He said "Lisps". Common Lisp may not be particularly function (though it is moreso than Perl), Scheme is pretty much functional and Clojure is very much function--moreso than some of the languages in this video.

@ZombieJig Ай бұрын

I would chose F# due to the strength of the standard library, which is in my view as important as the language.

@lilbigdooter Ай бұрын

It's also got the most consistent editor tooling in my experience, although I haven't tried every language on the list

@roelhemerik5715 Ай бұрын

Its also the least “functional” functional programming language of the bunch, especially when you use that extended standard library.

@the_mastermage Ай бұрын

@@roelhemerik5715 Isnt that due to the fact it can use most of .NET which is mainly based in C# to begin with?

@OverG88 10 күн бұрын

Kind of disappointed by F#. A lack of idiomatic libraries is very evident. I found myself backpaddling a lot to imperative "C# like" style.

@eeronat 21 күн бұрын

You're right, the square hole

@ukrustacean Ай бұрын

Cool. Absolutely loved the video ❤ Probably I need to spend some time this weekend checking out Unison and Gleam 🤔

@mctechcraft7 Ай бұрын

I feel like I’m starting to notice a pattern 🤔

@Mglunafh Ай бұрын

Thank you for the comprehensive and thorough analysis of the available functional programming languages, i could wish i had a time to effectively learn them all 😭

@user-vz9cq8ci9b Ай бұрын

I actually like Idris 2 more than Haskell, so I would add it to S tier as well. Also, I'm not quite comfortable with putting a language that has been abandoned for 5 years (Elm) to S tier

@sigmundwong2489 Ай бұрын

Gotta love Idris2! Dependent types, quantitative types, fancy interactive compiler, eager rather than lazy... and single colon for type annotations. \*chef kiss\*

@kilianvounckx9904 Ай бұрын

Elm is not abandoned, it is done. Also, latest commit to it was 8 months ago, so far from 5 years. Not all languages need new features every week

@isaacvandoren4733 Ай бұрын

Roc is great! It’s the performant pragmatic language with great tooling that I’ve been wanting. The combo of structural records, structural tag unions, and type inference is delightful. And I think some very interesting things will come from the platform design. Definitely worth checking out!

@smores56 Ай бұрын

ROC MENTIONED

@protosevn Ай бұрын

Least biased programming tier list video :D

@megaman13able Ай бұрын

No elixir??

@avinashsridhar7124 Ай бұрын

I think he prefers statically typed languages, he mentioned it at the beginning.

@grimaldjatlineur 9 күн бұрын

elixir is above S tier but it's dynamic typed, but i love it.

@Jankoekepannekoek Ай бұрын

No variant of Lisp in the list? (pun intended)

@sayanmallick2644 Ай бұрын

s teir video

@musicalintuition 20 күн бұрын

There is now MoonBit, which targets WASM and JS

@UrsEnzler Ай бұрын

Well played! However, as an F# developer, I wish the base library had been built with FP concepts in mind rather than for C#.

@tusharadhatrao4749 Ай бұрын

Loved it :)

@lpil 2 сағат бұрын

Heck yeah! Gleam!

@simpleprogrammingcodes Ай бұрын

I had to use Oz for studies. What is your opinion on Oz? Is it a functional language? If so, how good is it?

@impurepics Ай бұрын

I've never seen it tbh

@capability-snob Ай бұрын

Everyone who loves the BEAM languages should at least try Oz for contrast. It's functional-reactivity applied to distributed systems.

@simpleprogrammingcodes Ай бұрын

@@capability-snob BEAM? What do you mean? What makes these languages special?

@capability-snob Ай бұрын

@@simpleprogrammingcodes logic variables (like the ones Oz uses) for concurrency is a great concept, and feel very functional IMO. Languages that target the BEAM (erlang, elixir, etc) also have concurrent interaction baked into the languages themselves.

@stercorarius Ай бұрын

if anyone reading this wants to learn more about Oz, check out the book "Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming" (2004)

@dusilva3796 21 күн бұрын

For me this video is S tier.

@timedebtor Ай бұрын

not a single lisp

@balogunakanbi6329 Ай бұрын

Clojure???

@victorpinasarnault9135 Ай бұрын

What about LISP? And Scheme?

@smallcat2820 Ай бұрын

Not sure, but I guess S tier :)

@MarkusBurrer 13 күн бұрын

I assume he is biased by ML lanugages (like me)

@Son0fBeelzebub Ай бұрын

lack of lisps, but based. didn't notice any bias here

@Danielo515 Ай бұрын

Have you been spying on me recently while I was researching some new languages and just made a video about it?

@oserodal2702 Ай бұрын

Why does no one ever talk about Idris? (I've never written a line of Idris code)

@arnvgh 2 күн бұрын

until you realize, the real tier list is hidden in the order of choosing them.

@jsonkody 3 күн бұрын

Elixir is in S+ :)

@user-gd3ch9ix1x 22 күн бұрын

Where's clojure?

@MarkusBurrer 13 күн бұрын

It's not statically typed. If you take a close look in his list are only statically typed functional languages

@jhonyhndoea Ай бұрын

No elixir or clojure. why?

@MarkusBurrer 13 күн бұрын

Not statically typed

@iraqinationalist7778 Ай бұрын

Where is Elixir?

@nanonkay5669 5 күн бұрын

Damn near everything is S tier here lol

@hyperrealhank Ай бұрын

F sharp is F tier