tbf ancelotti in the league is average, one title with ac milan with such a world class team. I love ancelotti he’s underrated but even so

​@@user-bq2tc6dh6t Wenger 0 CLs though not even Europa

​@@user-bq2tc6dh6tyeah but he did bits in every team he went to other than everton

@@tomlally7893 i mean its not jose 's fault wenger didnt went to another club, its his choice , he made those calls , it didn't fair to other manager who did it so well

​@@user-bq2tc6dh6the won 2 with Milan and 2 w Madrid and like 7 balon dor winners

Lewis has Keegan, Souness, Pardew, Steve Bruce and Eddie Howe as his top 5.

Wenger above Paisley and Shankly is actually insane

genuinely think his mental age is about 7, even that might be being too generous.

such a victim

If you are a true Liverpool Fan you would know Shankly is our greatest ever manager. Paisley said himself all he did was build the ceiling and none of the trophies he won happens without Shankly

Very good shout. Bob Paisley has an honours rate of an average 2.2 per season for Liverpool. Only manager better than that is Pep. Definitely has to be in with a shout. Although would have to be said Shankly did build all the roots for Paisley to work on

@@Sean-sf1qx 100% but lets be real the 4 divs on pitchside wouldn't have taken those nuances into account they're defos just going off trophies lol

Mourinho is much better than either

Rafa Benitez is a more successful manager than Wenger.

⁠@@garymaidman625benetiz? You’re saying that like he’s a bad manager. He won Liverpool trophies one being a UCL. Wenger win some FA cups and a few prems

@@doubletapthatdotty4597 no, I'm saying Benitez, not benetiz. I don't know who benetiz is. As a Liverpool fan, I know the great work he has done, but fans other fans don't give him his dues, which is why I said he is more successful than Wenger. Maybe not better, but definitely more successful. When you look at the bodies of work of both managers, Benitez has won more trophies than Wenger, so Benitez is a more successful manager than Wenger. Again, that's not saying he is a better manager, as they aren't synonymous with one another.

peps better than alex tbf

you've defo just turned 18😂😂. look at your pfp and try tell me you're a grown man😂

@@woody19995just not tho

@@kylehoulihan3875 he is

​​@@woody19995do you have any idea about Alex Ferguson's Aberdeen reign? He won a European trophy beating real Madrid in final with a tiny club.

Always had an open chequebook just like Ferguson and Mourinho when he was sacked by Madrid, United and Chelsea right you twat?😂😂

Mourinho above pep is criminal

@@adz7147 when pep wins a major competition without a open chequebook, messi and kdb, he will move up in my eyes, what mourinho has done is far more impressive

bro wtfff you think pep made that barcelona team with an open chequebook???? 6 players in each of the ucl finals were academy graduates

@@anshulpal2639don’t even bother man these Pep haters will never get it

He revolutionised the professional side of it and bought in top physicians and dietary requirements, which showed during the late 90s and early 2000s. Then Jose came in and Sir Alex rebuilt and pushed him away.

Thats a myth. He revolutionised that within Arsenal, not the league. SAF was already implementing these standards everyday before Wenger appeared. He simply made Arsenal a more professional and disciplined team, not the league.​@@Boxy005

And?

Klopp ?? Cmon man you can do better than that

@@101notfound17 maybe so I did it off the cuff tbf mate. Have you got any mentions ?

@@StopTheBoats.Klopp isnt even the best german manager, Hitzfield, Heynckes and Lattek are top3 german managers

So Liverpool didn’t win the FA cup in 05/06 nah😂 clueless, at least fact check before you start writing shit

@@reeceeason8304 sorry my bad 04/05

Mourinho with Porto is clear of Ferguson with Aberdeen. Back to back UEFA Cup and UCL compared to one Cup Winners Cup?

@@desporto6559 An elite achievement no doubt, though I think arguments can be made either way when comparing the squads & draws each team had. Plus the slight unfair balance in comparing a one year achievement vs a two year achievement. That said, even if I take that on board, Ferguson is still the greater manager overall as his broader success vastly outstrips Mourinho’s. The latter especially has proven unable to build longevity in his career. He’s a bright burner but a fast burner, & often leaves clubs alight in his wake. As a short three year hope for success he’s perfect, but not the man to build a club around. He’s the type of manager I love to watch from afar, but I’m not sure I’d want at my club.

@@dmore I disagree completely. How does his broader success outstrip Mourinho? Mourinho is the only person to complete the top 3 countries, with every league, cup and supercup in England, Spain and Italy. Plus Portugal, an at least top 6/7 country, that ranks higher than Scotland. Has won all 3 major European trophies, a total of 5/6 times in 20 years. He's the fastest to 50 victories in each top 3 league (3 separate records). Only treble in Italian history (a foreigner, in the country of Lippi, Capello, Sacchi, Ancelotti, Trappatoni...). Every top manager has a life expectancy below 3 years in top clubs, on average. And the thing is that with him it was mostly on choice, that he left,especially in the early career. He left quickly because he was in a globetrotting adventure of One thing More and more and different countries. If you wanted you could have stayed decades in places like Porto or Inter. See how long the average stint is in top clubs and you'll realize that's the norm not the exception. a career can last 20 to 30 years, so if you commit to 7+ years in one place, you're pretty much give up the dream of traveling the world in coaching multiple clubs. Why is that negative and not a positive?

@@desporto6559 Before he went to Real he was more dependable & lasted on average a year/year & a half longer, after Real something changed & that was when the angry, brooding Mourinho came who began to burn clubs down as fast as he’d built them up. He’s won trophies at multiple levels because he’s failed to remain himself at the elite level, thus being in lesser trophies. Ferguson was never anything but the elite level. It’s easier to jump around from place to place, with the vigour of new surroundings & teams to take on the new manager bounce, than it is to stay in one place & revitalise it again & again. This is true is all competition, be it football, rugby or any other team sport. The hardest thing in sporting competition is to “go again”, longevity. Anyone can win something somewhere once. You see it time & time again, an underdog pulling off a miraculous victory, only to then return to their usual level soon after. The real trick is to go year in year out & stay at the top, stay in contention. You won’t always win, no one ever does, but to keep a team up there requires the greatest of skill. This is why Wenger is so highly praised despite a significant lack of trophies. Ferguson is consider so elite because he maintained everything over time. Winning, maintaining, rebuilding, then winning again. Challenge after challenge. Adjusting his style & tactics with the times. It’s true the average tenure of managers has dropped, & continues to drop over the years. That is what makes managers like Ferguson, Wenger, Pep & Klopp a level above. They buck that trend. I do include Mourinho in the elite with those managers however exactly due to the fact that despite moving like any other manager, he does have a unique & elite level of success. That cannot be denied. But he does lack that one strand that truly sets a manager apart.

@@dmore Nothing really changed after Real Madrid other than the fact he made poor and bold career decisions and people expected him to challenge for leagues and Europe with poor squads and decadent clubs which thought their big names entitled them to more. Still none of his successors in each of those clubs and manage to match his work there, let alone surpass it, oftentimes with a lot of less media frenzy and scrutiny around them, a lot more resources port on top of the squad that he had already...

Coz Mourinho took challenges at the club at highest. Same for Carlo too he was sacked by Chelsea, PSG, Bayern, Madrid, Napoli. Wenger must have nudes of owners that they didn't even sack him after going 10years without a trophy

Wenger is overrated. Plain and simople. 34 Years in Management: - 9 Year Trophy Drought - 14 Year League Title Drought - 0 European Trophies - 4 League Titles Thats not the resumé of a elite manager yet he gets forced into conversations with actual elite managers that achieved far more than him. He was never the best manager at any point of his career

Never managed a European giant or won a single European trophy

What 😂

That's not bias that's just a fact, SAF was great but Pep has revolutionised modern football and been a success everywhere he's been across Europe.

That's neither bias or a wrong decision 😂

Pep is better than Alex now

Cruijff nowhere near. 4-0 loss in a UCL final

if you think wenger is better than mou u should see a doctor fast Wenger in 22 seasons has 3 prem titles

Ur an absolute clown 😂😂

Mourinho’s resumé wipes the floor with Wengers. Mourinho’s time at Porto alone was greater than wengers entire managerial career. Wenger never retained a league title, never won a UCL, never won a UEL, never set even remotely close to the amount of records Mourinho.

Is this a joke or do I really have to explain why this is ridiculous

Mourinho is much better than all of those.

Overrated *

No, he isn't. Only 5 titles in 30 years ( 2 Mickey mouse ones with PSG and Bayern) and ran out of Bayern, Napoli and Everton

Ignore his sackings and look how well he done at the clubs

You're not a success if you don't get sacked.

@@garymaidman625 Troy deeney must be the goat then, he only lasted 29 days🐐🐐🐐

@@jacklaird4160 Deeney has also only been sacked once, so not really.

@@garymaidman625 it was satire💀

Klopp😂😂

@@Chidi_jcpretty much won everything in world football, gone to sides where resources weren’t the same like Pep has had, ended Liverpools title drought after 30 years, led a Liverpool side that in Premier League history is the first to compete in every single possible game domestically, 2 games of a quadruple, 4 champions league finals, 92, 97, 99 points in the premier league too, altogether which is ridiculous considering the state Liverpool were when he took over, you big ming

how is klopp above Ancelotti

@@helloitsme327 because he is a better manager

Zidane only managed for 5 years didn’t he

@@udaydhawan-yo9zw Yeahh, but I think what he accomplished in such a short time was insane. But yeah he’s not in the same bracket as the other 4.

Weres clough?

@@leehaslam5751 a little before my time, he'd probably be in my dad's top 5