Reading Martin Heidegger's Black Notebooks

Рет қаралды 4,395

Күн бұрын

On this livestream, we’ll read and clarify some (more or less random) passages from the first volume of Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. BlackNotebooks.com / MillermanSchool.com

Пікірлер: 31

@vaughanosgan2623 4 ай бұрын

Aristotle and Heidegger........Two of the greatest guides any human being can Have .....I first met Being and Time in 1962 and it was the greatest eye opener in my life.......I have read far and beyon since then....avoiding the commentaries....Greatest thing he wrote is Heraclitus and Parmenedes Started at 21 years old amd I am now 82 years old

@TheDavddd Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the exhortation to read Heidegger haha. I've given up about 50 times and keep coming back over the last 5 years.

@millerman Жыл бұрын

I have many videos and courses on him. Always worth another shot

@jaroslawszlaszynski1887 Жыл бұрын

Heidegger was Genius and he was ahead of his Time.

@Breeze954 Жыл бұрын

It feels like the West is in a malaise, and if consciousness in the West was expanded, to the point where Heidegger is broadly understood in the same way Aristotelian logic is taken for granted, there could be a paradigm shift of sorts.

@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine 6 ай бұрын

Okay was Crack invented yet that's what he was smoking

@bobkelly3162 Жыл бұрын

Remarkably interesting and motivational given the random nature of the selections. Your classes must be phenomenal!

@richardkelly419 5 ай бұрын

Brilliant thanks Michael it has me thinking about something I read on John Waters substack yesterday about Václav Havel and his sorrow and disappointment in his failure to change politics . Just for me success might very well not be their in your lifetime to enjoy but is a marker for the success in the future.

@MrJanes-cl5sj Жыл бұрын

lol he said "don't waste your time on that dark priest Marx." !!! when I mentioned that I was reading a biography on him! Seemed ironic in the context of the lesson.

@jkonrad Жыл бұрын

This channel is criminally under viewed.

@personanongrata7976 11 ай бұрын

I stand with Heidegger

@THINKincessantly Жыл бұрын

❤️🤍💙“We _____, we are the destroyers & will remain the destroyers. Nothing you do can ever meet our demands & needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own”.-- 1921 Maurice Samuel 🤡 We are told Germans wanted to rule over us as the master race by a tribe that lords over us as “The Chosen”.... Something to ponder when looking around the globe

@Woody-wz9vb Жыл бұрын

I'd be curious to hear what you think about Hubert Dreyfus' commentary on Being and Time? It is extremely accessible and I think very good. (But I'm not sure all would agree, it is definitely influenced by some of the pragmatism of Dreyfus' MIT environment - but perhaps the pragmatic, working language of engineers was a kind of working language Heidegger overlooks in thinking of science as mere theory - I am thinking here that Heidegger is a great champion of working languages, but thinks mostly those used by workers engaged in physical tasks).

@Woody-wz9vb Жыл бұрын

yeah having read the 'propositions on science' in contributions, maybe strike the bracketed stuff

@AMan-rg4en 11 ай бұрын

Whither has history escaped from us, such that newspapers and factions can boast to be its preservers? Heidegger responds to the NYT. Ponderings II-VI [70-72]

@trench6920 8 ай бұрын

Good stuff

@seanhamilton5185 5 ай бұрын

Millerman, really enjoy your videos. Question: you said that Nietzsche ended “Platonic” philosophy. In a few sentences😊, what is that philosophy and how did Nietzsche end it?

@FritztheCat74-k8e Жыл бұрын

The second meaning of incept is to take in, receive, specif. to consume ( amoebas incept food particles). Could this be a recommendation of ideographic rather than linear writing?

@borisshmagin8925 Жыл бұрын

Comment around minute 20, there is a movie "A hidden live" 2019

@VM-hl8ms Жыл бұрын

12:22 good.

@tlcetc4506 Жыл бұрын

For the algorithm 😉

@personanongrata7976 11 ай бұрын

21:55 What do you mean "we?"

@The2realistic Жыл бұрын

What have been some of the post-WW2 consequences, for politics and philosophy, of Heidegger being demonized for some of his views?

@VM-hl8ms Жыл бұрын

less counterweights for pragmatism, maybe?

@tlcetc4506 Жыл бұрын

I don't know enough to answer specifically, but my immediate thought was given that they elevated reason above all else then systemically destroyed our ability to reason, they didn't eventually didn't need to even target a specific philosopher, but it makes it easier to do when they do

@hemlock527 Жыл бұрын

The Analytical school seem less engaged with past thinkers and just arrogantly start from scratch, again and again and again

@superdeluxesmell Жыл бұрын

Not really, there is a consistent set of problems. They tend to talk about ideas rather than people though, because they’re philosophers, not fanboys. 😂

@hemlock527 Жыл бұрын

@@superdeluxesmell I agree there's some of that fanboy stuff... But i think, for example, Kant's 3rd Antinomy and his proposed resolution to it (as problematic as it may be) was way ahead of its time compared to the contemporary "compatibility problem" of free will, which is trapped in endless conundrum. But I've not seen a paper by van Inwagen, Frankfurt, Fischer, etc. engage with Kant.

@ignisimber2818 Жыл бұрын

That's what you get with analytical thought, the word itself comes from the Greek "analytos" meaning to dissolve. And that's all analytical philosophy is, you cant build anything from it

@JHimminy Жыл бұрын

If you got paid by a university, you wouldn’t do anything meaningful either.