Comparison between the recording of a real "golden age" Steinway piano and its digital clones Vintage D, Ivory, Black, Pianoteq
Пікірлер: 8
@takosan6993 ай бұрын
Anything other than pianoteq would suit me.
@gianmarcotrevi7 ай бұрын
Video molto interessante. E poi Alberto...suoni sempre da paura❤
@JamesWolffPiano7 ай бұрын
My personal preference out of those would be the Vintage D or Ivory, although in terms of playability I prefer Pianoteq
@calikokat100Ай бұрын
thats a no brainer...original...its alive..nothing else is even close
@godisbollocks7 ай бұрын
Pianoteq are up to version 8
@fulviaconsuelofortugno7 ай бұрын
Il mio preferito resta l'original Steinway!❤👏👏
@arbous6527 күн бұрын
I'm wondering if you do a take 2 to this comparison mainly to add Production Voices Concert Grand and Embertone Walker Steinway D 1955 libraries. I found the attacks of all but Vintage D was overblown to a point of making it sound fake when you listen back to back. Vintage D doesn't have many dynamic layers and the bit depth / sample rate is limited so the shortcoming still shows. Pianoteq has the most artificial sounding attack. Black has a bit better attack but the continuation from the attack sounds a bit synthetic and chorus kind. Not sure what it is but definitely not natural. Ivory attack is also not natural however the body of the tone is more believable. So I would say VIntage D and then Ivory and both of these are about a mile and half away from the real thing. I think above two products (PV Concert Grand and EW Steinway D 1955) could possibly be in a better ranking due to more layers of dynamic range and also better sampling bit depth and sample rate.