Hi

​@@Lumiere192hi

You call this a war? Its a extermination camp.

I miss the short 7 minute videos from a few years ago

I’d love to but I’m a teen and I don’t have any money to do that 😢

Lmfao

You can't trust all his sources and his interpretations. Just keep getting information from more than one place.

Tldr: Israel is being attacked because they are invading land and getting resistance

as someone with tiktok brain rot i watched every minute of this video 😂😂

🧡

only reason it involves other countries because of those illegal imigrats from syria and middle east countries in europe 80% of demonstrators are muslims

As a British person, we're responsible for most of the conflict in the middle East. Divide and conquer.

globalization was a mistake for this very reason nobody can make sense of all the intricate reasons and coalitions anymore so simple extremism takes over.

@@Mr.Cool628 the other 20% are left wing extremists. it's tradition for them to be antisemite, e.g. the "Rote Armee Fraktion", a german terrorist group who worked closely with Palestinians.

@@McYeroc Yeah, Coz before the Brits turned up the middle east was a bastion of peace and harmony. Give yourself a pat on the back for being so enlightened.

How is it "heavily one sided" ..there are things called FACTS...The israelis should have been smarter and invaded a plot of land with OIL...

Yes heavily one sided was my sentiment towards this video also

@@BrenTennme too

ffs

Would you love Britain giving your country to Israel?

@@CRCfail litealy no one cares i commented a month ago edit: i'd like it if americans would stop telling me what's happening in my country that they know nothing about

The people that are willing to watch a long video to educate themselves, are smart enough not to fight each other in the comments 😌♥️

@@vbandz1000 you're right, i wad trying to be pozitive and it devolved into a fight

Lol. Right?? I love it. A tiny little microcosm that displays clearly why violence and genocide are inevitable as long as humans are allowed to be human.

I did not say a WORD! on how palestine murdered and kill israeli civilians in terror attacks for YEARS. RealLifeLore is a nazi shit.

As a Jordanian-Palestinian, you missed that Jordan controlled the West Bank, and no one objected. Perhaps, the first thing Palestinians might desire after their independence is a union with Jordan, and This is not impossible; Jordan attempted a union with Iraq and Syria when they were all under Hashemite rule.

@@zaidmo6243"no one objected" King Abdullah was literally killed by a Palestinian nationalist what nonsense are you on about

​@@jameslane976 I don't understand your point, when I said no one it was a metaphor What is the connection between this assassination by one person With the people's approval of that ruling

​@@zaidmo6243When you say no one, does that include the Muslim world? Like was everyone okay with Jordan controlling Palestinian West Bank?

@@xsaxia2008 No, I was talking about the Palestinians in the West Bank and Jerusalem, In fact, only Pakistan and Britain recognized this annexation or union (call it what you want), but it was like no one tried to do anything In addition to the fact that half of the Jordanian government was from the West Bank, what would you do if you did not agree with the status of this country?

and they only won, because Arafat died with Arafat the Fatah would have won

Fatah were also terrorists that call for the total destruction of Israel so it really doesn't change much

Its about as much as the Nazis won in 33.

Fatah are not anything better

The problem is that Palestinians vote for terrorists

Learn English

Yea they should but it’s so hard cuz you can do AI translations but AI is shit so it will get stuff wrong and with how important this information is, I doubt he would want ANYTHING to be misconstrued just because of a poor translation, you could get people to translate for you, but then you will most likely have to pay them and he is either by himself or with only a small team, and idk if KZfaq allows you to edit things like multi language captions after uploading, but if they do, maybe he will add it at a later time cuz all of this info is time sensitive

@@username5352He is writing in English Stupid..

I hope he notices this comment. Thank you

@@username5352 learn a new language, it's so easy!

Egypt gets bribed with $1 billion dollars from America.

👍

Why would they take it?? Also many Palestinians dont want to be forced Egyptians

​@@calm123not to mention the Egyptians treated the Palestinians badly when they were refugees.

Well yeah… it’s not Egyptian land it’s Palestinian land, of course they don’t want it.

Actually, watching the piece, the context it provides is too unbalanced, which makes it... out of context. I watched the entire thing. Very informative. Watching it at first, I noticed some omissions that I thought were probably the result of a 100 years of conflict being condensed into a 1-hour piece. But the more I watched, the more I realized these are not just video length-based omissions. In fact, these omissions come with the very problematic side effect of misrepresentation. Given the amount of detail and information in this video, it's hard to see how this could be done without your awareness. A few examples: Misrepresenting the connection between Iran and Hamas, explaining it as a mere timely convenience. While Iran has supported Hamas with millions and millions of dollars, training its elite forces, providing it with lethal weapons, and a lot more. Most importantly, the "Octopus paradigm" explains its foreign policy in the area, such that Iran sends its tentacles via Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in an attempt to encircle Israel with unbearable threats. The relationship with Hamas and Fatah is shown to be almost that of competing political parties, while in fact, it's a very bloody relationship. When Hamas won the election in Gaza, it didn't just win against Fatah; it eliminated its supporters, throwing them from rooftops and killing them. Israel did not move out of the Gaza Strip only for economic and security reasons; that's absurd. It was a one-sided attempt by Israel (supposedly by the US) to cease its governance over the Gazan people. It was highly controversial politically, had very high costs, and the small side effect of a modern state evacuating its own citizens forcefully. The Israeli people learned quite a lesson there, shown partly in article 5. The repeated refusal of the Palestinian leaders to negotiate any peace offerings. And finally, you ignored an amazing amount of aggressions committed by both Hamas, Fatah, and Jihadist Islam groups. With over 24,000 rockets shot at civilian targets since 2001 from Gaza, around 8,500 of them since October 7th. With around over 70 successful suicide bombings out of the three groups, and hundreds of unsuccessful ones since 2001 (not including many more suicide bombings occurring before 2001). All directed against the civilian population, of course. Notwithstanding, looking at Hamas's official charter of murderous anti-Semitic claims (recommended read), and I'm keeping things very short. Without claiming it explicitly, you gave the impression of a complete oppressor-oppressed relationship, in which the Palestinian people are a freedom-seeking one, brutally stopped by Zionist cold-hearted actions. Just for the sake of anyone reading this and looking for more, I suggest asking a simple question (which wasn't answered in the video) as to why - why did Egypt join the blockade on Gaza?

​@@omrikatzavYou are lying. I was about to believe you until you started talking about Hamas eliminating Fatah supporters

​@@omrikatzavsource: trust me bro I pulled this out my ass

@@ABDELBADia.yeah because they did!! That’s what Hamas does

Israel actually is dealing with it properly now though (finally). Hopefully they stick to their convictions and see this thru this time. They have to stay strong though and not let crazy people across the globe shame them into a pointless ceasefire. From the river to the sea, FOR ISRAEL!! That’s the only there will ever be lasting peace.

I remember hearing about the conflict as a child 30 years later and the end is nowhere in sight

He missed all the major details on why Israel and Palestine did what they did.

@@Contractor48 He acknowledged it tho

@@LuisSierra42 yeah, too long history to be condensed in a 1 hour video is pretty hard. I was not criticizing real life lore but telling the OP to look deeper.

No one thinks this is new. The war is new. But this war is just another in a conflict filled with wars.

He didn't really

Very one sided

You should have a look at a channel called Warographics. They have a 2 hour video about the history of this conflict that is also excellent. They are fantastic if you enjoy geopolitics stuff.

production value is nice, but the glaring omissions and misdirection is not

@@nathanlevesque7812any examples of such?

I've watched dozens of documentaries, videos, read many books and articles on the subject. This is pretty much the most non-partisan analysis we could have seen on a 1h video. By the way, I've no horse in this race, both sides made glaring mistakes. And a 2 state solution is the only one to lead to long lasting peace.

@@ConfusedGeriatric Yeah, he say's after the nakba, Palestinians "fled" to westbanks and gaza, but that ain't how it went down. They were rounded up and intentionally concentrated. There was a lot of stuff like that.

Don't worry; soon, the Intifada will be globalized, and no one will not know its' true meaning. Good luck, infidels.

He's clearly biased, so I don't think he "forgot" them, just omitted because it hurts the narrative he wants to support.

@@gergcas the nakba got only a passing mention. come on, there's just so much history and the video is already over an hour long.

@@gergcasI think you’re obviously biased because you don’t know 1/100th of the history of the conflict.

@@gergcas what side he is biased on?

No one thinks a war will last several generations.

also missed the publicly available confession of Netanyahu boasting about stopping the Oslo Accords

@@CarlosVixil That’s also worth mentioning. Just strange how Ariel Sharon, Ehud Batak and Ehud Olmert barely got a mention. It’s like Rabin left office and Netanyahu has been PM since then.

right like it's one thing to say this video would be to long, and another to present things as a flawless continuum of facts. It paints a totally different picture.@@didnever1202

In which was a little clearer than I anticipated but thankfully it seems a little better and I'm quite keen for it was not the best place in India as Tatas was detected a few weeks away but it is a meme of my head to work on it now at work so hopefully u will be OK to call tomorrow to help u with your taste of my hair so you know what is a book you can u say you don't like it via Facebook or ur mum and you just don't know why you can't even talk it all in one place but it is very important for the people on their side and I have been targeting a couple more with my experience in this field but thankfully it seems like an idiot to do school in a couple hours but it's kinda cute now than I thought I should be able by any sugar or butter as a result for my diet but the treatment was a little bit different and a different one I used for it 😮and the world 😮was a little more like it when it is a little more complicated and the world will never change my head and all the things are in my heart as my room is Wth did I just write

​@@CarlosVixilyes his a n idiot. Still the ones refusing peace every time and retaliating each offer with terror are and were always the Palestinians

Is it so? He clearly says Hamas massacred 1400 Israelis but Gaza Health Ministry run by Hamas claimed that 10,000 Gaza citizens are killed. It's so hypocritic of this man. He should understand it's Israel who is occupying the land of Palestine by brutal violence and killing a lot more Palestinians always. Check the statistics.

Good to know all value is subjective and badness doesn't correspond to actual metrics of death and suffering. Each side has some valid points after all ☝️🤓 The totally-not-imaginary ends justify the means, and the balanced arguments are not deluded nor affected by systematic human bias!

lol ..he does not say it to your face but he hiding the reason this war started is defnitly making hamas look like ppl who attack for no rason ..its not like they are defending their land from ocupation ....no .no they are bad ..we are good ..they are terrorist cuz they fight us .cuz we controle the media to look nice

YOU HAVEN'T COMPLETED WATCHING YET ! (Posted your comment 35 mins ago while the video is 1 hour long and uploaded 1 hour ago).

"without opinion" comparing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, to Israel keeping the heights they took in a defensive war....

It isn't accurate.

@@galikafry8494these comments are all bots.

Out of curiosity, can you tell me your unbiased opinion? I'm not looking to criticize or argue, only to understand. Do you think Israel shouldn't exist? Are you Shia or Sunni, or another branch of Muslim, if you're a Muslim? Do you think Iran should be trying to unite the Arab/Muslim world under a pure theocracy, with Muslim religious leaders at the front, or is it better to have commerce at the forefront of a country? what are your thoughts on what the west usually describe as terrorism and terrorist attcks? Do you agree or disagree with the terminology used? do you think that there are better ways to be noticed by a wider community, that doesn't involve death? Or is this the only way that people are able to be recognized in a wider community?

@@xsaxia2008 Okay where to begin.. Do I think Israel shouldn't exist? I do not think that Israel's existence in itself is the issue, I think it's the form of that existence that is what's problematic here. Do I believe an entity that targets civilians with air raids of dumb bombs should not exist? I absolutely do; Is that a call for its obliteration? It's absolutely not, it's a call to stop targeting civilians with air raids of dumb bombs. In regards to my religious background, I find it very interesting that you never asked about whether the religious component of my identity would be represented in my answer to begin with; i.e. you never asked whether my believes impacted my thoughts or not, and they do not, hence I do not believe it is relevant to at all to your questions. As for whether Iran "should" or "should not" be trying to unite the arab/muslim world under a pure theocracy, in the most abstract terms there are, it is legitimate for each and every state to have its regional ambitions as long as those ambitions are in line with the benefits of everyone in the region. The means of achieving those ambitions should always be closely inspected, and I do not agree with the means Iran is using to promote for its regional ambitions. This being said, I also do not agree with the way Turkey or Saudi Arabia or the UAE or even Israel are promoting their regional ambitions either. It's a clusterfuck of who's who in this game of thrones of the 21st century in here. To have the commerce -by which I assume the economy- at the forefront hasn't led this region to democracy, you have to also understand. Some of the most successful economies around here are the KSA's and the UAE's, and I don't need to tell you about their human rights records, just ask Qatar. Oh, and there's Qatar. On terrorism; The entire paradigm of war on terror that was a direct result of the 9/11 attacks is largely a repetition of the paradigm of the war on drugs started by Nixon himself. It's war on an undefined entity via undefined means, with demand that only grows larger as you disrupt its supply chain. I would have loved it had it been labeled as war on radicalism; oh my god that would have been the dream. But no, terrorism is a much more vague term that can literally be applied to anything. Finally, your last couple of questions on being noticed by a wider community. I do not think you understand how little it means to those committing so violently to their causes- how little it means for them to be noticed by a wider community. They are not doing it for visibility. It is not a publicity stunt for them.

@hazemraad3723 Fascinating. I apologize for assuming that your beliefs affect your ability to rationalize actions of others. I know there are a few groups such as Houthis and Hamas, and probably Iran too, that advocate for the destruction of Israel regardless of what Israel does or doesn't do, which is why I wanted your opinion on that topic. I do understand that every state has a "right" to have their own ambitions, and maybe I phrased the question poorly. I think your answer does answer the question I should have asked. the only thing that I don't quite understand is why people would resort to what the US call terrorism (i.e. intentionally attacking civilians) if it isn't to make a statement. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer everything, and I absolutely with you the best. Much love from the US ❤️

​@@xsaxia2008, you may find it helpful to look at some of the terrorism that took place near the end of apartheid, in South Africa. Or consider other acts of terror, like eco-terrorism, or historical acts of terror, like the Boston Tea Party. Their goals, and success or failures, may help make sense of these questions.

@hazemraad3723 amazing answers. Sending Love from Isreal ❤️ wish there will be less extremists in key positions around the world.

Yes Egypt is a party to the blockade of Gaza but in the current context this is only being criticized as a barrier to the #1 desired end plan in the Israeli war (mongering) cabinet of pushing Gaza's population into the Sinai dessert. In the context of aid - Egypt would allow all supplies in however if not agreed and inspected by Israel, the Rafah crossing will again be bombed by the IDF - so Israel's blockade and current siege also encompasses the Rafah crossing.

You didnt actually claim that the reason the Arabs states wouldn’t recognize israel is bc there wasn’t a Palestinian state? Cmon. Be honest. Be factual with why they didn’t want it to exist (they hate Jews)

Egypt is basically a US puppet that obeys every order Recieved so that it can get billions of dollars in us aid. What's the argument here?

@@baigelbaigel Push Gazans into the Sinai? Israel doesn't want Gaza, they even tried to sell it to Egypt who also didn't want it.

The egyptians know what they are doing . if they actually allowed the palestenians to enter egypt israel would tell all of gaza to evacuate and take over all of gaza

Don't know if this is the source he used or not, but I have read Rashid Khalidi's 100 Year War on Palestine and it corroborates most of the info from the first 40 minutes

You have no idea how loud we had to shout for that to happen. Unfortunately The situation in Palestine is the epitome of everything wrong in global politics so UN mfs simp over it

😂why to invade them?hypocrisy

I think it’s because of the social media explosion that happened all of those conflicts that has people of foreign nations more invested in the conflict

This video is +- correct but ignores multiple facts to make Israel look bad. Fore example, it ignores multiple assault to Israel from Golans and "West Bank" (its Judea and Samaria if you ask me) between 1948 and 1967. It ignores that Israel windrow from Gaza was not only fore security reasons but as one sided peac deal to reduce arabic radicalism and as 2 state solution demo. Also it do not mention multiple terrorists attack before gaza blocked. Also multiple Israel peace negotiations rejected by arabs including "2 state solution". Also just spends much more time saying about stragle of arabic citizens and using emotion epitets to this and "think about children" but practically no worlds about Israeli who are living under constant terrorism treat now and was just under constant artillery fier and treat of total war. And i can see same algorithm in his other videos. So i think that autor is trying to be objective but cant recognize that he is biased or he is just very good propagandists who do it intentionally - trying to pretend be balanced and so absolutely truthful source while harming Israel image in eyes of pro-Isreal and neitral public. And all this is only in first half couse i do not bother look it longer.

Lol same. My brain started glazing over and I had to stop

Maybe a nice friendly Arab country will let you seek asylum😮

​@@Theplug926😂😂 what friendly arab country? I might be wrong but im pretty sure the Palestinians aren't welcome in any of the Arab nations.

@@montevallomustang They're not. Because they started civil wars in all of them.

@@Theplug926 why should they leave their land

​​@@darthlegit because its not their land, its all israely land

the production is stupid and heavily biased towards the us and isreal, the video is stupid

Agreed

It wasn’t changed

KZfaq doesn’t profit off of people educating themselves as much as they benefit from divisive political content that will garner engagement. It’s sad.

It literally has a million views, it's doing fine.

The algo won't push anything you have to pay for advertising. This guy wants to throw $150 at some advertising for 2 weeks, it would be getting WAYYY more attention!

It's not balanced, though. It skips the fact that Israeli governments pursued serious peace negotiations until 2008, and that all Palestinian fractions initiated the second Intifada in 2000, despite negotiations, thus obstructing the progression towards full Palestinian independence, including the C areas. That is a heavy piece of context to leave out, and a misrepresentation of Israeli actions and motivations.

Thankfully my algorithim brought me to it

Absolutely!

Not At all. This video is a RIDICULOUS ISLAMIC PROPAGANDA & Highly Unjust against ISRAEL.

@@shrinivasapte4610 Which parts of the video would you disagree with?

@@shrinivasapte4610he only stated the facts with no personal opinion he only displayed the geneva conventions +the un decisions as well as the game of chess between iran and saudi arabia and the enormous political ammunition russia has against the usa for their hypocrisy.

​@@shrinivasapte4610 Typical illiterate Indian.

Antisemitism is a Catholic and Germanisation effort against their tolerant Polish-Lithuanian neighbors It didn't happen just by Russia and "later in Germany" like described in the beginning of the video.

@@2MinuteHockey Don't forget about other religions, like anti muslim in Europe especially in the Netherlands!

@@TheBLACKDAYxD Don't forget "Black Pete" and that The Netherlands was a brutal colonial power and made Indonesia pay "colonial debt" for it's freedom in the billions

@@Potent_Techmology Yes these kinds of stuff too.

Do your own research because it is a very biased video that doesn't mention the constant attacks of Palestinians on Israel, which are the results of anything terrible happening to Palestinians. The intifada following the Oslo Accords is not even mentioned here.

​@@edanswthis video also didn't mention the constant attacks of israelis on palestenians for almost a century now in addition to how horribly they treated the palestenians for decades . it's very obvious that israel are the colonisers here .if you believe otherwise you're insane

​@@edansw nor the arabic rebelion in 2020

This video is +- correct but ignores multiple facts to make Israel look bad. Fore example, it ignores multiple assault to Israel from Golans and "West Bank" (its Judea and Samaria if you ask me) between 1948 and 1967. It ignores that Israel windrow from Gaza was not only fore security reasons but as one sided peac deal to reduce arabic radicalism and as 2 state solution demo. Also it do not mention multiple terrorists attack before gaza blocked. Also multiple Israel peace negotiations rejected by arabs including "2 state solution". Also just spends much more time saying about stragle of arabic citizens and using emotion epitets to this and "think about children" but practically no worlds about Israeli who are living under constant terrorism treat now and was just under constant artillery fier and treat of total war. And i can see same algorithm in his other videos. So i think that autor is trying to be objective but cant recognize that he is biased or he is just very good propagandists who do it intentionally - trying to pretend be balanced and so absolutely truthful source while harming Israel image in eyes of pro-Isreal and neitral public. And all this is only in first half couse i do not bother look it longer.

@@marknezanutoYou are viewing history from a certain lens instead of as a whole. Your Zionism has been noted. I’m Jewish, and I prefer to view history through clear lenses.

@@persephone342 can you give any arguments other than “I’m right and you’re wrong”?

@@marknezanuto not right or wrong. Just perspective.

@@persephone342 meh. I can't see any argument why youre perspective is clear anyway.

If you lock up the all those gang members you will see a massive drop off in crime. The question is whether new gangs form in place of the old ones. It is a question of the long term and also the cost of keeping all those prisoners in prison over many years without trial.

The kicker: El Salvador’s president is Palestinian. And he’s massively popular for taking a hardline approach and defying the liberal world order. As a Zionist, this guy is my favorite Palestinian leader of all time. I want him to finish his term and succeed Abbas as head of PA, and see if he can root out the Fedayeen in the same way.

@@georgef1936 Late, but let's ask a question. If you just saw the biggest, meanest, most horrific gang known to humanity just get all locked up, are you gonna pick a fight with the legitimate government that did it? I'm betting the answer is no because if you couldn't beat the old gang then you've no chance against a government.

Fam!! America has OVER 2 MILLION PEOPLE INCARCERATED!!!!! Stop talking stupid and saying what you don't know!!! El Salvador has nothing like those numbers!

@@georgef1936 The most efficient way by far to police gangs is social. The society itself needs to be able to police them or the resources required to keep the peace would be unimaginable. I know this firsthand as my parents are from the city of Laascaanood, Somalia. Virtually no government or police presence in a city of around 200k people. I know of many Somalis that go back for vacations and almost all of them go for the peace and quiet and lack of crime. This is because society keeps everyone in check. There are no gangs because society doesn't allow for their formation. It's far from perfect as sometimes society can enforce something terrible, like FGM for example. El Salvador, and the other countries in Central America, need to fix their failing societal structures to true and lasting peace. Every government will eventually weaken and collapse. Once it does, the people cannot devolve to The Purge.

Tell me you don't know geography without telling me so. Gaza isn't a country. It's under the control of either a terrorist group named Hamas or occupation by Israel. They are de JURE Palestinian but Palestine has 0 control over Gaza. Gaza is not an independent country de JURE, it's just occupied by a terrorist group

r u slow

I'd say about one hour

I've been waiting for this

Peaple are killed and you are joking about that ,shame

@@playerofgames7916you aren't ready for the internet babe

I can answer it in 5 seconds. 10% for the big guy

I agree with every word

Sounds like Netanyaho has one objective, keep things uncertain…always keeping turmoil and thus fear and thus him in power.

Politicians tap dance between right and wrong because of the religious right that seem to always side with isreal

Was that a big ole bible that Biden had to put his hand on when pledging his oath to the presidency? That is so messed up in so many ways. This whole mess is because of that book in my opinion.

All these deals are made amongst a very few people….not the regular citizens of any of these places mentioned in this video…..just pointing out this simple fact.

Can u get me some money I’m a kid with single mother trying to take care of my mom

The research is bad. It's not 1400 deads, IDF confirmed it is 1200. No confirmation how many of them died from Israeli crossfire (Hannibal directive) and how many are actuall civilians, wich is hard to say because Israeli has mandatory conscription, so many of them were actual soldiers.

its because of its length, tons of people click off

its also anti isareal which youtube dfoesnt like

@@animeninja2749its not necessarily anti anything its just stating the facts with no opinion or bias the only opinion stated is the un and the geneva convention decisions.

@@algerianfishbeatertru

There should be international pressure to make it a zero military zone, that way neither side would want it so much and there could be real talks about who should have it. (provided that theres a clause that if theres any military activity the other can attack)

I just think that that area is just not interesting. The people there don't want to be part of Syria for obvious reasons.

Why do settler colonialism to begin with 😂

He also fails to mention that Syria actually attacked Israeli citizens living the the Jordan Valley from the Golan Heights and this was part of the events the preceeded the 6 Days War and why the Golan Heights is now a part of Israel. He consistently fails to provide important context throughout the video.

Golan is also the headwaters for the Sea of Galilee and the Jordan River. Control of water is very important in a desert. As for rockets, Israel and Syria both have longer range rockets (Israel has nukes for some of them, Syria has chemicals for some of them), so location doesn't matter as much as it once did.

Yes, because they're all either occupied and unfree, or blockaded and sieged, or oppressed and tortured They're refugees, it's not a monopoly they have on the title, but the fact that all of them are living under the same conditions, caused by similar situations

@@Omer1996E.C the Palestinians in Jorden/Lebanon/Egypt and other arabs countries are occupied? I'm a descended of a refugee, I don't live in the country my grandmother was driven off from , but I'm not a refugee myself. My mother made a home in her new country and we are citizen like any other. The descendeds of Palestinian refugees living in other arabs countries should not be branded refugees, aby other group does not have this special care. After war world 2 there were about 40 millions refugees in the world, a lot of them didn't return to their home countries but their descendeds are not refugees today, they started a new life somewhere else.

@@AvivBHwhat country did your mother come from? Is impossible for you to return there if you desired to?

@@ElohAraphel for the people that were displaced that is true. But next gen are not regarded as refugees according to the UN. Unless they are specifically Palestinians. Also they are the only group of refugees that have their own UN body dedicated to them.

@@AvivBH What you are stating is completely wrong. The Palestinians do have a special status but not in the way you believe. You stated that "The Palestinians are the only group of refugees in the world where the status of refugee is passed down to the children of original refugee". This is completely and utterly nonsense. Let's take the Rohingya Genocide as an example. Many of them were expelled into neighboring Bangladesh. They live in camps. Refuge camps. Some Rohingyas are being born in these camps as we speak. According to you, these children are not refugees. What are they then? I'll tell you what they are and then explain to you why the Palestinians are still refugees so you can understand. According to the UNHCR (not specific to Palestinians), a person stops being a refugee after voluntary repatriation, local integration, or resettlement. In other words, you need to be a voluntary citizen in another country. Countries don't want refugees, and they most definitely will not simply award citizenship to millions of them. They'd rather leave them in refugee camps and have the UN take care of it. This is why Turkey has 3.7 million refugees, their descendants included. This is also why Egypt will never open the border to Gaza and shoot itself in the foot. Furthermore, the country of Palestine doesn't really exist. The people are all occupied and such can never be integrated. Thus, they will be refugees forever. They and their kids. They have a special body dedicated to them because they are special. Nowhere else in this world is there a country completely occupied, with all its current and future citizens included. The Rohingya children in Bangladesh are refugees, just like the Syrian children born in camps in Turkey, and the Palestinian children born in Gaza. If you read something online, don't just believe it. The internet is full of misinformation.

Golda Meir said it best I'm paraphrasing but basically"until they learn to love their children more than they hate their enemies this cycle will never stop" Yes she was only talking about Palestinians but I think it applies to all sides involved in this never ending conflict

@@Lord_Zore lmao you had to right that long ass comment just to victimize israel, and it's not even convincing

@@Lord_Zorespare me. Palestine launched no less than two wars with the explicit intent of destroying Israel and the Jews therein. The resulting losses of territory are the consequences of their own actions. It is incredibly hard to feel bad about evil being defeated.

I agree the economic interests of other parties are ENORMOUS in this conflict. However, there are actually sides here, peoples, leaders, their own actions not being purely political at all. I watched the entire thing. It was very informative indeed. Watching it at first, I noticed some omissions that I thought were probably the result of a 100 years of conflict being condensed into a 1-hour piece. But the more I watched, the more I realized these are not just video length-based omissions. In fact, these omissions come with the very problematic side effect of misrepresentation. Given the amount of detail and information in this video, it's hard to see how this could be done without his awareness. A few examples: 1. Misrepresenting the connection between Iran and Hamas, explaining it as a mere timely convenience. While Iran has supported Hamas with millions and millions of dollars, training its elite forces, providing it with lethal weapons, and a lot more. Most importantly, the "Octopus paradigm" explains its foreign policy in the area, such that Iran sends its tentacles via Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in an attempt to encircle Israel with unbearable threats. 2. The relationship with Hamas and Fatah is shown to be almost that of competing political parties, while in fact, it's a very bloody relationship. When Hamas won the election in Gaza, it didn't just win against Fatah; it eliminated its supporters, throwing them from rooftops and killing them. 3. Israel did not move out of the Gaza Strip only for economic and security reasons; that's absurd. It was a one-sided attempt by Israel (supposedly by the US) to cease its governance over the Gazan people. It was highly controversial politically, had very high costs, and the small side effect of a modern state evacuating its own citizens forcefully. The Israeli people learned quite a lesson there, shown partly in article 5. 4. The repeated refusal of the Palestinian leaders to negotiate any peace offerings. 5. And finally, he ignored an amazing amount of aggressions committed by both Hamas, Fatah, and Jihadist Islam groups. With over 24,000 rockets shot at civilian targets since 2001 from Gaza, around 8,500 of them since October 7th. With around over 70 successful suicide bombings out of the three groups, and hundreds of unsuccessful ones since 2001 (not including many more suicide bombings occurring before 2001). All directed against the civilian population, of course. Notwithstanding, looking at Hamas's official charter of murderous anti-Semitic claims (recommended read), and I'm keeping things very short. Without claiming it explicitly, he gave the impression of a complete oppressor-oppressed relationship, in which the Palestinian people are a freedom-seeking one, brutally stopped by Zionist cold-hearted actions. Just for the sake of anyone reading this and looking for more, I suggest asking a simple question (which wasn't answered in the video) as to why - why did Egypt join the blockade on Gaza?

I did not say a WORD! on how palestine murdered and kill israeli civilians in terror attacks for YEARS. RealLifeLore is a nazi shit.

Got to tell you that after this video I understand that his story is failing to tell the whole story

This guy is a leftist btw so please note that bias. He is friends with Hasan Piker and has been on his stream a few times.

How specifically? Give examples

@@32BitJunkie he mentions in the video that after rabin was assasinated, the Oslo peace treaties were gone and there was no other efforts to get to some agreement This is not true, and very important, there were at least two other very important conventions wherebisrael offered even better “deals” to the Palestinians at camp David in 2000 and in 2008 , where the Palestinians refused to all Israeli offers and started another riots shortly after. In camp David Israel offered that 90% of the West Bank will be given to Palestine. To me this shows that the Palestinians do not strive for the 2 state solution, at least without the right of return Which can’t accepted.

@AZ-zn9lg You do know that you have to support the statement with something? That being said i will not make this long, Judeism is on those lands for more than 3000 years, Islam is there for 1400 years. Go promote your stupidity somewhere else.

Oops that message obviously wasn't for This forum.. 😳

It was never just between them. Even when Britain "left" they did so while arming one side at a terrifying rate and scale. The Nakba wasn't a reaction as suggested here. It was the plan.

Yeah, had everyone not piped in with their opinions then the genocide of the Palestinian people could have been complete by now. Now we have this long drawn out genocide.

I don't know what you mean by this given that, from the start, outside nations were what drove the migration to the new state of Israel and the subsequent conflict of land rights, human rights, and borders. The Zionist philosophy made the Nakba inevitable. And the extremist assassination and replacement of the Israeli government effectively tore up the Oslo Accords (which had external powers serving as mediators) that were the sole step to solving the conflict ever committed. It seems that without any external forces, the Israeli government would have simply killed every Palestinian after tearing up the Oslo Accords. In that sense, external forces have prolonged the conflict, though maybe not for long.

It would not have.

Yes and no. No because Israel voted for a far-right government, while Gaza was taken over by a far-right terrorist group. That will always be an explosive mixture.

A land right along the Mediterranean that puts a western powers within striking distance of the largest deposits of fossil fuels in the region. Very important location.

you are only crossing off the bombing from one side in fact. You cannot complain about what the solution is not without acknowledging whow these wars always start. Namely with the palastinians stating some kind of attack. There is no point talking about the benefits of a ceasefire or peace when you know it is always one side that initiates the conflict. You dont set the seeds for radicalizing the next wars pool if you let Israel finish off hamas. Which the world NEVER ALLOWS. So don't tell me what is proven not to work. An unbiased teaching of WW2 would suggest the vastly unbalanced civilian casualtiess in germany for instance, to be an act that made the US and Britian the evil "side" or that we were evil to drop the bombs that ended the war in Japan. Those bombs did not "sow the seeds for the next war" If the palastians were actually occupied it might make a difference, but they are not. They dont want a 2 state solution. They have been offered it over and over again and have refused. They want Israel destroyed. That is what they voted for. That is who represents them overwhelmingly.@@liminallilac

I disagree. Bias = "prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.". Keyword here is unfair, once you take a look at the quantifiable stats, then you can form your opinion. personally, I think Israel is most definitely the oppressor; but for teachings to be biased completely to the Palestinian or Israeli side is just wrong. Let people see the complete truth for both sides and let them use their own critical thinking skills instead of being close-minded and only thinking your side is right. @@liminallilac

It’s not objective, if it was it would have mentioned the Palestinian vs Israeli death toll year to year. Israeli bias exists even in people who believe themselves to be objective!

​@@liminallilac While Israel's security policies have been oppressive, they have also completely eliminated what used to be an epidemic of small bomb attacks. There ARE two sides, and it IS very complex. The real problem is Fatah and Hamas, who cancel elections regularly, denying Palestinians an opportunity to elect leaders who actually represent their interests and provide security so that responsibility for that security no longer falls on Israel.

This video is +- correct but ignores multiple facts to make Israel look bad. Fore example, it ignores multiple assault to Israel from Golans and "West Bank" (its Judea and Samaria if you ask me) between 1948 and 1967. It ignores that Israel windrow from Gaza was not only fore security reasons but as one sided peac deal to reduce arabic radicalism and as 2 state solution demo. Also it do not mention multiple terrorists attack before gaza blocked. Also multiple Israel peace negotiations rejected by arabs including "2 state solution". Also just spends much more time saying about stragle of arabic citizens and using emotion epitets to this and "think about children" but practically no worlds about Israeli who are living under constant terrorism treat now and was just under constant artillery fier and treat of total war. And i can see same algorithm in his other videos. So i think that autor is trying to be objective but cant recognize that he is biased or he is just very good propagandists who do it intentionally - trying to pretend be balanced and so absolutely truthful source while harming Israel image in eyes of pro-Isreal and neitral public. And all this is only in first half couse i do not bother look it longer.

Hi I am a jew living in israel and i agree with you this is a great video

Salaam alaikum.

​@@giladbaruchigedanken2365shalom my friend 😁

@@daiakunin alaikum asalaam

​@@giladbaruchigedanken2365 Honestly the vast majority of arabs don't mind jewish people having their community as long as palestine is free from river to the sea Israel is a western colony in arab land

He can also turn a 5 minute topic into a 1hr video

@@brianmathews2926 magic

They usually turn 30 seconds into thirty minutes. The videos are always needlessly long.

yes@@brianmathews2926

College education is SO much more than listening to someone drone on. It's more about the research and critical thinking skills, and bouncing ideas back and forth, and figuring out what's bullshit Vs. what's logical. This is just half a day's worth of material.

This video is +- correct but ignores multiple facts to make Israel look bad. Fore example, it ignores multiple assault to Israel from Golans and "West Bank" (its Judea and Samaria if you ask me) between 1948 and 1967. It ignores that Israel windrow from Gaza was not only fore security reasons but as one sided peac deal to reduce arabic radicalism and as 2 state solution demo. Also it do not mention multiple terrorists attack before gaza blocked. Also multiple Israel peace negotiations rejected by arabs including "2 state solution". Also just spends much more time saying about stragle of arabic citizens and using emotion epitets to this and "think about children" but practically no worlds about Israeli who are living under constant terrorism treat now and was just under constant artillery fier and treat of total war. And i can see same algorithm in his other videos. So i think that autor is trying to be objective but cant recognize that he is biased or he is just very good propagandists who do it intentionally - trying to pretend be balanced and so absolutely truthful source while harming Israel image in eyes of pro-Isreal and neitral public. And all this is only in first half couse i do not bother look it longer.

@@marknezanuto Yep! Thought so too. No mentions of terror attacks and violence on the Palestinian side, while all the responces of Isreal to that violence are treated as 'Jewish supremacy' and 'Israel's desire to annex the West Bank'.

Where's the Gaza Canal?

Then it shouldn't have started by characterizing betrayal and annexation by Britain as "acquiring" Palestine.

Saying Israel seized territory without mentioning they were essentially invaded by those countries makes it seem like Israel invaded its neinhbors for land

yeah i don't get it, Israel seized these territories after all the Arab countries around tried to eradicate all of Israel and failed. That's a pretty important point.@@cjpack

@@cjpack none of you guys know what you're talking about, UN and Israeli intelligence have stated after the war in 1967 that none of the arab states were willing or capable to start a "war of eradication" of Israel, where many Israeli military officials even went out and said that saying something like that is "an insult to the IDF", and that the blocking of the straight of tiran by gamal abdel nasser was because of israel's aggression against jordan and syrian troops on those fronts, which surprise surprise, israel instigated if you guys are talking about the 1948 war then literally 200,000-250,000 palestinians were expelled first during the nakba before the arab states (who also tried to ask the UK to intervene) stepped in, and most of the arab states cited massacres of villages by zionists such as dier yassin (look it up) as their reason for entering the war so, israel did cease territory for the sake of land, proof of this also being that israel immeadietly began building settlements in sinai once they conquered it, very characteristic of a settler colonial ethnostate

lol impressive mental gymnastics ill give you that@@Eh-cb5td

Afaik Israel says it’s 1200 deaths now and not 1400 as RLL mentioned. And apparently some hostages were killed by the IDF. Still. Mass murder of non-combatant civilian population is an act of terrorism regardless of whether it’s Hamas or IDF. There’s no justification for it ever. Even if you were subjected to acts of terrorism for 7 hours or 7 decades and no matter what the goal is. Which is why people blame Hamas for the most recent escalation and blame the Israeli government for Hamas.

His siding with the Palestinians is clear, though.

​@@stoningupperanyone who knows history will side with Palestine

@@ahmedaraf8188 lol..nobody who knows history will side with "Palestine" (which never was a country)

@@IlyasMussin except the Muslim didn't blame hamas. They blame Israel for 'forcing' hamas to kill civilians..... It's just such a skewed view on both sides that arguing is useless. Basically, it's the end that important since both side won't listen to each other

Seems fine so far

This comment was created about 11 minutes after this 1 hour video was meant, not sure why would someone farm likes on KZfaq, but that seems to be the reason for that comment

@@Tomer-oy1hj what?

I agree. Most humans are very intelligent creatures and capable of handling nuance and large amounts of information while maintaining core principles. That's why we agree on so many things and consistently learn from history, making sure not to repeat any mistakes or perpetuate any cycles predictably (thanks also to our free will and defiance of the laws of nature).

Bold comment for someone that hasn't condemned Hamas enough.

I agree with you, it was very informative. Watching it at first, I noticed some omissions that I thought were probably the result of a 100 years of conflict being condensed into a 1-hour piece. But the more I watched, the more I realized these are not just video length-based omissions. In fact, these omissions come with the very problematic side effect of misrepresentation. Given the amount of detail and information in this video, it's hard to see how this could be done without your awareness. A few examples: 1. Misrepresenting the connection between Iran and Hamas, explaining it as a mere timely convenience. While Iran has supported Hamas with millions and millions of dollars, training its elite forces, providing it with lethal weapons, and a lot more. Most importantly, the "Octopus paradigm" explains its foreign policy in the area, such that Iran sends its tentacles via Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in an attempt to encircle Israel with unbearable threats. 2. The relationship with Hamas and Fatah is shown to be almost that of competing political parties, while in fact, it's a very bloody relationship. When Hamas won the election in Gaza, it didn't just win against Fatah; it eliminated its supporters, throwing them from rooftops and killing them. 3. Israel did not move out of the Gaza Strip only for economic and security reasons; that's absurd. It was a one-sided attempt by Israel (supposedly by the US) to cease its governance over the Gazan people. It was highly controversial politically, had very high costs, and the small side effect of a modern state evacuating its own citizens forcefully. The Israeli people learned quite a lesson there, shown partly in article 5. 4. The repeated refusal of the Palestinian leaders to negotiate any peace offerings. 5. And finally, he ignored an amazing amount of aggressions committed by both Hamas, Fatah, and Jihadist Islam groups. With over 24,000 rockets shot at civilian targets since 2001 from Gaza, around 8,500 of them since October 7th. With around over 70 successful suicide bombings out of the three groups, and hundreds of unsuccessful ones since 2001 (not including many more suicide bombings occurring before 2001). All directed against the civilian population, of course. Notwithstanding, looking at Hamas's official charter of murderous anti-Semitic claims (recommended read), and I'm keeping things very short. Without claiming it explicitly, he gave the impression of a complete oppressor-oppressed relationship, in which the Palestinian people are a freedom-seeking one, brutally stopped by Zionist cold-hearted actions. Just for the sake of anyone reading this and looking for more, I suggest asking a simple question (which wasn't answered in the video) as to why - why did Egypt join the blockade on Gaza?