Loved your conversation and it gave me hope seeing young, intelligent people discussing true Christianity!

Awesome talk. Hugely beneficial!! Just found Rebecca recently on KZfaq. Thanks for this!

Great interview. I'd love to see a conversation between Rebecca and Dr. Jordan Peterson.

Too good - thanks you guys

There's some great material, and really worthwhile conversation, in this interview. Thanks for making it available!

Book is very good👍🏻 absolutely amazing

Great interview!

Okay, psychobable acronyms aside, this is a very good conversation. The book is terrific, I just bought it, and can hardly put it down. In fact, I need to get back to work, but wanted to take a minute to see if Rebecca was on KZfaq. Thanks for the conversation. I am recommending your book widely, Rebecca. Glen, thank you for hosting. Thanks be to God for such a mature conversation about the Gospel.

i have an interesting argument about the existence of god and evolution: say that we will see a self replicating robot ( lets say even with dna) on a far planet. do we need to conclude design or a natural process in this case? remember that according to evolution if its made from organic components and have a self replicating system we need to conclude a natural process because it has living traits. but we know that even a self replicating robot is evidence for design. therefore a penguin for instance need design too :as for the problems with evolution you may interested in this answersingenesis.org/evolution/

The Christian ethic never condoned slavery. There were those who purported themselves to be Christians who supported or owned slaves, but owning of slaves was never a Christian act. Christians are no different from all others, in that all of us are capable of, and guilty of, sinning.

Read Martin Luther’s Bondage of the Will. Whenever anyone argues the fallacy that we “have free will,” I reply “sure, look where our ‘free will’ brings us.” Luther taught we are “in bondage to sun and cannot free ourselves…”

I just started your book and 2 mins into your interview I found out you're into the Enneagram... I'm baffled, what do I do now, I guess the bin it is 😔

Well, two Christians endorsing the Enneagram... that New Age tool. Unsubscribing.

Acknowledging her academic status is the least of manners to be shown (PhD= Dr Rebecca McLaughlin). Please, correct the title, thank you!

Dietrich Bonhoeffer found the Gospel in a Black church in New York!! 🤘🏿😇

Is she sitting cross cross apple sauce on her bed with the computer in her lap? The computer bounces every time she moves lol. She's great in any case.

This abruptly ended for me with mention of the enneagram. I'm shocked really. New age deception.

what's ENFP?

you should never put other peoples faiths down

With all your research, did you ever look into Judaism? The belief Christianity wrote on top of? Are you aware of what they believe in? Of what the message is they believe they received from G-d?

Hahahaha.... God says no to our no! True story!

Becky, U R N the worlds largest religion? Roman Catholic or Catholic? Check yes or know.

Enneagram? Ya dont say...🤔

so what is the issue....here...

You're talking a bit to fast for us Americans.

Sometimes Rebecca waffles a bit.

Debunking the historicity of scripture is irrelevant. It has no moral claims to make, being nothing more than an enforcer for extortion, as the practice of capitalism is merely the charging of tribute.

One is only truly saved when religion no longer serves them. I.E. they have a relationship with God, there's no need for a Bible.

Nope. Lost me at the enneagram….

I'm not convinced Christianity is the best if the bunch, particularly in view of Calvinism. What an awful belief set, that you'll be sent to eternal torture after death jyst because God has decreed before the start of time that thats your fate.

Well Rebecca, I haven't read your book but If I were a non believer in G-d, and I wanted to know who or what G-d was then would I go with your definition as being orthodox or some more liberal definition. The Orthodox perception of "G-d" is that he is a trinity. I wouldn't be too off in saying that 95% of Christians today are Trinitarian and 5% are unitarian. Trinitarians consider themselves unitarians but never question that they could be mathematically challenged. If you want to know about Trinitarianism then I would suggest reading " The Trinity, Christianity's Self Inflicted Wound" and then tell me how anyone could believe in it. So how could we reconcile such diversity so that we don't have such contention as to cause division and even at times, death. That definitely would not look good for the diversity cause. Christians have killed for lesser things in history If you want to make diversity work within the context of Christianity then you have to see your/my or anyone else's beliefs as being flexible. The fact is that the New Testament is filled with fail safe verses that tell the reader that if you don't believe in X, Y and Z then we get eternal hell and torture. Let's see now, Jesus my lord and savior, dying for my sins knowing that he is the only way to the Father or not to believe and spend eternity in Tortureville. I don't know now, let me think, this is tough, I think I'll take Jesus because it's really a no brainer. Jesus= eternal life with God and Jesus and the Holy Spirit as one or maybe not as one in Heaven, or no Jesus and be tossed into the pit of hell. Most people would go with Jesus, the logic being that even if the gospel narrative is false, what do we have to lose? If the gospel narrative is true then we, by choice, choose the safest path but what drives us toward Christianity, the need to be forgiven and the need to know the only path to G-d which we accept as being Jesus and that his blood (sacrifice) made an atonement for our sins that in itself is a pathetic misinformed variation of Temple sacrifice. If we studied the Torah we would understand fully that human sacrifice is an abomination to the G-d of Israel so how can the a "human" be the ultimate perfect sacrifice for all humanity, for all time till kingdom come. It's like saying the ultimate "abomination" is the perfect sacrifice. The only way out of this dilemma is to not make Jesus human and maybe G-d died on the cross albeit in human form but then again can G-d really die ? Accepting things because they make you feel good is not an indicator of truth. There is one lesson that I learned the hard way, the truth more than often makes us sad but like the saying goes if we don't learn from our mistakes we are destined to repeat them. So the million dollar question is this. Is the New Testament the word of G-d or maybe we should find out who G-d is first and that might in itself answer the question since we cannot separate Him from His Word unless we try to make his Word a human being. I mean, I'm just a curious ex Christian or maybe I never was, which in turn would be a compliment.