The shocking things in Australia are: They had this huge wildfires and they are losing great barrier reef. And they have just opened worlds largest coal mine, ensuring even more carbon to be burned to the atmosphere and making things even worse. And that happens in a country that has best chances to build wind and solar plants.

I may have mentioned here before but I’ll state my situation again. I’m a Horticulturist in Rome, Ga and past 3 yrs my vegetables stop growing and producing after 1-2 nights warmer than days….in town…Days were 75 but a couple nights got to 80 and everything stops. Also no earthworms or fly larvae in trash cans for 5 years. I don’t think we can stop this

It’s difficult to work in the garden when I see everything changing and so much dying. Earthworms visible declined in health and numbers for 5 years now I can’t find any in 3 entire counties. Plants blooming at weird times for a decade now. Annual are perennial and those are evergreen now. Had Phlox paniculate bloom last two Christmases.

The causal factor that cannot be talked about is the desire for a high standard of living for more folks than the total system can support. Fewer people, far far fewer. Lifestyle reduction i.e. no personal cars, no long distance shipping, no airplane travel, less electrical power and less convenience, most cities get eliminated (just bunches of people who have no ultimate purpose, maybe true of all of us). Without dealing with sources, forget about real cures.

When it comes down to improving global ocean health, the best thing for people to do is plant more mangroves, sea grass beds, and kelp forest.

And even in this discussion, the lack of discussing about the tipping points is pretty alarming. We are nearing, crossing or already crossed several tipping elements. Permafrost is thawing and even burning in alarming rates. Greenland icesheet is under discussion has it already tipped. Amazon rainforest is still burning and latest conference of the South American countries was not helping, so devastation will continue. Ocean deoxygenation is growing with accelated rates, creating death zones to the ocean floor. Most of the mountain glaciers are not going to survive these heatwaves, leading to water shortages for billions. Arctic sea ice is hardly going to survive next few decades adding darker surface to ocean that heats up the planet. And Antarctica has lost around 2 million square kilometers of sea ice with same consequences. Also Thwaites glacier is nearing tipping point and may collapse adding 60cm to sea level rise. Even AMOC is showing weakening and that may lead to serious changes in oceans and specially it may drop temperatures in Europe. Also El Niño is making havoc and leading the current temperature spikes in oceans and land areas. There are too many things that most likely will make things far worse. And they are not implemented in the discussions and they are not in the climate models. Models also misses the aerosol effects, which will rise temperatures after we shut down dirty fossil burners. +0,6C from aerosol effects by IPCC, but latest Hansen report says it could be more like 1,35C. These alone leads CURRENT temperature rise with aerosol effects to 1,8-2,55C range.

This panel represent a beautiful example of the potential of humanity - but what I find most frustrating is that the problems discussed are not in the realm of science - it is economic, social and governance. This would not be a new insight to anyone - the problems are how we are incentivised to act only in our self-interest and how self-interest is defined only by profit, and that profit has primacy over everything else...and how this has allowed the private interests to colonise the halls of power to protect their self-interests. It can not be overstated: the corporate world is utterly ruthless if you don't turn a profit or meet shareholder expectations on returns, you will not be employed for very long.....this often destroys any opportunity to address the issues being discussed before they can even hatch .... the world scientists, like on this panel, have to unite and walk down the hall in their universities and demand the economic departments stop teaching the majority of the worlds brightest minds the absolute drivel that is neoclassical economics. We must challenge the sacred cows of economics and corporate power and the domination of our intellects to the pursuit of profit at all costs! The beautiful souls on this panel can tell us in exquisite detail the damage these ideas are having in our oceans but have no clue how to stop the accelerating damage because we are not addressing the root cause ... human development, human prosperity, human economic systems and the boundary conditions between the human world and the more than human world ... The ultimate conundrum is how to alter the trajectory of economic growth - this is the base system that is destroying the oceans and the world and, frankly, impoverishing the majority to enrich the few... The beautiful people on this panel are describing the effects of this economic growth paradigm, and as long as the causes are left untouched, science will continue to measure the accelerating damage to our global ecology.

Night temps night temps night temps Will impact us more than day temps Please look into night temps and crop production and lack of day/night temp difference will shut crops down Look for Zombie crops or plants…don’t die but don’t grow after only one night too warm

40.12kw of energy in a US gallon of diesel, 10.6 in a litre, let's not forget our inputs into this problem. Propane, petrol, diesel is only the top third of each barrel of oil, the rest is all used, from the plastics that are in the device I am typing on now, to medicines to asphalt, oil-based products are all around us, taking these out of the system except by our choices is never going to happen by govts as they are complicit in keeping everybody employed. Reducing overall consumption 40%, how many people have done that, saving money on a solar system and spending that money elsewhere hasn't changed anything overall. It's time though that unless we as modern societies can show we can spend less, consume less, modern countries have to reduce 89% to make an impact because there are billions of poor people that have a rising consumption level, give them 10$ a day more and it raise their consumption 500%, which is why they say the next 100 years could look like the last 100.

Stop assuming that an appeal to altruism will have a meaningful effect. Instead, impose an escalating, predictable, global carbon dumping fee. EVERY DECISION, at every level, becomes a carbon decision. To me, that is a necessary (though probably not sufficient) starting point for effective action.

Where I am deeply concerned today is about solutions put forth by climate scientists is discussion around "Additives" to sea surfaces or higher atmosphere in down-regulating temperature acceleration metrics; not only might our actions cause unknowable (at present) damage to barely discovered complex ecosystems and the connectivity "tissues/relationships" between them, as for instance, the large number of single celled organisms that produce complex chemistries high in the upper atmosphere, but the "band aid" ameliorative olive branch will immediately be utilized by polluter corporations and the policymakers they purchase under Democratic systems as universal license to accelerate profit taking feedbacks through heavy investment in further coal, oil, shale, and natural gas deposit extraction ... while also creating a profit feedback in participating in the mitigation measures of said additive technologies and chemicals... much as what has happened around nicotine and cigarette manufacturers, who also own most of the treatment regimes, gums, patches, pills, and other technological means for people to slowly wean off of their cigarettes. In my view, it will be better strategically to state that climate polluters need to be disincentivized for profit taking internationally, their assets bootstrapped to the costs of mitigation long term, and their limited economic prospects removed through offers of nationalization of corporate assets, so that these organizations can have their marketing and propaganda departments shuttered, along with their fiduciary responsibilities to "the markets of the moment" and shareholder returns. Unless these companies' positive profit taking feedbacks cannot be cut, then efforts to dramatically engineer, through public policies and economic incentives, our planet away from burning of massive carbon inputs, and all of the sidereal "opportunities" that come with increasing climate change mechanisms that will require mass migration, a HUGE future boom for heavy industries like construction and infrastructure and shipping, the slower and less likely we'll be able to get climate inputs under control, soon enough to stave off thousands of years of catastrophic planet-wide warming.

An update on the Constanza et al (1997) paper specifically for oceans might help those in charge realise the value to trying to conserve it but you're right: unless it has a direct effect us (and more importantly on the people in charge) either physically or economically, nothing will change. Fossil fuel lobbies are too strong and politicians are too shortsighted and grasping.

Really good video!! The problem is that all this positive innovation groups are islands on the planet (and youtube). All these positive action groups need to connect worldwide. We need a worldwide chain of positive innovative groups who will lead the action and put pressure on the worlds systems. This group must operate independent from the UN, WEF, political or commercial system and create a powerful positive wave. If people can join this chain of positive action (also artists, musicians) it will help dealing with anxiety and grief about our planet.

Does this Sept correspond to 'an opposite peak' temp in March ( as in approaching from the 'other' direction)?

Personally 7 things really matter: 1) Having no children. 2) No car. 3) No flying. 4) Reduction of all consumption. 5) Smaller house and better insulation. 6) Plant based diet (or at least halving your meat consumption). 7) Changing your job to less consumption based one. But the most impactive thing are: 1) Shutdown of all fossil burning plants. 2) Land use has to change. (Farmlands and concrete/asphalt covers too much area. Forests are burning everywhere and they are overlogged.) 3) Economy has to take account all damages to nature. When damages to nature is added to product prices, they will show the reality that we have activly avoided to see. 4) Lying of natural costs and damages should be extremely illegal. Starting with sueing ALL fossil fuel CEO's and corrupted politicians for crimes against humanity and tries to extreminate many species including humans. 5) All ads that even tries to raise consumption of fossil burning products (ie. all car related at the beginning, incuding programs, no F1, rally, tractor pulling, car repairs, most expensive cars, no more Top gear, ...) or overall consumption has to be banned. 6) All rich people has to change all their habits and the way of life. This includes even many on this advisory group. We have to change whole evergy sector from fossil fuels to renewables. We need more wind, solar, geothermal and wave power plants. Sand heat batteries and multiple other energy storages are needed. And we need to find enough resources to do that change too. We saw what Covid shutdown did. They were enough for one years emission reduction, but that did not last, because after that we have made yet new emission records and oil demand is currently record high. G20 did not even mention coal in their papers. COP policies has to agree with all, including most polluting countries. Next COP is in oil producing country and led by oil company CEO. And then we jump to Australia, that just opened worlds largest coal mine. In USA, republican party is owned by fossil companies and it even does nonsensical things to cover for their money sources. These actors in USA are really a death cult. Over 50 years of political unwillingness to do anything and this BS is still going on.

Awesome presentation, ty

So why do we cover the oceans with an oily slick from transportation emissions and spills?

In addition to govmt actions, corporate level actions, please don’t ignore the individual response. We need to get real about this! Sure, we need to hold our corrupt politicians, corrupted media & the FF industry accountable, but it doesn’t mean we should just keep traveling wherever/whenever- we MUST change our lifestyles. That’s an undeniable fact. #FlyLESS #DriveLESS #EatLESSMeat #BanCruiseShips This is the reality if we hope to save our planet as a habitable one.

In the opening intro, the presenter says that the rising sea temperatures are causing rising ocean levels. What, exactly, are the measurements of the oceans showing? How many millimeters per year, for example?

Time to get drunk af Tequila 😭

If you really want to improve the oceans, then throw everyone into them.

Unfortunately every natural system, including oceans, their temperature, currents, etc., affect each and every other system on earth (air currents, precipitation, droughts, etc.) ... so they have to be discussed and protected as an integrated singular ecosystem. They cannot be divided into separate parts and regarded as individual, separate "tipping points", as one of your guests naively suggested. When the "tipping point" occurs (which our planet is now teetering on the brink) ... then each and every system will collapse together, simultaneously ... not separately ... the entire system that has sustained human existence for thousands of years will come tumbling down like a house of cards, so fast that any last minute solution will be like trying to pour a drop of water on a blazing forest inferno. These exact same kind of discussions have been taking place since way back in the 1970's (or even earlier). The time for "empty discussions" is long behind us. Only massive, collective, immediate action among every citizen of planet earth with every fiber of our being, could possibly get us out of this mess at this very late stage of the 'game of life'. We only have to glance at the several wars and skirmishes raging around the globe at this very moment to see that people and World Leaders have no qualms about invading and causing massive destruction of not only other humans, but of towns, cities and the environment, including all the wildlife that relies on it. These so-called leaders have zero guilt or twinge of conscience about blowing up oil facilities, invading major nuclear power plants and blowing up dams to flood entire villages, farming land and wilderness areas. Tell me, are these the same people you're hoping will sign and honour your ocean 'treaty' in good faith with open hearts??!! Unfortunately, human consciousness has not evolved to a level of compassion, selflessness and renunciation of personal gratification ... otherwise, each of us would at a very minimum would already have happily become vegans (I have) ... because, as you mention in this discussion, this is something that each person is able to do right now to be able to personally contribute to protecting great swaths of lands and rain forest being destroyed even as we speak, to be used for growing soy to feed cattle and other livestock and also used to graze animals for the massive international meat industry. Regarding oceans ... heat is a serious issue ... as is contamination, the dumping of raw sewage, ships dumping their filthy bilge water at sea to avoid paying fees ... plastic wastes ... these issues all compound one another ... if looked at separately none will ever be resolved ... humans will only try to buy extra time drawing up separate "treaties" ... while deep down, each of us already knows at our core, if we are willing to momentarily lift the rose colored glasses of delusion from our eyes ... that at the true centre of this issue lies the "selfish hearts of humankind" ... and from what I've observed in my 66 years of life so far ... human beings remain selfish, greedy far beyond their simple needs to sustain life. And Nature seems to have finally begun to take action in the form of 'natural selection' ... ie: wiping out a malignant and failed human specie branch from the Tree of Life.

Thank you Ade!

Hi. I'm from Costa Rica. On our Central Pacific Coast, the sea has gone over the wall and flooded the highway, as well as the houses across, twice in one month. People are being forced to move farthet inland. It's a first. Just letting you know.

📍38:26

I really wish that organisers of such shows would PAY ATTENTION to SOUND LEVELS, not just making everyone's volume turned up equally, but monitor levels, so that naturally soft spoken people can be heard clearly by the audience without having to tolerate pain, or run across the room, to turn volume down, when loud speakers, speak COMPARATIVELY LOUD 😡

Yeah we're done.

Turned into an advertisement for a company :(

It was a great information, but what about to reduce the number of newborns? It seem a theme that nobody talk about and I think it would be one of the first things to control.

Interesting idea of burrying excess carbon by collecting fallen tree leafs in the autumn, pack them and drop down in the middle of the ocean. People anyway do it to clear towns and this may let collect and burry carbon harvest annually, until the last excessive drop. As we know trees takes significant part of their carbon from the air and this is an easy way to deliver carbon to the deep sediments, where giant pressure simply will not let it out away. Is this simple way ever considered or am I the guy who just have invented this? Biomass carbon in annual cycle in northern semispher is very significant, we see it on co2 graphs, why let release it if we can collect and trap it until it solid?

The movie "Don't Look Up" was something of a documentary. I am afraid the world won't come together on this until the collective majority is suffering and even then, it may be politicized in such a way that tribalism remains the status quo. There may be resource and territorial wars. There is hope, however, if we survive AI alignment and that causes some kind of sea-change, pun intended, or shift in human consciousness.

"Semantic Scholar Glacier and lake-level variations in west-central Europe over the last 3500 years". During the Roman period, glaciers in the Alps were virtually non-existent, while in 1859/60 they reached their maximum extension of the last 3500 years, thanks to the Little Ice Age.

We are the 99%. If you're an individual deep thinker then you would take all this on board and change your way. The problem with us in the UK is that we gave been brainwashed to think of ourselves, not as a collective. We can change.

The only thing we can do is to do our hardest to make sure as much life survives. We are done for in the new few decades - hopefully life will flourish in a time after us.

108* today in tucson

Not getting any audio

Moving the mass sounds great, but first, we have to move the governments... We had the ability to change our behaviour quite quickly during the COVID period. We can do it again.

What do we need to move? 🙄

Brilliant

Why is everything going wrong in my 20s lol. This couldn’t have waited til I was like 60?

0:25 20.9 celsius 2:04

When are transnational investment firms going to hear this news

Nothing will change until we are on the drink, we all know this so are we surprised by the apparent lack of emergency so buckle up and watch the show.

One of the best carbon removal proposals is: Growing kelp in large quantities in the ocean with build rigs. Some of this can be used as food, can reduce cattle methane emissions or can be used as fertilizer. In the meanwhile you may grow other marine species with them. And you may also let fishes and other species to have a habitat in them. This in many ways gives some hope for emission removal and even benefits the farmer and even adds to the ocean ecosystem. Also ocean area is so huge that this method has enough space to be a meaningful one. And it does not burn like our forests. But first we has to slash down all fossil burning and other emissions. They are way too huge compared to any means of emission removal.

Ice free Arctic in 2024

Instead of assuming humanity and wildlife and plants are going to hell in a handbasket, people should start caring about the environment. Bugs me that so many people are negative, that makes em passive. And its a contradiction to think that its right to pollute a shitton just because its likely our future will be crappy shit and we might not have a future

Hey shout out to this video and your channel thank you very much for all your hard work I just wanted to use a few seconds to put in my two cents I'm very very frustrated first we didn't know now science clearly knows and doesn't seem to be able to face its own math and there are questions by people who are feeling anxious how do you think the planets feeling oh yeah I forgot humans don't think that planets feel well I got news for you that's incorrect so how do you think the planets feeling if you're feeling anxious and then oh what can we do just regular people and all of these scientific ideas of how to cool things do things fast which interrupts the regular rhythms of the planet and abuses her again and yet the simplest of solutions has been there even from when we don't know and is still there and nobody says is it and nobody seems to be willing to give up their self-absorbed greedy life to do it stop driving cars stop shooting Rockets stop using airplanes stop using trains if everybody stopped all of that today the planet would rejuvenate in probably 30 days 700 years for all we know and yet in the 65 years I've been alive up to now knowing what what science knows all I hear is what are we going to do well we better do something because the math says that the planets doomed at this point I could give a damn about the human race the planets doomed and the humans didn't help it survive at all as a matter of fact it's selfish and greedy self-absorbed lifestyle has only abused and push the poor planet to the point that it is now and even today there isn't a single person like me who hasn't been able to afford a car and now I'm thankful that I have never hardly ever driven or used one will just say well I know what I can do I'll just quit driving and if everybody did that if even half of everybody didd the planet would begin to heal rapidly so is that what intelligent articulate cultures of men I'm not when it comes to the human putting the woman in this because she hasn't had a say do just abuse to the point of abusing a whole planet and still today will not say I will not drive I will live somehow anyway without many of my conveniences so that the planet can live it disgusts me! okay I'm finished with my rant thank you for not listening because I'm sure nobody wants to hear the real truth the same old BS

Meanwhile dodge produces 1000 horsepower passenger cars….

I'll stop being anxious when I can find a job that has a positive ecological, footprint. Been a climate refugee for almost 2 decades

Human activity needs to be minimized. Current economic paradigm abandoned altogether. Lifestyle changes will need to be 'enforced' not a choice.

Are turtles one of the oldest species just like crocodiles and alligators who survived all that climate change way back in the day

You had better tell all the elites with beech-front properties that the ocean level is rising if they were worried surely they would not be building properties so close. The ocean is the biggest contributor to Co2 which actually is the gas of life. Carbon Dating has proven the planet was far warmer before the date from which global temperature records were started. Ask Dr Patrick Moore the co-founder of Greenpeace to discuss this. Q. Who funds /donates to, the "Climate Crisis Advisory Group".

Dear Mr. Elon Musk - (or Anyone Else who may Listen) ...A dream - is just tomorrow's - reality... No frills, no fluff - please consider this (or something else like it) to save the planet for my grandchildren. And yes, I may need to apologize in advance, because I watch - way - too many "save the planet" movies, have a fantastical imagination and grew up an idealist... however... Thank you for your consideration of the following. ..... Below: a means to control (regulate) by zone, in an extremely scientific and precise manner, the Eath's temperature(s) as derived by the amount of heating caused by direct or rebounding sunlight. A space-based algorithmic-solution-in-action albedo "adjuster"... AKA: infinitely adjustable shade - or a man-made eclipse. ..... Concept Overview: it will be a two dimensional pancake structure in a solar-staionary orbit approximately 200,000 miles between the moon and the sun, it will have an overall area roughly 1/4 the area of the two dimensional surface we see of the moon (take a moon globe, flatten it, divide by 4 - or as determined scientifically), it will have .5 to 3 million individually controlled iris-type apertures, when fully open the skeletal infrastructure will only block < 1% of earthbound light by designing an erector set style framework similar to helicopter blades turned 90° (as to allow phontons to continue on their original path with as little resistance as possible) and mechanical irisses that almost dissappear completely when closed - when fully closed the array will block up to 10% of earthbound light (loss of the aerosol masking effect may require that amount), irisses will be metal ion coated (low-e) milar - with all the necessary skeletal structure - and be opaque, it will have a redundant solar orbit stationary satellite network to monitor planetary "conditions" in real-time, it will have a tender space station, it will have a moon base for construction management, administration, material storage and housing for the revolving station workforce (with the moon's orbital interface in mind, ie., precise timing coordination), it will have gyroscopic and electrical ion egines for orientation and to offset inevitable photon/CE (coronal ejection) push, it will use solar, nuclear battery, regular battery and oxy-hydrogen generators for power, both the array and station will be fully protected from EMP and solar electromagnetic waves, it will have defensive weapons (for: meteors, debris, terrorism, little green men), it will be able to morph into a planetary CME protection device (form into a conical impeller-like shape and allowed to spin naturally/ or induced) to deflect "the worse" from hitting Earth - so it doesn't concentrate like a flashlight beam (hang a ball on a string, run water on it and you'll understand what I mean), a deflective screen might be needed to unfold at the perimeter during an event - the array must be modular, built as pods durung construction, AI/robotically assemble-able (plug and play) and constructed in a N&S (Earth comparison) first fashion, and operational when partially deployed - so we can refreeze the Arctic/Antarctic water-ice ASAP (as cresent-moon shade for the N-S pole zones, cool glaciers and/or have banded equatorial/oceanic shade zones, ect.) I propose 10 workers on the maintaining station (7 day rotational shifts), 90 workers on the base (6 month rotational shifts) and a minimum salary of 1 million dolars - not including the all the necessary human effort on-planet for the project. I am asking you to create and head a task-force to assess, engineer and deploy a temporary solution in space (similar to the above - because it is reversible and can be started almost immediately) while we slowly inch forward to fix the problem here on Earth. We can't help but convert our fossil-based energy economy slowly. We need the visionary - yes I/we can - Elon Musk - right now. I am not proposing hope, I am asking you to give humanity a fighting chance - and my grandchildren - a future, with a viable solution. Please don't give us all a cost analysis - because you know we cannot afford not to - or - continue to sit on our hands, as Canada continues to burn. Let me know how I can help, or if you would like to delegate the responsibility of saving the planet - to a dreamer/idealist. It will take an enormous international effort with - as a guess - 100 liftoffs a day at the height of construction until complete. Our children and grandchildren should have the same - or better - opportunities we had. Thank you again for your consideration. Sincerely, Carl Altomare Machiasport, ME ...Innovation - or a solution to a complex problem - always starts as - a dream...

Time for big,far out ideas. How about thermoaccustic cooling of water vapor on our atmosphere? Big ideas needed to tweak our climate. One day we might need thermoaccustic heating!

Dr. Judith Curry

If we must act very fast, then the fastest is a rationing system. Stop trying to use the market to solve the problems the market has created.

There is a lot of blaming done in the comments regarding companies etc. The companies etc. only survive if we buy their crap. Each of us has to change our lives radically in many areas; I was shocked when I did my carbon emissions survey ; so much is taken for granted and we, including me, need to change many aspects of our lives. If we do that the companies will have to change their ways of operating as well. It all starts with the individual...

We have a systemic problem that is not in my opinion CO2 first but waste /pollution/ biodiversity/ minerals. Ranking does not matter much because it's systemic, Simplifying to one cause does not address the others.. This rational simplistic thinking is good to move tha mass , but to where exaclty ? And I start to believe that this simplification, very much enhanced by our governments are excalty what is wished, at the extent of the systemic issue that is not addressd: Electric transition is simply not working on paper: It is so mineral intensive that we will all be like orcs desperately digging for copper, rare earth material, that are not here. And for those who think the governements regulate the business, we can say that the business regulate the governements, or even they are the same bunch of people of common vested interest.. The systemic crisis, is the economic & governance crisis, the asleep crowds ( by who ?) that now believe government global action is the solution.

Oceans are heating and it out of control doesn't matter seasons ocean heating every day Painting everything white reflect uv rays back threw green house games cause a doubling of heat on atmosphere games Oceans are on there way to briol and no going back now Your all to late

Best to declare nuclear energy green. Then electrify as much as possible. France has the lowest per capita carbon footprint of Europe. Also time to get serious with geo-engineering research.

?

Mindless continued overpopulation 😢

People will believe anything nowadays

here is a question: Every second the earth receives on average 342W/m^2. Of which 48% is absorbed by ocean and land because the albedo of the oceans are just 0.04. That would be 164W/sqm x 361x10^12 sqm of ocean = 5.9x10^16 watts of Energy every second of every minute of every day of every year for the whole Earth's oceans. An atomic bomb similar to that used in WW2 releases 1.5x10^13 joules energy. Or in every second, 7 atomic bombs, will release 1.05x10^14 Watts. This would represent just 0.0178% of the energy being absorbed by the ocean from the Sun each and every second. So, it is disingenuous to measure the downwelling IR in terms of atomic bombs. Just one average typhoon for example can absorb from the ocean an equivalent of 40 atomic bombs in energy per second or 3.5 million atomic bombs in a day. There are many ways to lie. One way is to create an analogy that causes fear and panic.

Lost me at eat veg, and your kids may live to 100! 10°c increase ave global temp is past possible, likely considering today's exponential growth in fossil fuel use. All large biological lifeforms will not survive that rate of increase let alone live to 100. Life expectancy is already dropping

As long as you continue to avoid discussing the actual cause of anthropogenic global heating you CAN NOT, and WILL NOT be taken seriously. How can you pretend to pose "serious questions", and more importantly offer "serious answers" when you lack the courage to name the root cause of the problem? Infinite growth, consumption based, profit driven, inefficient, fossil fuelled, neoliberal, competitive market, global CAPITALISM !!! If you aren't asking how we end this self destructive, unsustainable, resource distribution model that incentivises the destruction, pollution and exploitation (till exhaustion) of every planetary resource and system, you aren't even rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. You're just talking about how we really should move them around a bit to get a better view of the iceberg.

Baaa Baaa Baaa 🐑 🐏 🐑 🐏 🐑

Should the reef rebuild efforts be directed towards cooler regions, like from Florida to New York Harbor? 3-4C warming will make most of the Gulf of Mexico too warm for any corals, so why not start the needed relocation action already? And yea, don't kill local fisheries. And NY harbor is most likely too polluted already...

Climate engineering programs have been going on and expanding for over 75 years. How's that going so far?

Save Our Planet Now

Dr. Judith Curry. Search.

Recent data shows that the recent increase in ocean temperature, (occuring below the surface as well, which he purposely omits from his opening statement). Is Entirely caused by recent underwater volcanic eruptions. But that doesn't fit the narrative....

The climate models only take into account about 5% of known affects on climate.This is myopic science.

Brad Ack he has no idea what causes the problem. I suggest he consult real global experts. Not the ones he relies on now. However, we will see the truth soon enough.

Looks like a cult

Talk talk talk .......I bet everyone one of these guys gets in a car and gos to the whole foods.....I could not even get my family to help me plant trees and they are all crunchy types

So much insanity among the alarmist. Non-stop BS.

Silly humans trying to fix an interconnected global earth system no one fully understands. Good luck playing God. 🍿

And the fear porn just keeps coming.

crap story crap storyteller... CO2LOVE!!!!

STOP LYING

I can't afford to care and I don't trust the science any more so you're wasting your breath

Plonker!