So...mission accomplished...? :)

Lol

My Grandma AGREES

You , me and GRANDMA are FOOL'S

I can't stop watching that is our world at it's Best !!, Sorry 😀

There may be an easier way to do it, but I created it using the tools in my editing software (Avid Media Composer), with a little trial and error. I suspect that most NLE software would have the ability to do this, though the process might be a little different.

It's been a while since I checked the 3-D Google work. I don't think there was originally any need for 'eye-phones' or WMR headsets or any extra hardware or software beside your own two eyes. You'd simply cross your eyes till the two separate images synthesize a center and 3rd image between the other two, ignoring both the right box and left box and focusing as best you can on the center - it gets easier as you relax your eyes a good distance (unfortunately) from the computer screen - it just turns into 3-D. The 'ingredients' just work. It's worth the effort, and the bit of eye strain involved. I say 'unfortunately' because with the 3-D glasses at IMAX cinemas, it seems to work best the closer you got to the cinema screen, when it can cover the biggest amount of your peripheral vision. Here, just using your own two eyes, it seems to be most comfortable at least 3 feet away from the screen and better at about 4 feet. Very cool. Best of luck for success.

I know the 3-D cameras which took single snaps had two lenses mounted about the distance of one eye from the other - two to three inches, and they'd place two side-by-side still frames which you'd view with a binocular device, but see the above reply. Many thanks.

That is how we trick our eyes to believe its seeing 3d... two almost the same images on top of another that your brain tries to process at once.

@@braydenrosner4791 But it's not "almost the same", they're literally the same image, copy paste, there's no difference in perspective.