Business translation: "This film was already costing us money and buying the rights to use Mario will probably exceed the combined salary of 100 animators"

@@roflmywaffles1313 Yup. And I’m guessing that Nintendo acted very strict and overbearing, which probably wasn’t worth the hassle/delays.

But why do they have Bowser then?

That's respectable, a lot better than cramming random cameos with no rhyme or reason. *I S N ' T T H A T R I G H T, R A L P H B R E A K S T H E I N T E R N E T?*

I thought he was the bar tender

@emerald movies and tv they still incorporated the concept brilliantly when every time Ralph or Felix enters a new game whether it's the brooding high definition apocalyptic landscape of heroes duty or the simple quirky fun games of fix it Felix Jr and sugar rush, THEIR graphics change to match up to the game they currently reside in.

Yeah that would have made it more "realistic" if that's possible to say about sentient video game characters, but what I mean by it is that a pixel game just having 3d models in it that have stuff off screen that was never programmed just happen to exist (like the inside of the building)

WELL, SAY GOODBYE TO RALPH BEING THAT IN THE SEQUEL!….. …..

now i want to see that. they could have made it so when they move to a new game their graphics are upgraded or something

That would’ve been awesome! Like Mr. Game and Watch in Smash Bros. I think it would’ve been completely possible for them to do that and make him still function as a character

That was my favourite part

I understood that reference

Ehhh I get it

"Give me metal"

@@savril6901" You'll Get Your Medal When You Fix This Damn Car!!"

Agreed. Personally I prefer to believe the second movie took place in another Litwicks, where situations happened similarly but not exactly... Like in that one there was NO turbo, like he never existed. Hence why she decided to go turbo, and NO ONE stopped her. She LITERALLY went turbo, and as we all know... Online games player base are much more.. Picky when things seem questionable, and her glitching abilities would come off as hacky. Ergo some fans would report it and the developers would be all: "Wait what character? We never added that character". Followed by them DELETING her code, which the first time.. She would probably be safe, but the next time... The developers would think it's related to that "Ralph" virus, and decide to lock DOWN the game. Since it WAS a online only game, her code would only exist on THEIR servers. Then after locking it down, and transferring the game to a new temporary server. They would load an old BACKUP of the game like MONTHS before she was "added". They would then look into the code on the temp server, just to find out anything they can... Think torturing her code. Meanwhile... Ralph and Friends would end up finding out about her deletion... Ralph would go to investigate, asking those from the game only for them not to recognize ralph or anything. Even Felix's hammer would have no effect. Oh and since everyone at litwicks LOVED her, sugar rush would DIE without their favorite character.

@@electrobob992 _Vanellope of the second movie is the "Turbo". She left his game to stay in another, she even don't care about what Sugar Rush people will do without a ruler, because it's his proposite in the game being the new ruler, like Ralph is the principal thing to make his game work, without Vanellope, i can't see another character being the ruler or some shit, i think being a ruler of Sugar Rush as his work and no one can replace she_

I simply like to imagine the second one does not and never existed. It's better that way.

The whole plot of the sequel is garbage in context to the original movie. It's as if the characters all suddenly had amnesia and forgot all the lessons they learned and who they are, what they care about, etc. It comes off as the writers not really caring about the first movie and just writing up a sequel as a cash grab, which honestly is probably what happened.

@@Karumaino it doesn’t matter what happens to the kingdom since she left everyone will lose their home as her missing will be seen as a glitched

I don't really like the movie, but I think that scene was done very well from an emotional perspective.

The scene was insane and very "scary" to watch as a child, not scary as in I was scared of Ralph, but more as an "Omg what's happening oh god please make it stop"

I agree.

they really know how to pull on someone's heart strings

Right? When this scene played in the theater, I looked away at the perspective shot of his hands before smashing it. I couldn't bring myself to watch.

@abc.animal514 Ye.

Well, Sarah Silverman is a talented actor. Her voice just felt right for Vannelope in this movie

And Vanellope was too selfish about her dream to not realize her life may be in danger.

OMG LOL🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Venellope, running away from Ralph with tears in her eyes: *BUY A LARGE PIZZA FROM PIZZA HUT!*

Freaking THOSE ads...

This made me laugh so much that now my stomach hurts

Or [Random Military Ad]

Then again, at that moment, there was a chance that King Candy was right. I don’t blame Ralph for not wanting to take the risk of killing Vanellope

You mean... it WRECKED you?

I hated and didn't trust King Candy since his first appearance in the movie so I didn't believe a single thing he said

@@REDFRLegend Makes sense, because later on, you'll realize he's actually Turbo!

What a shame, that King Candy would ultimately turn out to be right.

Wait omg i never thought about it like that. That makes it sad for both him and vanellope.

Princess Bubblegum from Adventure acts pretty much like King Candy.

That’s why he died in the end. I think traumatising a child is basically a death sentence, even if you didn’t directly cause it

@@EngineerRiff Wait what? Ralph didn't die, did we even watch the same movie?

@@EngineerRiff he didn’t die tho-

I was talking about King Candy

It also shows how much of an effective manipulator King Candy is, he's willing to ruin Ralph's friendship with Vanellope to get what he wants, playing into Ralph's insecurities in the process.

iv'e disowned Ralph breaks the internet i pretend it doesn't even exist

Basil

@@neutralcloud987 oregano

@@miigi-p4939 Me when I saw Ralph Breaks the Internet: “Everything is going to be okay… everything is going to be okay… oh wait there’s memes nothing is okay :(“

@@altyresloweffortdump9138 like the movie is fine and fun even But its such a downgrade from the original to the point where its insulting

Games are made to be played, but I think that everybody wants to make something important with in their lives, and because games take a lot to make I think that game devs want to do more then make the players be happy for a while only to forget about their game entirely, so I'm happy that much of the games today include a story and something to be learned and never to be forget... Just compare any "satisfying" game with one which still holds a place in your heart (by the way you should play Evan's remains)

At least it's not a live-action remake

@@carbootstudios2459 Idk that would be a bit interesting to see. I wonder how they would do the Nicelanders & the Turbo/Cybug monster. I'd low key love to see what it would turn out to be.

@@myaedelman ok

@@carbootstudios2459 In about 10 years there probably will be knowing Disney.

@@PeterGriffin11 Right

Sucks they ruined it with the second movie

@@shrimp8431 I liked the sequel

@@ozyisgoated whether people like it or not its still dogshit

@@Sad_Elf I actually didn’t know people would always try to find a way to hate movies, but whatever

@@ozyisgoated I also Liked the Sequel

He’s bad, and that’s good. He’ll never be good and that’s not bad. There’s no one he’d rather be, than him

Alan Tudyk killed it as Candy/Turbo.

Now that is fucking scary.

I wish we got more of Cybug Turbo, he was such a menacing, unexpected form. And frankly, all the abilities he had from modifying code, and being a Cybug made him the strongest thing there, even more so than Ralph. If it werent for the fact it was a mentos and coke volcano, he would have destroyed the entire arcade, and replaced it with himself.

King Candy/Turbo is a underrated Villain

This movie is so good

There’s no fixing it + there’s no need for a third one and there was never a need for even a second one in the first place

He was more like a father to me, too. It was what really hurt the second movie for me to see their relationship differently.

-EDP445

@@buffboi7977 Oh god

@@buffboi7977 yeah and vanelope looks like a cupcake

I mean he wasn’t wrong, he just left out the parts that made him the bad guy, so it sounded innocent, but yunno, anyway

@@scruffmaster0185 Well, he was wrong. Vanellope wasnt a glitch, her code was just altered. While she couldnt leave, a reset of the game world would not have killed her, it would have restored her as princess Vanellope, or at worst, leave her as normal Vanellope until Turbo dies.

The best lies have the essence of the truth.

True

Yes we did

And too selfish by only caring about her dream and not her life. That's low.

I like your avatar

@@sonicroachdoggjrraven3263 its very cringe

I feel that. it was like it was going back and saying going Turbo is good????? And how did she get out of her game when in this one it is clear she is still a glitch.

@@henrymcbark7337 they also didn’t make Ralph’s character correctly at all. He just became a parasite and was dependent on Penelope.

I heard the movie was like a long advertisement.

Reminding you to watch it again

Lmao

Dark as hell 😭😭😭, I had I to blink 😂

*THE SOUND OF BONES BREAKING*

Jesus Christ that got fucking dark

Please Stop That! If only there was a way I could forget I read this. Wait a minute. (Neuralizer Flash) There, that’s better.

This wasn’t a Pixar movie tho

this isn't Pixar it's Disney animation studios

Wait Pixar made this Has my life been a lie

@@someone0 No Disney made it, Pixar had no part in this

It is jarring to see Ralph's character painfully downgraded in the sequel. I wish we got at least a degree of self-awareness from him way before the climax that he was starting to go a little too far with holding her back. Thus, his character friendship conflict shifts focus sooner from something that's just selfishly comes from inward into a genuine situational one where he actually acknowledges the cons of her leaving the citizens of Sugar Rush behind unplugged and the risks of living in the Internet. I guess I'd like the film to rather allow Ralph start to go through the steps of letting go a friend much earlier, instead of all this happening only during the resolution. At least this way, as how I see it, prevents Ralph from going down the rabbit hole of becoming a selfish man baby, which is sadly what happened in the film.

@@BuizelCream On the issue of friendship and Ralph opening up and allowing himself to change Vanellope's game, for me it was a contradictory message to the one in the first film, the evils that occur if a character leaves his game have already been established. the clear message that each character is special in a way to make their proper game work. That's what breaks the second movie, Ralph in the first one he sacrificed his friendship with Vanellope to let her "alive" after hearing the fake King Candy story, and after that at the end of the movie he even realizes that he is important to make his game work, just like Felix and all the civilians in the building, in this second, they just force a "forget that "special", Vanellope is an empowered woman and she can do whatever she wants, regardless of the problems that this can generate for your game and all those who are part of it such as runners and extras". That's what destroys the movie, they could easily cut this poorly crafted "follow your dreams" message for the movie and make Vanellope see that even though she's bored with knowing 100% of her racing game, she's still a fundamental piece to his game.

​@@Karumaino That is true too. Although, if we take what we can see at face value the events that happened since the resolution of the first film, its credit scene, all the way to the sequel, we can observe these two things: The Arcade games seemed to have adapted pretty well in terms of characters, not only visiting each other off-work, but also cameo-ing one another in each other's games by coming up with "new game mechanics ft. new characters". And the fear of "going Turbo" may have also been vanquished when Turbo himself got destroyed, and the societal norms inside the Arcade started to shift since Ralph's victory. Ever since, characters labeled as "villains" during work are being accepted more in social groups and friendship circles off-game. The community in the Arcade as a whole became a lot more tight-knitted, which allowed the film's fundamental worldbuilding elements to become really malleable. For me, it kind of makes sense, after 6 years leading to the sequel, that the Arcade characters are behaving so relaxed like this. It made it easy for Vanellope to consider leaving her game when her role as princess that tied the Sugar Rush game together seemed to have become even more nonessential. It's why Ralph could easily allow Felix to make impromptu adjustments to their game while he is away in the Internet because they have the whole Arcade to help them out. From one's perspective, these developments looked like it broke the 1st film, but looking at it another way shows things kind of otherwise, at least to me. Which is why my problem with the sequel stems more with the main characters not being properly developed in showing their character arcs, rather than all this.

@@BuizelCream _I understand you, and I completely understand your point of view, but man, for me I can't, and I'm speaking for myself, to see how Vanellope from the first movie suffered just to want to be accepted by the other characters in her game and be able to compete in the racing, so that in the film's sequel the producers simply want to make us think that Vanellope, the character who most wanted to be part of their game and not just be seen as a bug, would turn into a character so cold as to not care what would happen if she left Sugar Rush because according to the second movie "I'm one of the 16 runners, they won't miss me" just shows how the film's directors are hypocritical to the point of contradicting themselves in the messages that the two films show_

​@@Karumaino I totally understand how jarring it is. In a way, I do wish we have gotten to see at least a lot more screentime during those 6 years where we get to see Vanellope being happier in Sugar Rush. From what I can see, the daily competition from her peers in that game for 6 years have really gotten into her though ^^; It kind of makes sense she went off to look for a more comradery type of association that's also built in the racing game's function, which Shank and her friends in Slaughter Race can provide her it seems.

Lol

I got the same, except it was a KZfaq music ad XD

Just commenting so he has a higher chance of seeing this

same

Same 2x

Pikmin was how I found this channel

@@DrTimes99 This channel is how I found Pikmin lol

Aww

The relatability of the film

@abc.animal514 yeah

@abc.animal514 or an anti-villain?

Gru: But did he steal de moon?

Pixar ? It’s a Disney

I don't know if I'd call it a redemption arc. He never did anything wrong to begin with that needed redeeming *until* this scene. He's not a villain, he's an actor. He plays the role of a villain but that isn't who he is and he set out to prove it

Right. That "selfish villain" role goes to Turbo, who goes to psychopathic extremes to remain the center of attention, like turning Vanellope into a glitch and altering everyone's memories so they can only bully her!

penelope 💀

YEAAAH.

Yeah! That made me so sad when I was little!

Flying Battery right? First thing I thought of when I read “one villainous scene”

Woah where is the link to the clip

i disagree with comparing this to abuse, especially sexual abuse. abusers don’t care about their victims, they take want they want. they dont abuse the victims “for their own good”, they only do it for selfish reasons.

That's a really interesting concept

Your one cruel dude. Rad.

What sick, twisted mind would think of that?

@@MovieFan1912 um 😐 have you seen the KZfaq commenters cause they do also it does sound like that believe me)

@@MovieFan1912 You're new here aren't ya?

Thanks, I hate it

1 year later, I can confirm you did the right thing by not watching the sequel. It's purely a cash grab

@@catguy4996 Still haven't and still won't lol

The thing is if that happened Fix it Felix would have to be shut down since ralph cannot wreck the building anymore. It just wouldn’t be a good ending even though it’d be really emotional

@@joeyjerry1586 very good point. I guess it would also be a harsh lesson of “out with the old, in with the new.”

*what*

There you, you Yapping Parrot you got me here. Thank you :)