How did your brother -screen indication of the Video cekermis
@AleksanderWilkowski9 жыл бұрын
Do you have (or had) a board computer? If so, how does it work? I mean - where can you read the information and how can you change them (between fuel economy, range etc.)?
@AleksanderWilkowski8 жыл бұрын
+legioner9 Dzięki za odpowiedź i sorry, że po angielsku napisałem, ale nie zorientowałem się, że jesteś z Polski ;) Komputer miałem u siebie nieaktywny i trzeba go było aktywować, stąd też moje wątpliwości co do jego obsługi. W innym filmie widziałem, że masz zachipowany silnik. Jak wypada kwestia osiągów, spalania? Nie wystąpiły żadne awarie? Ja mam wersję 90 koni i zdecydowanie brakuje mocy.
@erminmujanovic2066 жыл бұрын
We have the 2.5 liter one and it's very reliable, fuel efficient (for a van), it has a descend amount of power,...
@beyzehade14710 жыл бұрын
13s very slow
@jirkaskalda10 жыл бұрын
I don't think so. For a van it's a good result!
@beyzehade14710 жыл бұрын
jirkaskalda starex van, but 0-100 9s
@DavidTNK10 жыл бұрын
Cebrail Gürsoy starex 2.5 l it's slower than the 2.0 l trafic, starex 2.5 got 15.1 s to 100 km/h, here is the proff www.sgcarmart.com/new_cars/newcars_specs.php?CarCode=10508
@beyzehade14710 жыл бұрын
DavidSonicRO this information is incorrect . short starex 0-100 : 9-11s , long starex 0-100 : 9.5-12s . watch it: watch?v=jl0l5WI62QY
@DavidTNK10 жыл бұрын
Cebrail Gürsoy that video is irelevant, if i make a 0-100 to my car, it need 9 sec, but in specification, it say's that need 12 sec, and that is the real, my top speed on bord is 205 in straight line, and in specification is 183 km\h, so ii try with a GPS, and at 205 on board it was 185 on gps, so that's the truth, to make a 0-100 corectly, you need to verify the speedmeter with a GPS, and need to make the test on both ways of the road to see if you got the same results, trust me the specification don't lie