Well said very true and funny

@@WinAmosProd you know the guys who built this weren't alive in 1943?

Lol hahaha

But they can dam aure slap some cardboard on a t 34

the last replica of the "Tiger I" in real life. The following will be drawn in 3D like Star Wars

Это случилась еще из-за того что завод который делал гусеницы для этого танка сделали бракованные и они ломались

So what happened to this replica?

thx for the info. have watched the movie. fairly good one.

i see... very cool.

Wasn't it a T-34? I've seen many replicas which are basically just a T-34 made to look kind of like a Tiger. You can see the gun length is different and the turret being too far forward to actually be a Tiger. This replica in the video is miles ahead of anything I've seen on the internet before.

but unfortunately all he can say is "I own a freaking replica tiger tank".

🙂

I do! Er, it's 1/8 scale though.

@@angowT mines 1/6 and it was bloody expensive

@@Windows_XP_2005 I bet yours is armotek, they are bloody expensive. Mine a Mark 1.

There is and it's on youtube, but you have to search in Russian text

6 years later but, better after than never kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o7KGabapnZ3ao4U.html

@@vladislavfeldman5165 there is also a slideshow available on KZfaq, you can find it without the use of the Russian language

@@VinBizz or this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o7KGabapnZ3ao4U.html

@@VinBizz Hi VinBizz, check this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n7-DldSAsMWWgXU.html

deathlibrarian true m8

Agreed

@Ezra Redgwell actually for the making its an is2 with some mods to look like a tiger

@@CakeClarinet bruh it was is 2

@@thisisveerus6667 it was a fkin is2 in white tiger movie

What, then live in it?

Yep, there would be demand for these. Have a group of ten people or so like a tank or a historic club, and it would be plausible.

I think they actually do produce them for around 550k a tank, But I think he

+GarzukaTheGamer wow, you seem quite unaware of thngs in the world, first off, it was 250k reichsmarks not dollars or euros, second off inflation affects the price alot, third is that they were produced in bigger numbers at massive plants whilst these are most likely just carefully and well crafted workshop units..

No. Clear L.A. traffic with it and make the 405 driveable again.

Should place it beside the tiger 231.

Eine Frage: Was soll die Ausbuchtung in der Mitte der linken Turmoberkante? Die habe ich nie an einem Tiger I beobachtet, denn die hufeisenförmige Seitenfläche war gewalzt.

@@napi94naza15 131*

@@napi94naza15 131*

german would question

I think it would look more realistic, more than it already does if the put spare tracks on the side of the turret and maybe some bags and stuff

+Drifter Knight spare tracks Wasa't on all tigers tho

I know but it was common

+Jagdtoq I notice a lot of things in this replica which are a giveaway. The body seemingly not wide enough and the edges of the side armor seem much too thick and prominent. However, the turret and the track assembly appear to quite well constructed. I think the turret is the best part of this vehicle.

Camden C. Still the best looking replica out there

and Kelly's Heroes

Basih Those two in Kelly's Heroes were made by Yugoslavia for the movie "Neretva" (Kelly's was shot in Yugoslavia). The Shermans were also ex Yugoslav army vehicles, the postwar M4A3E4. One of those used in the movie still exists and it is my home town of Novi Sad, Serbia.

the T-34 tigers in Kelly's heroes were not from the neretva production.

Vinyl Stash Where and when were they made?

I meant that the t-34 tigers from Neretva weren't reused in Kelly's heroes, the production crew for Kelly's heroes got a few normal T-34s that they modified themselves. here is two images showing the difference between the tiger mockups www.imcdb.org/i392206.jpg www.imcdb.org/i031790.jpg

True! Also since there is only one running tiger 1 in existence it would be nice to have more so people do not have to go all the way to England to see such a marvel of engineering running.

And to add authenticity to a war film, than be reliant upon non wartime vehicles to simulate a WW2 tank.

they did make one for the movie Fury, where they had the actual Tiger 131 do some static shots, while they also had a T-55 Clad (i think made by Australia Armor and Cavalry Museum) in Tiger 1 shells, which gave them the shots they needed when the Tiger 1 was moving. though the cost of making one prop for a single film is very expensive.

@@nightshade4873 Not really. In Fury, they had mock ups of the upper hull for close-ups as well as interiors. It's not that hard or as expensive as you might think To build something out of fiber glass is not a difficult task, or even half a tank, portions, with the remainder to be filled using CGI. Or simply do all the exterior shots with CGI. A lot of films do that, even if the final product isn't great, a bigger budget film could get away with it. When you watch modern films with car chases along the streets with cars plowing into each other, flipping over, etc. That's all CGI. In many cases the results are so good you would argue it was real stunt driving with real cars.

me thinks that the russians are a major tank community

yup. and i like tanks too :D

i want them to replicate the KV-4 hahahh

Giganaut233 Pfft, KV-4. KV-5 best tank! KV-4 for tiny slow moving babies who need crutch gun and can't hide weak spots! In all seriousness though, I actually have both and enjoy both of them, KV-5 is just more fun to drive though, IMO. Takes a bit more skill to get the most out of it though when its top or mid-tier. There's no question that the Russians definitely have a serious love of tanks. They even have sports involving the things.

i do like my KV-5 too hehe :D fun to ram troll low hp tanks. it gives that certain satisfaction

prancstaman Unfortunately This tiger has been delayed on the movie, so they use some other model and turn it into tiger 1

@@megajeremy90001 did you mean A white tiger movie?

@@napi94naza15 yes, it would be awesome if they made it in time.

Дед увидив это выкатил свой ИС-2

Actually, I'd want to know where they got it from so I could get one for myself.

They built it

Ikr why couldn’t they have waited for this, it’s always Hollywood stopping things because of “delays”

There was a delay with production of tracks for this Replica, so the director couldn't wait any longer and had to start shooting with the other "model".

алекс алексин thanks for letting me know

that is a poor excuse..... many time in Hollywood when they delays like that..... they shoot all the scenes that do not require the tank.... then shoot those scenes later.

that tiger in white tiger may looked crappy, but it was kinda looking like Tiger P with side armour

J Bautista the the replica for the one in White Tiger is actually excusable cuz there is a variant of the Tiger called Tiger P (Porsche) and it looks like the one in the movie

Amazing!

Must have been one of the scariest thing to see in the war

Why mk1? Nobody calls it Mk1..

Actually is Tiger 1 pzkpfw Mark VI

@@cjc5118 the british used Mark but not the Germans. It was just PzKpfw VI or Panzer 6 / VI

@@cjc5118 they use the term Panzerkampfwagen to refer to their tanks, and give a corresponding number in relation to the time they started development from other platforms of the same designation. the Tiger 1 in this case is Panzerkampfwagen VI, in some cases it has an additional word of "Ausf" followed by a letter, which is there to denote a version of the same platform. the number at the end when it comes to german designation nomenclature is there to designate the platform, not the variation of the platform, can be applied to "Sdkfz" and "Pzkpfw" designations The UK were the ones that implemented the Mark system to denote that the tank has differences or modifications from an existing version (Churchill Mk. 1/Mk. 3/Mk.5), and it's limited to their own platforms.

One Tiger replica from the SPR movie is now in the museum in Duxford (in the tank hall in the western corner). Are you sure it´s the one used in the KH movie?

Hello pirata, - i believe so.....

+spottydog4477 Exactly. The tanks form SPR are a very poor copy of a Tiger in all aspects, and are made upon same scheme that the ones of "Kellys Heores" (T34 or T44 with a fake turret). I´m surprised that a poor imitation is displayed at a museum.

+spottydog4477 The three Tiger I Tanks used in the film (Kellys Heroes) were actually ex-Soviet Army T-34 tanks, converted in great detail by specialists of the Yugoslav army for the 1969 movie The Battle of Neretva. I am glad that ..these machines have been preserved and work as movie stand ins otherwise 131 would be worn out rather than the superb machine that it is

No interleave wheels, wrong dimensions, turret in wrong place, sound of diesel engine. All T-34 based Tiger replicas are all the same. Everyone who know how real Tiger tank look like knows this is not a Tiger.

TheApollo1232 Shitty one??? O.O What do you mean??

CryBite He means why did they use a fucking IS-2 tank in dragqueen uniform instead of this beautiful Tiger. The answer is, this replica tiger was not finished on time for the beginning of filming... Which is a shame because I can't watch the movie with a straight face when I see that IS-2 with a dress driving around

Oh XD ok.. Thanks Lucas! :D

Lucas Muijrers I would postponed filming until this beauty was finished. Especially considering the stand in "tiger" is worst looking Tiger replica seen in film so far.

TheApollo1232 The Tiger in the movie is Porsche's proposal.

id shit my pant seeing one even now (well not really, but u know what I mean)

A lot of Allied troops did shit their Pants when they Saw German Panzer or Heard them, and apprently saw more Tiger tanks, than actualy was made :P so the Germans rely made a Tank, so good, that rely put the fear into the Allies :P not the Russians of course, but at first I reckon, when they didn t have anything to stop the Germans, early one. "the Movie White Tiger" rely shows how 1 Tiger or modifed Tiger I, can do so much damage.

Can you imagine coming up against a tiger one and it goes away and comes back with his big brother they would not need to do anything the site alone would make you give in and anything you though at it bounced off

I wouldn't tell that to Fury - they used Tiger 131 in that.

rebeljack 1860 transportketten?

Bovington tiger was using "transport" tracks, this Tiger is using "combat" tracks. Tigers had 2 sets of tracks.

the bovington tiger seems a bit high to me, and the tracks too wide, maybe all the "restoration" "work" has changed it

@@tristanevans1219 The “combat” tracks were wider, the “transport” tracks narrower. There’s mention of it on the Bovington website. Tiger 131 has the combat tracks installed as it was captured after being abandoned in combat.

10000000 reichmarks needed

🗿

+Хан Аспарух Does it come with heated leather seats rumor it gets cold in Russia+premium sound system nothing like Wagnerian opera?

The thing costs 380,000 Euros

Because the Tiger in 'White Tiger' wasn't a real Tiger. It was supposed a new prototype, that's why none of the captured Germans knew about it, and everyone spoke as if it was a phantom tank. The unrealistic sound effect when the Tiger fired it's gun was done intentionally, to show it wasn't a real tank, but rather a 'phantom' tank. It all gets explained in the film....

Ah, that makes more sense. I hope I can see the film one day.

it is an excellent film, and it manages to use 'paranormal elements' but remains a film about WW2 tanks. The 'fantasy' and 'paranormal' sides of the film are very very subtle and toned down.

the tank was intended for the movie, but they had problems with the tracks, and they had to fix it, but the director couldn't wait any longer, so he used the poor copy of the tiger

Michael Aitken because it has been delayed and the director won't wait so they use the crappy one instead.

It's also in snow, perfect surface for a tank, and probably much lighter than an original.

Hi Jay, the track links make the noise you hear. They cannot be lubricated (back then) because of sand/dirt/mud, etc. sticking to the greased/oiled links. Now they have sealed bearing (I think sometimes in the fifties). Ciao, L

Kinda stupid, that means they would have to replace the tracks every now and then cause we all know how long "fix bearings" without lubication would last.... not very too long.

Jay McDaniel Hi Jay, good point. You have to understand that especially back then, the operating cost aka cost to sale ratio (man-hours, machining, raw material, assembly, etc.) of a weapon system was critical. You can see the difference of philosophy between Germans (i.e. over-engineering, quality, durability of "most" of their later tanks such as PzKpfw V & VI) and Russians (simplicity, ruggedness, quantity, ease of manufacturing, etc.) on the battlefield. Russians estimated that in battle, a tank would last ~10 hours so they favored numbers over durability/complexity. Track links were also easy to replace (i.e. cheap, expendable...). Have a nice weekend, Ciao, L

lancelot1953 Yeah I understand, yet was the Germans mistake for preferring quality over quantity and focused on trying to Better the earlier Panzers rather than spending so much on a clumsy heavy box with an 88mm anti air flak gun slapped in the nose of this thing.

And yea the russians didnt even have bolts on their tracks. They would have a panel on the end to smack the pins back into place haha. Smooth Russia.

Dewnaldd Tramp And replicated in Soviet Russia.

Анастасия покров but.... Russians built it....

@@thelodbabyjaysus4163 took them couple decades

Gave you a like and commented! I love both!!!! :P

denovemportem me too

I did both

I did both because I like both

.

Ahahahah

Это уже там

😂

Well, its made for the movie and not for the war

I was just thinking if it was like a potato launcher or something.

Derian Parsons sorry if I'm late but on the website it claims it can fire pyrotechnics

that was not even a Tiger (P), it was a T-34-85 or so disguised as a Tiger I

kind of

IlijaRu Ozegovic unfortunately they couldn't make it in time, so that horrible replica was used. nevertheless awesome movie

you are right

+j wewa it was an IS-2 disguised as a Tiger P

This isn't a 1942 model Tiger; despite being gray not dark yellow, it's got the 'vision' cupola introduced into production in July 1943