and he has enjoyable music to listen to while your watching.

It was a fun one, but my wrap has a nice new tear in it as a result!

He loves the camping trips and seeing the sights!

Thank you!

He loves it!

Great choice of vehicle! Lol

It’s definitely a lot more fun with them there!

I do worry that some of those roads will be forgotten if they aren’t traveled enough!

@@RevereOverland definitely. It's also a testament to just how quickly those forests will reclaim the land. Imagine being the poor forest service employee tasked with keeping those roads cleared. Talk about an endless game of whack-a-mole. 🤣

😂

Thank you!

Sure thing! I really like it for the buggy areas, but it definitely takes up a LOT of space

Thanks! It’s a good mixture of drone and gimbal

We couldn’t have been luckier with the weather

I hope so!

He's just that happy! I think he did have one screaming episode, but obviously that doesn't make it onto camera 😂

That was me! Missouri is the WORST part of my commute out west lol.

I don’t blame you, next time you roll through you should swing by Cranes Country Store in Williamsburg, it’s 30 seconds off 70 and it’s been in the same family for a long time! One of the gems of Missouri, other than constant road construction and single lane, single digit speeds!

That’s a solar panel from Cascadia 4x4. I found out after I bought it that Lensun Solar has a higher output panel for less!

It’s a Cascadia 4x4 solar panel. It’s neat, but I can’t figure out why it’s so much more expensive than Lensun’s version.

@@RevereOverland Well for my 2500 Lensuns claims 100 watts and is available now, Cascadia is 85 watts and on backorder/pre-order. They both claim the same qualities in material used to capture the sun.

@@RevereOverland I watched @OutdoorsMan1 review of the two brands. Lensun is a cheap knock off of the Cascadia product.

I figured that’s the case, and assumed a 100W Lensun would probably have a similar output to an 85W Cascadia. I’ll have to watch the comparison when I get a chance.

www.nps.gov/aboutus/news/commercial-film-and-photo-permits.htm#:~:text=Federal%20law%20requires%20a%20permit,such%20as%20KZfaq%20and%20TikTok.

Olympic National Park wanted $300 to just apply, plus $50 a day and they’d pair you with a babysitter the entire time. Not all National Parks are quite as steep though. Some are free once you contact them and explain the video is not focused on the actual park, just the vehicle (Joshua Tree).

@@Mrs.Revere thanks for clarifying, that is pretty intense!

I watched a vidoe by RVMiles{ I think that was it) where he had sent a letter with what he was planning to use to 7 diffrent national parks (without the permit applacation) and got the same letter back from 6 of the 7 which said he didnt need a permit. so maybe they are getting a lot of feed back as you can take pictures with the same stuff with out the permit and you just flip a switch and now you can? hopefully it will clear itself up soon.

You’re right. Olympic wanted the $300 application fee, $50 an hour babysitter fee, and undisclosed location fees. When I asked what the location fees are, they ghosted me. About a third of the parks I emailed say no permit was required since the videoing is incidental to our visit, a third said a permit is required, and a third never responded.

It was July!

Kloshe Nanitch Lookout

You’re a dad and you think babies should have their food restricted??? Please tell me the mom is the one raising your kid(s), not you.

"No dispersed camping". Spoken like someone who's never explored the insane amount of public land in Washington State. Spoiler alert .... there are endless dispersed campsites in WA.

It’s just the OP that we struggled to find spots. The next few videos take us through the rest of Washington, and it’s beautiful.

@@WheretoNextOverland I was just talking about the peninsula where I lived for 15 years. The rest of the state is much different.

@RevereOverland yeah no doubt. Especially on the south & west side of the OP, it can be tricky to find dispersed camping.