Review of the Amazing Diesel Outboard Waterjet Engine by OXE Marine (OXE300 Jet-Tech)

  Рет қаралды 42,292

Salt Water Fishing University

Жыл бұрын

Waterjet technology has now been introduced to the diesel outboard marketing with the new release of the OXE300 Jet-Tech. Environmentally friendly and incredibly efficient, this waterjet technology is a marvel to see. Check out this video for features, pricing, and more.
Visit us at www.speechlesssportfishing.com

Пікірлер: 51
@icydrink97
@icydrink97 Жыл бұрын
Wow, this blew me away.
@chrisschoendorf6691
@chrisschoendorf6691 Жыл бұрын
Awesome😊
@DENNISTunaKiller
@DENNISTunaKiller Жыл бұрын
Marcus, when u get a chance, can u let me know about prop wash with the jet compared to props outboard motors. Thanks
@shaynelhta
@shaynelhta 4 ай бұрын
1-1power on the jet???? Really? I would like to see it in person.
@DENNISTunaKiller
@DENNISTunaKiller Жыл бұрын
Awsome video , i have a question. I have a twin outboard, and prop wash is an issue trolling. Is there less prop wash with a jet? Number 1 fan of SPEECHLESS,, as soon as the weather warmes up, im gonna contact you.
@sharonbraselton4302
@sharonbraselton4302 Жыл бұрын
yes it diße
@cgem8426
@cgem8426 Жыл бұрын
Cool cool. But this is not a review. It's a preview.
@MrJackal43
@MrJackal43 5 күн бұрын
No, this is a sales pitch.
@josemariomerced9219
@josemariomerced9219 11 ай бұрын
Could you provide us service manual & parts catalog manual or download CD .I been servicing lately phillipine navy OXE 150 hp . Screw propulsion
@Blanchy10
@Blanchy10 Жыл бұрын
I'd like some better pics. Looks like the intake is attached to the transom? How do they turn?
@tamaralee4108
@tamaralee4108 Жыл бұрын
The engine doesn't turn. The waterjet has a steering nozzle on the discharge. You can see the stainless nozzle gimble shaft in some of the views that show the bottom of the jet.
@variator7466
@variator7466 Жыл бұрын
So efficiency is higher with jet than prop, is that what this man is claiming?
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 Жыл бұрын
The shielded nature of the impeller in waterjets makes them so much safer than props for marine life and swimmer's... Though more efficient than an open prop it would be interesting to see the comparison with a toroidal/sharrow prop and the deep speed electric rim driven electrojet.. the advantage tends to open up in favour of jets as speed increases.. and with jets however the rim driven blades of the electrojet mean it continues to cause less cavitation and has lower operating costs in terms of servicing .. oil and filter changes. That give the Rim driven E jet a speed and efficiency advantage over internal ICE driven interior waterjets. The bio diesel option makes sense but even more logical is the development and substitution of the rotary liquid piston diesel and multi fuel motors.. mainly for simplicity size and lightness 80%. and also another 20 -30% efficiency . They produce less noise vibration and with only about 60 parts in a whole motor. They are also inherently quieter and physically small. To anyone interested in wake turbulence/noise reduction rim driven electric drive adds total rpm control from 1rpm up to max. to the options whilst full motor torque is available from the first few RPM. Up to near max. This is an interesting and valuable transitional development but it can quickly be overtaken if the combustion of the fuel is optimised through an advanced generator .. as in comercial diesel electric systems..🤔
@user-kh3gy4gr7t
@user-kh3gy4gr7t 4 ай бұрын
Такой привод КПД сильно занижин, чем у простого винта.
@Twelvestonestacking
@Twelvestonestacking Жыл бұрын
Weeks Marine has the conventional Oxe outboards and tear them up "weekly"! I personally am building a pleasure boat (32' x 9'6")will the engines hold up? So far we are Not impressed!
@Joelontugs
@Joelontugs 4 ай бұрын
I was down until the end lmao
@JRotten
@JRotten Ай бұрын
I hope the best for this company. But 90k is out of my price range. My two Suzuki's rigged, costed less.
@kellymchenry1944
@kellymchenry1944 Жыл бұрын
That’s a lot of money for 300hp. The price has to come way down.
@brianpeele9156
@brianpeele9156 Жыл бұрын
Wel I mean it’s not for basic recreation….
@dreed7312
@dreed7312 Жыл бұрын
Carbon pollutes water? I'd like to hear more about that.
@xavierrivadeneira4129
@xavierrivadeneira4129 19 күн бұрын
Hola Precio porfa
@Charles53412
@Charles53412 Жыл бұрын
I'd put the Cox 300hp V8 diesel up against it any day.
@swine_tech8014
@swine_tech8014 Жыл бұрын
Nananana, not so faaasst. So did OXE just solve the diesel soot problem, or is it just unregulated in the maritime applications? That's true, if the guy says, that diesels are 50% cleaner in terms of CO2 compared to gasolines, buuut what about the typical diesel problems: NOx and soot? Solved or not regulated? P.S. I was triggered by him mentioning, that this engine was much cleaner than others in that room..
@gregoryhunt1142
@gregoryhunt1142 10 ай бұрын
It would depend on how you set it up .
@chippyjohn1
@chippyjohn1 4 ай бұрын
If the exhaust is discharged into the water like most marine engines you will not have an issue with airborne soot particles. Also for the most part boats do not operate in highly populated areas.
@Rico11b
@Rico11b 3 ай бұрын
Awesome technology. However, the cost is STILL way to high. It's not going anywhere for now.
@IonNight
@IonNight 4 күн бұрын
Looks like OXE has a lot of issues with the engines and support to workshops. I wouldn't even think of buying it
@sharonbraselton4302
@sharonbraselton4302 Жыл бұрын
oxe 200 hp disel jet outvard
@1STGeneral
@1STGeneral 4 ай бұрын
Eva Gabor relative ? Oliver you need an outvard for the tractor
@redman2751
@redman2751 Жыл бұрын
Um am I just dumb but a 300hp outboard is between $28k-$38k. He compares an outboard to inboard. Why? He says it’s $100k versus a $160k inboard. Also isn’t the Yamaha jet engines way less than that. I mean the Yamaha 25fsh with twin jet engines isn’t even $100k. Granted you can’t get just the Yamaha engines as far as I know but seems like it’s a ridiculous price.
@edwardbowles8613
@edwardbowles8613 Жыл бұрын
Guessing he is comparing it to a diesel inboard so comparing diesel to diesel. Not outboard to outboard.
@redman2751
@redman2751 Жыл бұрын
@@edwardbowles8613 ah yeah that makes sense. When he said it, it seemed off though. That does make sense though. I don’t know what diesel inboards cost but I’d imagine it’s right around there.
@saltwaterfishinguniversity
@saltwaterfishinguniversity Жыл бұрын
Yep, as Edward said 👍
@gabbermaikel
@gabbermaikel Жыл бұрын
300 hp diesel is way more then 300 gas hp as the torque wil be much higher so you can run a bigger prop on the diesel meaning a 300hp diesel wil be faster then a 300hp gas engine
@brettweltz8135
@brettweltz8135 Ай бұрын
@@gabbermaikel but what about the gearbox? Diesel engines are Torque Monsters, can the gearbox survive for enough time to make it financially make sense?
@freddienh
@freddienh Жыл бұрын
Who ever heard sucking in water - ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT? I guess the water suddenly has to bob up into the intake. How can that be efficient at more than a few MPH?
@cordellej
@cordellej 7 ай бұрын
if you look properly you will see a tube on the back of the boat. when the engine is lowered into position the front of the jet seals onto that tube. and that tube leads to the intake thats under the bracket ( similar to an armstrong bracket )
@duncandmcgrath6290
@duncandmcgrath6290 15 күн бұрын
Every jet on every boat is above the hull line , try and educate yourself on jet pumps
@chippyjohn1
@chippyjohn1 4 ай бұрын
BMW B57 twin turbo outboard, hmm.
@polska905
@polska905 4 ай бұрын
Unreliable overpriced junk
@jot2287
@jot2287 2 ай бұрын
Lol 160 000 for comparable outboard. Ok I'm an idiot Doug 🤣
@Ras-wisdom
@Ras-wisdom 7 ай бұрын
Prices for those diesel-powered outboards is way toooooo ridiculous & soon another intelligent engine manufacturer will make some less than half their price & see prices drop fast!
@polska905
@polska905 4 ай бұрын
Sorry, but jets are not more efficient.
@freddienh
@freddienh Жыл бұрын
Stop bragging about instantaneous thrust at take off. Water jets totally suck against a prop from a start. Very weak.
@saltwaterfishinguniversity
@saltwaterfishinguniversity Жыл бұрын
Why so frustrated Fred? It’s OK to not like the tech, but no need to get angry about it man. Life’s too short.
@2200pathfinder
@2200pathfinder Жыл бұрын
Agreed, prop performance way better and more efficient than a jet. Not sure how they are coming up with that.
@miketee2444
@miketee2444 10 ай бұрын
The President should retire. I half way pay attention to these motors but now he satisfied my suspicion. For me, a salesman that is trying way too hard and willing to say things that aren't true isn't looking out for your interests. There is a rule in the Marine Industry. If Merc. Engineers haven't done it, it doesn't need doing. Yes I know they've built a diesel.
@JacobRozaly
@JacobRozaly Жыл бұрын
ONLY $90K.. HAHA.. I'LL STICK TO HONDA, YAMAHA, SUZUKI, AND ANYTHING JAPANESE MADE
@treashurehunter800
@treashurehunter800 7 ай бұрын
Meh cat 32b ...is the bone.$150 k worth the extra $25,000 bones ..🥹
Slow motion boy #shorts by Tsuriki Show
00:14
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
🤔Какой Орган самый длинный ? #shorts
00:42
How Many Balloons Does It Take To Fly?
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 198 МЛН
ПРОВЕРИЛ АРБУЗЫ #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Slow motion boy #shorts by Tsuriki Show
00:14
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН